Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
ACP | Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 327–348, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-327-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 327–348, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-327-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 09 Jan 2019

Research article | 09 Jan 2019

Quantification and evaluation of atmospheric pollutant emissions from open biomass burning with multiple methods: a case study for the Yangtze River Delta region, China

Yang Yang and Yu Zhao
Download
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Yu Zhao on behalf of the Authors (10 Nov 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (13 Nov 2018) by Hailong Wang
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (30 Nov 2018)
ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (30 Nov 2018) by Hailong Wang
AR by Yu Zhao on behalf of the Authors (10 Dec 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (13 Dec 2018) by Hailong Wang
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We estimated and evaluated the air pollutant emissions from open biomass burning in the Yangtze River Delta with three methods. Chemistry transport modeling indicated that the constraining method provided the best emissions. The traditional bottom-up method could often overestimate emissions and could hardly track their interannual trends. The emissions based on fire radiative power might be underestimated, which is attributed to the satellite detection limit on small fires.
We estimated and evaluated the air pollutant emissions from open biomass burning in the Yangtze...
Citation