Articles | Volume 18, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13547-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13547-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
25 Sep 2018
Research article |
| 25 Sep 2018
| 25 Sep 2018
Reanalysis intercomparisons of stratospheric polar processing diagnostics
Zachary D. Lawrence
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, USA
NorthWest Research Associates, Socorro, NM, USA
Gloria L. Manney
NorthWest Research Associates, Socorro, NM, USA
New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM, USA
Krzysztof Wargan
NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD, USA
Viewed
Total article views: 2,464 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,562 | 816 | 86 | 2,464 | 65 | 61 |
- HTML: 1,562
- PDF: 816
- XML: 86
- Total: 2,464
- BibTeX: 65
- EndNote: 61
Total article views: 1,837 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 25 Sep 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,222 | 548 | 67 | 1,837 | 54 | 46 |
- HTML: 1,222
- PDF: 548
- XML: 67
- Total: 1,837
- BibTeX: 54
- EndNote: 46
Total article views: 627 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 19 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 340 | 268 | 19 | 627 | 11 | 15 |
- HTML: 340
- PDF: 268
- XML: 19
- Total: 627
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 15
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,464 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,440 with geography defined
and 24 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 1,837 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,856 with geography defined
and -19 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 627 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 584 with geography defined
and 43 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Arctic Stratosphere Dynamical Processes in the Winter 2021–2022 P. Vargin et al. 10.3390/atmos13101550
- Strong Evidence of Heterogeneous Processing on Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol in the Extrapolar Southern Hemisphere Following the 2022 Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Eruption M. Santee et al. 10.1029/2023JD039169
- Record‐Low Arctic Stratospheric Ozone in 2020: MLS Observations of Chemical Processes and Comparisons With Previous Extreme Winters G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2020GL089063
- Study of the Variability of Spring Breakup Dates and Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex Parameters from Simulation and Reanalysis Data P. Vargin et al. 10.1134/S0001433820050114
- Near‐Complete Local Reduction of Arctic Stratospheric Ozone by Severe Chemical Loss in Spring 2020 I. Wohltmann et al. 10.1029/2020GL089547
- Arctic Stratosphere Circulation Changes in the 21st Century in Simulations of INM CM5 P. Vargin et al. 10.3390/atmos13010025
- Reanalysis intercomparison of potential vorticity and potential-vorticity-based diagnostics L. Millán et al. 10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021
- Role of the quasi-biennial oscillation in the downward extension of stratospheric northern annular mode anomalies R. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s00382-020-05285-4
- Fluid Dynamics of Polar Vortices on Earth, Mars, and Titan D. Waugh 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120720-032208
- Arctic polar vortex dynamics during winters 2014/2015 and 2020/2021 V. Zuev et al. 10.30758/0555-2648-2023-69-2-114-123
- Stratospheric polar vortex dynamics according to the vortex delineation method V. Zuev & E. Savelieva 10.1007/s12040-023-02060-x
- Siege in the Southern Stratosphere: Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Water Vapor Excluded From the 2022 Antarctic Polar Vortex G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2023GL103855
- What's in a Name? On the Use and Significance of the Term “Polar Vortex” G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2021GL097617
- The Anomalous 2019 Antarctic Ozone Hole in the GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation System With MLS Observations K. Wargan et al. 10.1029/2020JD033335
- Analysis of the Arctic polar vortex dynamics during the sudden stratospheric warming in January 2009 V. Zuev et al. 10.30758/0555-2648-2021-67-2-134-146
- The Remarkably Strong Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex of Winter 2020: Links to Record‐Breaking Arctic Oscillation and Ozone Loss Z. Lawrence et al. 10.1029/2020JD033271
- Unprecedented Spring 2020 Ozone Depletion in the Context of 20 Years of Measurements at Eureka, Canada K. Bognar et al. 10.1029/2020JD034365
- Arctic stratosphere changes in the 21st century in the Earth system model SOCOLv4 P. Vargin et al. 10.3389/feart.2023.1214418
- Temperature and tropopause characteristics from reanalyses data in the tropical tropopause layer S. Tegtmeier et al. 10.5194/acp-20-753-2020
- Climate change favours large seasonal loss of Arctic ozone P. von der Gathen et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24089-6
- Chemical Evolution of the Exceptional Arctic Stratospheric Winter 2019/2020 Compared to Previous Arctic and Antarctic Winters I. Wohltmann et al. 10.1029/2020JD034356
- NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS‐CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition K. Knowland et al. 10.1029/2021MS002852
- Is the subtropical jet shifting poleward? P. Maher et al. 10.1007/s00382-019-05084-6
- Prolonged and Pervasive Perturbations in the Composition of the Southern Hemisphere Midlatitude Lower Stratosphere From the Australian New Year's Fires M. Santee et al. 10.1029/2021GL096270
- Features of Stratospheric Polar Vortex Weakening Prior to Breakdown V. Zuev et al. 10.1134/S1024856022020142
- Signatures of Anomalous Transport in the 2019/2020 Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2022JD037407
26 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Arctic Stratosphere Dynamical Processes in the Winter 2021–2022 P. Vargin et al. 10.3390/atmos13101550
- Strong Evidence of Heterogeneous Processing on Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol in the Extrapolar Southern Hemisphere Following the 2022 Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Eruption M. Santee et al. 10.1029/2023JD039169
- Record‐Low Arctic Stratospheric Ozone in 2020: MLS Observations of Chemical Processes and Comparisons With Previous Extreme Winters G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2020GL089063
- Study of the Variability of Spring Breakup Dates and Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex Parameters from Simulation and Reanalysis Data P. Vargin et al. 10.1134/S0001433820050114
- Near‐Complete Local Reduction of Arctic Stratospheric Ozone by Severe Chemical Loss in Spring 2020 I. Wohltmann et al. 10.1029/2020GL089547
- Arctic Stratosphere Circulation Changes in the 21st Century in Simulations of INM CM5 P. Vargin et al. 10.3390/atmos13010025
- Reanalysis intercomparison of potential vorticity and potential-vorticity-based diagnostics L. Millán et al. 10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021
- Role of the quasi-biennial oscillation in the downward extension of stratospheric northern annular mode anomalies R. Zhang et al. 10.1007/s00382-020-05285-4
- Fluid Dynamics of Polar Vortices on Earth, Mars, and Titan D. Waugh 10.1146/annurev-fluid-120720-032208
- Arctic polar vortex dynamics during winters 2014/2015 and 2020/2021 V. Zuev et al. 10.30758/0555-2648-2023-69-2-114-123
- Stratospheric polar vortex dynamics according to the vortex delineation method V. Zuev & E. Savelieva 10.1007/s12040-023-02060-x
- Siege in the Southern Stratosphere: Hunga Tonga‐Hunga Ha'apai Water Vapor Excluded From the 2022 Antarctic Polar Vortex G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2023GL103855
- What's in a Name? On the Use and Significance of the Term “Polar Vortex” G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2021GL097617
- The Anomalous 2019 Antarctic Ozone Hole in the GEOS Constituent Data Assimilation System With MLS Observations K. Wargan et al. 10.1029/2020JD033335
- Analysis of the Arctic polar vortex dynamics during the sudden stratospheric warming in January 2009 V. Zuev et al. 10.30758/0555-2648-2021-67-2-134-146
- The Remarkably Strong Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex of Winter 2020: Links to Record‐Breaking Arctic Oscillation and Ozone Loss Z. Lawrence et al. 10.1029/2020JD033271
- Unprecedented Spring 2020 Ozone Depletion in the Context of 20 Years of Measurements at Eureka, Canada K. Bognar et al. 10.1029/2020JD034365
- Arctic stratosphere changes in the 21st century in the Earth system model SOCOLv4 P. Vargin et al. 10.3389/feart.2023.1214418
- Temperature and tropopause characteristics from reanalyses data in the tropical tropopause layer S. Tegtmeier et al. 10.5194/acp-20-753-2020
- Climate change favours large seasonal loss of Arctic ozone P. von der Gathen et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24089-6
- Chemical Evolution of the Exceptional Arctic Stratospheric Winter 2019/2020 Compared to Previous Arctic and Antarctic Winters I. Wohltmann et al. 10.1029/2020JD034356
- NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System GEOS‐CF v1.0: Stratospheric Composition K. Knowland et al. 10.1029/2021MS002852
- Is the subtropical jet shifting poleward? P. Maher et al. 10.1007/s00382-019-05084-6
- Prolonged and Pervasive Perturbations in the Composition of the Southern Hemisphere Midlatitude Lower Stratosphere From the Australian New Year's Fires M. Santee et al. 10.1029/2021GL096270
- Features of Stratospheric Polar Vortex Weakening Prior to Breakdown V. Zuev et al. 10.1134/S1024856022020142
- Signatures of Anomalous Transport in the 2019/2020 Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex G. Manney et al. 10.1029/2022JD037407
Latest update: 23 Apr 2024
Short summary
Stratospheric polar processing diagnostics are compared in both hemispheres for four recent high-resolution reanalyses. Temperature-based diagnostics show largest differences before 1999 in the Antarctic; agreement becomes much better thereafter, when the reanalysis inputs include higher-resolution satellite radiances. Recommendations for usage of reanalysis data in research studies are given based on the differences among the reanalyses, which can be substantial and difficult to interpret.
Stratospheric polar processing diagnostics are compared in both hemispheres for four recent...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint