Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.414 IF 5.414
  • IF 5-year value: 5.958 IF 5-year
    5.958
  • CiteScore value: 9.7 CiteScore
    9.7
  • SNIP value: 1.517 SNIP 1.517
  • IPP value: 5.61 IPP 5.61
  • SJR value: 2.601 SJR 2.601
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 191 Scimago H
    index 191
  • h5-index value: 89 h5-index 89
ACP | Articles | Volume 18, issue 4
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2769–2786, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2769-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: The Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP):...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2769–2786, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2769-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 27 Feb 2018

Research article | 27 Feb 2018

Sensitivity of the radiative forcing by stratospheric sulfur geoengineering to the amount and strategy of the SO2injection studied with the LMDZ-S3A model

Christoph Kleinschmitt et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 2,104 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,426 643 35 2,104 43 38
  • HTML: 1,426
  • PDF: 643
  • XML: 35
  • Total: 2,104
  • BibTeX: 43
  • EndNote: 38
Views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2017)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 04 Aug 2017)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,099 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,078 with geography defined and 21 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

Discussed (preprint)

Latest update: 02 Jul 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We use a state-of-the-art stratospheric aerosol model to study geoengineering through stratospheric sulfur injections. We find that the efficiency may decrease more drastically for larger injections than previously estimated and that injections at higher altitude are not more effective. This study may provide additional evidence that this proposed geoengineering technique is still more complicated, probably less effective, and may implicate stronger side effects than initially thought.
We use a state-of-the-art stratospheric aerosol model to study geoengineering through...
Citation