Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5407-5438, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5407-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
27 Apr 2017
Lower-tropospheric CO2 from near-infrared ACOS-GOSAT observations
Susan S. Kulawik et al.

Data sets

Multi-laboratory compilation of atmospheric carbon dioxide # data for the period 2000-2012 # (obspack_co2_1_PROTOTYPE_v1.0.4b_2014-02-13)
Cooperative Global Atmospheric Data Integration Project
https://doi.org/10.3334/OBSPACK/1001
TCCON data from Park Falls, Wisconsin, USA, Release GGG2014R0
P. O. Wennberg, C. Roehl, D. Wunch, G. C. Toon, J.-F. Blavier, R. Washenfelder, G. Keppel-Aleks, N. Allen, and J. Ayers
https://doi.org/10.14291/tccon.ggg2014.parkfalls01.R0/1149161
TCCON data from Lamont, Oklahoma, USA, Release GGG2014R0
P. O. Wennberg, D. Wunch, C. Roehl, J.-F. Blavier, G. C. Toon, N. Allen, P. Dowell, K. Teske, C. Martin, and J. Martin
https://doi.org/10.14291/tccon.ggg2014.lamont01.R0/1149159
HIPPO Merged 10-second Meteorology, Atmospheric Chemistry, Aerosol Data (R_20121129)
S. C. Wofsy, B. C. Daube, R. Jimenez, E. Kort, J. V. Pittman, S. Park, R. Commane, B. Xiang, G. Santoni, D. Jacob, J. Fisher, C. Pickett-Heaps, H. Wang, K. Wecht, Q.-Q. Wang, B. B. Stephens, S. Shertz, A. S. Watt, P. Romashkin, T. Campos, J. Haggerty, W. A. Cooper, D. Rogers, S. Beaton, R. Hendershot, J. W. Elkins, D. W. Fahey, R. S. Gao, F. Moore, S. A. Montzka, J. P. Schwarz, A. E. Perring, D. Hurst, B. R. Miller, C. Sweeney, S. Oltmans, D. Nance, E. Hintsa, G. Dutton, L. A. Watts, J. R. Spackman, K. H. Rosenlof, E. A. Ray, B. Hall, M. A. Zondlo, M. Diao, R. Keeling, J. Bent, E. L. Atlas, R. Lueb, and M. J. Mahoney
https://doi.org/10.3334/CDIAC/hippo_010
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We introduce new vertically resolved GOSAT products that better separate locally and remotely influenced CO2. Current GOSAT column results for CO2 (XCO2) are sensitive to fluxes on continental scales, whereas flux estimates from surface and tower measurements are affected by sampling bias and model transport uncertainty. These new GOSAT measurements of boundary layer CO2 are validated against aircraft and surface observations of CO2 and are compared to vertically resolved MOPITT CO.
We introduce new vertically resolved GOSAT products that better separate locally and remotely...
Share