the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
| 09 May 2019
Ice-nucleating particles in a coastal tropical site
Luis A. Ladino
Graciela B. Raga
Harry Alvarez-Ospina
Manuel A. Andino-Enríquez
Irma Rosas
Leticia Martínez
Eva Salinas
Javier Miranda
Zyanya Ramírez-Díaz
Bernardo Figueroa
Cedric Chou
Allan K. Bertram
Erika T. Quintana
Luis A. Maldonado
Agustín García-Reynoso
Victoria E. Irish
Atmospheric aerosol particles that can nucleate ice are referred to as ice-nucleating particles (INPs). Recent studies have confirmed that aerosol particles emitted by the oceans can act as INPs. This very relevant information can be included in climate and weather models to predict the formation of ice in clouds, given that most of them do not consider oceans as a source of INPs. Very few studies that sample INPs have been carried out in tropical latitudes, and there is a need to evaluate their availability to understand the potential role that marine aerosol may play in the hydrological cycle of tropical regions.
This study presents results from the first measurements obtained during a field campaign conducted in the tropical village of Sisal, located on the coast of the Gulf of Mexico of the Yucatan Peninsula in Mexico in January–February 2017, and one of the few data sets currently available at such latitudes (i.e., 21∘ N). Aerosol particles sampled in Sisal are shown to be very efficient INPs in the immersion freezing mode, with onset freezing temperatures in some cases as high as −3 ∘C, similarly to the onset temperature from Pseudomonas syringae. The results show that the INP concentration in Sisal was higher than at other locations sampled with the same type of INP counter. Air masses arriving in Sisal after the passage of cold fronts have surprisingly higher INP concentrations than the campaign average, despite their lower total aerosol concentration.
The high concentrations of INPs at warmer ice nucleation temperatures ( ∘C) and the supermicron size of the INPs suggest that biological particles may have been a significant contributor to the INP population in Sisal during this study. However, our observations also suggest that at temperatures ranging between −20 and −30 ∘C mineral dust particles are the likely source of the measured INPs.
- Article
(4607 KB) -
Supplement
(1488 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Clouds are essential to the hydrological cycle of the planet and also play a significant role in the radiative balance of the climate system (Ramanathan et al., 1989; Lohmann and Feichter, 2005; Andreae and Rosenfeld, 2008; Stevens and Feingold, 2009). Cloud formation depends on the presence of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) and most precipitation from mixed-phase clouds involves also the presence of ice-nucleating particles (INPs). Aerosol–cloud interactions are one of the main sources of uncertainty in climate projections as assessed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Stocker et al., 2013), prompting a large amount of research effort from the scientific community in recent years. Nevertheless, the formation and evolution of ice crystals in mixed-phase and cirrus clouds still remain highly uncertain (Seinfeld et al., 2016; Kanji et al., 2017; Field et al., 2017). Several pathways have been proposed to be potentially responsible for ice formation: condensation freezing, contact freezing, immersion freezing, and deposition nucleation (Vali et al., 2015). Murray et al. (2012) and Ladino et al. (2013) have suggested that contact freezing and immersion freezing are the most efficient mechanisms leading to ice nucleation in clouds; however, the atmospheric relevance of contact freezing is still unclear given the contradictory results (Hobbs and Atkinson, 1976; Ansmann et al., 2005; Cui et al., 2006; Phillips et al., 2007; Seifert et al., 2011; Kanji et al., 2017).
Most of the precipitation from deep convection in the tropics, e.g., in the intertropical convergence zone, forms via the ice phase (Mülmenstädt et al., 2015). Given the ice-nucleating potential of a variety of aerosol particles such as mineral dust, biological particles, crystalline salts, carbonaceous particles, and secondary organic aerosol, the main source of INPs at tropical latitudes is highly uncertain (Kanji et al., 2017; Yakobi-Hancock et al., 2014; DeMott et al., 2010). Although it is yet not fully understood what exactly makes an aerosol particle an efficient INP (e.g., its composition, active sites, crystal structure, size, or hygroscopicity), there is evidence that their composition is one of the key factors (Kanji et al., 2017). On a global scale, the large tropospheric concentrations and the good ice-nucleating abilities of mineral dust have been widely reported as an important INP source (Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Nenes et al., 2014; Atkinson et al., 2013; Kanji et al., 2017). Bioaerosol has also been identified as very efficient INP (Kanji et al., 2017; Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2016; Hill et al., 2017), with onset freezing temperatures reported as high as −2 ∘C (Yankofsky et al., 1981; Després et al., 2012; Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2015; Wex et al., 2015; Stopelli et al., 2017). Global climate models parameterize cloud droplet and ice crystal formation from observational studies and results from such modeling suggest that on a global scale bioaerosol is not a major source of INPs, and therefore, have a lower impact on ice cloud formation in comparison to mineral dust particles (Hoose et al., 2010; Sesartic et al., 2012). However, this may not be the case on a regional scale (Burrows et al., 2013; Mason et al., 2015a). Marine organic matter, likely of biological origin, has been suggested to be an important oceanic source of INPs in the southern oceans, North Atlantic, and North Pacific (Burrows et al., 2013; Yun and Penner, 2013; Wilson et al., 2015; Vergara-Temprado et al., 2017). However, the maritime source suggestion was made with little or no data from tropical latitudes.
Important efforts were made during the 1950–1970s to understand the role of the oceans in ice cloud formation (Bigg, 1973; Schnell and Vali, 1975; Schnell, 1975, 1977, 1982; Rosinski et al., 1987, 1988). There is recent new and robust evidence that biological material from the marine environment could act as efficient INPs (Knopf et al., 2011; Wilson et al., 2015; Mason et al., 2015b; DeMott et al., 2016; Ladino et al., 2016; McCluskey et al., 2017; Irish et al., 2017; Welti et al., 2018). Most of the past available INP data were obtained from middle- and high-latitude studies, with tropical latitudes heavily underrepresented (Schnell, 1982; Rosinski et al., 1987, 1988; Boose et al., 2016; Welti et al., 2018; Price et al., 2018). Marine and coastal INP concentration ([INP]) typically ranges from 10−4 to 10−1 L−1 for temperatures between −10 and −25 ∘C (Kanji et al., 2017) but have shown to be higher at tropical coastal sites (Rosinski et al., 1988; Boose et al., 2016; Welti et al., 2018; Price et al., 2018). This large [INP] range may strongly depend on the microbiota concentration, the marine biological activity, and the organic matter enrichment in the sea surface microlayer as shown in Wilson et al. (2015).
At marine and coastal sites, a large variety of bacteria have been identified with Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes as the main reported phyla (Després et al., 2012). Also, airborne fungi are common in both continental and marine environments, with Cladosporium, Alternaria, Penicillium, Aspergillus, and Epicoccum being the main identified genera (Després et al., 2012). Besides bacteria and fungal spores, viruses, algae, and pollen have been identified in the bioaerosol of marine environments (Després et al., 2012; Fröhlich-Nowoisky et al., 2015; Michaud et al., 2018). Therefore, the concentration, ice-nucleating abilities, and variability of tropical bioaerosol need to be better characterized to quantify their role in cloud formation and precipitation development at regional levels and within the tropical zonal band.
Figure 1Map showing the sampling location. The red star shows the location of the Engineering Institute building where the sampling took place, while the yellow star shows the center of Sisal (Google Maps).
The Yucatan Peninsula, surrounded by the Gulf of Mexico to the west and by the Caribbean Sea to the east, with a large variety of tropical vegetation, is a great source of both terrestrial and marine microorganisms (Guzmán, 1982; Videla et al., 2000; Morales et al., 2006). Tropical cyclones (TCs) and cold fronts are some of the meteorological phenomena that seasonally affect the Yucatan Peninsula every year (Whigham et al., 1991; Landsea, 2007; Knutson et al., 2010). DeLeon-Rodriguez et al. (2013) show that TCs can significantly enhance the concentration of biological particles throughout the troposphere and can also efficiently transport biological particles far away from their sources. Moreover, Mayol et al. (2017) has shown that ocean and terrestrial microorganisms can be efficiently transported long distances from their sources over the tropical and subtropical oceans.
(Mason et al., 2015a)Table 1List of the measured variables and the corresponding instrumentation.
This study presents results of the INP concentration as a function of temperature and particle size, and the concentration and composition of biological particles at a tropical coastal site (Sisal, Yucatan) to infer the potential relevance of biological particles in mixed-phase cloud formation and precipitation development.
2.1 Sampling site
Ambient aerosol particles were collected between 21 January and 2 February 2017 in the coastal village of Sisal, located in the northwest corner of the Yucatan Peninsula ( N W), as shown in Fig. 1. Sisal had 1837 inhabitants in 2015 (SEDESOL, 2015), with fishing and tourism recognized as the main economical activities. The closest industry is located approximately 25 km away from the village and the nearest city is Merida, 75 km away.
The instruments used in this study were located on the roof of the Engineering Institute building of the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM, Sisal Campus), which is 50 m from the shoreline and about 1.7 km from the center of Sisal (Fig. 1). The roof is 25 m above ground level and directly faces the ocean.
January and February are part of the cold dry season in Mexico, with isolated events of rain associated with cold fronts reaching the deep tropics. The arithmetic mean ± standard deviation for air temperature and relative humidity (RH) during the sampling period were 22.3±3.6 ∘C and 68.9±6.2 %.
2.2 Instrumentation
A suite of instrumentation was deployed in Sisal to characterize the aerosol chemical composition, concentration, size distribution, biological content, INP concentration, and meteorological variables (Table 1). Most instruments were run simultaneously and next to each other (less than 10 m apart), and only wet aerosol particles were sampled (mean RH =69 %). Additionally, none of the instruments used an impactor or cyclone ahead of their inlets. The inlets were located around 1.5–2.0 m above the roof surface. The meteorological data were obtained with a meteorological station (Davis, VANTAGE PRO2) placed in a different building approximately 20 m away from the other instruments.
2.2.1 Aerosol concentration and size distribution
The aerosol particle concentration and size distribution were monitored with a condensation particle counter (CPC 3010, TSI) and with an optical particle counter (LasAir II 310A, PMS), respectively. In the CPC, the size of the aerosol particles is increased in a heated saturator and cooled condenser system prior to their detection. The particles grown are directed towards a laser beam and the dispersed light is collected by a photodetector that converts it to particle concentration. Similarly to the CPC, aerosol particles in the LasAir are counted by being passed through a laser beam (without any prior treatment). Based on the pulses (or voltage) and their amplitude the dispersed light by the particles is then converted to particle concentration and size. The total particle concentration reported by the CPC was collected every second at a flow rate of 1 L min−1, whereas the aerosol concentration as a function of their optical diameter (cut sizes at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, 10.0, and 25 µm) was recorded every 11 s with the LasAir at a flow rate of 28.3 L min−1.
2.2.2 Ice-nucleating particles
Aerosol particles were collected on hydrophobic glass cover slips (HR3-215; Hampton Research) with the help of a Micro-Orifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI 110R, MSP) to determine INP concentrations in ambient air. Identical substrate holders to those described in Mason et al. (2015a) were used to keep the glass cover slips at a location on the impaction plate where particle concentrations varied by a relatively small amount. The MOUDI has eight stages for particle separation and collection as a function of their aerodynamic diameter (cut sizes are 10.0, 5.6, 3.2, 1.8, 1.0, 0.56, 0.32, and 0.18 µm). The particle size range for each MOUDI stage is given in Table S1 in the Supplement. The flow through the MOUDI is 30 L min−1 and the typical sampling time was 6 h. It has been recognized that when sampling with a MOUDI under dry conditions (i.e., RH below approximately 60 %), aerosol particles can bounce from the impaction plates moving to lower stages (Winkler, 1974; Chen et al., 2011; Bateman et al., 2014). Although this is a known artifact when using this technique, this may not have been an issue in the current study given that the ambient RH was typically above 67 %. The glass substrates containing the ambient aerosol particles were stored in petri dishes at 4 ∘C prior to their analysis.
The INP concentrations were measured with a cold cell coupled to an optical microscope with an EC Plan-Neofluar 5 X objective (Axiolab, Zeiss) following the MOUDI-DFT method described by Mason et al. (2015a). The cold-cell microscope system used here is the same one used in previous studies (Mason et al., 2015a, b, 2016; DeMott et al., 2016; Si et al., 2018). The following steps encompass the analysis: (i) the samples collected on glass cover slips were placed in the cold cell at room temperature, (ii) the cold cell was isolated and kept at 0 ∘C while humid air (RH >100 %) was injected into the cell to induce liquid droplet formation by water vapor condensation, and (iii) dry air (N2) was then injected into the cold cell to prevent the newly formed droplets from touching. This is a key step that minimizes the probability of liquid droplets freezing by contact, and (iv) once the droplet sizes and thermodynamic conditions were stable, the cold cell was closed. The activation scans were conducted between 0 and −40 ∘C at a cooling rate of −10 ∘C per minute for particles collected on stages 2 to 7. Stage 1 (>10.0 µm) was not taken into account given that the aerosol concentration on the glass substrates was typically very low, whereas in stage 8 (0.18–0.32 µm) the number concentration of particles deposited on the glass substrates was so high that it inhibited the proper formation of water drops. The temperature at which each droplet froze was determined by analyzing the video from the CCD camera (XC-ST50, Sony) connected to the microscope and the data reported by the resistance temperature detector (RTD) located at the center of the cold cell with a ±0.2 ∘C uncertainty (Mason et al., 2015b). Homogeneous freezing experiments were performed on laboratory blanks exposed during the preparation of the MOUDI, while heterogeneous freezing experiments were run on ambient particles deposited on the glass cover slips (Fig. S1 in the Supplement). The [INP] was calculated using the following expression:
where Nu(T) is the number of unfrozen droplets at temperature T, No the total number of droplets, Adeposit the total area of the aerosol deposit on the hydrophobic glass cover slip, ADFT the area of the hydrophobic glass cover slip analyzed in the DFT experiments, V the total volume of air sampled, fne a correction factor to account for uncertainty associated with the number of nucleation events in each experiment, fnu,0.25–0.10 mm and fnu,1 mm a non-uniformity factor which corrects for aerosol deposit inhomogeneity on scales of 0.25–0.10 and 1 mm (Mason et al., 2015a). The upper and lower detection limits of the MOUDI-DFT are 30 and 0.01 L−1. We refer the readers to Mason et al. (2015a, b) for more details on the MOUDI-DFT operational principle.
2.2.3 Chemical composition
A second eight-stage MOUDI (100NR, MSP) was operated simultaneously to collect aerosol particles for chemical composition analysis with particle sizes ranging from 0.18 to 10.0 µm. Particles were collected on 47 mm Teflon filters (Pall Science) for 48 h at a flow rate of 30 L min−1. Filters were weighed prior to and after the sampling and stored in petri dishes at 4 ∘C until they were analyzed. Two different analyses were performed on each filter: elemental composition followed by ion-cation concentration analysis.
Elemental composition of the aerosol samples was determined by X-ray fluorescence (XRF), using the X-ray spectrometer at Laboratorio de Aerosoles, Instituto de Fisica, UNAM (Espinosa et al., 2012). The samples were mounted on plastic frames with no previous treatment. The analysis was carried out using an Oxford Instrument (Scotts Valley, CA, USA) X-ray tube with an Rh anode and an Amptek (Bedford, MA, USA) Silicon Drift Detector (resolution 140 eV at 5.9 keV). The tube operated at 50 kV and a current of 500 µA, irradiating during 900 s per spectrum. The efficiency of the detection system was measured using a set of thin film standards (MicroMatter Co., Vancouver, Canada). The spectra obtained for the samples were deconvolved with the WinQXAS computer code (IAEA, 1997), and the experimental uncertainties in elemental concentrations were computed according to the method described by Espinosa et al. (2010).
After the XRF analysis, the Teflon filters were analyzed for , , Cl−, K+, Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and using a Dionex model ICS-1500 equipped with an electrical conductivity detector, following Chow and Watson (1999). , Cl−, and were separated using a Thermo Scientific Dionex IonPac AS23-4 µm Analytical Column (4 mm×250 mm) with Thermo Scientific Dionex CES 300 Capillary Electrolytic Suppressor module. The injection volume was 1000 µL, the mobile phase was 4.5 mM Na2CO3 – 0.8 mM NaHCO at 1 mL min−1 flow rate. For , Na+, Ca2+, Mg2+, and K+, volumes of 1000 µL were injected in a Thermo Scientific Dionex IonPac CS12A Cation-Exchange Column (4 mm×250 mm) with the Thermo Scientific Dionex CES 300 Capillary Electrolytic Suppressor. The mobile phase was a solution CH4SO3 20 mM and 1 mL min−1 flow rate.
2.2.4 Biological particles
Air samples were collected using two Quick Take 30 Sample Pump BioStage viable cascade impactor (SKC Inc. USA), which is a one-stage portable battery-powered instrument operated at a constant airflow rate (28.3 L min−1) for a sampling time of 5 min. Petri dishes containing Trypticase soy agar (TSA; BD Bioxon) media, supplemented with 100 mg L−1 cycloheximide (Sigma-Aldrich) to prevent fungal growth, were used for capture cultivable total bacteria, and malt extract agar (MEA; BD Bioxon) for cultivable airborne propagule fungi. The two impactors, one with the TSA and the other one with MEA growing media, were run in parallel. After exposure, the plates were incubated at 37 ∘C during 24–48 h for cultivable total bacteria and at 25 ∘C during 48–72 h for propagule fungi. After incubation, colonies growing on each plate were counted and concentrations were calculated by taking the sampling rates into account. They were reported as colony-forming units per cubic meter (cfu m−3) of air. The petri dishes with the grown colonies were stored at 4 ∘C prior to their analysis. Fungi were identified to genus level by macroscopic characteristics of the colonies and microscopic examination of the spore structure. Representative bacterial colonies were selected and purified using several transfer steps of single colonies on TSA and checked by Gram staining and microscopy. Fresh biomass of the bacterial isolates were suspended in 30 % glycerol LB broth (Alpha Biosciences, Inc.) and stored at −72 ∘C for further analysis.
Bacteria isolated from the pure cultures were identified by 16S rRNA sequencing. DNA was extracted using the QIAamp DNA Mini kit (QIAGEN), according to the manufacturer's protocol. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequences were amplified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using universal bacterial primers 27F (5-AGA GTT TGA TCM TGG CTC AG-3) and 1492R (5-TAC GGY TAC CTT GTT ACG ACT T-3) (Lane, 1991). PCRs were performed in a total volume of 50 µL including 2 µL of bacterial DNA, 35.4 µL of ddH2O, 5 µL of 10 X buffer, 1.5 µL of MgCl2 (1.5 mM), 1 µL of dNTPs (10 mM), 0.1 µL of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U µL−1), and 2.5 µL of each primer (10 µM). Cycle conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 94 ∘C for 1 min followed by 35 cycles at 94 ∘C for 1 min, 56 ∘C for 30 s, 72 ∘C for 1.5 min; and a final extension at 72 ∘C for 5 min. The PCR products were examined for size and yield using 1.0 % (w∕v) agarose gels in the TAE buffer. After successful amplification, the obtained products were sequenced using a PRISM 3730 automated sequencer (Applied Biosystem Inc.). DNA sequences were edited and assembled using the SeqMan and EditSeq software (Chromas Lite, Technely Slom Pty Ltd. USA). Sequence similarity analysis was performed using the BLAST software (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST, last access: 8 May 2018).
Although specific growing media for actinobacteria were not used in this study, some actinobacteria colonies were able to grow on the TSA petri dishes; therefore, in some cases they were isolated and identified as follows. Genomic DNA was extracted using standard protocols reported previously for actinobacteria (Maldonado et al., 2009). The DNA preparations were then used as a template for 16S rRNA gene amplification using the universal set of bacterial primers 27f and 1525r (Lane, 1991). The following components for the PCR mix were employed: 0.5 µL DNA template (for a final concentration of 100 ng µL−1, 5 µL 10X DNA polymerase buffer, 1.5 µL MgCl2 (50 mM stock solution), 1.25 µL dNTP (10 mM stock mixture), 0.5 µL of each primer (20 µM stock solution), and 2.0 units of Taq polymerase made up to 50 µL with deionized sterile distilled water.
The PCR amplification was achieved using a Techne 512 gradient machine using the protocol described in Maldonado et al. (2008). The expected product (size approx. 1500 bp) was checked by horizontal electrophoresis (70 V, 40 min) and then purified using the QIAquick PCR purification kit (QIAGEN, Germany) following the manufacturer's instructions. Purified 16S rRNA gene PCR products were sent for sequencing to Macrogen (Korea) for the BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems). Assembly of each 16S rRNA gene sequence was performed using Chromas (http://www.technelysium.com.au, last access: 21 March 2018) and checked manually with the SeaView software (Galtier et al., 1996). Each assembled sequence was compared against two databases, namely, (a) the GenBank database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, last access: 21 March 2018) by using the BLAST option and (b) the EZCloud (https://www.ezbiocloud.net, last access: 21 March 2018) under its EZTaxon option. Both databases generated a list of the closest phylogenetic neighbors to each sequence and the EZTaxon specifically provided the list of the closest described (type) species. At least 650 bp was employed for the analyses.
Figure 2Time evolution of wind and aerosol particle concentration time series for the entire campaign (21 January–2 February 2017). (a) Time series of the wind speed (yellow) and wind direction (green), (b) particle concentration measured by the CPC, (c) particle concentration measured by the LasAir full-size range (0.3 to 25 µm), and (d) particle concentration measured by the LasAir for particles >500 nm (0.5 to 25 µm). Grey areas denote the periods affected by cold fronts A and B. Each tick mark on the x axis corresponds to midnight local time.
3.1 Aerosol concentration and meteorology
Two cold fronts affected Sisal during the sampling period between 21 January and 2 February 2017, providing different air mass characteristics. The periods affected by each of the fronts are indicated in Fig. 2 by vertical grey bars and labeled cold front A and cold front B, associated with increased wind speed and shifts in wind direction. Figure 2b–d shows the time series of the aerosol particle concentration between 21 January and 2 February 2017. There is a large diurnal variability for the aerosol particle concentration measured by the CPC (particles > 30 nm, Fig. 2b) and the LasAir (particles >300 nm, Fig. 2c). Assuming log-normal distributions, the geometric mean concentration and multiplicative standard deviation (cf. Limpert et al., 2001) for the entire sampling period were 758.51x∕1.76 and 1.00x∕1.37 cm−3. From the CPC data shown in Fig. 2b, there seems to be a daily cycle with most of the highest concentration taking place between 7 and 12 h (local time), most notably on days without the influence of cold fronts. The data reported by the CPC and the LasAir indicate that most of the aerosol particles were smaller than 300 nm. A similar result was found by Rosinski et al. (1988) in the Gulf of Mexico (GoM), who found that the aerosol concentration for particles ranging between 0.5 and 1.0 µm was 3 to 4 orders of magnitude smaller than particles ranging between 0.003 and 0.1 µm. A decrease in aerosol particle concentration was observed at the arrival and during the passage of two cold fronts during the sampling period, associated with an increase in horizontal wind speed of at least a factor of 3 (Fig. 2a). During the passage of cold front A, precipitation events were not observed which was not the case for cold front B. This could partially explain the lower aerosol concentration during the passage of the cold front B in comparison to cold front A. Also note that, during the influence of the cold front A, the wind direction was almost constant from approximately 270∘, while during cold front B the wind direction varied between 270 and 360∘, with a more northerly component and a larger influence from the GoM compared to winds associated with cold front A.
Back trajectories from the measurement site were estimated using the HYSPLIT model (Stein et al., 2015). They were run on each day of the campaign for 72 h. In the absence of cold fronts A and B, air masses arriving in Sisal had a predominantly continental influence, associated with southerly winds (Fig. S2). However, when the cold fronts A and B reached the Yucatan Peninsula, northerly and northwesterly winds prevailed and contributed a more maritime influence. The arrival of the cold fronts was also confirmed by the surface weather maps for 22 and 29 January (Fig. S3) provided by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA).
Air masses behind both cold fronts, flowing over the GoM, were characterized by lower aerosol particle concentrations than air masses coming from the south to the site. This result agrees well with a large body of evidence indicating that marine air masses have lower aerosol particle concentration than continentally influenced air masses (Patterson et al., 1980; Fitzgerald, 1991). As for the total aerosol concentration (Fig. 2), the number size distributions of the aerosol particles larger than 300 nm were also impacted by the cold fronts. For example, the concentration of particles smaller than 5.0 µm was lower during the passage of the cold front B (Fig. S4). As shown in Fig. 3 (and Fig. S5), the XRF analysis indicates that, although there are small differences in the bulk chemical composition of the aerosol particles, the overall composition is generally comparable in the presence or absence of cold fronts. Note, however, that this is not a completely fair comparison given that sampling time for the chemical analysis was 48 h, while sampling time for determining the influence of the cold-front air masses on INP populations was on the order of 36 h. Therefore, the periods denoted as cold fronts contain aerosol particles that may not technically correspond to cold-front air masses.
Figure 3Time series of the ambient aerosol mass concentration and bulk chemical composition as measured by the XRF. Each sample was collected for 48 h starting at 12:00 h local time. A and B indicate that those samples were partially influenced by the passage of the cold front A and the cold front B, respectively.
3.2 Ice-nucleating particle concentration
A total of 41 samples (eight stages each) were collected during the Sisal field campaign to calculate the [INP] as a function of temperature and particle size. Some of these samples showed a high ice-nucleating activity with onset freezing temperatures found to occur at temperatures as high as −3 ∘C (Fig. S6). Figure 4 summarizes the [INP] as a function of temperature and particle size for 29 analyzed samples. Due to technical issues it was not possible to analyze the samples collected after 30 January. Figure 4 also shows recent literature data obtained at coastal and marine regions from DeMott et al. (2016), Welti et al. (2018), and Irish et al. (2019).
Figure 4Summary of average INP concentrations as a function of temperature and particle size (solid symbols). Total [INP] are represented by the grey triangles, whereas the brown asterisks, light blue dotted lines, and purple stars are data from DeMott et al. (2016), Welti et al. (2018), and Irish et al. (2019), respectively. The upper and lower detection limits of the MOUDI-DFT are 30 and 0.01 L−1.
At −15 ∘C the [INP] measured in Sisal are in relatively good agreement with those found at Cabo Verde (Welti et al., 2018) but are 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than the values reported by Irish et al. (2019) from the Arctic boundary layer and by DeMott et al. (2016) from sea spray laboratory-generated particles and ambient marine boundary layer particles. As temperature decreases from −20 to −30 ∘C there is a better agreement between the Sisal [INP] and data from DeMott et al. (2016). It is important to note that the large variability of the [INP] from Welti et al. (2018) is related to the large amount of data summarized on each dotted line (i.e., from 2009 to 2013).
The high [INP] found at −15 ∘C can be explained in part by the very efficient INPs shown in Fig. S6 with sizes ranging from 1.0 to 1.8 µm. However, it is important to note that particles with diameters between 1.8 and 10 µm also contribute to the total [INP] at warm temperatures. Aerosol particles acting as INPs at −15 ∘C are usually biological, given that other aerosol particles such as metals, crystalline salts, combustion particles (e.g., soot), and organics are not efficient INPs under these conditions. Moreover, for typical atmospheric concentrations of mineral dust, ice nucleation at these temperatures seems to be of secondary importance (Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Murray et al., 2012; Kanji et al., 2017). The potential sources of the measured INPs in Sisal are discussed below.
Figure 5Mean INP number concentrations at droplet freezing temperatures of −15 (light gray), −20 (dark gray), and −25 ∘C (black). The blue and red stars represent the mean INP concentration during the cold fronts A and B and cold front B, respectively. Uncertainties are given as the standard uncertainty of the mean (adapted from Mason et al., 2016).
Figure 6Mean INP concentration as a function of aerosol particle size at (a) −15, (b) −20, (c) −25, and (d) −30 ∘C. Uncertainties are given as the standard uncertainty of the mean.
Figure 5 is based on Mason et al. (2016) and shows the average [INP] for three different temperatures (−15, −20, and −25 ∘C) at different locations around the globe using the same sampling and analysis methods. The Sisal data correspond to particle diameters ranging between 0.32 and 10 µm; full information in all size stages was obtained in 16 out of the 29 samples analyzed. At −15 ∘C the average [INP] in Sisal was lower than Colby (USA), an agricultural site, and Labrador Sea; however, the obtained values are comparable to those found at UBC (Canada), Saclay (France), and Ucluelet (Canada). At −20 and −25 ∘C the average [INP] in Sisal was comparable or higher than at the other locations. As shown by the stars on top of the Sisal bars, the [INP] during the passage of the cold fronts was found to be higher than the average [INP], although the obtained values are within the uncertainty bars. For example, at −15 ∘C the [INP] increases from 0.33 to 0.59 L−1 in the cold air mass after the passage of cold front B. Recalling that the air masses behind cold front B contained a lower aerosol particle concentration, this suggests that the marine particles in that air mass are more efficient INPs than in the air masses with more continental influence. Given that the bulk chemical composition as shown in Fig. S5 (and Fig. 3) is comparable before, during, and after the passage of the cold front B, it is possible that the observed differences in the ice-nucleating abilities are linked to the biological content in the cold air masses. This is further discussed below.
The majority of the field studies performed to measure the [INP] have been conducted at midlatitudes; nevertheless, here we compare our observations with the results presented by Rosinski et al. (1988), who measured the [INP] in the condensation freezing mode for particles in the GoM during a cruise between 20 July and 30 August 1986, during midsummer. The study reports very efficient INPs with onset freezing temperatures as high as −4 ∘C for particles with diameters between 0.1 and 0.4 µm. On 6 August 1986 (the closest sampling site to Sisal in the GoM) the study shows that the [INP] at −15 ∘C was on the order of 10−2 L−1 for particles with sizes between 0.1 and 0.4 µm. In contrast, our results indicate that the [INP] at −15 ∘C varied between 10−1 and 100 L−1 for particles ranging between 0.32 and 10 µm. This discrepancy could be attributed to the differences in the size of the particles sampled and could also be influenced by seasonal variability. If supermicron particles are excluded, the [INP] at −15 ∘C from the present study is 1 order of magnitude lower (Fig. 4). As shown by DeMott et al. (2010) particles larger than 500 nm are the more likely potential INPs and as stated by Mason et al. (2016) and as shown in Fig. 4, super-micron particles are a large contributor to the INP population. Additionally, the chemical composition of the aerosol particles collected by Rosinski et al. (1988) indicate that the air masses in the GoM in July–August were significantly influenced by mineral dust particles. African dust episodes reached Florida between May and October (Lenes et al., 2012), and there have been no reported episodes during the sampling period of this study (January–February).
3.2.1 [INP] vs. particle size
Figure 6 shows the mean [INP] concentration as a function of particle size between 0.32 and 10 µm at four different temperatures (−15, −20, −25, and −30 ∘C). Note that the INP size distributions are different for each of the temperatures considered, in contrast with the results from Mason et al. (2015b) on the Pacific coast of Canada. At −15 ∘C the peak [INP] corresponds to particles ranging between 1.0 and 1.8 µm; this range has been reported as the typical size for airborne bacteria (Burrows et al., 2009). Similar size distributions were obtained at −20 and −25 ∘C with peak concentration for particles ranging in size between 3.2 and 5.6 µm. Finally, at −30 ∘C the peak was observed at smaller sizes (i.e., between 1.8 and 3.2 µm). The discrepancies between the present results and those from Mason et al. (2015b) at −15 and −30 ∘C could be explained by differences in air mass history. Although both studies were conducted at coastal locations, the back-trajectories from the present study indicate that during “normal” days (i.e., 70 % of the time) the sampled air masses had a significant continental contribution (Fig. S2). In contrast, air masses were mostly maritime in the Mason et al. (2015b) study. Also, it is important to note that, although the cold air masses that reached Sisal behind the cold fronts had crossed the GoM, the aerosol particles found in them are likely a mixture of particles originated in the Central Great Plains and the GoM (Figs. S2b–c and S5).
Figure 7The fraction of aerosol particles acting as an INP ([INP]/NTot) as a function of particle size at −15, −20, and −25 ∘C. NTot refers to the number of aerosol particles in a given size range measured by the LasAir. The solid colored symbols represent the entire campaign, while the black symbols represent the samples collected under the influence of the cold fronts.
Figure 8(a) Mean mass concentration of 14 detected elements for the collected aerosol particles using XRF, (b) mean mass concentration of eight detected ions for the collected aerosol particles using HPLC, (c) and (d) mean mass size distribution of the main five detected elements/ions with the XRF and HPLC. These results are the average for the whole sampling period.
Figure 6 also shows that most of the INPs are in the supermicron size range, where submicron particles represent less than 10 % of the total [INP] independent of temperature, in agreement with Mason et al. (2015b, 2016). To confirm the size dependence and the importance of supermicron particles to the [INP] in Sisal, the fraction of particles acting as INPs was calculated by combining the DFT and LasAir data (Fig. 7). The [INP] was normalized for four size bins (i.e., 0.3–0.5, 0.5–1.0, 1.0–5.0, and 5.0–10.0 µm). As expected (from Figs. 4 and 6), the fraction of particles acting as INPs increases with increasing particle size and with decreasing temperature. This trend is in agreement with the results shown by Si et al. (2018), with the present results being higher. Figure 7 also shows that the fraction of aerosol particles acting as INP is higher when influenced by the cold fronts (black symbols), especially for particles ranging between 1.0 and 5.0 µm.
Table 2Correlation coefficients (r2) of the average chemical composition and the average [INP] per sample at −15, −20, −25, and −30 ∘C. Bold text highlights the r2 with p<0.05 (Table S1) for each temperature. The correlations were obtained for five sample points at each temperature.
Figure 9(a) Time series of the [INP] at −15 (blue), −20 (brown), and −25 ∘C (yellow), (b) time series of the [INP] at −15 ∘C (blue) together with bacteria concentration (red), and (c) time series of the [INP] at −15 ∘C (blue) together with fungal concentration (black). Each x-axis tick corresponds to 06:00 local time. The horizontal uncertainty bars indicate the time span of the MOUDI-DFT measurements, i.e., 6 h. Grey areas denote the periods affected by cold fronts A and B.
3.3 Identification of the potential INP sources
The chemical analysis of the sampled aerosol particles (for the whole sampling period) indicates that a large fraction of the particle mass (for sizes between 0.18 and 10.0 µm) are likely of marine origin (Figs. 3 and 8a–b). Both techniques, i.e., XRF and HPLC, found that the main elements and ions are sodium and chlorine. The low concentrations of Ti, Cu, K, and Zn show the very low probability of anthropogenic influence at the sampling site. However, although sulfate and ammonium can be emitted by natural sources, their presence, in addition to nitrates, indicate that the influence of anthropogenic activities to the aerosol population is not completely negligible. Finally, the low concentration of Al, Fe, Ca, and Si suggest that mineral dust is not a major contributor of aerosol particle mass during the sampling period. However, although the long-range transport of mineral dust particles from Africa to the Yucatan Peninsula and the GoM is very rare between January and February, mineral dust particles are frequently found in the Caribbean including the GoM (Rosinski et al., 1988; Prospero and Lamb, 2003; Doherty et al., 2008; Kishcha et al., 2014).
Table 3Bacterial isolation for (top) 21–22 January, (middle) at cold front A and (bottom) cold front B.
a Isolated on TSA media. b Isolated on GYM media.
Figure 8c–d shows the mean mass size distribution for the whole sampling period of the main five elements/ions determined by the XRF and HPLC techniques. For the XRF analyses Na, Cl, and Ca have a single peak at 3.2 µm, whereas the S and Mg reported two peaks at 0.32 and 3.2 µm. Similarly to the XRF results, the HPLC analyses for Na+ and Cl− also showed a single peak at 3.2 µm. , showed two peaks at 0.32 and 3.2 µm, whereas for the peaks were located at 0.32 and 5.6 µm. The obtained size distributions are in agreement with those of sea-salt-type particles as reported elsewhere (O'Dowd et al., 2004; Prather et al., 2013).
Although Al, Si, Ca, and Fe were found at low concentrations (Fig. 8a), Tables 2 and S2 suggest that mineral dust particles are an important source of INPs in Sisal at temperatures ranging from −20 to −30 ∘C. This is in close agreement with the results obtained by Si et al. (2019) in the Canadian High Arctic. From the correlation of the [INP] and the aerosol chemical composition at −15 ∘C, Mg was the only element showing a correlation that is statistically significant at the 95 % confidence interval (p<0.05). Although Mg can be found in mineral dust particles in low percentages, it can also be found in marine environments linked to sea spray aerosol (e.g., Savoie and Prospero, 1980; Andreae, 1982; Casillas-Ituarte et al., 2010). Given that mineral dust particles are unlikely the source of the measured INPs above −15 ∘C (as suggested by Table 2), and as secondary organic aerosol and soot are not typically efficient INPs at temperatures above −15 ∘C (Kanji et al., 2017), in addition to the supermicron size of ca. 90 % of the INPs (Fig. 6), bioaerosol is a potential source of the INPs measured at warm temperatures. Note that bioparticles have been shown to efficiently nucleate ice at those high temperatures (Hoose and Möhler, 2012; Murray et al., 2012; Ladino et al., 2013). Efficient INPs such as those measured in Sisal could be very important for cloud glaciation. Additionally, they can trigger ice multiplication or secondary ice formation at such high temperatures via the Hallett–Mossop mechanism (Hallett and Mossop, 1974; Field et al., 2017) and impact precipitation formation.
To confirm the presence of bioparticles around Sisal and to determine their potential role in the ice-nucleating abilities of the collected aerosol particles, bacteria and fungi identification was performed. As stated by Islebe et al. (2015) both bacteria and fungi need to be properly documented in the peninsula and the GoM to fully understand their regional importance. Samples for viable bacteria and fungi were collected every day at 06:00, 08:00, 10:00, and 12:00 local time. However, a single daily profile was performed between 22 and 23 January. Bacteria and fungi colony-forming units (cfu) m−3 were usually above zero, with the highest concentrations found early in the morning (Fig. S7). The bacteria and fungi concentrations showed a relatively good correlations (r=0.55, p<0.0005 not shown) with average values for the whole of the sampling periods of 295±312 and 438±346 cfu m−3, respectively. The bacteria concentrations are comparable to the values found by Hurtado et al. (2014) in Tijuana, on the Pacific coast of Mexico (i.e, 230–280 cfu m−3). Bacteria and fungi concentrations were found to be lower when the wind was coming from the north in comparison with southern-continental air masses (Fig. S8), a behavior similar to the aerosol concentration shown in Sect. 3.1.
Table 4Fungal identification on MEA media for the whole sampling period.
Figure 9 shows the time series of the [INP] together with the bacteria and fungal concentrations. Panels B and C show a poor correlation between the bacteria and fungal concentrations with the [INP] with correlation coefficients at −15 ∘C of 0.12 (p=0.06) and 0.36 (p=0.03), respectively. This poor correlation can be in part due to the different sampling times of the MOUDI and the biosamplers. An additional factor is that the reported bacteria and fungi concentrations are only a small fraction of the total population given that the used method is selective to viable microorganisms only. Note that the fraction of detected microorganisms by culture methods is typically ca. 1 % (but can be lower) of the total population (Lighthart, 2000; Burrows et al., 2009). From Fig. 9 it is notable that, although the bacteria and fungi concentrations were very low on 29 January (i.e., under the influence of the cold front B), the [INP] at −15 ∘C was comparable to the average value for the entire campaign. It is therefore intriguing if the marine microorganisms brought to Sisal by the cold front B could be efficient INPs.
Table 3 summarizes the identified bacteria before the arrival of cold front A and after the passage of cold fronts A and B. Additionally, Table 4 shows the fungi identification for the whole campaign. To our knowledge this is the first time that airborne viable bacteria, and fungi are identified at this coastal location. Although biological microorganism characterization has been previously conducted in Mexico, those studies focused mainly on health effects (Santos-Burgoa et al., 1994; Guzman, 1998; Maldonado et al., 2009; Frías-De León et al., 2016; Ríos et al., 2016). Note that 76 % of the detected bacteria were Gram positive with Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, and Bacillus as the main identified genera (Fig. S9). As shown in Table 3, before the arrival of cold front A (21–22 January), a large variety of bacteria species were found with different typical sources, mostly terrestrial. This is in contrast with the identified species found after the passage of cold fronts A and B. Especially after cold front B, different Vibrio species were identified, most of which are typically of marine origin. Recently, Hurtado et al. (2014) found that the most common genera of the bacteria in Tijuana were Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Pseudomonas, and Bacillus in close agreement with the present results.
Regarding fungi, different genera were also identified as shown in Table 4 with Cladosporium and Penicillium as the most frequent ones (51 % and 11 %, respectively) as shown in Fig. S9. This is in good agreement with the data reported by Després et al. (2012).
Several studies have shown the good correlation between the concentration of fluorescent biological particles and the [INP]; however, from those studies it is highly uncertain if the good ice-nucleating abilities can be attributed to a single microorganism specie (Mason et al., 2015b; Twohy et al., 2016). Offline methods such as the one used here have been able to identify specific microorganisms such as Pseudomonas syringae, Micrococcus, Staphylococcus, Cladosporium, Penicillium, and Aspergillus from rainwater and cloud water, with some showing good ice-nucleating abilities (Amato et al., 2007, 2017; Delort et al., 2010; Failor et al., 2017; Stopelli et al., 2017; Akila et al., 2018).
Aerosol particles collected around Sisal (on the northwest coast of the Yucatan Peninsula) from 21 January to 2 February 2017 were found to be efficient INPs with onset freezing temperatures as high as −3 ∘C, similarly to the onset freezing temperature of the well-known efficient INP Pseudomonas syringae (Wex et al., 2015) and Arctic sea surface microlayer organic-enriched waters (Wilson et al., 2015). The results show that the INP concentrations in Sisal are comparable (geometric mean and multiplicative standard deviation of 0.44x∕1.77, 1.73x∕2.56, and 6.20x∕2.65 L−1 at −15, −20, and −25 ∘C, respectively) and in specific cases even higher than at other locations studied using the same type of INP counter. Higher INP concentrations were observed, especially under the influence of cold fronts. This is an intriguing result given that the air masses behind the cold front contained lower aerosol particle concentrations. This deserves further analysis given that the Yucatan Peninsula and the Caribbean region are impacted regularly by this meteorological phenomenon during the winter and early spring months.
The chemical analyses performed on the sampled aerosol particles did not indicate the presence of mineral dust particles at high concentrations (the combined mass concentrations of Al, Si, and Fe correspond to 5.1 % of the total particle mass measured by the XRF). However, Al, Si, Ca, and Fe showed high correlation coefficients (r2 above 0.64 with p<0.05) with the [INP] at temperatures between −20 and −30 ∘C. At −15 ∘C the [INP] in Sisal was 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher than the concentrations reported from other coastal and marine regions around the globe. The size of this very efficient INPs was found to be above 1.0 µm with a large contribution to the [INP] of particles ranging from 1.0 to 1.8 µm. A summary of the observations presented in this study shows (i) the presence of large [INP] above −15∘C, (ii) 90 % of the INPs are supermicron in size, (iii) poor correlation between mineral dust tracers and the [INP], and (iv) the presence of marine biological particles behind cold fronts, coinciding with the highest [INP]. These results lead us to hypothesize that the likely source of the INPs measured in Sisal at high temperatures is biological particles. Therefore, our results suggest that continental and maritime biological particles could play an important role in ice cloud formation and precipitation development in the Yucatan Peninsula. Although several bacteria and fungi were identified, it is unknown if any of them were responsible for the observed ice-nucleating abilities of the aerosol around Sisal.
The present results are important for the development of new parameterizations to be incorporated in climate models, given that the currently available parameterizations contain little or no data from tropical latitudes. However, further similar studies are needed given that the [INP] may vary seasonally. In particular, the arrival of mineral dust particles to the GoM and the Caribbean region from Africa in July–August is expected to impact the [INP], and therefore, ice cloud formation, as shown by Rosinski et al. (1988) and DeMott et al. (2003).
The quantitative understanding of the importance of biological particles in ice particle formation is a challenging task for the cloud physics community. As shown here, even when combining biology with chemistry, physics, and meteorology, the results obtained are not as quantitative as would be desired. Therefore, further studies are needed in order to improve our current limited understanding of the role that tropical microorganisms could play in ice cloud formation.
Data are available upon request to the corresponding author.
The supplement related to this article is available online at: https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6147-2019-supplement.
LAL and GBR designed the experiments. LAL, HAO, MAE, and BF carried out the INP and aerosol measurements. IR, LM, ES, EQ, LAM, and AGR analyzed the biological particles. HAO and JM performed the chemical analyses. LAL, ZRD, CC, AKB, MS, and VI performed the INP analyses. LAL wrote the paper, with contributions from all co-authors.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The authors thank Elizabeth Garcia, Gabriel Garcia, Irma Gavilan, Rafaela Gutierrez, Joshua Munoz, Luis Landeros, Fernanda Cordoba, Wilfrido Gutierrez, Manuel Garcia, Miguel Robles, Alfredo Rodriguez, Juan Carlos Pineda, Luis Gonzalez, Alejandra Prieto, Telma Castro, Ma. Isabel Saavedra, and Aline Cruz for their invaluable help. We also thank David S. Valdes from CINVESTAV Merida for sharing the meteorological data. Finally, we thank the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) for facilitating the use of the surface maps and the HYSPLIT. This study was financially supported by the Direccion General de Asuntos del Personal Academico (DGAPA) through grants PAPIIT IA108417 and IN102818 and by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (Conacyt) through grant I000/781/2106.
This paper was edited by Paul Zieger and reviewed by five anonymous referees.
Akila, M., Priyamvada, H., Ravikrishna, R., and Gunthe, S. S.: Characterization of bacterial diversity and ice-nucleating ability during different monsoon seasons over a southern tropical Indian region, Atmos. Environ., 191, 387–394, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.08.026, 2018. a
Amato, P., Parazols, M., Sancelme, M., Laj, P., Mailhot, G., and Delort, A.-M.: Microorganisms isolated from the water phase of tropospheric clouds at the Puy de Dôme: major groups and growth abilities at low temperatures, FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 59, 242–254, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00199.x, 2007. a
Amato, P., Joly, M., Besaury, L., Oudart, A., Taib, N., Moné, A. I., Deguillaume, L., Delort, A.-M., and Debroas, D.: Active microorganisms thrive among extremely diverse communities in cloud water, PloS one, 12, e0182869, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182869, 2017. a
Andreae, M. and Rosenfeld, D.: Aerosol–cloud–precipitation interactions. Part 1. The nature and sources of cloud-active aerosols, Earth Sci. Rev., 89, 13–41, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2008.03.001, 2008. a
Andreae, M. O.: Marine aerosol chemistry at Cape Grim, Tasmania, and Townsville, Queensland, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 87, 8875–8885, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC11p08875, 1982. a
Ansmann, A., Mattis, I., Müller, D., Wandinger, U., Radlach, M., Althausen, D., and Damoah, R.: Ice formation in Saharan dust over central Europe observed with temperature/humidity/aerosol Raman lidar, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, D18S12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005000, 2005. a
Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278, 2013. a
Bateman, A. P., Belassein, H., and Martin, S. T.: Impactor apparatus for the study of particle rebound: Relative humidity and capillary forces, Aerosol Sci. Techonol., 48, 42–52, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.853866, 2014. a
Bigg, E.: Ice nucleus concentrations in remote areas, J. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1153–1157, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<1153:INCIRA>2.0.CO;2, 1973. a
Boose, Y., Sierau, B., García, M. I., Rodríguez, S., Alastuey, A., Linke, C., Schnaiter, M., Kupiszewski, P., Kanji, Z. A., and Lohmann, U.: Ice nucleating particles in the Saharan Air Layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 9067–9087, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9067-2016, 2016. a, b
Burrows, S. M., Elbert, W., Lawrence, M. G., and Pöschl, U.: Bacteria in the global atmosphere – Part 1: Review and synthesis of literature data for different ecosystems, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 9263–9280, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-9263-2009, 2009. a, b
Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Pöschl, U., and Lawrence, M. G.: Ice nuclei in marine air: biogenic particles or dust?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 245–267, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-245-2013, 2013. a, b
Casillas-Ituarte, N. N., Callahan, K. M., Tang, C. Y., Chen, X., Roeselová, M., Tobias, D. J., and Allen, H. C.: Surface organization of aqueous MgCl2 and application to atmospheric marine aerosol chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6616–6621, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0912322107, 2010. a
Chen, S.-C., Tsai, C.-J., Chen, H.-D., Huang, C.-Y., and Roam, G.-D.: The influence of relative humidity on nanoparticle concentration and particle mass distribution measurements by the MOUDI, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 45, 596–603, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551557, 2011. a
Chow, J. C. and Watson, J. G.: Ion chromatography in elemental analysis of airborne particles, Elemental analysis of airborne particles, 1, 97–137, 1999. a
Cui, Z., Carslaw, K. S., Yin, Y., and Davies, S.: A numerical study of aerosol effects on the dynamics and microphysics of a deep convective cloud in a continental environment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, D05201, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005981, 2006. a
DeLeon-Rodriguez, N., Lathem, T. L., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Barazesh, J. M., Anderson, B. E., Beyersdorf, A. J., Ziemba, L. D., Bergin, M., Nenes, A., and Konstantinidis, K. T.: Microbiome of the upper troposphere: species composition and prevalence, effects of tropical storms, and atmospheric implications, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 2575–2580, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1212089110, 2013. a
Delort, A.-M., Vaïtilingom, M., Amato, P., Sancelme, M., Parazols, M., Mailhot, G., Laj, P., and Deguillaume, L.: A short overview of the microbial population in clouds: Potential roles in atmospheric chemistry and nucleation processes, Atmos. Res., 98, 249–260, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2010.07.004, 2010. a
DeMott, P. J., Sassen, K., Poellot, M. R., Baumgardner, D., Rogers, D. C., Brooks, S. D., Prenni, A. J., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: African dust aerosols as atmospheric ice nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1732, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017410, 2003. a
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D.: Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107, 2010. a, b
DeMott, P. J., Hill T. C., McCluskey C. S., Prather, K. A., Collins, D. B., Sullivan, R. C., Ruppel, M. J., Mason, R. H., Irish, V. E., Lee, T., Hwang, C. Y., Rhee, T. S., Snider, J. R., McMeeking, G. R., Dhaniyala, S., Lewis, E. R., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J. P. D., Lee, C., Sultana, C. M., Ault, A. P., Axson, J. L., Diaz Martinez M., Venero, I., Santos-Figueroa, G., Stokes, M. D., Deane, G. B., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., Grassian, V. H., Bertram, T. H., Bertram, A. K., Moffett, B. F., and Franc, G. D.: Sea spray aerosol as a unique source of ice nucleating particles, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5797–5803, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514034112, 2016. a, b, c, d, e, f
Després, V., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A., Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M., Pöschl, U., and Jaenicke, R.: Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere: a review, Tellus B, 64, 15598, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598, 2012. a, b, c, d, e
Doherty, O., Riemer, N., and Hameed, S.: Saharan mineral dust transport into the Caribbean: Observed atmospheric controls and trends, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D07211, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009171, 2008. a
Espinosa, A., Miranda, J., and Pineda, J.: Uncertainty evaluation in correlated quantities: application to elemental analysis of atmospheric aerosols, Rev. Mex. Fis., E56, 134–140, 2010. a
Espinosa, A., Reyes-Herrera, J., Miranda, J., Mercado, F., Veytia, M., Cuautle, M., and Cruz, J.: Development of an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer for environmental science applications, Instrum. Sci. Technol., 40, 603–617, https://doi.org/10.1080/10739149.2012.693560, 2012. a
Failor, K., Schmale Iii, D., Vinatzer, B., and Monteil, C. L.: Ice nucleation active bacteria in precipitation are genetically diverse and nucleate ice by employing different mechanisms, ISME J., 11, 2740, https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2017.124, 2017. a
Field, P. R., Lawson, R. P., Brown, P. R., Lloyd, G., Westbrook, C., Moisseev, D., Miltenberger, A., Nenes, A., Blyth, A., Choularton, T., Connolly, P., Buehl, J., Crosier, J., Cui, Z., Dearden, C., DeMott, P., Flossmann, A., Heymsfield, A., Huang, Y., Kalesse, H., Kanji, Z.A., Korolev, A., Kirchgaessner, A., Lasher-Trapp, S., Leisner, T., McFarquhar, G., Phillips, V., Stith, J., and Sullivan, S.: Secondary Ice Production: Current State of the Science and Recommendations for the Future, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 7.1–7.20, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0014.1, 2017. a, b
Fitzgerald, J. W.: Marine aerosols: A review, Atmos. Environ., 25, 533–545, https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(91)90050-H, 1991. a
Frías-De León, M. G., Duarte-Escalante, E., del Carmen Calderón-Ezquerro, M., del Carmen Jiménez-Martínez, M., Acosta-Altamirano, G., Moreno-Eutimio, M. A., Zúñiga, G., García-González, R., Ramírez-Pérez, M., and del Rocío Reyes-Montes, M.: Diversity and characterization of airborne bacteria at two health institutions, Aerobiologia, 32, 187–198, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10453-015-9389-z, 2016. a
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Hill, T. C. J., Pummer, B. G., Yordanova, P., Franc, G. D., and Pöschl, U.: Ice nucleation activity in the widespread soil fungus Mortierella alpina, Biogeosciences, 12, 1057–1071, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-1057-2015, 2015. a, b
Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Kampf, C. J., Weber, B., Huffman, J. A., Pöhlker, C., Andreae, M. O., Lang-Yona, N., Burrows, S. M., Gunthe, S. S., Elbert,W., Su, H., Hoor, P., Thines, E., Hoffmann, T., Després, V. R., and Pöschl, U.: Bioaerosols in the Earth system: Climate, health, and ecosystem interactions, Atmos. Res., 182, 346–376, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.07.018, 2016. a
Galtier, N., Gouy, M., and Gautier, C.: SEAVIEW and PHYLO_WIN: two graphic tools for sequence alignment and molecular phylogeny, Bioinformatics, 12, 543–548, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/12.6.543, 1996. a
Guzmán, G.: New species of fungi from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mycotaxon, 1982. a
Guzman, G. N.: Inventorying the fungi of Mexico, Biodivers. Conserv., 7, 369–384, 1998. a
Hallett, J. and Mossop, S.: Production of secondary ice particles during the riming process, Nature, 249, 26–28, https://doi.org/10.1038/249026a0, 1974. a
Hill, T. C., DeMott, P., Conen, F., and Möhler, O.: Impacts of Bioaerosols on Atmospheric Ice Nucleation Processes, Microbiol. Aerosol., p. 197, 2017. a
Hobbs, P. V. and Atkinson, D. G.: The concentrations of ice particles in orographic clouds and cyclonic storms over the Cascade Mountains, J. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1362–1374, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033<1362:TCOIPI>2.0.CO;2, 1976. a
Hoose, C. and Möhler, O.: Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9817–9854, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012, 2012. a, b, c, d
Hoose, C., Kristjánsson, J., and Burrows, S.: How important is biological ice nucleation in clouds on a global scale?, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 024009, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/024009, 2010. a
Hurtado, L., Rodríguez, G., López, J., Castillo, J., Molina, L., Zavala, M., and Quintana, P. J.: Characterization of atmospheric bioaerosols at 9 sites in Tijuana, Mexico, Atmos. Environ., 96, 430–436, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.07.018, 2014. a, b
IAEA: Manual for QXAS, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, 1997. a
Irish, V. E., Elizondo, P., Chen, J., Chou, C., Charette, J., Lizotte, M., Ladino, L. A., Wilson, T. W., Gosselin, M., Murray, B. J., Polishchuk, E., Abbatt, J. P. D., Miller, L. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice-nucleating particles in Canadian Arctic sea-surface microlayer and bulk seawater, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10583–10595, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10583-2017, 2017. a
Irish, V. E., Hanna, S. J., Willis, M. D., China, S., Thomas, J. L., Wentzell, J. J. B., Cirisan, A., Si, M., Leaitch, W. R., Murphy, J. G., Abbatt, J. P. D., Laskin, A., Girard, E., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice nucleating particles in the marine boundary layer in the Canadian Arctic during summer 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1027–1039, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1027-2019, 2019. a, b, c
Islebe, G. A., Calmé, S., León-Cortés, J. L., and Schmook, B.: Biodiversity and conservation of the Yucatán Peninsula, Springer, 2015. a
Kanji, Z. A., Ladino, L. A., Wex, H., Boose, Y., Burkert-Kohn, M., Cziczo, D. J., and Krämer, M.: Overview of ice nucleating particles, Meteorol. Monogr., 58, 1.1–1.33, https://doi.org/10.1175/AMSMONOGRAPHS-D-16-0006.1, 2017. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Kishcha, P., da Silva, A. M., Starobinets, B., Long, C. N., Kalashnikova, O., and Alpert, P.: Meridional distribution of aerosol optical thickness over the tropical Atlantic Ocean, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 14, 23309–23339, https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-14-23309-2014, 2014. a
Knopf, D., Alpert, P., Wang, B., and Aller, J.: Stimulation of ice nucleation by marine diatoms, Nat. Geosci., 4, 88–90, https://doi.org/10.1038/NGEO1037, 2011. a
Knutson, T. R., McBride, J. L., Chan, J., Emanuel, K., Holland, G., Landsea, C., Held, I., Kossin, J. P., Srivastava, A., and Sugi, M.: Tropical cyclones and climate change, Nat. Geosci., 3, 157–163, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo779, 2010. a
Ladino Moreno, L. A., Stetzer, O., and Lohmann, U.: Contact freezing: a review of experimental studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9745–9769, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9745-2013, 2013. a, b
Ladino, L., Yakobi-Hancock, J., Kilthau, W., Mason, R., Si, M., Li, J., Miller, L., Schiller, C., Huffman, J., Aller, J., Knopf, D. A., Bertram, A. K., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Addressing the ice nucleating abilities of marine aerosol: A combination of deposition mode laboratory and field measurements, Atmos. Environ., 132, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.028, 2016. a
Landsea, C.: Counting Atlantic tropical cyclones back to 1900, Eos, 88, 197–202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007EO180001, 2007. a
Lane, D.: 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, in: Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics, edited by: Stackebrandt, E. and Goodfellow, M., 115–175, 1991. a, b
Lenes, J., Prospero, J., Landing, W., Virmani, J., and Walsh, J.: A model of Saharan dust deposition to the eastern Gulf of Mexico, Mar. Chem., 134, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2012.02.007, 2012. a
Lighthart, B.: Mini-review of the concentration variations found inthe alfresco atmospheric bacterial populations, Aerobiologia, 16, 7–16, 2000. a
Limpert, E., Stahel, W. A., and Abbt, M.: Log-normal distributions across the sciences: keys and clues: on the charms of statistics, and how mechanical models resembling gambling machines offer a link to a handy way to characterize log-normal distributions, which can provide deeper insight into variability and probability-normal or log-normal: that is the question, BioScience, 51, 341–352, https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2001)051[0341:LNDATS]2.0.CO;2, 2001. a
Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-715-2005, 2005. a
Maldonado, L. A., Stach, J. E., Ward, A. C., Bull, A. T., and Goodfellow, M.: Characterisation of micromonosporae from aquatic environments using molecular taxonomic methods, Anton. Leeuw., 94, 289–298, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-008-9244-0, 2008. a
Maldonado, L. A., Fragoso-Yáñez, D., Pérez-García, A., Rosellón-Druker, J., and Quintana, E. T.: Actinobacterial diversity from marine sediments collected in Mexico, Anton. Leeuw., 95, 111–120, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-008-9294-3, 2009. a, b
Mason, R. H., Chou, C., McCluskey, C. S., Levin, E. J. T., Schiller, C. L., Hill, T. C. J., Huffman, J. A., DeMott, P. J., and Bertram, A. K.: The micro-orifice uniform deposit impactor-droplet freezing technique (MOUDI-DFT) for measuring concentrations of ice nucleating particles as a function of size: improvements and initial validation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2449–2462, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2449-2015, 2015a. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Mason, R. H., Si, M., Li, J., Chou, C., Dickie, R., Toom-Sauntry, D., Pöhlker, C., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Ladino, L. A., Jones, K., Leaitch, W. R., Schiller, C. L., Abbatt, J. P. D., Huffman, J. A., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice nucleating particles at a coastal marine boundary layer site: correlations with aerosol type and meteorological conditions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12547–12566, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12547-2015, 2015b. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
Mason, R. H., Si, M., Chou, C., Irish, V. E., Dickie, R., Elizondo, P., Wong, R., Brintnell, M., Elsasser, M., Lassar, W. M., Pierce, K. M., Leaitch, W. R., MacDonald, A. M., Platt, A., Toom-Sauntry, D., Sarda-Estève, R., Schiller, C. L., Suski, K. J., Hill, T. C. J., Abbatt, J. P. D., Huffman, J. A., DeMott, P. J., and Bertram, A. K.: Size-resolved measurements of ice-nucleating particles at six locations in North America and one in Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 1637–1651, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-1637-2016, 2016. a, b, c, d, e
Mayol, E., Arrieta, J. M., Jiménez, M. A., Martínez-Asensio, A., Garcias-Bonet, N., Dachs, J., González-Gaya, B., Royer, S.-J., Benítez-Barrios, V. M., Fraile-Nuez, E., and Duarte, C. M.: Long-range transport of airborne microbes over the global tropical and subtropical ocean, Nat. Commun., 8, 1–9, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00110-9, 2017. a
McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C., Malfatti, F., Sultana, C. M., Lee, C., Santander, M. V., Beall, C. M., Moore, K. A., Cornwell, G. C., Collins, D. B., Prather, K. A., Jayarathne, T., Stone, E. A., Azam, F., Kreidenweis, S. M., and DeMott, P. J.: A Dynamic Link between Ice Nucleating Particles Released in Nascent Sea Spray Aerosol and Oceanic Biological Activity during Two Mesocosm Experiments, J. Atmos. Sci., 74, 151–166, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-16-0087.1, 2017. a
Michaud, J., Luke, T., Drishti, K., Josh, E., Alexander, R., Zhenjiang, Z., Christopher, L., Kevin, P., Charlotte, B., Francesca, M., Farooq, A., Rob, K., Michael, B., Christopher, D., and Kimberly, P.: Taxon-specific aerosolization of bacteria and viruses in an experimental ocean-atmosphere mesocosm, Nat. Commun., 18, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04409-z, 2018. a
Morales, J. L., Cantillo-Ciau, Z. O., Sánchez-Molina, I., and Mena-Rejón, G. J.: Screening of antibacterial and antifungal activities of six marine macroalgae from coasts of Yucatan peninsula, Pharm. Biol., 44, 632–635, https://doi.org/10.1080/13880200600897569, 2006. a
Mülmenstädt, J., Sourdeval, O., Delanoë, J., and Quaas, J.: Frequency of occurrence of rain from liquid-, mixed-, and ice-phase clouds derived from A-Train satellite retrievals, Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 6502–6509, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064604, 2015. a
Murray, B., O'sullivan, D., Atkinson, J., and Webb, M.: Ice nucleation by particles immersed in supercooled cloud droplets, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6519–6554, https://doi.org/10.1039/C2CS35200A, 2012. a, b, c
Nenes, A., Murray, B., and Bougiatioti, A.: Mineral dust and its microphysical interactions with clouds, in: Mineral Dust, 287–325, Springer, 2014. a
O'Dowd, C. D., Facchini, M. C., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Mircea, M., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Yoon, Y. J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Biogenically driven organic contribution to marine aerosol, Nature, 431, 676–680, https://doi.org/10.1038/Nature02959, 2004. a
Patterson, E., Kiang, C., Delany, A., Wartburg, A., Leslie, A., and Huebert, B.: Global measurements of aerosols in remote continental and marine regions: Concentrations, size distributions, and optical properties, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 7361–7376, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC085iC12p07361, 1980. a
Phillips, V. T., Donner, L. J., and Garner, S. T.: Nucleation processes in deep convection simulated by a cloud-system-resolving model with double-moment bulk microphysics, J. Atmos. Sci., 64, 738–761, https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3869.1, 2007. a
Prather, K. A., Bertram, T. H., Grassian, V. H., Deane, G. B., Stokes, M. D., DeMott, P. J., Aluwihare, L. I., Palenik, B. P., Azam, F., Seinfeld, J. H., Moffet, R. C., Molina, M. J., Cappa, C. D., Geiger, F. M., Roberts, G. C., Russell, L. M., Ault, A. P., Baltrusaitis, J., Collins, D. B., Corrigan, C. E., Cuadra-Rodriguez, L. A., Ebben, C. J., Forestieri, S. D., Guasco, T. L., Hersey, S. P., Kim, M. J., Lambert, W. F., Modini, R. L., Mui, W., Pedler, B. E., Ruppel, M. J., Ryder, O. S., Schoepp, N. G., Sullivan, R. C., and Zhao, D.: Bringing the ocean into the laboratory to probe the chemical complexity of sea spray aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110, 7550–7555, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1300262110, 2013. a
Price, H., Baustian, K., McQuaid, J., Blyth, A., Bower, K., Choularton, T., Cotton, R., Cui, Z., Field, P., Gallagher, M., Hawker, R., Merrington, A., Miltenberger, A., Neely III, R. R., Parker, S. T., Rosenberg, P. D., Taylor, J. W., Trembath, J., Vergara-Temprado, J., Whale, T. F., Wilson, T. W., Young, G., and Murray, B. J.: Atmospheric Ice-Nucleating Particles in the Dusty Tropical Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res, 123, 2175–2193, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027560, 2018. a, b
Prospero, J. M. and Lamb, P. J.: African droughts and dust transport to the Caribbean: Climate change implications, Science, 302, 1024–1027, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089915, 2003. a
Ramanathan, V., Cess, R., Harrison, E., Minnis, P., Barkstrom, B., Ahmad, E., and Hartmann, D.: Cloud-radiative forcing and climate: Results from the Earth Radiation Budget Experiment, Science, 243, 57–63, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.243.4887.57, 1989. a
Ríos, B., Torres-Jardón, R., Ramírez-Arriaga, E., Martínez-Bernal, A., and Rosas, I.: Diurnal variations of airborne pollen concentration and the effect of ambient temperature in three sites of Mexico City, Int. J. Biometeorol., 60, 771–787, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-015-1061-3, 2016. a
Rosinski, J., Haagenson, P., Nagamoto, C., and Parungo, F.: Nature of ice-forming nuclei in marine air masses, J. Aerosol Sci., 18, 291–309, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(87)90024-3, 1987. a, b
Rosinski, J., Haagenson, P., Nagamoto, C., Quintana, B., Parungo, F., and Hoyt, S.: Ice-forming nuclei in air masses over the Gulf of Mexico, J. Aerosol Sci., 19, 539–551, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(88)90206-6, 1988. a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h
Santos-Burgoa, C., Rosas, I., and Yela, A.: Occurrence of airborne enteric bacteria in Mexico City, Aerobiología, 10, 39–45, 1994. a
Savoie, D. and Prospero, J.: Water-soluble potassium, calcium, and magnesium in the aerosols over the tropical North Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 85, 385–392, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC085iC01p00385, 1980. a
Schnell, R.: Ice nuclei produced by laboratory cultured marine phytoplankton, Geophys. Res. Lett., 2, 500–502, https://doi.org/10.1029/GL002i011p00500, 1975. a
Schnell, R.: Ice nuclei in seawater, fog water and marine air off the coast of Nova Scotia: Summer 1975, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1299–1305, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1299:INISFW>2.0.CO;2, 1977. a
Schnell, R.: Airborne ice nucleus measurements around the Hawaiian Islands, J. Geophys. Res, 87, 8886–8890, https://doi.org/10.1029/JC087iC11p08886, 1982. a, b
Schnell, R. and Vali, G.: Freezing nuclei in marine waters, Tellus, 27, 321–323, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1975.tb01682.x, 1975. a
SEDESOL: Secretaria de desarrollo social: Catalogo de localidades, available at: http://www.microrregiones.gob.mx/catloc/contenido.aspx?refnac=310380004 (last access: November 2018), 2015. a
Seifert, P., Ansmann, A., Gross, S., Freudenthaler, V., Heinold, B., Hiebsch, A., Mattis, I., Schmidt, J., Schnell, F., Tesche, M., Wandinger, U., and Wiegner, M.: Ice formation in ash-influenced clouds after the eruption of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in April 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, D00U04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015702, 2011. a
Seinfeld, J. H., Bretherton, C., Carslaw, K. S., Coe, H., DeMott, P. J., Dunlea, E. J., Feingold, G., Ghan, S., Guenther, A. B., Kahn, R., Kraucunas, I., Kreidenweis, S. M., Molina, M. J., Nenes, A., Penner, J. E., Prather, K. A., Ramanathan, V., Ramaswamy, V., Rasch, P. J., Ravishankara, A. R., Rosenfeld, D., Stephens, J., and Wood, R.: Improving our fundamental understanding of the role of aerosol-cloud interactions in the climate system, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 5781–5790, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514043113, 2016. a
Sesartic, A., Lohmann, U., and Storelvmo, T.: Bacteria in the ECHAM5-HAM global climate model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 8645–8661, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8645-2012, 2012. a
Si, M., Irish, V. E., Mason, R. H., Vergara-Temprado, J., Hanna, S. J., Ladino, L. A., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Schiller, C. L., Wentzell, J. J. B., Abbatt, J. P. D., Carslaw, K. S., Murray, B. J., and Bertram, A. K.: Ice-nucleating ability of aerosol particles and possible sources at three coastal marine sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15669–15685, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15669-2018, 2018. a, b
Si, M., Evoy, E., Yun, J., Xi, Y., Hanna, S. J., Chivulescu, A., Rawlings, K., Veber, D., Platt, A., Kunkel, D., Hoor, P., Sharma, S., Leaitch, W. R., and Bertram, A. K.: Concentrations, composition, and sources of ice-nucleating particles in the Canadian High Arctic during spring 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 3007–3024, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-3007-2019, 2019. a
Stein, A., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1, 2015. a
Stevens, B. and Feingold, G.: Untangling aerosol effects on clouds and precipitation in a buffered system, Nature, 461, 607–613, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08281, 2009. a
Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G., Tignor, M., Allen, S., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P.: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Intergovernmental panel on climate change, working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth assessment report (AR5), New York, 2013. a
Stopelli, E., Conen, F., Guilbaud, C., Zopfi, J., Alewell, C., and Morris, C. E.: Ice nucleators, bacterial cells and Pseudomonas syringae in precipitation at Jungfraujoch, Biogeosciences, 14, 1189–1196, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-1189-2017, 2017. a, b
Twohy, C. H., McMeeking, G. R., DeMott, P. J., McCluskey, C. S., Hill, T. C. J., Burrows, S. M., Kulkarni, G. R., Tanarhte, M., Kafle, D. N., and Toohey, D. W.: Abundance of fluorescent biological aerosol particles at temperatures conducive to the formation of mixed-phase and cirrus clouds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8205–8225, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8205-2016, 2016. a
Vali, G., DeMott, P. J., Möhler, O., and Whale, T. F.: Technical Note: A proposal for ice nucleation terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10263–10270, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10263-2015, 2015. a
Vergara-Temprado, J., Murray, B. J., Wilson, T. W., O'Sullivan, D., Browse, J., Pringle, K. J., Ardon-Dryer, K., Bertram, A. K., Burrows, S. M., Ceburnis, D., DeMott, P. J., Mason, R. H., O'Dowd, C. D., Rinaldi, M., and Carslaw, K. S.: Contribution of feldspar and marine organic aerosols to global ice nucleating particle concentrations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3637–3658, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3637-2017, 2017. a
Videla, H. A., Guiamet, P. S., and de Saravia, S. G.: Biodeterioration of Mayan archaeological sites in the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico, Int. Biodeter. Biodegr., 46, 335–341, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(00)00106-2, 2000. a
Welti, A., Müller, K., Fleming, Z. L., and Stratmann, F.: Concentration and variability of ice nuclei in the subtropical maritime boundary layer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5307–5320, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5307-2018, 2018. a, b, c, d, e, f, g
Wex, H., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Boose, Y., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Diehl, K., Dreyer, A., Frank, F., Hartmann, S., Hiranuma, N., Jantsch, E., Kanji, Z. A., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Möhler, O., Niedermeier, D., Nillius, B., Rösch, M., Rose, D., Schmidt, C., Steinke, I., and Stratmann, F.: Intercomparing different devices for the investigation of ice nucleating particles using Snomax® as test substance, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1463–1485, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1463-2015, 2015. a, b
Whigham, D. F., Olmsted, I., Cano, E. C., and Harmon, M. E.: The impact of Hurricane Gilbert on trees, litterfall, and woody debris in a dry tropical forest in the northeastern Yucatan Peninsula, Biotropica, 23, 434–441, https://doi.org/10.2307/2388263, 1991. a
Wilson, T. W., Ladino, L. A., Alpert, P. A., Breckels, M. N., Brooks, I. M., Burrows, S. M., Carslaw, K. S., Huffman, J. A., Judd, C., Kilthau, W. P., Mason, R. H., McFiggans, G., Miller, L. A., Najera, J. J., Polishchuk, E., Rae, S., Schiller, C. L., Si, M., Vergara Temprado, J., Whale, T. H., Wong, J. P. S., Wurl, O., Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Aller, J. Y., Bertram, A. K., Knopf, D. A., and Murray, B. J..: A marine biogenic source of atmospheric ice-nucleating particles, Nature, 525, 234–238, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14986, 2015. a, b, c, d
Winkler, P.: Relative humidity and the adhesion of atmospheric particles to the plates of impactors, J. Aerosol Sci., 5, 235–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(74)90058-5, 1974. a
Yakobi-Hancock, J. D., Ladino, L. A., and Abbatt, J. P.: Review of Recent Developments and Shortcomings in the Characterization of Potential Atmospheric Ice Nuclei: Focus on the Tropics, Revista de Ciencias, 17, 15–34, https://doi.org/10.25100/rc.v17i3.476, 2014. a
Yankofsky, S., Levin, Z., Bertold, T., and Sandlerman, N.: Some basic characteristics of bacterial freezing nuclei, J. Appl. Meteorol., 20, 1013–1019, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1981)020<1013:SBCOBF>2.0.CO;2, 1981. a
Yun, Y. and Penner, J. E.: An evaluation of the potential radiative forcing and climatic impact of marine organic aerosols as heterogeneous ice nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 40, 4121–4126, https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50794, 2013. a