Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.509 IF 5.509
  • IF 5-year value: 5.689 IF 5-year 5.689
  • CiteScore value: 5.44 CiteScore 5.44
  • SNIP value: 1.519 SNIP 1.519
  • SJR value: 3.032 SJR 3.032
  • IPP value: 5.37 IPP 5.37
  • h5-index value: 86 h5-index 86
  • Scimago H index value: 161 Scimago H index 161
Volume 18, issue 7 | Copyright

Special issue: Quadrennial Ozone Symposium 2016 – Status and trends...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5001-5019, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5001-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 12 Apr 2018

Research article | 12 Apr 2018

Middle atmospheric ozone, nitrogen dioxide and nitrogen trioxide in 2002–2011: SD-WACCM simulations compared to GOMOS observations

Erkki Kyrölä1, Monika E. Andersson1, Pekka T. Verronen1, Marko Laine2, Simo Tukiainen3, and Daniel R. Marsh4 Erkki Kyrölä et al.
  • 1Earth Observation Research, Space and Earth Observation Centre, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
  • 2Meteorological Research, Meteorological and Marine Research Programme, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Atmospheric Composition Research, Climate Research Programme, Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101 Helsinki, Finland
  • 4National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, USA

Abstract. Most of our understanding of the atmosphere is based on observations and their comparison with model simulations. In middle atmosphere studies it is common practice to use an approach, where the model dynamics are at least partly based on temperature and wind fields from an external meteorological model. In this work we test how closely satellite measurements of a few central trace gases agree with this kind of model simulation. We use collocated vertical profiles where each satellite measurement is compared to the closest model data.

We compare profiles and distributions of O3, NO2 and NO3 from the Global Ozone Monitoring by Occultation of Stars instrument (GOMOS) on the Envisat satellite with simulations by the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM). GOMOS measurements are from nighttime. Our comparisons show that in the stratosphere outside the polar regions differences in ozone between WACCM and GOMOS are small, between 0 and 6%. The correlation of 5-day time series show a very high 0.9–0.95. In the tropical region 10°S–10°N below 10hPa WACCM values are up to 20% larger than GOMOS. In the Arctic below 6hPa WACCM ozone values are up to 20% larger than GOMOS. In the mesosphere between 0.04 and 1hPa the WACCM is at most 20% smaller than GOMOS. Above the ozone minimum at 0.01hPa (or 80km) large differences are found between WACCM and GOMOS. The correlation can still be high, but at the second ozone peak the correlation falls strongly and the ozone abundance from WACCM is about 60% smaller than that from GOMOS. The total ozone columns (above 50hPa) of GOMOS and WACCM agree within ±2% except in the Arctic where WACCM is 10% larger than GOMOS.

Outside the polar areas and in the validity region of GOMOS NO2 measurements (0.3–37hPa) WACCM and GOMOS NO2 agree within −5 to +25% and the correlation is high (0.7–0.95) except in the upper stratosphere at the southern latitudes. In the polar areas, where solar particle precipitation and downward transport from the thermosphere enhance NO2 abundance, large differences up to −90% are found between WACCM and GOMOS NO2 and the correlation varies between 0.3 and 0.9. For NO3, we find that the WACCM and GOMOS difference is between −20 and 5% with a very high correlation of 0.7–0.95. We show that NO3 values strongly depend on temperature and the dependency can be fitted by the exponential function of temperature. The ratio of NO3 to O3 from WACCM and GOMOS closely follow the prediction from the equilibrium chemical theory. Abrupt temperature increases from sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) are reflected as sudden enhancements of WACCM and GOMOS NO3 values.

Download & links
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Short summary
In this work we compare three key constituents of the middle atmosphere (ozone, NO2, and NO3) from the GOMOS satellite instrument with the WACCM model. We find that in the stratosphere (below 50 km) ozone differences are very small, but in the mesosphere large deviations are found. GOMOS and WACCM NO2 agree reasonably well except in the polar areas. These differences can be connected to the solar particle storms. For NO3, WACCM results agree with GOMOS with a very high correlation.
In this work we compare three key constituents of the middle atmosphere (ozone, NO2, and NO3)...
Citation
Share