Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
ACP | Articles | Volume 18, issue 21
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16155–16172, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16155-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Special issue: Chemistry–Climate Modelling Initiative (CCMI) (ACP/AMT/ESSD/GMD...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16155–16172, 2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16155-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Research article 13 Nov 2018

Research article | 13 Nov 2018

Tropospheric ozone in CCMI models and Gaussian process emulation to understand biases in the SOCOLv3 chemistry–climate model

Laura E. Revell et al.
Viewed  
Total article views: 1,446 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,046 378 22 1,446 81 20 20
  • HTML: 1,046
  • PDF: 378
  • XML: 22
  • Total: 1,446
  • Supplement: 81
  • BibTeX: 20
  • EndNote: 20
Views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 26 Jun 2018)
Viewed (geographical distribution)  
Total article views: 1,396 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 1,386 with geography defined and 10 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Cited  
Saved (final revised paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Saved (discussion paper)  
No saved metrics found.
Discussed (final revised paper)  
Discussed (discussion paper)  
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 18 Oct 2019
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
Global models such as those participating in the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI) consistently simulate biases in tropospheric ozone compared with observations. We performed an advanced statistical analysis with one of the CCMI models to understand the cause of the bias. We found that emissions of ozone precursor gases are the dominant driver of the bias, implying either that the emissions are too large, or that the way in which the model handles emissions needs to be improved.
Global models such as those participating in the Chemistry-Climate Model Initiative (CCMI)...
Citation