Dear authors,

please find enclosed two referee reports on the revised version of your manuscript. While referee 2 is satisfied with the revision, referee requests a further revision which however mainly concerns the text and requires solely more explanations in the text. I think to consider these would be worth and would definitely improve the manuscript.

Best regards, Farahnaz Khosrawi

Dear authors,

your manuscript can be accepted for publication in ACP after considering the technical corrections given below:

P4, L2: studies? I guess you rather mean data sets here.

Fig. 2, 3, and 4: These have not been put next to each in one Figure as requested by the referee (at least not in the draft that was submitted). Instead of next to each other, you could also arrange these figures below each other, which may be maybe easier to handle with the printed two column format. Further, the y-axes labelling ("Pressure") should start with a capital letter.

Table 3 and 4: Since you show the same here as for Table 2, but for different parameters, you could write in the Table 3 and 4 "Same as Table 2, but for Water Vapour" and "Same as Table 3, but for RHi [%]", respectively.

Figure 7: typo in in the top panel labelling: stratopshere -> stratosphere

P14, L7 and L11: space missing between numbers and between % and text, respectively.

P15, L29: can be also -> can also be

P16, L21: space between number and unit missing (two occasions)

P16, L22: degree sign missing

P17, Fig 8 caption: Add "a", Example of typical flight.... -> Example of a typical flight.....

P22, Fig 11 caption: Second part of the figure caption does not agree with the figures shown. Which lines?

P23, L8: distances -> distance

Best regards, Farahnaz Khosrawi