Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Volume 17, issue 7
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4599–4609, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4599-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4599–4609, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4599-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 07 Apr 2017

Research article | 07 Apr 2017

The role of the gamma function shape parameter in determining differences between condensation rates in bin and bulk microphysics schemes

Adele L. Igel and Susan C. van den Heever
Download
Interactive discussion
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
Peer review completion
AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Adele Igel on behalf of the Authors (08 Aug 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Referee Nomination & Report Request started (30 Aug 2016) by Eric Jensen
RR by Anonymous Referee #3 (16 Sep 2016)
RR by Anonymous Referee #2 (20 Sep 2016)
ED: Reconsider after major revisions (07 Dec 2016) by Eric Jensen
AR by Adele Igel on behalf of the Authors (24 Feb 2017)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (19 Mar 2017) by Eric Jensen
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We ran simulations of cumulus clouds with bin and bulk microphysics schemes and compared the predicted condensation rates. Differences are predominantly due to the use of a fixed shape parameter in bulk models. The shape parameter is poorly constrained by observations and requires further study.
We ran simulations of cumulus clouds with bin and bulk microphysics schemes and compared the...
Citation