Articles | Volume 19, issue 23
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15157-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-15157-2019
Research article
 | 
13 Dec 2019
Research article |  | 13 Dec 2019

Evaluating wildfire emissions projection methods in comparisons of simulated and observed air quality

Uma Shankar, Donald McKenzie, Jeffrey P. Prestemon, Bok Haeng Baek, Mohammed Omary, Dongmei Yang, Aijun Xiu, Kevin Talgo, and William Vizuete

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Uma Shankar on behalf of the Authors (09 Oct 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (15 Oct 2019) by Stefano Galmarini
AR by Uma Shankar on behalf of the Authors (25 Oct 2019)  Author's response    Manuscript
Download
Short summary
We evaluate two wildfire emissions estimates for the southeastern US, based on projected annual areas burned in 2011–2060, against a benchmark wildfire inventory in air quality (AQ) simulations for 2010 and AQ network observations. Our emissions estimates compare well with the benchmark but all three simulations have large biases compared to observations. We find our methods suitable to assess current and future wildfire AQ impacts but also identify areas for AQ model improvements.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint