Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Volume 6, issue 12
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5225–5246, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006
© Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5225–5246, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5225-2006
© Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

  16 Nov 2006

16 Nov 2006

Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations

M. Schulz1, C. Textor1, S. Kinne2, Y. Balkanski1, S. Bauer3, T. Berntsen4, T. Berglen4, O. Boucher5,11, F. Dentener6, S. Guibert1, I. S. A. Isaksen4, T. Iversen4, D. Koch3, A. Kirkevåg4, X. Liu7,12, V. Montanaro8, G. Myhre4, J. E. Penner7, G. Pitari8, S. Reddy9, Ø. Seland4, P. Stier2, and T. Takemura10 M. Schulz et al.
  • 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Centre for Marine and Atmospheric Sciences (ZMAW), Hamburg, Germany
  • 3Columbia University, GISS, New York, USA
  • 4University of Oslo, Department of Geosciences, Oslo, Norway
  • 5Hadley Centre, Met Office, Exeter, UK
  • 6European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability,Climate Change Unit, Ispra, Italy
  • 7Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
  • 8Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi L'Aquila, Coppito, Italy
  • 9NOAA, Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, Princeton, New Jersey, USA
  • 10Research Institute for Apllied mechanics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • 11Laboratoire d'Optique Atmospherique, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, CNRS, Villeneuve d'Ascq, France
  • 12Battelle, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA

Abstract. Nine different global models with detailed aerosol modules have independently produced instantaneous direct radiative forcing due to anthropogenic aerosols. The anthropogenic impact is derived from the difference of two model simulations with prescribed aerosol emissions, one for present-day and one for pre-industrial conditions. The difference in the solar energy budget at the top of the atmosphere (ToA) yields a new harmonized estimate for the aerosol direct radiative forcing (RF) under all-sky conditions. On a global annual basis RF is −0.22 Wm−2, ranging from +0.04 to −0.41 Wm−2, with a standard deviation of ±0.16 Wm−2. Anthropogenic nitrate and dust are not included in this estimate. No model shows a significant positive all-sky RF. The corresponding clear-sky RF is −0.68 Wm−2. The cloud-sky RF was derived based on all-sky and clear-sky RF and modelled cloud cover. It was significantly different from zero and ranged between −0.16 and +0.34 Wm−2. A sensitivity analysis shows that the total aerosol RF is influenced by considerable diversity in simulated residence times, mass extinction coefficients and most importantly forcing efficiencies (forcing per unit optical depth). The clear-sky forcing efficiency (forcing per unit optical depth) has diversity comparable to that for the all-sky/ clear-sky forcing ratio. While the diversity in clear-sky forcing efficiency is impacted by factors such as aerosol absorption, size, and surface albedo, we can show that the all-sky/clear-sky forcing ratio is important because all-sky forcing estimates require proper representation of cloud fields and the correct relative altitude placement between absorbing aerosol and clouds. The analysis of the sulphate RF shows that long sulphate residence times are compensated by low mass extinction coefficients and vice versa. This is explained by more sulphate particle humidity growth and thus higher extinction in those models where short-lived sulphate is present at lower altitude and vice versa. Solar atmospheric forcing within the atmospheric column is estimated at +0.82±0.17 Wm−2. The local annual average maxima of atmospheric forcing exceed +5 Wm−2 confirming the regional character of aerosol impacts on climate. The annual average surface forcing is −1.02±0.23 Wm−2. With the current uncertainties in the modelling of the radiative forcing due to the direct aerosol effect we show here that an estimate from one model is not sufficient but a combination of several model estimates is necessary to provide a mean and to explore the uncertainty.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation