Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.509 IF 5.509
  • IF 5-year value: 5.689 IF 5-year 5.689
  • CiteScore value: 5.44 CiteScore 5.44
  • SNIP value: 1.519 SNIP 1.519
  • SJR value: 3.032 SJR 3.032
  • IPP value: 5.37 IPP 5.37
  • h5-index value: 86 h5-index 86
  • Scimago H index value: 161 Scimago H index 161
Volume 6, issue 3 | Copyright
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 613-666, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-613-2006
© Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

  27 Feb 2006

27 Feb 2006

A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing

H. Yu1,2, Y. J. Kaufman2, M. Chin2, G. Feingold3, L. A. Remer2, T. L. Anderson4, Y. Balkanski5, N. Bellouin6, O. Boucher6,7, S. Christopher8, P. DeCola9, R. Kahn10, D. Koch11, N. Loeb12, M. S. Reddy7,13, M. Schulz5, T. Takemura14, and M. Zhou15 H. Yu et al.
  • 1Goddard Earth Science and Technology Center, University of Maryland at Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
  • 2Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, Maryland, USA
  • 3NOAA Environmental Technology Laboratory (ETL), Boulder, Colorado, USA
  • 4University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
  • 5Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA/CNRS – LSCE, L’Orme des Merisiers, France
  • 6Met Office, Exeter, UK
  • 7Laboratoire d’ Optique Atmosphérique (LOA), Villeneuve d’Ascq, France
  • 8University of Alabama, Huntsville, Alabama, USA
  • 9NASA Headquarters, Washington, D.C., USA
  • 10NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), Pasadena, California, USA
  • 11NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS), New York, New York, USA
  • 12NASA Langley Atmospheric Research Center (LaRC), Hampton, Virginia, USA
  • 13NOAA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), Princeton, New Jersey, USA
  • 14Kyushu University, Fukuoka, JapanC., USA
  • 15Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Abstract. Aerosols affect the Earth's energy budget directly by scattering and absorbing radiation and indirectly by acting as cloud condensation nuclei and, thereby, affecting cloud properties. However, large uncertainties exist in current estimates of aerosol forcing because of incomplete knowledge concerning the distribution and the physical and chemical properties of aerosols as well as aerosol-cloud interactions. In recent years, a great deal of effort has gone into improving measurements and datasets. It is thus feasible to shift the estimates of aerosol forcing from largely model-based to increasingly measurement-based. Our goal is to assess current observational capabilities and identify uncertainties in the aerosol direct forcing through comparisons of different methods with independent sources of uncertainties. Here we assess the aerosol optical depth (τ), direct radiative effect (DRE) by natural and anthropogenic aerosols, and direct climate forcing (DCF) by anthropogenic aerosols, focusing on satellite and ground-based measurements supplemented by global chemical transport model (CTM) simulations. The multi-spectral MODIS measures global distributions of aerosol optical depth (τ) on a daily scale, with a high accuracy of ±0.03±0.05τ over ocean. The annual average τ is about 0.14 over global ocean, of which about 21%±7% is contributed by human activities, as estimated by MODIS fine-mode fraction. The multi-angle MISR derives an annual average AOD of 0.23 over global land with an uncertainty of ~20% or ±0.05. These high-accuracy aerosol products and broadband flux measurements from CERES make it feasible to obtain observational constraints for the aerosol direct effect, especially over global the ocean. A number of measurement-based approaches estimate the clear-sky DRE (on solar radiation) at the top-of-atmosphere (TOA) to be about -5.5±0.2 Wm-2 (median ± standard error from various methods) over the global ocean. Accounting for thin cirrus contamination of the satellite derived aerosol field will reduce the TOA DRE to -5.0 Wm-2. Because of a lack of measurements of aerosol absorption and difficulty in characterizing land surface reflection, estimates of DRE over land and at the ocean surface are currently realized through a combination of satellite retrievals, surface measurements, and model simulations, and are less constrained. Over the oceans the surface DRE is estimated to be -8.8±0.7 Wm-2. Over land, an integration of satellite retrievals and model simulations derives a DRE of -4.9±0.7 Wm-2 and -11.8±1.9 Wm-2 at the TOA and surface, respectively. CTM simulations derive a wide range of DRE estimates that on average are smaller than the measurement-based DRE by about 30-40%, even after accounting for thin cirrus and cloud contamination.

A number of issues remain. Current estimates of the aerosol direct effect over land are poorly constrained. Uncertainties of DRE estimates are also larger on regional scales than on a global scale and large discrepancies exist between different approaches. The characterization of aerosol absorption and vertical distribution remains challenging. The aerosol direct effect in the thermal infrared range and in cloudy conditions remains relatively unexplored and quite uncertain, because of a lack of global systematic aerosol vertical profile measurements. A coordinated research strategy needs to be developed for integration and assimilation of satellite measurements into models to constrain model simulations. Enhanced measurement capabilities in the next few years and high-level scientific cooperation will further advance our knowledge.

Download & links
Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share