Articles | Volume 18, issue 11
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8265-2018
Research article
 | 
13 Jun 2018
Research article |  | 13 Jun 2018

Assessing the capability of different satellite observing configurations to resolve the distribution of methane emissions at kilometer scales

Alexander J. Turner, Daniel J. Jacob, Joshua Benmergui, Jeremy Brandman, Laurent White, and Cynthia A. Randles

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Alexander Turner on behalf of the Authors (04 May 2018)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (15 May 2018) by Martin Heimann
Download
Short summary
We conduct a 1-week WRF-STILT simulation to generate methane column footprints at 1.3 km spatial resolution and hourly temporal resolution over the Barnett Shale. We find that a week of TROPOMI observations should provide regional (~30 km) information on temporally invariant sources and GeoCARB should provide information on temporally invariant sources at 2–7 km spatial resolution. An instrument precision better than 6 ppb is an important threshold for achieving fine resolution of emissions.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint