Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
ACP | Articles | Volume 19, issue 12
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8243–8268, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8243–8268, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8243-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 26 Jun 2019

Research article | 26 Jun 2019

Evaluation and comparison of multiangle implementation of the atmospheric correction algorithm, Dark Target, and Deep Blue aerosol products over China

Ning Liu et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 941 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
599 327 15 941 7 9
  • HTML: 599
  • PDF: 327
  • XML: 15
  • Total: 941
  • BibTeX: 7
  • EndNote: 9
Views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 25 Jan 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 869 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 859 with geography defined and 10 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 02 Jun 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The systematic validation and comparison of MAIAC, DT, and DB AOD products across China from 2000 to 2017 is presented. In this process, the overall accuracy, land type dependence, view geometry dependence, spatiotemporal retrieval accuracy, spatial variation pattern, and spatiotemporal completeness of the three products are analyzed in detail. In general, MAIAC achieves higher accuracy than DT and DB, but DT and DB may perform better than MAIAC under some specific land cover types or seasons.
The systematic validation and comparison of MAIAC, DT, and DB AOD products across China from...
Citation