Quantifying uncertainties of climate signals in chemistry climate models related to the 11-year solar cycle – Part 1: Annual mean response in heating rates, temperature, and ozone

Kunze, Markus; Kruschke, Tim; Langematz, Ulrike; Sinnhuber, Miriam; Reddmann, Thomas; Matthes, Katja

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6991-2020

Articles | Volume 20, issue 11

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6991-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue:

The Modular Earth Submodel System (MESSy) (ACP/GMD inter-journal...

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6991-2020

© Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 20, issue 11

Research article

|

12 Jun 2020

Research article |

| 12 Jun 2020

Quantifying uncertainties of climate signals in chemistry climate models related to the 11-year solar cycle – Part 1: Annual mean response in heating rates, temperature, and ozone

Markus Kunze, Tim Kruschke, Ulrike Langematz, Miriam Sinnhuber, Thomas Reddmann, and Katja Matthes

Download

Final revised paper (published on 12 Jun 2020)
Supplement to the final revised paper
Preprint (discussion started on 31 Jan 2020)
Supplement to the preprint

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

SC1: 'What about other celestial factors?', Paul Pukite, 01 Feb 2020
- AC1: 'Answer to the short comment of Paul Pukite', Markus Kunze, 07 May 2020
RC1: 'Interesting and sound study', Anonymous Referee #1, 25 Feb 2020
- AC2: 'Answer to Reviewer #1', Markus Kunze, 08 May 2020
RC2: 'Review of Kunze et al.', Anonymous Referee #2, 26 Feb 2020
- AC3: 'Answer to Reviewer #2', Markus Kunze, 08 May 2020
RC3: 'review of Kunze et al', Anonymous Referee #3, 28 Feb 2020
- AC4: 'Answer to Reviewer #3', Markus Kunze, 08 May 2020

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by Markus Kunze on behalf of the Authors (08 May 2020) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Publish as is (12 May 2020) by Franz-Josef Lübken

Download

Article (14748 KB)
Full-text XML

Short summary

Modelling the response of the atmosphere and its constituents to 11-year solar variations is subject to a certain uncertainty arising from the solar irradiance data set used in the chemistry–climate model (CCM) and the applied CCM itself. This study reveals significant influences from both sources on the variations in the solar response in the stratosphere and mesosphere. However, there are also regions where the random, unexplained part of the variations in the solar response is largest.