Articles | Volume 18, issue 12
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9075-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-9075-2018
Research article
 | 
28 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 28 Jun 2018

Production and transport mechanisms of NO in the polar upper mesosphere and lower thermosphere in observations and models

Koen Hendrickx, Linda Megner, Daniel R. Marsh, and Christine Smith-Johnsen

Related authors

Sampling the diurnal and annual cycles of the Earth’s energy imbalance with constellations of satellite-borne radiometers
Thomas Hocking, Thorsten Mauritsen, and Linda Megner
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-356,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-356, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (AMT).
Short summary
The Co-benefits of a Low-Carbon Future on Air Quality in Europe
Connor J. Clayton, Daniel R. Marsh, Steven T. Turnock, Ailish M. Graham, Kirsty J. Pringle, Carly L. Reddington, Rajesh Kumar, and James B. McQuaid
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-755,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-755, 2024
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics (ACP).
Short summary
Towards the definition of a solar forcing dataset for CMIP7
Bernd Funke, Thierry Dudok de Wit, Ilaria Ermolli, Margit Haberreiter, Doug Kinnison, Daniel Marsh, Hilde Nesse, Annika Seppälä, Miriam Sinnhuber, and Ilya Usoskin
Geosci. Model Dev., 17, 1217–1227, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-1217-2024, 2024
Short summary
Scale separation for gravity wave analysis from 3D temperature observations in the MLT region
Björn Linder, Peter Preusse, Qiuyu Chen, Ole Martin Christensen, Lukas Krasauskas, Linda Megner, Manfred Ern, and Jörg Gumbel
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-136,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-136, 2024
Short summary
An improved and extended parameterization of the CO2 15 µm cooling in the middle/upper atmosphere
Manuel López-Puertas, Federico Fabiano, Victor Fomichev, Bernd Funke, and Daniel R. Marsh
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2424,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2023-2424, 2023
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Gases | Research Activity: Remote Sensing | Altitude Range: Mesosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Significant decline of mesospheric water vapor at the NDACC site near Bern in the period 2007 to 2018
Martin Lainer, Klemens Hocke, Ellen Eckert, and Niklaus Kämpfer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6611–6620, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6611-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6611-2019, 2019
Short summary
Mesospheric nitric oxide model from SCIAMACHY data
Stefan Bender, Miriam Sinnhuber, Patrick J. Espy, and John P. Burrows
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 2135–2147, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2135-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-2135-2019, 2019
Short summary
The airglow layer emission altitude cannot be determined unambiguously from temperature comparison with lidars
Tim Dunker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6691–6697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6691-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6691-2018, 2018
Short summary
Assessing the ability to derive rates of polar middle-atmospheric descent using trace gas measurements from remote sensors
Niall J. Ryan, Douglas E. Kinnison, Rolando R. Garcia, Christoph G. Hoffmann, Mathias Palm, Uwe Raffalski, and Justus Notholt
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1457–1474, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1457-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1457-2018, 2018
Short summary
The SPARC water vapor assessment II: intercomparison of satellite and ground-based microwave measurements
Gerald E. Nedoluha, Michael Kiefer, Stefan Lossow, R. Michael Gomez, Niklaus Kämpfer, Martin Lainer, Peter Forkman, Ole Martin Christensen, Jung Jin Oh, Paul Hartogh, John Anderson, Klaus Bramstedt, Bianca M. Dinelli, Maya Garcia-Comas, Mark Hervig, Donal Murtagh, Piera Raspollini, William G. Read, Karen Rosenlof, Gabriele P. Stiller, and Kaley A. Walker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14543–14558, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14543-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14543-2017, 2017
Short summary

Cited articles

Andersson, M., Verronen, P., Marsh, D., Päivärinta, S., and Plane, J.: WACCM-D – Improved modeling of nitric acid and active chlorine during energetic particle precipitation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 10328–10341, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024173, 2016. a
Arsenovic, P., Rozanov, E., Stenke, A., Funke, B., Wissing, J., Mursula, K., Tummon, F., and Peter, T.: The influence of middle range energy electrons on atmospheric chemistry and regional climate, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phy., 149, 180–190, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2016.04.008, 2016. a
Bailey, S. M., Barth, C. A., and Solomon, S. C.: A model of nitric oxide in the lower thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 107, SIA 22–SIA 21, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JA000258, 2002. a, b
Barth, C. A.: Nitric Oxide in the Lower Thermosphere, in: The Upper Mesosphere and Lower Thermosphere: A Review of Experiment and Theory, edited by: Johnson, R. M. and Killeen, T. L., Vol. 87, Geophysical Monograph Series, 225–233, American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., https://doi.org/10.1029/GM087p0225, 1995. a, b, c
Barth, C. A., Mankoff, K., Bailey, S., and Solomon, S.: Global observations of nitric oxide in the thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Space, 108, 1027, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002ja009458, 2003. a
Download
Short summary
The mechanisms that produce, destroy and transport nitric oxide (NO) in the Antarctic mesosphere and lower thermosphere are investigated in AIM-SOFIE satellite observations and compared to SD-WACCM simulations. During winter, NO concentrations are most similar while the altitude of maximum NO number densities is most separated. Even though the rate of descent is similar in both datasets, the simulated descending NO flux is too low in concentration, which reflects a missing source of NO.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint