Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
ACP | Articles | Volume 19, issue 1
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 115-138, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-115-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 115-138, 2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-115-2019
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Review article 04 Jan 2019

Review article | 04 Jan 2019

Atmospheric new particle formation in China

Atmospheric new particle formation in China
Biwu Chu1, Veli-Matti Kerminen1, Federico Bianchi1,2, Chao Yan1, Tuukka Petäjä1,3, and Markku Kulmala1,2 Biwu Chu et al.
  • 1Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 2Aerosol and Haze Laboratory, Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Soft Matter Science and Engineering, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing, China
  • 3Joint International Research Laboratory of Atmospheric and Earth System Sciences, School of Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China
Abstract
Back to toptop

New particle formation (NPF) studies in China were summarized comprehensively in this paper. NPF frequency, formation rate, and particle growth rate were closely compared among the observations carried out at different types of sites in different regions of China in different seasons, with the aim of exploring the nucleation and particle growth mechanisms. The interactions between air pollution and NPF are discussed, emphasizing the properties of NPF under heavy pollution conditions. The current understanding of NPF cannot fully explain the frequent occurrence of NPF at high aerosol loadings in China, and possible reasons for this phenomenon are proposed. The effects of NPF and some aspects of NPF research requiring further investigation are also summarized in this paper.

1 Introduction
Back to toptop

Atmospheric aerosols have adverse effects on human health and visibility, and cause severe air pollution in many countries (Kaiser, 2005; Cheng et al., 2011; Hand and Malm, 2007; Lelieveld et al., 2015). In addition, aerosol particles influence the Earth's radiation balance due to their direct extinction of light and their capability to serve as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice nuclei (IN). These influences result in very high uncertainties in predicting ongoing climate change (IPCC, 2013). In order to understand these effects better, and especially to reduce the uncertainty of evaluating their role in climate change, comprehensive knowledge about the formation and growth of aerosol particles in the atmosphere is required. Atmospheric new particle formation (NPF) is the dominant source of atmospheric aerosol particles on a global scale in terms of number concentrations and has attracted a wide range of attention for couple of decades (Kulmala et al., 2004, 2013; Merikanto et al., 2009; Dunne et al., 2016).

Generally, NPF includes the following separate steps: (1) chemical reactions in the gas phase to produce low-volatility vapour(s), (2) cluster formation from gaseous vapours, (3) nucleation or barrierless nucleation, (4) activation of clusters with a second group of vapours to form a critical nucleated particle, and (5) subsequent condensational growth of nucleated particles to detectable sizes or even larger (Kulmala et al., 2014). NPF starts from atmospheric clustering. The key precursors of clusters have extremely low-volatility, including sulfuric acid (Sipilä et al., 2010; Kirkby et al., 2011) and highly oxygenated molecules (HOMs) (Bianchi et al., 2016; Tröstl et al., 2016; Kirkby et al., 2016; Ehn et al., 2014). Molecular clusters seem to be continuously generated almost everywhere and all the time (Kulmala et al., 2017). These clusters can be further stabilized by reacting with other gaseous compounds like amines, ammonia, and HOMs, or through electrostatic interactions in the presence of ions (Kirkby et al., 2016), after which they will grow to larger nanoparticles or will be scavenged by existing surfaces. Therefore, there are two main factors controlling whether NPF will be detected in the atmosphere. One is how fast the clusters grow, while the other is how fast the clusters are scavenged (McMurry and Friedlander, 1979; Kerminen et al., 2001; McMurry et al., 2005; Kuang et al., 2010). Sulfuric acid and organics are the main contributors to aerosol growth. Generally, condensation of sulfuric acid gives an important, sometimes dominant, contribution to the initial growth, while organics became more and more important as the particle size is increased (Xiao et al., 2015; Kulmala et al., 2016b). High concentrations of these growth contributors will help the nanoclusters grow to sizes large enough be detected. Meanwhile, pre-existing aerosol particles act as a sink for these precursors, small clusters, and newly formed particles and thereby suppress the occurrence of an NPF event.

Several gas compounds and precursors have been shown to influence NPF under conditions relevant to the atmosphere, such as SO2/H2SO4 (Sipilä et al., 2010), NH3 (Kirkby et al., 2011; Kürten et al., 2016), amines (Almeida et al., 2013), volatile organic compounds (VOCs)/HOMs (Riccobono et al., 2014; Ehn et al., 2014; Bianchi et al., 2016), NOx (Wildt et al., 2014) and iodine species (Sipilä et al., 2016). Meanwhile, many of these compounds are responsible for secondary aerosol formation, which is very pronounced during pollution episodes (R. Zhang et al., 2015; Guo et al., 2014). The concentrations of these precursors and pre-existing aerosol particles can both be high in polluted cities, especially in the developing countries like China and India, and cause some special features in NPF events compared with cleaner environments, which we cannot explain yet (Kulmala et al., 2017). In China, rapid economic development and urbanization have led to high emissions of various pollutants from coal combustion, motor vehicle exhausts and various industrial emissions, and resulted in highly complex air pollution. Besides high concentrations of fine particles (PM2.5, particulate matter with diameters less than 2.5 µm), high concentrations of SO2, NOx, NH3, and VOCs were observed in frequent haze pollution episodes (Liu et al., 2013; Ye et al., 2011; Zou et al., 2015; L. Wang et al., 2015). Due to a large proportion of energy supply from coal combustion, the concentration of SO2 was thought to be the highest in the world (Bauduin et al., 2016), with surface concentrations in the range of a few ppb to over 100 ppb in northern China (Sun et al., 2009; Li et al., 2007). The emissions and concentrations of SO2 decreased in most regions of China in recent years (Lu et al., 2010; S. W. Wang et al., 2015), but high concentrations (dozens of or over 100 ppb) of SO2 are still being frequently observed during the heating period in winter (L. Wang et al., 2015; Q. Zhang et al., 2015). Unlike SO2, emissions of NOx are also closely related to traffic. NOx emissions in China showed a decreasing trend from 2012 onwards, which appeared later than SO2 (Ronald et al., 2017). Several studies have found that high PM2.5 concentrations are strongly associated with the increasing concentrations of NOx (Y. Wang et al., 2013; He et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2016). NOx concentrations usually range from a few ppb to dozens of ppb in Chinese cities, while during severe haze pollution episodes NOx concentration in the city centre can be even higher than 300 ppb (He et al., 2014; Sun et al., 2016). For the most important alkaline gas, i.e. NH3, there has been no national-scale measurement in China despite its extensive emissions and increasing emission trend (Fu et al., 2015). High concentrations of NH3 (maximum concentration higher than 100 ppb) (Z. Meng et al., 2015; Wen et al., 2015; Meng et al., 2011, 2018; Pan et al., 2012, 2018) and strong correlations between the peak levels of fine particles and large increases in NH3 concentrations (Liu et al., 2015; Ye et al., 2011) were observed in the North China Plain. Unlike SO2, emissions of NH3 are mainly from non-point sources difficult to control. Emission of VOCs have a similar situation to NH3. The total emissions of VOCs in China were estimated to be still increasing in recent years (Wei et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2018; Sun et al., 2018). Observation data showed that the annual average mass concentration of total non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) was about 102µg m−3, or dozens of ppb at urban and suburban sites in Chinese cities, which is much higher than that in North America (H. Zhang et al., 2017; von Schneidemesser et al., 2010; Parrish et al., 2009; Zou et al., 2015). HOMs can be formed from anthropogenic VOCs (Molteni et al., 2018), although their role in new particle formation is still not clear, yet they might play an important role in NPF measured in Chinese megacities. High concentrations of these gas precursors have resulted in high concentrations of secondary inorganic and organic species in PM2.5 during haze formation (Yang et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2013; Dan et al., 2004; Duan et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2012), but how this cocktail of high concentrations of SO2, NOx, NH3, VOCs and particulate matter (or highly complex air pollution) influence NPF remains highly uncertain.

Atmospheric NPF has been observed globally in almost all kinds of environments (Kulmala et al., 2004, 2016b; Wang et al., 2017; Manninen et al., 2010; Nieminen et al., 2018; Kerminen et al., 2018). However, no uniform theory has been found that would explain the occurrence and characteristics of NPF in different atmospheric environments. Generally, NPF was observed less frequently than expected in pristine environments, while more often than theoretically predicted in polluted cities (Kulmala et al., 2017). In this study, we will summarize the NPF studies conducted in China, focusing on the properties of the NPF events in polluted regions and trying to figure out the possible reasons for the frequent occurrence of NPF at high aerosol loadings. Recently, Wang et al. (2017) summarized the techniques, recent advances, current bottlenecks and future directions in studying NPF in China, while this study will provide a more comprehensive summary of the characteristics of NPF and will emphasize the interactions between air quality and NPF.

https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/115/2019/acp-19-115-2019-f01

Figure 1Map of observation sites involving NPF study in China. Most of these observations sites were classified into four regions in this study, i.e. North China Plain (NCP), Yangtze River delta (YRD), Pearl River delta (PRD) and western China region (western).

Download

2 Overview of NPF research in China
Back to toptop

Field observation related to atmospheric NPF started around 2004 in China (Wu et al., 2007). After that, observations concerning NPF were carried out in the North China Plain (NCP), Yangtze River delta (YRD), Pearl River delta (PRD), western Chinese cities like Lanzhou, Xi'an, and Urumqi, and coastal cities as well as adjacent seas. NCP, YRD, and PRD are the most developed regions in China and they all have a high population density. The air pollution level decreases from NCP to PRD, or from north to south, among these three regions (Zhang and Cao, 2015). The western Chinese cities like Xi'an and Urumqi suffered from heavy air pollution. Xi'an was reported to have a much higher concentration of fine particles than Beijing in the NCP (Huang et al., 2014). In 2017, according to the reports of the Xi'an Environmental Protection Bureau (http://xaepb.xa.gov.cn/ptl/def/def/index_982_4434_ci_trid_2861812.html, last access: 12 October 2018), Xinjiang Department of Environmental Protection (http://www.xjepb.gov.cn/xjepb/resource/cms/article/2012/268650/2017.pdf, last access: 12 October 2018) and Beijing Municipal Environmental Protection Bureau (http://www.bjepb.gov.cn/bjhrb/resource/cms/2018/05/2018051614522475279.pdf, last access: 12 October 2018), the annual average PM2.5 concentrations were 73 and 70 µg m−3 in Xi'an and Urumqi, which were higher than that of Beijing (58 µg m−3).

A map of observation stations involving NPF studies in China is shown in Fig. 1. These observation sites include urban and suburban sites like Beijing, Shanghai, Nanjing, and Guangzhou; regional and rural sites like Shangdianzi, Yufa, SORPES (Nanjing University), Backgarden, and Kaiping; and mountain sites like Waliguan, Tai, Heng, and Huang, providing information on aerosol size distribution in different environments. Besides routine observations, comprehensive campaigns like PRIDE-PRD2004, CAREBeijing-2006, and CAREBeijing-2008 were also carried out for a better understanding of NPF and aerosol pollution in representative regions and periods in China. Long-term observations of NPF are relatively rare in China, and only a few studies reported NPF observations covering more than a 1-year period (Wu et al., 2007, 2011; Kivekäs et al., 2009; Yao et al., 2010; Shen et al., 2011; Qi et al., 2015; Peng et al., 2017). The relative short-period observations may not represent varying atmospheric conditions, and therefore, the applicability of these observation results may be limited to specific conditions.

Up to now, about 100 papers from about 20 groups have been published related to NPF in China. Most of these studies focused on the characterization of NPF events, such as the properties and time evolution of the particle size distribution, particle formation and growth rate, and condensation sink. Some of them also studied favourable conditions for NPF, including the influences of relative humidity (RH), temperature, wind speed and direction, and air mass origin. Few of these studies investigated NPF mechanisms involving the nucleation participants, the growth contributors and the scavenging process by preexisting aerosols, while some others investigated various effects of NPF, especially the contribution of NPF to atmospheric CCN.

Table 1Parameters to characterize NPF events.

Download Print Version | Download XLSX

The aerosol size distribution and its time evolution provide the basic information for studying NPF. Many studies about NPF in China measured only particles larger than 10 nm, while a few studies also measured particles with diameters in the range of 3–10 nm. In recent years, an increasing number of studies were carried out with measurements of sub-3 nanoparticles (Xiao et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2017; Cai and Jiang, 2017; Jayaratne et al., 2017; Dai et al., 2017; Lv et al., 2018; Yao et al., 2018), using a particle size magnifier (PSM), a neutral cluster and air ion spectrometer (NAIS) or a diethylene glycol scanning mobility particle spectrometer (DEG-SMPS). As for gas-phase precursors, direct measurements of H2SO4 were carried out with atmospheric pressure-ion drift-chemical ionization mass spectrometer (AP-ID-CIMS) in a few studies (Yue et al., 2010; Zheng et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2011), while other studies usually estimated H2SO4 concentrations using different proxies related to SO2, radiation, O3, and relative humidity (RH). Amines and ammonia are crucial in NPF since they are able to stabilize sulfuric acid clusters by forming acid-base complexes, yet there are very few NPF measurement results related to these compounds in China (J. Zheng et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2016, 2018). Measurement results on natural ions and neutral compounds and clusters were recently reported by Yao et al. (2018), including both H2SO4 and HOMs, obtained using an atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight mass spectrometer (APi-TOF-MS) and a nitrate-based chemical ionization–APi-TOF-MS (CI-APi-TOF-MS). Research on these relevant gaseous compounds, like HOMs, or on air ions, is still very limited in China. Comprehensive, long-term and high-quality relevant measurements are required for a better understanding of the nucleation and growth mechanisms of nanoparticles in China.

3 Characterization of NPF events in China
Back to toptop

A few basic parameters were used to characterize NPF events, which are listed in Table 1. Most of the NPF research in China calculated these parameters, as listed in Table 2. In the following chapters, we will summarize and discuss the measurement results of the frequency of NPF events, new particle formation rate (FR), particle growth rate (GR) and the related concentrations and source rate of condensation vapours. Although there were differences in calculating these parameters by different groups, we will not discuss much about the methodology, since the main purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the characteristics of NPF in China.

Table 2Characterization of NPF events in China.

Download XLSX

https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/115/2019/acp-19-115-2019-f02

Figure 2NPF frequency observed at different places in different seasons in China. The number on top of each column indicates the references of the data: 1 is Cai et al. (2017), 2 is Leng et al. (2014), 3 is Zhu et al. (2013), 4 is Yue et al. (2009), 5 is Zhang et al. (2011), 6 is Wang et al (2011), 7 is Peng et al. (2014), 8 is Yu et al. (2016), 9 is L. J. Shen et al. (2016a), 10 is Yue et al. (2013), 11 is Shen et al. (2016b), 12 is Dai et al. (2017), 13 is Jayaratne et al. (2017), 14 is Xiao et al. (2015), 15 is Tan et al. (2016), 16 is Wang et al. (2013b), 17 is Wu et al. (2007), 18 is Gao et al. (2011), 19 is Gao et al. (2012), 20 is Guo et al. (2012), 21 is X. H. Zhang et al. (2017), 22 is Herrmann et al. (2014), 23 is Peng et al. (2017), 24 is Qi et al. (2015), 25 is Wang et al. (2013d), 26 is Liu et al. (2008), 27 is X. J. Shen et al. (2016b), 28 is X. R. Zhang et al. (2017), 29 is Lv et al. (2018), and 30 is Liu et al. (2014).

Download

3.1 NPF frequency

The primary question in studying atmospheric NPF is whether it is taking place or not, i.e. to identify NPF events. Unfortunately, there is no unique mathematical criterion or definition for an NPF event. Dal Maso et al. (2005) suggested criteria for justifying an NPF event: a distinctly new mode of particles start in the nucleation-mode size range, prevail over a time span of hours, and show signs of growth. The particle growth is important for separating an NPF event from particles associated with local emission sources like traffic, especially when the particle size detection limit of the instruments is not low. In addition to NPF event days, the days with an absence of particles in the nucleation-mode size range are called non-event days. However, some days are not easily classified as either events or non-events, so they are usually classified as undefined days. Most NPF studies in China used similar methods, but certainly subjective biases existed. A challenge that exists to identify NPF is the interference of primarily emitted particles from local combustion sources near the observation site. For example, the formation and rapid growth of vehicular particles during the initial 1–2 s of exhaust cooling and dilution processes frequently lead to a nucleation mode at 10–20 nm (Vu et al., 2015; Lee et al., 2015). Spikes of particle number concentration associated with combustion emissions were observed in many NPF studies (Liu et al., 2014; D. W. Wang et al., 2014; Peng et al., 2017; Zhu et al., 2017), but these spikes usually had some different characteristics from those of the NPF events (D. W. Wang et al., 2014). The particle size (Hofman et al., 2016), the ratio of number concentrations of in the nucleation-mode particles to those of fine particles (Peng et al., 2017; Jung et al., 2013), the time of duration of NPF events (Zhu et al., 2017), and the correlation of the particle number concentration with other gaseous pollutant concentrations and meteorology conditions (D. W. Wang et al., 2014) were used to identify the contribution of primary emissions in the burst in growth of particle number concentration. However, there are still uncertainties in distinguishing the new-particle signal from the mixed signals of newly formed particles and freshly emitted particles from combustion, especially when NPF measurements were carried out with a particle size detection limit larger than 10 nm. There is a possibility that the growth of the vehicular emission of sub-10 nm particles may look like an NPF event and therefore overestimate the NPF frequency. A recent observation found a notable presence of traffic-originated nanocluster aerosol particles in the size range of 1.3–3.0 nm in urban air (Rönkkö et al., 2017), which might raise new questions about the sources of nanocluster aerosol particles in semi-urban roadside environments. In this study, as mentioned earlier, we will not pursue the details of the justifying methods, but focus on the results of the measurement statistics.

NPF events were observed with quite different frequencies ranging from less than 10 % to more than 50 % in different environments and different seasons. In Fig. 2, we summarize the reported NPF event frequencies in China according to the season, observation site type and region, but ignoring observations of too short a period like less than 1 month. Generally, low frequencies were observed in remote clean environments like above marginal seas (Liu et al., 2014), while there were no significant differences among urban, suburban and rural or regional sites. Although higher NPF event frequencies were sometimes observed in an urban site compared with a rural site in the same region (Yue et al., 2013), NPF was usually found to be a regional phenomenon in China. For example, NPF in the Beijing urban area always coincided with NPF at a regional site 120 km away (Wang et al., 2013b). Shen et al. (2018) observed regional NPF in the NCP with a horizontal extent larger than 500 km and found that large-scale regional NPF was favoured by a fast transport of northwesterly air masses. Despite the similar frequencies, much higher FR (by 220 %) and GR (by 50 %) were observed at the Beijing urban site than at the corresponding regional background site (Yue et al., 2009; Wang et al., 2013b). The corresponding values of a source rate of condensation vapours (Q), condensation vapour concentration (Ccv), and condensation sink (CS) were also larger at Beijing than those at the regional site Yufa by 40 %, 40 %, and 60 %, respectively (Yue et al., 2009). These results indicated that the higher pollution level in Chinese cities usually resulted in stronger NPF events compared to rural areas. As for different regions, there seemed to be no significant differences in the NPF event frequency between NCP, YRD and western Chinese cities. PRD had a relatively lower NPF frequency compared with these three regions, but the difference was not statistically significant. Despite different pollution conditions in different regions of China, there is a lack of long-term NPF observations, which limits our knowledge about the relationship between the level of air pollution and the occurrence of NPF. Air pollutants and meteorological features are usually studied together with nanoparticles and their precursors. By comparing the pollution character between NPF events and other days, the primary factors affecting NPF events might be identified. Cai et al. (2017) found that the Fuchs surface area (which is a representative parameter of coagulation scavenging based on kinetic theory and is proportional to CS) fundamentally determined the occurrence of NPF events in Beijing. The Fuchs surface area had a good correlation with the PM2.5 mass concentration, and no NPF event was observed when the daily mean PM2.5 concentration was higher than 43 µg m−3 in the winter of 2015 in Beijing (Jayaratne et al., 2017). However, in some cases, the CS or the average coagulation sinks during NPF events were not significantly lower compared to other times when new particles were not formed, indicating that other factors, such as the precursor vapours and photochemical activity, might also play an important role in driving NPF (Gong et al., 2010). Besides the condensation sink, NPF events seemed not to be very sensitive to the concentration levels of common gas pollutants in China, such as O3, SO2, and NO2 (Zhu et al., 2013; An et al., 2015). It was observed that SO2 concentrations were lower during the NPF event days than during non-event days in the NCP (Herrmann et al., 2014) and Taiwan (Young et al., 2013a), as well as during autumn and winter in the YRD (Qi et al., 2015), whereas higher SO2 concentrations on NPF days were only observed during spring and summer in the YRD (Qi et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016), during autumn in the PRD (Gong et al., 2010), and at mountain sites (X. R. Zhang et al., 2017). Meanwhile, based on the empirical parameter developed to judge whether NPF will occur or not, the exponent of SO2 in this empirical parameter was quite small, indicating that there is usually enough SO2 for NPF to occur under heavily polluted conditions (Herrmann et al., 2014). Similar results for sulfuric acid were reported and it was found that sulfuric acid concentrations were not significantly higher (even lower, sometimes) on NPF days compared with non-event days (Qi et al., 2015; Xiao et al., 2015; Cai et al., 2017). Overall, the previous results seem to suggest that SO2 was not a limiting factor for NPF in China, and a similar conclusion might also be made for sulfuric acid. However, higher SO2 concentrations could increase the probability of occurrence of NPF events at a mountaintop site (Lv et al., 2018). Besides, NPF might have different patterns in an environment with abundant SO2 or not. Stronger nucleation but weak growth of particles was observed with high concentrations of SO2 in polluted air masses characteristic of urban (heavy traffic emission) or power-plant plumes, in spite of similar CS with lower concentrations of SO2 (Gao et al., 2009; Yue et al., 2010).

NPF event frequencies were different between the different seasons. In northern China, spring is usually the season with the highest frequency of NPF events, which is probably due to the typically low CS, relatively high solar radiation intensity, and low temperature and RH (Shen et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2007). In the NCP of China, many studies observed that summer had the lowest NPF event frequency, although the condensable vapour concentration was the highest during summer months due to the enhanced photochemical process (Shen et al., 2011; Wu et al., 2007; Yue et al., 2009). The lowest frequency of NPF events during summertime in the NCP might be related to the high temperatures and RH, together with the stagnant and polluted air masses, which could cause a high CS (Wu et al., 2007). In the YRD region, high NPF event frequencies were observed in spring and summer, although the temperature and RH were high in summer (Zhu et al., 2013; Qi et al., 2015). A low temperature favours NPF (Zhu et al., 2013), but according to our summary, as shown in Fig. 2, low frequencies of the NPF event were usually observed in winter, which might be due to the weak solar radiation as well as typically high pollution levels at that time of the year. In spite of an increasing number of aerosol size distribution measurements in China, atmospheric NPF observations that cover the full annual cycle are still quite limited. Meanwhile, the main reason for the different NPF event frequencies in different seasons is still uncertain because many factors influencing NPF, such as the radiation intensity, temperature, relative humidity, wind properties, biogenic activity and anthropogenic emissions, tend to be changed simultaneously.

The NPF event frequency can also be quite different in air masses from different directions (Wu et al., 2007). Higher NPF event frequencies were usually observed within relatively clean air masses having a low CS (Zhu et al., 2013; An et al., 2015; Jayaratne et al., 2017; Peng et al., 2017). However, in some cases, NPF events also occurred in polluted air masses. For example, during the summer in Beijing, NPF was observed under low-wind-speed conditions and this phenomenon usually coincided with a wind direction change from north to south, where the air is more polluted (Zhang et al., 2011). Similarly, in Hong Kong, NPF was usually observed when air masses originated from the northwest to northeast directions (Guo et al., 2012). At the summit of Mt Tai, a continental air mass passing through more polluted areas also favoured NPF (Lv et al., 2018). Consecutive NPF events were observed in the presence of strong biomass-burning plume at a downwind rural site in the PRD (Wang et al., 2013d). Meanwhile, compared to the NPF events taking place in clean air masses, the FR seemed to be lower and the GR seemed to be higher in the NPF events taking place in a polluted air mass plume (Qi et al., 2015). An observation in the North China Plain reported that, when the air mass was transported from the polluted south area, the average PM10 (PM with diameter less than 10 µm) concentrations on NPF event days were higher than during the non-event days (Shen et al., 2011). In addition, air masses from polluted northern China favoured the occurrence of regional NPF, while clean air masses from the east usually caused local NPF in Nanjing in the YRD region (Dai et al., 2017). These results highlighted the complex relationship between air pollution and NPF. Many factors, including pre-existing aerosols, organic pollutants and SO2, are connected each other due to their similar emission sources, so it is not easy to extract the influence of one factor on NPF. Furthermore, since environments are complex and diverse, some other factors, such as the concentration of OH radicals and topography, can also be important to NPF and therefore deserve further investigation in both field observations and controlled experiments.

3.2 Formation rate

Due to the lack of measurements down to particle diameters of about 1.5 nm, most atmospheric nucleation rates were inferred indirectly only by measuring the particle formation rate at some larger size in most of the NPF studies in China. The FR at larger sizes (the “apparent” particle formation rate) can be related to the FR of critical clusters (the “real” nucleation rate) by the Kerminen–Kulmala equation and its revised version (Lehtinen et al., 2007; Kerminen and Kulmala, 2002), but the nuclei GR and coagulational scavenging rate (CoagS or CS) are needed. Besides, the assumed coagulation sticking probability of 1 for molecular clusters with pre-existing particles in their collision and the unclear GR of sub-3 nm particles might result in errors in the derivation of FR (Kulmala et al., 2017). We did not convert the “apparent” particle formation rate into “real” nucleation rate, but summarized FR calculated at different particle sizes in this study (Fig. 3). The observed FR ranged from less than 0.1 cm−3 s−1 at particle sizes larger than 10 nm to about 103 cm−3 s−1 at particle sizes below 2 nm. At a certain particle size, the FR could still differ by 2 orders of magnitude due to the different environmental conditions. For example, many studies reported the FR of 3 nm particles ranging from less than 1 to several tens of cm−3 s−1.

https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/115/2019/acp-19-115-2019-f03

Figure 3New particle FR observed at different places in different seasons in China. The line between two data points indicates that a range of FR was reported in the literature. The data are collected in the references in Table 2.

Download

Due to the wide range of FR under different environmental conditions, it is not easy to determine differences in FR between different site types, regions or seasons. In principle, a higher CS causes a more rapid scavenging of clusters and small particles, resulting in lower FR (Zhu et al., 2014; Man et al., 2015). According to the equation developed by Herrmann et al. (2014) based on the observation date in the YRD region, FR is also inversely proportional to the CS. However, when NPF was studied at an urban site and a nearby regional site at the same time, FR was usually higher at the urban site in spite of the higher CS, indicating much more abundant precursors for NPF in the polluted urban environment (Wang et al., 2013b). As for NPF at a same observation site but in different seasons, the highest FR was observed in summer in the NCP (Shen et al., 2011) and in spring in the YRD (Qi et al., 2015).

https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/115/2019/acp-19-115-2019-f04

Figure 4Particle GR observed in different seasons at a regional site in the YRD (a) and an urban and a regional site in the NCP (b) and some measurement results of GR and sulfuric acid (SA) contribution to the GR in different size ranges (c). The data are collected in the references indicated in the figure.

Download

Although the nucleation mechanism in different environmental conditions remains unknown according to current knowledge, neutral clusters of sulfuric acid, stabilized with additional vapours such as ammonia, amines, and HOMs should play a key role in NPF (Kulmala et al., 2013, 2014). A positive relationship between nucleation rate and the sulfuric acid concentration (or H2SO4 proxy) was observed in many NPF studies in China, although nucleation rates were rarely calculated using measurements of particles in the size range of 1–3 nm. The fitted exponent between FR and sulfuric acid concentration ranged from 0.65 to 2.4 (Cai et al., 2017; Xiao et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2017), while sometimes even higher values between 2.5 and 7 were found (Wang et al., 2011). These exponents were observed to increase with an increasing CS in Beijing (Wang et al., 2011). Besides sulfuric acid, organics, NH3 and amines were also found to be important in atmospheric particle nucleation (Z. B. Wang et al., 2015). As we mentioned earlier, although CS was much higher at urban sites, the FR was usually higher at corresponding regional sites (Wang et al., 2013b). Meanwhile, SO2 is a regional pollutant and its concentrations were similar between regional sites and city areas (He et al., 2014; Ma et al., 2018). These features indicate important roles of other gas precursors in NPF in the air pollution complex of China. In fact, some observations showed that the correlation between FR and NH3 was better than that between FR and H2S4 (Xiao et al., 2015). According to the national ammonia observation network, the overall average concentration of ammonia in China is much higher than the values observed in the US. The seasonal maximum NH3 concentrations were observed in the summer and the most abundant concentrations of NH3 were observed in the NCP region in China (Pan et al., 2018). Compared to NH3, the amine measurements are more sparse (J. Zheng et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2016), and direct information on amine emissions is currently not available but these emissions have to be estimated by assuming a fixed ratio or source-dependent ratios of amines to total ammonia emissions in China (Mao et al., 2018). Dai et al. (2017) proposed that plumes containing high concentrations of ammonia, amines or HOMs produced from their observed VOCs led to strong local NPF events. The observations made at the SORPES station in the YRD indicated that HOMs played an essential role in the initial condensational growth of newly formed clusters (Huang et al., 2016; Ding et al., 2016; Qi et al., 2018). Recently, Yao et al. (2018) reported a long-term continuous observation for NPF in urban Shanghai and observed 1 to 2 orders of magnitude higher FR than typical values in the clean atmosphere. These observed FR were far higher than those derived from H2SO4H2O or H2SO4NH3H2O mechanisms but close to those observed in the H2SO4–DMA–H2O laboratory experiments, and coincided with sulfuric acid clusters and sulfuric acid–dimethylamine (DMA) clusters. These results suggested that H2SO4–DMA–H2O nucleation played important roles in the NPF in Chinese megacities. Up to now, there are still quite limited investigations into the relation between FR and organics, NH3 and amines in China and it is certainly crucial for a better understanding of NPF in polluted areas. Ion-induced pure organic nucleation was proposed to be important according to chamber experiments (Kirkby et al., 2016), but seems to have a minor role in the polluted environment in China (Herrmann et al., 2014; Xiao et al., 2015; Yao et al., 2018). This is understandable because the ion production rate is usually much lower than FR in China.

3.3 Growth rate

Growth of nanoparticles is crucial for NPF. The GR determines the size that new particles can grow to before being scavenged; i.e. a higher GR results in a larger particle diameter (Zhu et al., 2014; Man et al., 2015). There are several methods that calculate GRs from the time variations of particle size distributions, such as the appearance time method (Kulmala et al., 2013) and mode-fitting method (Kulmala et al., 2012), or solving the general aerosol dynamics equation (Pichelstorfer et al., 2018).

Regardless of the possible difference caused by using different calculation methods, GRs reported in China varied a lot from an urban area to a rural region and from spring to winter, ranging from a few nm h−1 to more than 20 nm h−1 (Table 2). Generally, GRs at urban sites were found to be higher than at their regional sites, as shown in Fig. 4a (Wang et al., 2013b), which is also summarized by Kerminen et al. (2018). This is probably caused by the more abundant condensing vapours in polluted cities, although there are limited data on sulfuric acid and low-volatile organic vapour concentrations in China. No significant differences were found among the observations carried out in different regions in China in spite of the different pollution levels. Lower GR was observed at a mountain site compared to that in an urban area (H. L. Wang et al., 2014), but the GR of large particles at mountain sites could be as high as about 10 nm h−1 (Nie et al., 2014; H. L. Wang et al., 2014). For GRs in different seasons, higher GRs were observed in summer than other seasons, indicating higher concentrations of condensable vapours, which may be related to strong photochemical and biological activities, as shown in Fig. 4a and b (Zhu et al., 2013; Shen et al., 2011; Qi et al., 2015). GR is also dependent on the size of the particles, with larger particles usually having a larger GR (Xiao et al., 2015), which could also be inferred from the data summarized in Fig. 4c.

Sulfuric acid and organic vapours with low volatility were thought to be the main contributors to the growth of particles formed by NPF. Generally, sulfuric acid was thought to be the dominant contributor for the growth of newly formed particles, but became less and less prominent for the growth of larger particles (Xiao et al., 2015). For example, Xiao et al. (2015) and Yao et al. (2018) calculated and estimated that sulfuric acid was enough to explain the observed growth for particles smaller than 3 nm but was insufficient to explain the observed growth rates of large particles. They further calculated the relative contribution of sulfuric acid to the particle growth in different particle size ranges. As shown in Fig. 4c, these calculated contributions were 39 % and 29 % for the size ranges of 2.39–7 and 7–20 nm, respectively, in urban Shanghai (Xiao et al., 2015), 3 % to 14 % for the size range of 7–30 nm in urban Beijing (Z. B. Wang et al., 2015), about 26 % for the size range of 5.5–25 nm in suburban Hong Kong (Guo et al., 2012), and about 29 % during the Beijing Summer Olympic period (Gao et al., 2012). Some studies reported that H2SO4 had a negligible contribution to the growth of particles larger than 10 nm (H. Meng et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2014). The particle shrinkage (reversal in growth of particles size) was reported in a few studies in China. The particle shrinkage could be due to measuring particles present in different air masses during different times of the day, or the evaporation of water and/or semi-volatile species in the particles. If the air masses did not vary significantly, a similar shrinkage rate to the growth rate in the NPF events might indicate a notable fraction of semi-volatile species contributed to the growth (Young et al., 2013b; Yao et al., 2010), which is consistent with organics being the main contributor to the large particle growth. Yu et al. (2016) estimated that a high concentration of extremely low-volatility organic compounds was the key factor leading to a maximum in GR for very small particles (1.4–3 nm) in urban Nanjing. Although the existence of local maxima in GR in the sub-3 nm size range is highly sensitive to uncertainties in particle size distributions, the results highlighted that detailed investigations for the mechanisms of the initial growth steps of atmospheric NPF are needed (Yu et al., 2016). On the other hand, Yue et al. (2010) proposed a dominant role of sulfuric acid in the growth of new particles in sulfur-rich NPF events. A model simulation study about NPF in Beijing also supported that only small fraction of organics contributed to the growth of new particles, and these organics were mainly O3 initiated (Wang et al., 2013a). Besides sulfuric acid and organics, some studies reported a two-stage growth of new particles in China, in which sulfuric acid and organics contributed to the first-stage growth in the daytime, while NH4NO3 and organics possibly contributed to the second-stage growth at night-time (Zhu et al., 2014; Man et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2014). Tao et al. (2016) observed higher levels of aminium in particles with relative smaller sizes, and suggested that the heterogeneous uptake of amines by acid-base reactions could effectively contribute to the particle growth during NPF events. However, they only measured the particle chemical composition with a lowest cut-off size of 56 nm, which may not be directly related to NPF. In fact, measuring the chemical composition of nucleation-mode particles is still quite challenging all over the world. To summarize, most studies observed a slow GR for newly formed particles, with H2SO4 as the dominate contributor, while other species, such as organics, would contribute more to the particle growth as the particles grow to bigger sizes and also result in higher GR.

4 NPF under heavy air pollution
Back to toptop

The heavy air pollution makes China quite a different environment for NPF compared with western countries (Wang et al., 2017; Kulmala et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2017). Generally, concentrations of particles and condensable vapours in Chinese cities and regional background area are much higher in China than that in North America or Europe (Shen et al., 2016a, b; Wang et al., 2013b; Gao et al., 2009). The CS and small molecular cluster and particle (1–3 nm) concentrations are about an order of magnitude higher in China compared with European cities (Kulmala, 2015; Kontkanen et al., 2017). The occurrence frequencies of NPF events in high aerosol-loading environments of China were higher than those in low aerosol-loading environments (Peng et al., 2014). Meanwhile, the observed FR was much higher, and the GR was also higher (but to a smaller extent relative to FR) for NPF in China than that at rural/urban sites in western countries (L. J. Shen et al., 2016). As pointed out by Cai et al. (2017), previous FR calculations may still underestimate the real nucleation rate due to underestimation or omission of coagulation among particles in the nucleation mode with strong nucleation in China.

The influence of heavy air pollution on NPF might be identified by studying NPF in periods with short-term strong air pollution control. Shen et al. (2016b) investigated NPF during the Olympics in 2008 and during the APEC meeting in 2015 in Beijing. They found that a higher NPF event frequency coincided with the improved air quality during these important events associated with temporary intense air pollution control actions compared to a similar time of the year during 2010–2013. In spite of more frequent NPF events (Yue et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2011), the strength of NPF decreased during these periods with temporary intense air pollution control actions, characterized with lower FR and GR values (Shen et al., 2016b). Due to the decreasing strength of NPF and also the reduction of the primary emission source of fine particles, the number concentration of particles decreased in spite of the increased frequency of NPF. The mean number and volume concentrations of particles decreased by 41 % and 35 %, respectively, in August 2008 during the Beijing Olympic compared with 2004–2007 (Wang et al., 2013c). However, these temporary intense air pollution control actions had a much smaller influence on Aitken-mode particles than on accumulation-mode particles, according to the observations carried out during the APEC meeting in 2015 in Beijing (Du et al., 2017).

NPF was observed more often in the high aerosol-loading environment of China than we would expect based on the current understanding of nucleation and particle growth (Peng et al., 2014; Kulmala et al., 2017). The ratio of particle scavenging loss rate over condensational growth rate, which is proportional to the ratio of CS to GR, was used as a criterion to predict the occurrence of NPF events (McMurry et al., 2005; Kuang et al., 2010). With much higher CS values in China than at European and American sites, the difference in GR was not very obvious at the same site types between China and other countries (Peng et al., 2014). It turned out that NPF occurred frequently in megacities in China when the ratio of CS (10−4 s−1) to GR (nm h−1) was above 200, whereas it only occurred when this same ratio was less than 50 under clean and moderately polluted conditions (Kulmala et al., 2017). As shown in Fig. 5, most of the observation data reported ratios of CS (10−4 s−1) to GR (nm h−1) between 200 and 500, while a few were less than 200 but always higher than 50. More importantly, many studies reported that NPF took place with this ratio higher than 500 at urban and suburban sites. Such NPF events were able to take place in all regions in China (NCP, YRD, PRD and western China), and during both winter and summer seasons. There are several possible reasons for the higher threshold ratio of CS to GR in highly polluted environment, including the overestimation of particle losses due to assuming a coagulation sticking probability of 1, the underestimation of GR in the sub-3 size range, and also unidentified nucleation and growth mechanisms relevant to a polluted atmosphere (Kulmala et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2017).

https://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/19/115/2019/acp-19-115-2019-f05

Figure 5Particle GR as a function of CS in the NPF events in China. The solid points are average data for a certain observation period, while the open points are data for individual NPF days. The line between two data points indicates that a range of GR and/or CS was reported in the literature. The data are collected in the references in Table 2.

Download

NPF mainly occurred when the PM2.5 concentration (CS) and gas pollutant concentrations, such as NO2, CO and SO2, were both low (Wu et al., 2007; Dai et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2016). These gas pollutants were mainly from primary combustion emissions (De Gouw and Jimenez, 2009), whereas PM2.5, the main cause of haze, originated from both primary emission and secondary formation, and the latter was thought to dominate during haze events in China (Yang et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2013; Dan et al., 2004; Duan et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2012). NPF was found to be concentrated on days with low RH in previous NPF studies in Beijing (Wu et al., 2007; Yue et al., 2009). A possible reason for this would be that photochemical reactions are faster on sunny days with strong solar radiation and low RH. On the contrary, haze usually occurs at high RH when multiphase processes contribute more to the aerosol mass (Sun et al., 2010; He et al., 2014; B. Zheng et al., 2015; Cheng et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2017) and the hygroscopic aerosols contribute more to light extinction compared with low-RH conditions (Shi et al., 2014; Shen et al., 2015). NPF and haze are either purely secondary processes or dominated by secondary pollution processes, so there might be some common properties or internal relations between them. With this in mind, besides the possible inaccurate estimation for the GR and CS, as pointed out and estimated by Kulmala et al. (2017) and further discussed in detail by Yu et al. (2017), several other possible reasons might also be related to the frequent occurrence of NPF under heavy air pollution in China.

Secondary aerosols, including sulfate and organic aerosols, are still underestimated in current air quality models (Xiao et al., 2015; Chen et al., 2016; Hodzic et al., 2010), indicating unknown chemical and physical processes that are important for secondary aerosol formation (Kulmala et al., 2014). These processes might create oxidants or change the surface properties of aerosols, and thereby limit their ability to take up condensable vapours and cause more frequent NPF (Kulmala, 2015). The effects of a high percentage of inorganic aerosol particles on the effectiveness of CS are unknown and may need to be investigated in laboratory experiments. NPF was observed during dust episodes in China, and both FR and GR were enhanced under dust conditions, indicating that photo-induced, dust surface-mediated reactions might be important for producing condensable vapours for NPF (Nie et al., 2014; Xie et al., 2015; Kulmala et al., 2017). Heterogeneous photochemical processes inducing new particle formation and growth might happen in the real atmosphere and need to be further investigated. In addition to these, high concentrations of sulfuric acid (106 molecules cm−3) were observed at night-time, indicative of non-photochemical OH sources (Zheng et al., 2011). The contribution of oxidation of SO2 by Criegee radicals (Welz et al., 2012; Mauldin et al., 2012) and other possible surface-mediated reactions to the formation of night-time sulfuric acid under complex air pollution conditions in China need to be figured out as well.

The NPF leads directly to a burst of small nanoparticles and increases the particle number concentration prominently. While NPF usually tends to occur on clean days with low CS, particle number concentrations are usually much higher on NPF event days than on non-event days (L. J. Shen et al., 2016; An et al., 2015). Kulmala et al. (2016a) studied nucleation-, Aitken- and accumulation-mode particle number concentrations separately in Nanjing in the YRD regions of China, and estimated that the majority of the particles were of secondary origin in all modes. NPF was found to be an important influential factor on atmospheric aerosol number size distribution from remote mountains to polluted cities (Du et al., 2012; L. J. Shen et al., 2016, X. R. Zhang et al., 2017). NPF also changes the surface and volume size distribution. An et al. (2015) observed that NPF events had a large effect on Aitken- and nuclei-mode particle surface and volume concentrations, while having limited contributions to accumulation- and coarse-mode particles. NPF was observed to increase the proportions of NH4+, SO42-, NO3-, K+ and Mg2+ in nucleation- and Aitken-mode particles compared with those in the total aerosol. Zheng et al. (2011) found that the calculated condensation rate of H2SO4 correlated with the Aitken-mode sulfate mass concentration but not with the accumulation-mode sulfate mass concentration.

With high concentrations of condensable vapours, newly formed particles have the potential to grow quickly, which results in an increase in PM volume or mass concentrations. In an episode with consecutive NPF events in the presence of strong biomass burning in the PRD, the aerosol volume concentration increased by 6.1 mm3 cm−3 in volume mass concentration per day or about 10 µg m−3 per day in mass concentration, with organics and sulfate accounting for 42 % and 35 %, respectively, of the particle mass concentration (Wang et al., 2013d). Furthermore, it was estimated that primary emissions and secondary formation provided 28 % and 72 % of particle number concentration and 21 % and 79 % of mass concentration, respectively. Similarly, Shen et al. (2011) observed that about 20 % of the NPF events led to a measurable increase in the particle mass concentration, with an average growth rate of about 4.9 µg m−3 h−1 for PM1 (PM with diameter less than 1  µm) during the period of the mass concentration increase. Guo et al. (2014) reported a case with NPF followed by the continuous growth and appearance of haze pollution in Beijing and proposed that the efficient aerosol nucleation and growth led to severe PM2.5 development.

In summary, NPF was found to be the main source of the particle number concentration in the atmosphere, being able to dramatically increase particle number concentrations in a relatively short time. NPF and subsequent particle growth seem to also have a noticeable contribution to the volume and mass concentration of nucleation- and Aitken-mode particles. Although secondary formation of PM2.5 mass is the main cause of haze compared with primary particle emissions, the accumulation of this secondary aerosol mass usually occurs over several days following NPF. The contribution of NPF to haze formation is still an open question.

5 Significance and future research directions for NPF study
Back to toptop

The effects of NPF on air pollution and human health are crucial but highly uncertain. As we mentioned above, the effect or contribution of NPF to haze formation is still an open question. Answering this question might be difficult using only field observations, so new laboratory experiments and model simulations may need to be designed. In addition, interactions between NPF, pollution and meteorological conditions should be studied further. Heavy pollution could have significant feedbacks to meteorological conditions in China. For a case study in the YRD, it was calculated that air pollution resulted in a decrease in the solar radiation intensity by more than 70 %, in the sensible heat by more than 85 % and drop in temperature by almost 10 K (Ding et al., 2013). These effects resulted in a decrease of the boundary layer height, which further increased PM concentrations, forming a feedback loop (Petaja et al., 2016). On the other hand, NPF occurring in a free troposphere may have a major impact on the marine boundary layer particle concentrations due to the subsidence (Clarke et al., 1998; Lin et al., 2007). When the aerosol loading was high, the distance between the NPF peak and the planetary boundary layer became larger (Quan et al., 2017). These interactions would be also crucial for predicting NPF and air quality and for identifying the contribution of NPF to air pollution. Rather than ground observations, multidimensional measurements may need to be carried out in order to understand the atmospheric process up to the free troposphere. Compared with the effect of NPF to haze formation, the health effect of high number concentrations of particles with diameters of several or tens of nanometres would be more essential. NPF usually occurs around the same time period as people commute to work. The effects of exposure to a high particle number concentration environment should be investigated.

Atmospheric nucleation and subsequent growth of newly formed particles could have significant effects on air quality and climate by contributing to CCN (IPCC, 2013). NPF was calculated to enhance the CCN number significantly with ratios ranging from 1.2 to 1.8 in Shanghai in the YRD region of China (Leng et al., 2014). Considering both NPF and non-event days, the average contributions of NPF events to potential CCN in the afternoon were calculated to be 11 % and 6 % at urban sites and regional sites, respectively (Peng et al., 2014). It seems that the enhancement of CCN due to NPF in China on a regional scale was larger than that in Europe (Shen et al., 2016a), which might be due to the combination of a higher nucleation rate and quicker subsequent condensable growth associated with higher pollution levels in China. NPF events were also found to have a greater impact on CCN at polluted urban sites than at regional or rural sites in China. For example, CCN number concentrations were observed to be enhanced by a factor of 2–6 in background regions and by a factor of 5.6–8.7 in polluted regions during the NPF event days (Wang et al., 2013b; Shen et al., 2016a). Nevertheless, the impact of NPF on the CCN number concentration was found to depend on the location and individual character of each NPF event, including different hygroscopic properties of particles and thus different CCN activities during different NPF events, so Ma et al. (2016) suggested not using a fixed parameter to predict the contribution of NPF to CCN and Tao et al. (2018) emphasized the importance of real-time measurements of hygroscopicity of particles.

During the past 15 years, a lot of NPF observations and related studies were carried out in China but, as summarized by Wang et al. (2017), the application of state-of-the-art instruments are still quite limited in China. In recent years, an increasing number of studies utilized more advanced instruments, such as PSM (Xiao et al., 2015; Dai et al., 2017; Yu et al., 2016; Yao et al., 2018), NAIS (Jayaratne et al., 2017; Lv et al., 2018), DEG-SMPS (Cai and Jiang, 2017; Cai et al., 2017) and APi-ToF-MS/CI-APi-ToF-MS (Yao et al., 2018), greatly improving our understanding about the nucleation and particle growth mechanisms in China, especially in highly polluted environments. However, the lack of continuous and comprehensive long-term observations, which should include measurements of particle number size distribution preferably down to 1–2 nm and vapours that potentially participate in NPF and subsequent particle growth (H2SO4, ELVOCs, LVOC, ammonia and amines), still limits our understanding of the mechanism of NPF in different environments in China. Key participants and processes of NPF under complex air pollution conditions in China still wait to be answered, and the unexpected NPF at high aerosol loadings need to be explained. Contributions of different mechanisms to NPF should be evaluated with the consideration of spatio-temporal difference, and possibly also with the consideration of interannual variability in the process of air pollution control in China. Long periods and comprehensive observations would be the most important factor when investigating NPF mechanisms in China, while laboratory experiments and model simulations would also be very helpful and necessary. As suggested by Kulmala (2018), grand environmental challenges, such as climate change, water and food security as well as urban air pollution, are all linked and need to be studied together. The effects of NPF in China on climate change and human health are still poorly understood and should be evaluated quantitatively. Although a global view is needed for these common challenges of mankind, densely populated China will undoubtedly be a very important area in this respect. Studying these effects will be essential for future studies of NPF in China and will be important for a global effort for a better atmosphere on Earth.

Data availability
Back to toptop
Data availability. 

All the data in the paper are presented in the references. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the corresponding author: biwu.chu@helsinki.fi.

Author contributions
Back to toptop
Author contributions. 

MK  designed the study. BC collected the data. BC and VK led the writing and data analysis with input from all co-authors. FB, CY, TP and MK contributed to the editing of the paper.

Competing interests
Back to toptop
Competing interests. 

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements
Back to toptop
Acknowledgements. 

This work was supported by the Academy of Finland (1251427, 1139656, 296628, 306853, Finnish centre of excellence 1141135), and the EC Seventh Framework Program and European Union's Horizon 2020 programme (ERC, project no. 742206, ATM-GTP).

Edited by: Joachim Curtius
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees

References
Back to toptop

Almeida, J., Schobesberger, S., Kurten, A., Ortega, I. K., Kupiainen-Maatta, O., Praplan, A. P., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Downard, A., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Henschel, H., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kurten, T., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Leppa, J., Loukonen, V., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., McGrath, M. J., Nieminen, T., Olenius, T., Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Riccobono, F., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M., Rondo, L., Ruuskanen, T., Santos, F. D., Sarnela, N., Schallhart, S., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Simon, M., Sipila, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Trostl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Virtanen, A., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Williamson, C., Wimmer, D., Ye, P. L., Yli-Juuti, T., Carslaw, K. S., Kulmala, M., Curtius, J., Baltensperger, U., Worsnop, D. R., Vehkamaki, H., and Kirkby, J.: Molecular understanding of sulphuric acid-amine particle nucleation in the atmosphere, Nature, 502, 359–363, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12663, 2013. 

An, J. L., Wang, H. L., Shen, L. J., Zhu, B., Zou, J. A., Gao, J. H., and Kang, H. Q.: Characteristics of new particle formation events in Nanjing, China: Effect of water-soluble ions, Atmos. Environ., 108, 32–40, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.01.038, 2015. 

Bauduin, S., Clarisse, L., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Theys, N., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P. F.: Retrieval of near-surface sulfur dioxide (SO2) concentrations at a global scale using IASI satellite observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 721–740, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-721-2016, 2016. 

Bianchi, F., Trostl, J., Junninen, H., Frege, C., Henne, S., Hoyle, C. R., Molteni, U., Herrmann, E., Adamov, A., Bukowiecki, N., Chen, X., Duplissy, J., Gysel, M., Hutterli, M., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Kuerten, A., Manninen, H. E., Muench, S., Perakyla, O., Petaja, T., Rondo, L., Williamson, C., Weingartner, E., Curtius, J., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: New particle formation in the free troposphere: A question of chemistry and timing, Science, 352, 1109–1112, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad5456, 2016. 

Cai, R. L. and Jiang, J. K.: A new balance formula to estimate new particle formation rate: reevaluating the effect of coagulation scavenging, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12659–12675, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12659-2017, 2017. 

Cai, R. L., Yang, D. S., Fu, Y. Y., Wang, X., Li, X. X., Ma, Y., Hao, J. M., Zheng, J., and Jiang, J. K.: Aerosol surface area concentration: a governing factor in new particle formation in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12327–12340, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12327-2017, 2017. 

Chen, D., Liu, Z. Q., Fast, J., and Ban, J. M.: Simulations of sulfate-nitrate-ammonium (SNA) aerosols during the extreme haze events over northern China in October 2014, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10707–10724, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10707-2016, 2016. 

Cheng, S. H., Yang, L. X., Zhou, X. H., Xue, L. K., Gao, X. M., Zhou, Y., and Wang, W. X.: Size-fractionated water-soluble ions, situ pH and water content in aerosol on hazy days and the influences on visibility impairment in Jinan, China, Atmos. Environ., 45, 4631–4640, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.05.057, 2011. 

Cheng, Y., Zheng, G., Wei, C., Mu, Q., Zheng, B., Wang, Z., Gao, M., Zhang, Q., He, K., Carmichael, G., Poschl, U., and Su, H.: Reactive nitrogen chemistry in aerosol water as a source of sulfate during haze events in China, Sci. Adv., 2, e1601530, https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601530, 2016. 

Clarke, A. D., Varner, J. L., Eisele, F., Mauldin, R. L., Tanner, D., and Litchy, M.: Particle production in the remote marine atmosphere: Cloud outflow and subsidence during ACE 1, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 16397–16409, https://doi.org/10.1029/97jd02987, 1998. 

Dai, L., Wang, H. L., Zhou, L. Y., An, J. L., Tang, L. L., Lu, C. S., Yan, W. L., Liu, R. Y., Kong, S. F., Chen, M. D., Lee, S. H., and Yu, H.: Regional and local new particle formation events observed in the Yangtze River Delta region, China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 2389–2402, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD026030, 2017. 

Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Wagner, R., Hussein, T., Aalto, P. P., and Lehtinen, K. E. J.: Formation and growth of fresh atmospheric aerosols: eight years of aerosol size distribution data from SMEAR II, Hyytiala, Finland, Boreal Environ. Res., 10, 323–336, 2005. 

Dan, M., Zhuang, G., Li, X., Tao, H., and Zhuang, Y.: The characteristics of carbonaceous species and their sources in PM2.5 in Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3443–3452, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.02.052, 2004. 

De Gouw, J. and Jimenez, J. L.: Organic Aerosols in the Earth's Atmosphere, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 7614–7618, https://doi.org/10.1021/es9006004, 2009. 

Ding, A. J., Fu, C. B., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Wang, T., Xie, Y., Herrmann, E., Zheng, L. F., Nie, W., Liu, Q., Wei, X. L., and Kulmala, M.: Intense atmospheric pollution modifies weather: a case of mixed biomass burning with fossil fuel combustion pollution in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10545–10554, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10545-2013, 2013. 

Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Huang, X., Chi, X. G., Sun, J. N., Kerminen, V. M., Xu, Z., Guo, W. D., Petaja, T., Yang, X. Q., Kulmala, M., and Fu, C. B.: Long-term observation of air pollution-weather/climate interactions at the SORPES station: a review and outlook, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 10, 15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0877-3, 2016. 

Du, J. F., Cheng, T. T., Zhang, M., Chen, J. M., He, Q. S., Wang, X. M., Zhang, R. J., Tao, J., Huang, G. H., Li, X., and Zha, S. P.: Aerosol Size Spectra and Particle Formation Events at Urban Shanghai in Eastern China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 12, 1362–1372, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2011.12.0230, 2012. 

Du, W., Zhao, J., Wang, Y. Y., Zhang, Y. J., Wang, Q. Q., Xu, W. Q., Chen, C., Han, T. T., Zhang, F., Li, Z. Q., Fu, P. Q., Li, J., Wang, Z. F., and Sun, Y. L.: Simultaneous measurements of particle number size distributions at ground level and 260 m on a meteorological tower in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6797–6811, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6797-2017, 2017. 

Duan, F., He, K., Ma, Y., Jia, Y., Yang, F., Lei, Y., Tanaka, S., and Okuta, T.: Characteristics of carbonaceous aerosols in Beijing, China, Chemosphere, 60, 355–364, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2004.12.035, 2005. 

Dunne, E. M., Gordon, H., Kurten, A., Almeida, J., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Ortega, I. K., Pringle, K. J., Adamov, A., Baltensperger, U., Barmet, P., Benduhn, F., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Clarke, A., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Kupc, A., Lawler, M. J., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mann, G., Mathot, S., Merikanto, J., Miettinen, P., Nenes, A., Onnela, A., Rap, A., Reddington, C. L. S., Riccobono, F., Richards, N. A. D., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Simon, M., Sipilaa, M., Smith, J. N., Stozkhov, Y., Tome, A., Trostl, J., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Worsnop, D. R., and Carslaw, K. S.: Global atmospheric particle formation from CERN CLOUD measurements, Science, 354, 1119–1124, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf2649, 2016. 

Ehn, M., Thornton, J. A., Kleist, E., Sipila, M., Junninen, H., Pullinen, I., Springer, M., Rubach, F., Tillmann, R., Lee, B., Lopez-Hilfiker, F., Andres, S., Acir, I.-H., Rissanen, M., Jokinen, T., Schobesberger, S., Kangasluoma, J., Kontkanen, J., Nieminen, T., Kurten, T., Nielsen, L. B., Jorgensen, S., Kjaergaard, H. G., Canagaratna, M., Dal Maso, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T., Wahner, A., Kerminen, V.-M., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wildt, J., and Mentel, T. F.: A large source of low-volatility secondary organic aerosol, Nature, 506, 476–479, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13032, 2014. 

Fu, X., Wang, S. X., Ran, L. M., Pleim, J. E., Cooter, E., Bash, J. O., Benson, V., and Hao, J. M.: Estimating NH3 emissions from agricultural fertilizer application in China using the bi-directional CMAQ model coupled to an agro-ecosystem model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6637–6649, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6637-2015, 2015. 

Gao, J., Wang, T., Zhou, X. H., Wu, W. S., and Wang, W. X.: Measurement of aerosol number size distributions in the Yangtze River delta in China: Formation and growth of particles under polluted conditions, Atmos. Environ., 43, 829–836, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.10.046, 2009. 

Gao, J., Chai, F., Wang, T., and Wang, W.: Particle number size distribution and new particle formation (NPF) in Lanzhou, Western China, Particuology, 9, 611–618, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2011.06.008, 2011. 

Gao, J., Chai, F. H., Wang, T., Wang, S. L., and Wang, W. X.: Particle number size distribution and new particle formation: New characteristics during the special pollution control period in Beijing, J. Environ. Sci., 24, 14–21, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(11)60725-0, 2012. 

Gong, Y. G., Hu, M., Cheng, Y. F., Su, H., Yue, D. L., Liu, F., Wiedensohler, A., Wang, Z. B., Kalesse, H., Liu, S., Wu, Z. J., Xiao, K. T., Mi, P. C., and Zhang, Y. H.: Competition of coagulation sink and source rate: New particle formation in the Pearl River Delta of China, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3278–3285, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.049, 2010. 

Guo, H., Wang, D. W., Cheung, K., Ling, Z. H., Chan, C. K., and Yao, X. H.: Observation of aerosol size distribution and new particle formation at a mountain site in subtropical Hong Kong, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9923–9939, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9923-2012, 2012. 

Guo, S., Hu, M., Zamora, M. L., Peng, J. F., Shang, D. J., Zheng, J., Du, Z. F., Wu, Z., Shao, M., Zeng, L. M., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R. Y.: Elucidating severe urban haze formation in China, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 17373–17378, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1419604111, 2014. 

Hand, J. L. and Malm, W. C.: Review of aerosol mass scattering efficiencies from ground-based measurements since 1990, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D16203, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008484, 2007. 

He, H., Wang, Y., Ma, Q., Ma, J., Chu, B., Ji, D., Tang, G., Liu, C., Zhang, H., and Hao, J.: Mineral dust and NOx promote the conversion of SO2 to sulfate in heavy pollution days, Sci. Rep., 4, 04172, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04172, 2014. 

Herrmann, E., Ding, A. J., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Yang, X. Q., Sun, J. N., Qi, X. M., Manninen, H., Hakala, J., Nieminen, T., Aalto, P. P., Kulmala, M., and Fu, C. B.: Aerosols and nucleation in eastern China: first insights from the new SORPES-NJU station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2169–2183, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2169-2014, 2014. 

Hodzic, A., Jimenez, J. L., Madronich, S., Canagaratna, M. R., DeCarlo, P. F., Kleinman, L., and Fast, J.: Modeling organic aerosols in a megacity: potential contribution of semi-volatile and intermediate volatility primary organic compounds to secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5491–5514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-5491-2010, 2010. 

Hofman, J., Staelens, J., Cordell, R., Stroobants, C., Zikova, N., Hama, S. M. L., Wyche, K. P., Kos, G. P. A., Van der Zee, S., Smallbone, K. L., Weijers, E. P., Monks, P. S., and Roekens, E.: Ultrafine particles in four European urban environments: Results from a new continuous long-term monitoring network, Atmos. Environ., 136, 68–81, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.010, 2016. 

Huang, R.-J., Zhang, Y., Bozzetti, C., Ho, K.-F., Cao, J.-J., Han, Y., Daellenbach, K. R., Slowik, J. G., Platt, S. M., Canonaco, F., Zotter, P., Wolf, R., Pieber, S. M., Bruns, E. A., Crippa, M., Ciarelli, G., Piazzalunga, A., Schwikowski, M., Abbaszade, G., Schnelle-Kreis, J., Zimmermann, R., An, Z., Szidat, S., Baltensperger, U., Haddad, I. E., and Prevot, A. S. H.: High secondary aerosol contribution to particulate pollution during haze events in China, Nature, 514, 218–222, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13774, 2014. 

Huang, X., Zhou, L., Ding, A., Qi, X., Nie, W., Wang, M., Chi, X., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V. M., Roldin, P., Rusanen, A., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Comprehensive modelling study on observed new particle formation at the SORPES station in Nanjing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2477–2492, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2477-2016, 2016. 

IPCC: Working group I contribution to the IPCC fifth Assessment Report (AR5), in: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis, Geneva, Switzerland, 2013. 

Jayaratne, R., Pushpawela, B., He, C. R., Li, H., Gao, J., Chai, F. H., and Morawska, L.: Observations of particles at their formation sizes in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8825–8835, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8825-2017, 2017. 

Jung, J., Miyazaki, Y., and Kawamura, K.: Different characteristics of new particle formation between urban and deciduous forest sites in Northern Japan during the summers of 2010–2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 51–68, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-51-2013, 2013. 

Kaiser, J.: How dirty air hurts the heart, Science, 307, 1858–1859, 2005. 

Kerminen, V. M.,and Kulmala, M.: Analytical formulae connecting the “real” and the “apparent” nucleation rate and the nuclei number concentration for atmospheric nucleation events, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 609–622, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(01)00194-X, 2002. 

Kerminen, V. M., Pirjola, L., and Kulmala, M.: How significantly does coagulational scavenging limit atmospheric particle production?, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 24119–24125, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000322, 2001. 

Kerminen, V. M., Chen, X. M., Vakkari, V., Petaja, T., Kulmala, M., and Bianchi, F.: Atmospheric new particle formation and growth: review of field observations, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 103003, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/Aadf3c, 2018. 

Kirkby, J., Curtius, J., Almeida, J., Dunne, E., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Franchin, A., Gagne, S., Ickes, L., Kuerten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Riccobono, F., Rondo, L., Schobesberger, S., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wimmer, D., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Dommen, J., Downard, A., Ehn, M., Flagan, R. C., Haider, S., Hansel, A., Hauser, D., Jud, W., Junninen, H., Kreissl, F., Kvashin, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Lima, J., Lovejoy, E. R., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Mikkila, J., Minginette, P., Mogo, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Pereira, P., Petaja, T., Schnitzhofer, R., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipila, M., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Vanhanen, J., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Walther, H., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Winkler, P. M., Carslaw, K. S., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., and Kulmala, M.: Role of sulphuric acid, ammonia and galactic cosmic rays in atmospheric aerosol nucleation, Nature, 476, 429–433, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10343, 2011. 

Kirkby, J., Duplissy, J., Sengupta, K., Frege, C., Gordon, H., Williamson, C., Heinritzi, M., Simon, M., Yan, C., Almeida, J., Troestl, J., Nieminen, T., Ortega, I. K., Wagner, R., Adamov, A., Amorim, A., Bernhammer, A.-K., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Chen, X., Craven, J., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Hakala, J., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Krapf, M., Kuerten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Molteni, U., Onnela, A., Peraekylae, O., Piel, F., Petaejae, T., Praplan, A. P., Pringle, K., Rap, A., Richards, N. A. D., Riipinen, I., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipilae, M., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Virtanen, A., Vogel, A. L., Wagner, A. C., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Zhang, X., Hansel, A., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Worsnop, D. R., Baltensperger, U., Kulmala, M., Carslaw, K. S., and Curtius, J.: Ion-induced nucleation of pure biogenic particles, Nature, 533, 521–526, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17953, 2016. 

Kivekäs, N., Sun, J., Zhan, M., Kerminen, V.-M., Hyvärinen, A., Komppula, M., Viisanen, Y., Hong, N., Zhang, Y., Kulmala, M., Zhang, X.-C., Deli-Geer, and Lihavainen, H.: Long term particle size distribution measurements at Mount Waliguan, a high-altitude site in inland China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5461–5474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5461-2009, 2009. 

Kontkanen, J., Lehtipalo, K., Ahonen, L., Kangasluoma, J., Manninen, H. E., Hakala, J., Rose, C., Sellegri, K., Xiao, S., Wang, L., Qi, X., Nie, W., Ding, A., Yu, H., Lee, S., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Measurements of sub-3 nm particles using a particle size magnifier in different environments: from clean mountain top to polluted megacities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2163–2187, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2163-2017, 2017. 

Kuang, C., Riipinen, I., Sihto, S.-L., Kulmala, M., McCormick, A. V., and McMurry, P. H.: An improved criterion for new particle formation in diverse atmospheric environments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8469–8480, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8469-2010, 2010. 

Kulmala, M.: China's choking cocktail, Nature, 526, 497–499, 2015. 

Kulmala, M.: Build a global Earth observatory, Nature, 553, 21–23, 2018. 

Kulmala, M., Vehkamaki, H., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., Lauri, A., Kerminen, V. M., Birmili, W., and McMurry, P. H.: Formation and growth rates of ultrafine atmospheric particles: a review of observations, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 143–176, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2003.10.003, 2004. 

Kulmala, M., Petaja, T., Nieminen, T., Sipila, M., Manninen, H. E., Lehtipalo, K., Dal Maso, M., Aalto, P. P., Junninen, H., Paasonen, P., Riipinen, I., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., and Kerminen, V. M.: Measurement of the nucleation of atmospheric aerosol particles, Nat. Protoc., 7, 1651–1667, https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2012.091, 2012. 

Kulmala, M., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Petaja, T., Sipila, M., Schobesberger, S., Rantala, P., Franchin, A., Jokinen, T., Jarvinen, E., Aijala, M., Kangasluoma, J., Hakala, J., Aalto, P. P., Paasonen, P., Mikkila, J., Vanhanen, J., Aalto, J., Hakola, H., Makkonen, U., Ruuskanen, T., Mauldin, R. L., Duplissy, J., Vehkamaki, H., Back, J., Kortelainen, A., Riipinen, I., Kurten, T., Johnston, M. V., Smith, J. N., Ehn, M., Mentel, T. F., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Laaksonen, A., Kerminen, V. M., and Worsnop, D. R.: Direct Observations of Atmospheric Aerosol Nucleation, Science, 339, 943–946, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227385, 2013. 

Kulmala, M., Petaja, T., Ehn, M., Thornton, J., Sipila, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Kerminen, V. M.: Chemistry of Atmospheric Nucleation: On the Recent Advances on Precursor Characterization and Atmospheric Cluster Composition in Connection with Atmospheric New Particle Formation, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem., 65, 21–37, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-physchem-040412-110014, 2014. 

Kulmala, M., Luoma, K., Virkkula, A., Petaja, T., Paasonen, P., Kerminen, V. M., Nie, W., Qi, X. M., Shen, Y. C., Chi, X. G., and Ding, A. J.: On the mode-segregated aerosol particle number concentration load: contributions of primary and secondary particles in Hyytiala and Nanjing, Boreal Environ. Res., 21, 319–331, 2016a. 

Kulmala, M., Petaja, T., Kerminen, V. M., Kujansuu, J., Ruuskanen, T., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Wu, Z. J., Wang, L., and Worsnop, D. R.: On secondary new particle formation in China, Front. Environ. Sci. Eng., 10, 08, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0850-1, 2016b. 

Kulmala, M., Kerminen, V. M., Petaja, T., Ding, A. J., and Wang, L.: Atmospheric gas-to-particle conversion: why NPF events are observed in megacities?, Faraday Discuss., 200, 271–288, https://doi.org/10.1039/c6fd00257a, 2017. 

Kürten, A., Bianchi, F., Almeida, J., Kupiainen-Maatta, O., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Williamson, C., Barmet, P., Breitenlechner, M., Dommen, J., Donahue, N. M., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Gordon, H., Hakala, J., Hansel, A., Heinritzi, M., Ickes, L., Jokinen, T., Kangasluoma, J., Kim, J., Kirkby, J., Kupc, A., Lehtipalo, K., Leiminger, M., Makhmutov, V., Onnela, A., Ortega, I. K., Petaja, T., Praplan, A. P., Riccobono, F., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Schnitzhofer, R., Schobesberger, S., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G., Stozhkov, Y., Tome, A., Trostl, J., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Wagner, P. E., Wimmer, D., Ye, P. L., Baltensperger, U., Carslaw, K., Kulmala, M., and Curtius, J.: Experimental particle formation rates spanning tropospheric sulfuric acid and ammonia abundances, ion production rates, and temperatures, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 12377–12400, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023908, 2016. 

Lee, S. H., Kwak, J. H., Lee, S. Y., and Lee, J. H.: On-road chasing and laboratory measurements of exhaust particle emissions of diesel vehicles equipped with aftertreatment technologies (DPF, urea-SCR), Int. J. Automot. Technol., 16, 551–559, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12239-015-0056-8, 2015. 

Lehtinen, K. E. J., Dal Maso, M., Kulmala, M., and Kerminen, V. M.: Estimating nucleation rates from apparent particle formation rates and vice versa: Revised formulation of the Kerminen-Kulmala equation, J. Aerosol Sci., 38, 988–994, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2007.06.009, 2007. 

Lelieveld, J., Evans, J. S., Fnais, M., Giannadaki, D., and Pozzer, A.: The contribution of outdoor air pollution sources to premature mortality on a global scale, Nature, 525, 367–371, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15371, 2015. 

Leng, C., Zhang, Q., Tao, J., Zhang, H., Zhang, D., Xu, C., Li, X., Kong, L., Cheng, T., Zhang, R., Yang, X., Chen, J., Qiao, L., Lou, S., Wang, H., and Chen, C.: Impacts of new particle formation on aerosol cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) activity in Shanghai: case study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 11353–11365, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11353-2014, 2014. 

Li, C., Marufu, L. T., Dickerson, R. R., Li, Z., Wen, T., Wang, Y., Wang, P., Chen, H., and Stehr, J. W.: In situ measurements of trace gases and aerosol optical properties at a rural site in northern China during East Asian Study of Tropospheric Aerosols: An International Regional Experiment 2005, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D22S04, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007592, 2007. 

Lin, P., Hu, M., Wu, Z., Niu, Y., and Zhu, T.: Marine aerosol size distributions in the springtime over China adjacent seas, Atmos. Environ., 41, 6784–6796, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.04.045, 2007. 

Liu, S., Hu, M., Wu, Z. J., Wehner, B., Wiedensohler, A., and Cheng, Y. F.: Aerosol number size distribution and new particle formation at a rural/coastal site in Pearl River Delta (PRD) of China, Atmos. Environ., 42, 6275–6283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.01.063, 2008. 

Liu, X. G., Li, J., Qu, Y., Han, T., Hou, L., Gu, J., Chen, C., Yang, Y., Liu, X., Yang, T., Zhang, Y., Tian, H., and Hu, M.: Formation and evolution mechanism of regional haze: a case study in the megacity Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4501–4514, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4501-2013, 2013. 

Liu, X. G., Sun, K., Qu, Y., Hu, M., Sun, Y. L., Zhang, F., and Zhang, Y. H.: Secondary Formation of Sulfate and Nitrate during a Haze Episode in Megacity Beijing, China, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 15, 2246–2257, https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2014.12.0321, 2015. 

Liu, X. H., Zhu, Y. J., Zheng, M., Gao, H. W., and Yao, X. H.: Production and growth of new particles during two cruise campaigns in the marginal seas of China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7941–7951, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7941-2014, 2014. 

Liu, Y. C., Wu, Z. J., Wang, Y., Xiao, Y., Gu, F. T., Zheng, J., Tan, T. Y., Shang, D. J., Wu, Y. S., Zeng, L. M., Hu, M., Bateman, A. P., and Martin, S. T.: Submicrometer Particles Are in the Liquid State during Heavy Haze Episodes in the Urban Atmosphere of Beijing, China, Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett., 4, 427–432, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.7b00352, 2017. 

Lu, Z., Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., Wang, S., Carmichael, G. R., Cheng, Y. F., Wei, C., Chin, M., Diehl, T., and Tan, Q.: Sulfur dioxide emissions in China and sulfur trends in East Asia since 2000, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 6311–6331, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-6311-2010, 2010. 

Lv, G. L., Sui, X., Chen, J. M., Jayaratne, R., and Mellouki, A.: Investigation of new particle formation at the summit of Mt. Tai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2243–2258, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2243-2018, 2018. 

Ma, J., Chu, B., Liu, J., Liu, Y., Zhang, H., and He, H.: NOx promotion of SO2 conversion to sulfate: An important mechanism for the occurrence of heavy haze during winter in Beijing, Environ. Pollut., 233, 662–669, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.10.103, 2018. 

Ma, N., Zhao, C., Tao, J., Wu, Z., Kecorius, S., Wang, Z., Größ, J., Liu, H., Bian, Y., Kuang, Y., Teich, M., Spindler, G., Müller, K., van Pinxteren, D., Herrmann, H., Hu, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Variation of CCN activity during new particle formation events in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 8593–8607, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-8593-2016, 2016. 

Man, H. Y., Zhu, Y. J., Ji, F., Yao, X. H., Lau, N. T., Li, Y. J., Lee, B. P., and Chan, C. K.: Comparison of Daytime and Nighttime New Particle Growth at the HKUST Supersite in Hong Kong, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 7170–7178, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b02143, 2015. 

Manninen, H. E., Nieminen, T., Asmi, E., Gagné, S., Häkkinen, S., Lehtipalo, K., Aalto, P., Vana, M., Mirme, A., Mirme, S., Hõrrak, U., Plass-Dülmer, C., Stange, G., Kiss, G., Hoffer, A., Töro, N., Moerman, M., Henzing, B., de Leeuw, G., Brinkenberg, M., Kouvarakis, G. N., Bougiatioti, A., Mihalopoulos, N., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Arneth, A., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tarozzi, L., Decesari, S., Facchini, M. C., Birmili, W., Sonntag, A., Wiedensohler, A., Boulon, J., Sellegri, K., Laj, P., Gysel, M., Bukowiecki, N., Weingartner, E., Wehrle, G., Laaksonen, A., Hamed, A., Joutsensaari, J., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., and Kulmala, M.: EUCAARI ion spectrometer measurements at 12 European sites – analysis of new particle formation events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7907–7927, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7907-2010, 2010. 

Mao, J. B., Yu, F. Q., Zhang, Y., An, J. Y., Wang, L., Zheng, J., Yao, L., Luo, G., Ma, W. C., Yu, Q., Huang, C., Li, L., and Chen, L. M.: High-resolution modeling of gaseous methylamines over a polluted region in China: source-dependent emissions and implications of spatial variations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7933–7950, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7933-2018, 2018. 

Mauldin, R. L., Berndt, T., Sipila, M., Paasonen, P., Petaja, T., Kim, S., Kurten, T., Stratmann, F., Kerminen, V. M., and Kulmala, M.: A new atmospherically relevant oxidant of sulphur dioxide, Nature, 488, 193–196, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11278, 2012. 

McMurry, P. H. and Friedlander, S. K.: New particle formation in the presence of an aerosol, Atmos. Environ., 13, 1635–1651, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(79)90322-6, 1979. 

McMurry, P. H., Fink, M., Sakurai, H., Stolzenburg, M. R., Mauldin, R. L., Smith, J., Eisele, F., Moore, K., Sjostedt, S., Tanner, D., Huey, L. G., Nowak, J. B., Edgerton, E., and Voisin, D.: A criterion for new particle formation in the sulfur-rich Atlanta atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005901, 2005. 

Meng, H., Zhu, Y. J., Evans, G. J., Jeong, C. H., and Yao, X. H.: Roles of SO2 oxidation in new particle formation events, J. Environ. Sci., 30, 90–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.12.002, 2015. 

Meng, Z., Xie, Y., Jia, S., Zhang, R., Lin, W., Xu, X., and Yang, W.: Characteristics of Atmospheric Ammonia at Gucheng, a Rural Site on North China Plain in Summer of 2013, J. Appl. Meteorol. Sci., 26, 141–150, 2015. 

Meng, Z. Y., Lin, W. L., Jiang, X. M., Yan, P., Wang, Y., Zhang, Y. M., Jia, X. F., and Yu, X. L.: Characteristics of atmospheric ammonia over Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6139–6151, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6139-2011, 2011. 

Meng, Z. Y., Xu, X. B., Lin, W. L., Ge, B. Z., Xie, Y. L., Song, B., Jia, S. H., Z hang, R., Peng, W., Wang, Y., Cheng, H. B., Yang, W., and Zhao, H. R.: Role of ambient ammonia in particulate ammonium formation at a rural site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 167–184, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-167-2018, 2018. 

Merikanto, J., Spracklen, D. V., Mann, G. W., Pickering, S. J., and Carslaw, K. S.: Impact of nucleation on global CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 8601–8616, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-8601-2009, 2009. 

Molteni, U., Bianchi, F., Klein, F., El Haddad, I., Frege, C., Rossi, M. J., Dommen, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Formation of highly oxygenated organic molecules from aromatic compounds, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1909–1921, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1909-2018, 2018. 

Nie, W., Ding, A. J., Wang, T., Kerminen, V. M., George, C., Xue, L. K., Wang, W. X., Zhang, Q. Z., Petaja, T., Qi, X. M., Gao, X. M., Wang, X. F., Yang, X. Q., Fu, C. B., and Kulmala, M.: Polluted dust promotes new particle formation and growth, Sci. Rep., 4, 6634, https://doi.org/10.1038/Srep06634, 2014. 

Nieminen, T., Kerminen, V. M., Petäjä, T., Aalto, P. P., Arshinov, M., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Beddows, D. C. S., Beukes, J. P., Collins, D., Ding, A., Harrison, R. M., Henzing, B., Hooda, R., Hu, M., Hõrrak, U., Kivekäs, N., Komsaare, K., Krejci, R., Kristensson, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Leaitch, W. R., Lihavainen, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Németh, Z., Nie, W., O'Dowd, C., Salma, I., Sellegri, K., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tunved, P., Ulevicius, V., Vakkari, V., Vana, M., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Z., Virtanen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Global analysis of continental boundary layer new particle formation based on long-term measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14737–14756, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018, 2018. 

Pan, Y. P., Wang, Y. S., Tang, G. Q., and Wu, D.: Wet and dry deposition of atmospheric nitrogen at ten sites in Northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 6515–6535, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6515-2012, 2012. 

Pan, Y. P., Tian, S. L., Zhao, Y. H., Zhang, L., Zhu, X. Y., Gao, J., Huang, W., Zhou, Y. B., Song, Y., Zhang, Q., and Wang, Y. S.: Identifying Ammonia Hotspots in China Using a National Observation Network, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 3926–3934, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b05235, 2018. 

Parrish, D. D., Kuster, W. C., Shao, M., Yokouchi, Y., Kondo, Y., Goldan, P. D., de Gouw, J. A., Koike, M., and Shirai, T.: Comparison of air pollutant emissions among mega-cities, Atmos. Environ., 43, 6435–6441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.06.024, 2009. 

Peng, J. F., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Huang, X. F., Kumar, P., Wu, Z. J., Guo, S., Yue, D. L., Shang, D. J., Zheng, Z., and He, L. Y.: Submicron aerosols at thirteen diversified sites in China: size distribution, new particle formation and corresponding contribution to cloud condensation nuclei production, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10249–10265, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10249-2014, 2014. 

Peng, Y., Liu, X. D., Dai, J., Wang, Z., Dong, Z. P., Dong, Y., Chen, C., Li, X. M., Zhao, N., and Fan, C.: Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation events in the suburb of Xi'an, northwest China, Atmos. Environ., 153, 194–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.01.022, 2017. 

Petaja, T., Jarvi, L., Kerminen, V. M., Ding, A. J., Sun, J. N., Nie, W., Kujansuu, J., Virkkula, A., Yang, X. Q., Fu, C. B., Zilitinkevich, S., and Kulmala, M.: Enhanced air pollution via aerosol-boundary layer feedback in China, Sci. Rep., 6, 18998, https://doi.org/10.1038/Srep18998, 2016. 

Pichelstorfer, L., Stolzenburg, D., Ortega, J., Karl, T., Kokkola, H., Laakso, A., Lehtinen, K. E. J., Smith, J. N., McMurry, P. H., and Winkler, P. M.: Resolving nanoparticle growth mechanisms from size- and time-dependent growth rate analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1307–1323, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1307-2018, 2018. 

Qi, X. M., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Petäjä, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Herrmann, E., Xie, Y. N., Zheng, L. F., Manninen, H., Aalto, P., Sun, J. N., Xu, Z. N., Chi, X. G., Huang, X., Boy, M., Virkkula, A., Yang, X.-Q., Fu, C. B., and Kulmala, M.: Aerosol size distribution and new particle formation in the western Yangtze River Delta of China: 2 years of measurements at the SORPES station, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12445–12464, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12445-2015, 2015. 

Qi, X., Ding, A., Roldin, P., Xu, Z., Zhou, P., Sarnela, N., Nie, W., Huang, X., Rusanen, A., Ehn, M., Rissanen, M. P., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., and Boy, M.: Modelling studies of HOMs and their contributions to new particle formation and growth: comparison of boreal forest in Finland and a polluted environment in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11779–11791, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11779-2018, 2018. 

Quan, J. N., Liu, Y. A., Liu, Q., Jia, X. C., Li, X., Gao, Y., Ding, D. P., Li, J., and Wang, Z. F.: Anthropogenic pollution elevates the peak height of new particle formation from planetary boundary layer to lower free troposphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 7537–7543, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL074553, 2017. 

Riccobono, F., Schobesberger, S., Scott, C. E., Dommen, J., Ortega, I. K., Rondo, L., Almeida, J., Amorim, A., Bianchi, F., Breitenlechner, M., David, A., Downard, A., Dunne, E. M., Duplissy, J., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Hansel, A., Junninen, H., Kajos, M., Keskinen, H., Kupc, A., Kurten, A., Kvashin, A. N., Laaksonen, A., Lehtipalo, K., Makhmutov, V., Mathot, S., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petaja, T., Praplan, A. P., Santos, F. D., Schallhart, S., Seinfeld, J. H., Sipila, M., Spracklen, D. V., Stozhkov, Y., Stratmann, F., Tome, A., Tsagkogeorgas, G., Vaattovaara, P., Viisanen, Y., Vrtala, A., Wagner, P. E., Weingartner, E., Wex, H., Wimmer, D., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Donahue, N. M., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Baltensperger, U.: Oxidation Products of Biogenic Emissions Contribute to Nucleation of Atmospheric Particles, Science, 344, 717–721, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1243527, 2014. 

Ronald, J. V., Mijling, B., Ding, J., Koukouli, M. E., Liu, F., Li, Q., Mao, H. Q., and Theys, N.: Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality policy for SO2 and NOx emissions in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 1775–1789, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017, 2017. 

Rönkkö, T., Kuuluvainen, H., Karjalainen, P., Keskinen, J., Hillamo, R., Niemi, J. V., Pirjola, L., Timonen, H. J., Saarikoski, S., Saukko, E., Järvinen, A., Silvennoinen, H., Rostedt, A., Olin, M., Yli-Ojanperä, J., Nousiainen, P., Kousa, A., and Dal Maso, M.: Traffic is a major source of atmospheric nanocluster aerosol, P. Natl. Acad. Sci., 114, 7549–7554, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1700830114, 2017. 

Shen, L. J., Wang, H. L., Lu, S., Li, L., Yuan, J., Zhang, X. H., Tian, X. D., and Tang, Q.: Observation of aerosol size distribution and new particle formation at a coastal city in the Yangtze River Delta, China, Sci. Total Environ., 565, 1175–1184, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.164, 2016. 

Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Wehner, B., Nowak, A., Tuch, T., Zhang, X. C., Wang, T. T., Zhou, H. G., Zhang, X. L., Dong, F., Birmili, W., and Wiedensohler, A.: First long-term study of particle number size distributions and new particle formation events of regional aerosol in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1565–1580, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1565-2011, 2011. 

Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, X. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, L., Che, H. C., Ma, Q. L., Yu, X. M., Yue, Y., and Zhang, Y. W.: Characterization of submicron aerosols and effect on visibility during a severe haze-fog episode in Yangtze River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 120, 307–316, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.011, 2015. 

Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, X. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, L., and Fan, R. X.: Key features of new particle formation events at background sites in China and their influence on cloud condensation nuclei, Fron. Environ. Sci. Eng., 10, 05, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-016-0833-2, 2016a. 

Shen, X. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, X. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, L., Fan, R. X., Zhang, Z. X., Zhang, X. L., Zhou, H. G., Zhou, L. Y., Dong, F., and Shi, Q. F.: The influence of emission control on particle number size distribution and new particle formation during China's V-Day parade in 2015, Sci. Total Environ., 573, 409–419, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.085, 2016b. 

Shen, X., Sun, J., Kivekäs, N., Kristensson, A., Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, L., Fan, R., Qi, X., Ma, Q., and Zhou, H.: Spatial distribution and occurrence probability of regional new particle formation events in eastern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 587–599, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-587-2018, 2018. 

Shi, Y., Chen, J., Hu, D., Wang, L., Yang, X., and Wang, X.: Airborne submicron particulate (PM1) pollution in Shanghai, China: Chemical variability, formation/dissociation of associated semi-volatile components and the impacts on visibility, Sci. Total Environ., 473–474, 199–206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.024, 2014. 

Sipilä, M., Berndt, T., Petaja, T., Brus, D., Vanhanen, J., Stratmann, F., Patokoski, J., Mauldin III, R. L., Hyvarinen, A.-P., Lihavainen, H., and Kulmala, M.: The Role of Sulfuric Acid in Atmospheric Nucleation, Science, 327, 1243–1246, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180315, 2010. 

Sipilä, M., Sarnela, N., Jokinen, T., Henschel, H., Junninen, H., Kontkanen, J., Richters, S., Kangasluoma, J., Franchin, A., Perakyla, O., Rissanen, M. P., Ehn, M., Vehkamaki, H., Kurten, T., Berndt, T., Petaja, T., Worsnop, D., Ceburnis, D., Kerminen, V. M., Kulmala, M., and O'Dowd, C.: Molecular-scale evidence of aerosol particle formation via sequential addition of HIO3, Nature, 537, 532–534, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19314, 2016. 

Sun, W., Shao, M., Granier, C., Liu, Y., Ye, C. S., and Zheng, J. Y.: Long-Term Trends of Anthropogenic SO2, NOx, CO, and NMVOCs Emissions in China, Earth's Future, 6, 1112–1133, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF000822, 2018. 

Sun, Y., Wang, Y. S., and Zhang, C. C.: Measurement of the vertical profile of atmospheric SO2 during the heating period in Beijing on days of high air pollution, Atmos. Environ., 43, 468–472, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.057, 2009. 

Sun, Y. L., Zhang, Q., Anastasio, C., and Sun, J.: Insights into secondary organic aerosol formed via aqueous-phase reactions of phenolic compounds based on high resolution mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4809–4822, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4809-2010, 2010. 

Sun, Y. L., Chen, C., Zhang, Y. J., Xu, W. Q., Zhou, L. B., Cheng, X. L., Zheng, H. T., Ji, D. S., Li, J., Tang, X., Fu, P. Q., and Wang, Z. F.: Rapid formation and evolution of an extreme haze episode in Northern China during winter 2015, Sci. Rep., 6, 27151, https://doi.org/10.1038/Srep27151, 2016. 

Tan, H. B., Yin, Y., Li, F., Liu, X. T., Chan, P. W., Deng, T., Deng, X. J., Wan, Q. L., and Wu, D.: Measurements of Particle Number Size Distributions and New Particle Formation Events during Winter in the Pearl River Delta Region, China, J. Trop. Meteorol., 22, 191–199, https://doi.org/10.16555/j.1006-8775.2016.02.009, 2016. 

Tao, J. C., Zhao, C. S., Ma, N., and Kuang, Y.: Consistency and applicability of parameterization schemes for the size-resolved aerosol activation ratio based on field measurements in the North China Plain, Atmos. Environ., 173, 316–324, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.021, 2018. 

Tao, Y., Ye, X. N., Jiang, S. Q., Yang, X., Chen, J. M., Xie, Y. Y., and Wang, R. Y.: Effects of amines on particle growth observed in new particle formation events, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 324–335, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD024245, 2016. 

Tröstl, J., Chuang, W. K., Gordon, H., Heinritzi, M., Yan, C., Molteni, U., Ahlm, L., Frege, C., Bianchi, F., Wagner, R., Simon, M., Lehtipalo, K., Williamson, C., Craven, J. S., Duplissy, J., Adamov, A., Almeida, J., Bernhammer, A.-K., Breitenlechner, M., Brilke, S., Dias, A., Ehrhart, S., Flagan, R. C., Franchin, A., Fuchs, C., Guida, R., Gysel, M., Hansel, A., Hoyle, C. R., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Kangasluoma, J., Keskinen, H., Kim, J., Krapf, M., Kuerten, A., Laaksonen, A., Lawler, M., Leiminger, M., Mathot, S., Moehler, O., Nieminen, T., Onnela, A., Petaejae, T., Piel, F. M., Miettinen, P., Rissanen, M. P., Rondo, L., Sarnela, N., Schobesberger, S., Sengupta, K., Sipila, M., Smith, J. N., Steiner, G., Tome, A., Virtanen, A., Wagner, A. C., Weingartner, E., Wimmer, D., Winkler, P. M., Ye, P., Carslaw, K. S., Curtius, J., Dommen, J., Kirkby, J., Kulmala, M., Riipinen, I., Worsnop, D. R., Donahue, N. M., and Baltensperger, U.: The role of low-volatility organic compounds in initial particle growth in the atmosphere, Nature, 533, 527–531, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18271, 2016. 

von Schneidemesser, E., Monks, P. S., and Plass-Duelmer, C.: Global comparison of VOC and CO observations in urban areas, Atmos. Environ., 44, 5053–5064, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.09.010, 2010. 

Vu, T. V., Delgado-Saborit, J. M., and Harrison, R. M.: Review: Particle number size distributions from seven major sources and implications for source apportionment studies, Atmos. Environ., 122, 114–132, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.09.027, 2015. 

Wang, D. W., Guo, H., Cheung, K., and Gan, F. X.: Observation of nucleation mode particle burst and new particle formation events at an urban site in Hong Kong, Atmos. Environ., 99, 196–205, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.074, 2014. 

Wang, H. L., Zhu, B., Shen, L. J., An, J. L., Yin, Y., and Kang, H. Q.: Number size distribution of aerosols at Mt. Huang and Nanjing in the Yangtze River Delta, China: Effects of air masses and characteristics of new particle formation, Atmos. Res., 150, 42–56, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2014.07.020, 2014. 

Wang, L., Wen, L., Xu, C., Chen, J., Wang, X., Yang, L., Wang, W., Yang, X., Sui, X., Yao, L., and Zhang, Q.: HONO and its potential source particulate nitrite at an urban site in North China during the cold season, Sci. Total Environ., 538, 93–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.032, 2015. 

Wang, S. W., Zhang, Q., Martin, R. V., Philip, S., Liu, F., Li, M., Jiang, X. J., and He, K. B.: Satellite measurements oversee China's sulfur dioxide emission reductions from coal-fired power plants, Environ. Res. Lett., 10, 114015, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114015, 2015. 

Wang, Y., Yao, L., Wang, L., Liu, Z., Ji, D., Tang, G., Zhang, J., Sun, Y., Hu, B., and Xin, J.: Mechanism for the formation of the January 2013 heavy haze pollution episode over central and eastern China, Sci. China Earth Sci., 57, 14–25, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4773-4, 2013. 

Wang, Z., Wang, T., Guo, J., Gao, R., Xue, L. K., Zhang, J. M., Zhou, Y., Zhou, X. H., Zhang, Q. Z., and Wang, W. X.: Formation of secondary organic carbon and cloud impact on carbonaceous aerosols at Mount Tai, North China, Atmos. Environ., 46, 516–527, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.019, 2012. 

Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Yue, D. L., Zheng, J., Zhang, R. Y., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Z. J., Nieminen, T., and Boy, M.: Evaluation on the role of sulfuric acid in the mechanisms of new particle formation for Beijing case, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12663–12671, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12663-2011, 2011. 

Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Mogensen, D., Yue, D. L., Zheng, J., Zhang, R. Y., Liu, Y., Yuan, B., Li, X., Shao, M., Zhou, L., Wu, Z. J., Wiedensohler, A., and Boy, M.: The simulations of sulfuric acid concentration and new particle formation in an urban atmosphere in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 11157–11167, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-11157-2013, 2013a. 

Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Sun, J. Y., Wu, Z. J., Yue, D. L., Shen, X. J., Zhang, Y. M., Pei, X. Y., Cheng, Y. F., and Wiedensohler, A.: Characteristics of regional new particle formation in urban and regional background environments in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 12495–12506, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-12495-2013, 2013b. 

Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Wu, Z. J., Yue, D. L., He, L. Y., Huang, X. F., Liu, X. G., and Wiedensohler, A.: Long-term measurements of particle number size distributions and the relationships with air mass history and source apportionment in the summer of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10159–10170, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10159-2013, 2013c. 

Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Yue, D. L., He, L. Y., Huang, X. F., Yang, Q., Zheng, J., Zhang, R. Y., and Zhang, Y. H.: New particle formation in the presence of a strong biomass burning episode at a downwind rural site in PRD, China, Tellus B, 65, 19965, https://doi.org/10.3402/Tellusb.V65i0.19965, 2013d. 

Wang, Z. B., Hu, M., Pei, X. Y., Zhang, R. Y., Paasonen, P., Zheng, J., Yue, D. L., Wu, Z. J., Boy, M., and Wiedensohler, A.: Connection of organics to atmospheric new particle formation and growth at an urban site of Beijing, Atmos. Environ., 103, 7–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.069, 2015. 

Wang, Z. B., Wu, Z. J., Yue, D. L., Shang, D. J., Guo, S., Sun, J. Y., Ding, A. J., Wang, L., Jiang, J. K., Guo, H., Gao, J., Cheung, H. C., Morawska, L., Keywood, M., and Hu, M.: New particle formation in China: Current knowledge and further directions, Sci. Total Environ., 577, 258–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.10.177, 2017. 

Wei, W., Wang, S. X., Hao, J. M., and Cheng, S. Y.: Projection of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emissions in China for the period 2010–2020, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6863–6871, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.013, 2011. 

Welz, O., Savee, J. D., Osborn, D. L., Vasu, S. S., Percival, C. J., Shallcross, D. E., and Taatjes, C. A.: Direct Kinetic Measurements of Criegee Intermediate (CH2OO) Formed by Reaction of CH2I with O2, Science, 335, 204–207, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213229, 2012. 

Wen, L. A., Chen, J. M., Yang, L. X., Wang, X. F., Xu, C. H., Sui, X. A., Yao, L., Zhu, Y. H., Zhang, J. M., Zhu, T., and Wang, W. X.: Enhanced formation of fine particulate nitrate at a rural site on the North China Plain in summer: The important roles of ammonia and ozone, Atmos. Environ., 101, 294–302, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.11.037, 2015. 

Wildt, J., Mentel, T. F., Kiendler-Scharr, A., Hoffmann, T., Andres, S., Ehn, M., Kleist, E., Müsgen, P., Rohrer, F., Rudich, Y., Springer, M., Tillmann, R., and Wahner, A.: Suppression of new particle formation from monoterpene oxidation by NOx, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2789–2804, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2789-2014, 2014. 

Wu, R. R., Bo, Y., Li, J., Li, L. Y., Li, Y. Q., and Xie, S. D.: Method to establish the emission inventory of anthropogenic volatile organic compounds in China and its application in the period 2008–2012, Atmos. Environ., 127, 244–254, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.12.015, 2016. 

Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Liu, S., Wehner, B., Bauer, S., Ssling, A. M., Wiedensohler, A., Petaja, T., Dal Maso, M., and Kulmala, M.: New particle formation in Beijing, China: Statistical analysis of a 1-year data set, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D09209, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007406, 2007. 

Wu, Z. J., Hu, M., Yue, D. L., Wehner, B., and Wiedensohler, A.: Evolution of particle number size distribution in an urban atmosphere during episodes of heavy pollution and new particle formation, Sci. China-Earth Sci., 54, 1772–1778, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-011-4227-9, 2011. 

Xiao, S., Wang, M. Y., Yao, L., Kulmala, M., Zhou, B., Yang, X., Chen, J. M., Wang, D. F., Fu, Q. Y., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, L.: Strong atmospheric new particle formation in winter in urban Shanghai, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 1769–1781, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1769-2015, 2015. 

Xie, Y. N., Ding, A. J., Nie, W., Mao, H. T., Qi, X. M., Huang, X., Xu, Z., Kerminen, V. M., Petaja, T., Chi, X. G., Virkkula, A., Boy, M., Xue, L. K., Guo, J., Sun, J. N., Yang, X. Q., Kulmala, M., and Fu, C. B.: Enhanced sulfate formation by nitrogen dioxide: Implications from in situ observations at the SORPES station, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 12679–12694, 2015. 

Yang, F., Tan, J., Zhao, Q., Du, Z., He, K., Ma, Y., Duan, F., Chen, G., and Zhao, Q.: Characteristics of PM2.5 speciation in representative megacities and across China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5207–5219, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5207-2011, 2011. 

Yao, L., Wang, M. Y., Wang, X. K., Liu, Y. J., Chen, H. F., Zheng, J., Nie, W., Ding, A. J., Geng, F. H., Wang, D. F., Chen, J. M., Worsnop, D. R., and Wang, L.: Detection of atmospheric gaseous amines and amides by a high-resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometer with protonated ethanol reagent ions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14527–14543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14527-2016, 2016. 

Yao, L., Garmash, O., Bianchi, F., Zheng, J., Yan, C., Kontkanen, J., Junninen, H., Mazon, S. B., Ehn, M., Paasonen, P., Sipilä, M., Wang, M., Wang, X., Xiao, S., Chen, H., Lu, Y., Zhang, B., Wang, D., Fu, Q., Geng, F., Li, L., Wang, H., Qiao, L., Yang, X., Chen, J., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D. R., Kulmala, M., and Wang, L.: Atmospheric new particle formation from sulfuric acid and amines in a Chinese megacity, Science, 361, 278–281, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao4839, 2018. 

Yao, X. H., Choi, M. Y., Lau, N. T., Lau, A. P. S., Chan, C. K., and Fang, M.: Growth and Shrinkage of New Particles in the Atmosphere in Hong Kong, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 44, 639–650, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.482576, 2010. 

Ye, X. N., Ma, Z., Zhang, J. C., Du, H. H., Chen, J. M., Chen, H., Yang, X., Gao, W., and Geng, F. H.: Important role of ammonia on haze formation in Shanghai, Environ. Res. Lett., 6, 024019, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/6/2/024019, 2011. 

Young, L. H., Lee, S. H., Kanawade, V. P., Hsiao, T. C., Lee, Y. L., Hwang, B. F., Liou, Y. J., Hsu, H. T., and Tsai, P. J.: New particle growth and shrinkage observed in subtropical environments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 547–564, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-547-2013, 2013a. 

Young, L. H., Lee, S. H., Kanawade, V. P., Hsiao, T. C., Lee, Y. L., Hwang, B. F., Liou, Y. J., Hsu, H. T., and Tsai, P. J.: Atmospheric Observations of New Particle Growth and Shrinkage, Nucl. Atmos. Aerosols, 1527, 426–429, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4803295, 2013b. 

Yu, H., Zhou, L. Y., Dai, L., Shen, W. C., Dai, W., Zheng, J., Ma, Y., and Chen, M. D.: Nucleation and growth of sub-3nm particles in the polluted urban atmosphere of a megacity in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2641–2657, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2641-2016, 2016. 

Yu, H., Ren, L., and Kanawade, V. P.: New Particle Formation and Growth Mechanisms in Highly Polluted Environments, Curr. Poll. Rep., 3, 245–253, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-017-0067-3, 2017. 

Yuan, Q., Yang, L. X., Dong, C., Yan, C., Meng, C. P., Sui, X., and Wang, W. X.: Particle physical characterisation in the Yellow River Delta of Eastern China: number size distribution and new particle formation, Air Qual. Atmos. Health, 8, 441–452, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-014-0293-4, 2015. 

Yue, D. L., Hu, M., Wu, Z. J., Wang, Z. B., Guo, S., Wehner, B., Nowak, A., Achtert, P., Wiedensohler, A., Jung, J., Kim, Y. J., and Liu, S.: Characteristics of aerosol size distributions and new particle formation in the summer in Beijing, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D00g12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010894, 2009. 

Yue, D. L., Hu, M., Zhang, R. Y., Wang, Z. B., Zheng, J., Wu, Z. J., Wiedensohler, A., He, L. Y., Huang, X. F., and Zhu, T.: The roles of sulfuric acid in new particle formation and growth in the mega-city of Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4953–4960, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4953-2010, 2010. 

Yue, D. L., Hu, M., Wang, Z. B., Wen, M. T., Guo, S., Zhong, L. J., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, Y. H.: Comparison of particle number size distributions and new particle formation between the urban and rural sites in the PRD region, China, Atmos. Environ., 76, 181–188, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.11.018, 2013. 

Zhang, H., Li, H., Zhang, Q. Z., Zhang, Y. J., Zhang, W. Q., Wang, X. Z., Bi, F., Chai, F. H., Gao, J., Meng, L. S., Yang, T., Chen, Y. Z., Cheng, Q., and Xia, F. M.: Atmospheric Volatile Organic Compounds in a Typical Urban Area of Beijing: Pollution Characterization, Health Risk Assessment and Source Apportionment, Atmosphere, 8, 61, https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos8030061, 2017. 

Zhang, Q., Shen, Z. X., Cao, J. J., Zhang, R. J., Zhang, L. M., Huang, R. J., Zheng, C. J., Wang, L. Q., Liu, S. X., Xu, H. M., Zheng, C. L., and Liu, P. P.: Variations in PM2.5, TSP, BC, and trace gases (NO2, SO2, and O3) between haze and non-haze episodes in winter over Xi'an, China, Atmos. Environ., 112, 64–71, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.04.033, 2015. 

Zhang, R., Wang, G., Guo, S., Zarnora, M. L., Ying, Q., Lin, Y., Wang, W., Hu, M., and Wang, Y.: Formation of Urban Fine Particulate Matter, Chem. Rev., 115, 3803–3855, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00067, 2015. 

Zhang, X. H., Zhang, Y. M., Sun, J. Y., Zheng, X. J., Li, G., and Deng, Z. Q.: Characterization of particle number size distribution and new particle formation in an urban environment in Lanzhou, China, J. Aerosol Sci., 103, 53–66, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2016.10.010, 2017. 

Zhang, X. R., Yin, Y., Lin, Z. Y., Han, Y. X., Hao, J., Yuan, L., Chen, K., Chen, J. H., Kong, S. F., Shan, Y. P., Xiao, H., and Tan, W.: Observation of aerosol number size distribution and new particle formation at a mountainous site in Southeast China, Sci. Total Environ., 575, 309–320, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.212, 2017. 

Zhang, Y.-L. and Cao, F.: Fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in China at a city level, Sci. Rep., 5, 14884, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14884, 2015. 

Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, X. Y., Sun, J. Y., Lin, W. L., Gong, S. L., Shen, X. J., and Yang, S.: Characterization of new particle and secondary aerosol formation during summertime in Beijing, China, Tellus B, 63, 382–394, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00533.x, 2011. 

Zhao, P. S., Dong, F., He, D., Zhao, X. J., Zhang, X. L., Zhang, W. Z., Yao, Q., and Liu, H. Y.: Characteristics of concentrations and chemical compositions for PM2.5 in the region of Beijing, Tianjin, and Hebei, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4631–4644, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4631-2013, 2013. 

Zheng, B., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., He, K. B., Wang, K., Zheng, G. J., Duan, F. K., Ma, Y. L., and Kimoto, T.: Heterogeneous chemistry: a mechanism missing in current models to explain secondary inorganic aerosol formation during the January 2013 haze episode in North China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2031–2049, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2031-2015, 2015. 

Zheng, B., Tong, D., Li, M., Liu, F., Hong, C., Geng, G., Li, H., Li, X., Peng, L., Qi, J., Yan, L., Zhang, Y., Zhao, H., Zheng, Y., He, K., and Zhang, Q.: Trends in China's anthropogenic emissions since 2010 as the consequence of clean air actions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14095–14111, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14095-2018, 2018. 

Zheng, J., Hu, M., Zhang, R., Yue, D., Wang, Z., Guo, S., Li, X., Bohn, B., Shao, M., He, L., Huang, X., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhu, T.: Measurements of gaseous H2SO4 by AP-ID-CIMS during CAREBeijing 2008 Campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7755–7765, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7755-2011, 2011. 

Zheng, J., Ma, Y., Chen, M. D., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Khalizov, A. F., Yao, L., Wang, Z., Wang, X., and Chen, L. X.: Measurement of atmospheric amines and ammonia using the high resolution time-of-flight chemical ionization mass spectrometry, Atmos. Environ., 102, 249–259, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.12.002, 2015. 

Zhu, B., Wang, H. L., Shen, L. J., Kang, H. Q., and Yu, X. N.: Aerosol spectra and new particle formation observed in various seasons in Nanjing, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 30, 1632–1644, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-013-2202-4, 2013. 

Zhu, Y. J., Sabaliauskas, K., Liu, X. H., Meng, H., Gao, H. W., Jeong, C. H., Evans, G. J., and Yao, X. H.: Comparative analysis of new particle formation events in less and severely polluted urban atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 98, 655–664, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.09.043, 2014. 

Zhu, Y. J., Yan, C. Q., Zhang, R. Y., Wang, Z. F., Zheng, M., Gao, H. W., Gao, Y., and Yao, X. H.: Simultaneous measurements of new particle formation at 1 s time resolution at a street site and a rooftop site, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9469–9484, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9469-2017, 2017.  

Zou, Y., Deng, X. J., Zhu, D., Gong, D. C., Wang, H., Li, F., Tan, H. B., Deng, T., Mai, B. R., Liu, X. T., and Wang, B. G.: Characteristics of 1 year of observational data of VOCs, NOx and O3 at a suburban site in Guangzhou, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 6625–6636, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-6625-2015, 2015. 

Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
The characteristics of new particle formation (NPF) in China, including frequency, formation rate, and particle growth rate, were summarized comprehensively and were compared among observations in different environments. The interactions between air pollution and NPF are discussed, as well as the possible reasons for more frequent NPF under heavy pollution conditions than in our current understanding. Significant and future research directions for NPF studies in China are also summarized.
The characteristics of new particle formation (NPF) in China, including frequency, formation...
Citation
Share