Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
ACP | Articles | Volume 19, issue 18
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11743–11764, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11743-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: EARLINET aerosol profiling: contributions to atmospheric and...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11743–11764, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11743-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 23 Sep 2019

Research article | 23 Sep 2019

EARLINET evaluation of the CATS Level 2 aerosol backscatter coefficient product

Emmanouil Proestakis et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,250 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
869 369 12 1,250 14 16
  • HTML: 869
  • PDF: 369
  • XML: 12
  • Total: 1,250
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 16
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Feb 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,086 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,078 with geography defined and 8 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 05 Jun 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
To increase accuracy and validate satellite-based products, comparison with ground-based reference observations is required. To do this, we present evaluation activity of EARLINET for the qualitative and quantitative assessment of NASA's CATS lidar operating aboard the International Space Station (ISS) while identified discrepancies are discussed. Better understanding CATS performance and limitations provides a valuable basis for scientific studies implementing the satellite-based lidar system.
To increase accuracy and validate satellite-based products, comparison with ground-based...
Citation