Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.414 IF 5.414
  • IF 5-year value: 5.958 IF 5-year
    5.958
  • CiteScore value: 9.7 CiteScore
    9.7
  • SNIP value: 1.517 SNIP 1.517
  • IPP value: 5.61 IPP 5.61
  • SJR value: 2.601 SJR 2.601
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 191 Scimago H
    index 191
  • h5-index value: 89 h5-index 89
ACP | Articles | Volume 18, issue 22
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16729–16745, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: ML-CIRRUS – the airborne experiment on natural cirrus...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16729–16745, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16729-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 27 Nov 2018

Research article | 27 Nov 2018

Intercomparison of midlatitude tropospheric and lower-stratospheric water vapor measurements and comparison to ECMWF humidity data

Stefan Kaufmann et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 1,089 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
760 309 20 1,089 29 20
  • HTML: 760
  • PDF: 309
  • XML: 20
  • Total: 1,089
  • BibTeX: 29
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Jul 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 1,081 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,062 with geography defined and 19 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved (final revised paper)

No saved metrics found.

Saved (preprint)

No saved metrics found.

Discussed (final revised paper)

No discussed metrics found.

Discussed (preprint)

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 01 Jul 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We present an intercomparison of the airborne water vapor measurements during the ML-CIRRUS mission. Although the agreement of the hygrometers significantly improved compared to studies from recent decades, systematic differences remain under specific meteorological conditions. We compare the measurements to model data, where we observe a model wet bias in the lower stratosphere close to the tropopause, likely caused by a blurred humidity gradient in the model tropopause.
We present an intercomparison of the airborne water vapor measurements during the ML-CIRRUS...
Citation