An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses

Duncan, David Ian; Eriksson, Patrick

doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018

Articles | Volume 18, issue 15

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018

© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Articles | Volume 18, issue 15

Research article

|

13 Aug 2018

Research article |

| 13 Aug 2018

An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses

David Ian Duncan and Patrick Eriksson

Download

Final revised paper (published on 13 Aug 2018)
Preprint (discussion started on 16 Apr 2018)

Interactive discussion

Status: closed

AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment

- Printer-friendly version

- Supplement

RC1: 'acp-2018-275 review comments', Anonymous Referee #1, 04 May 2018
RC2: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #2, 13 May 2018
AC1: 'Response to reviewers', David Duncan, 22 Jun 2018

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision

AR by David Duncan on behalf of the Authors (22 Jun 2018) Author's response Manuscript

ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (06 Jul 2018) by Michael Pitts

RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (06 Jul 2018)

RR by Anonymous Referee #1 (11 Jul 2018)

ED: Publish subject to minor revisions (review by editor) (24 Jul 2018) by Michael Pitts

AR by David Duncan on behalf of the Authors (25 Jul 2018) Author's response

ED: Publish as is (26 Jul 2018) by Michael Pitts

Short summary

Ice cloud mass is assessed on a global scale using the latest satellite and reanalysis datasets. While ice cloud variability driven by large-scale circulations is an area of relative consensus, models and observations disagree strongly on the overall magnitude and finer-scale variability of atmospheric ice mass. The results reflect limitations of the current Earth observing system and indicate ice microphysical assumptions as the likely culprit of disagreement.