Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12341-12360, 2017
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12341-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
17 Oct 2017
Multi-model ensemble simulations of olive pollen distribution in Europe in 2014: current status and outlook
Mikhail Sofiev1, Olga Ritenberga2, Roberto Albertini3, Joaquim Arteta4, Jordina Belmonte5,6, Carmi Geller Bernstein7, Maira Bonini8, Sevcan Celenk9, Athanasios Damialis10,11, John Douros12, Hendrik Elbern13, Elmar Friese13, Carmen Galan14, Gilles Oliver15, Ivana Hrga16, Rostislav Kouznetsov1,22, Kai Krajsek17, Donat Magyar18, Jonathan Parmentier4, Matthieu Plu4, Marje Prank1, Lennart Robertson19, Birthe Marie Steensen20, Michel Thibaudon15, Arjo Segers21, Barbara Stepanovich16, Alvaro M. Valdebenito20, Julius Vira1, and Despoina Vokou11 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, Erik Palmenin Aukio 1, Helsinki, Finland
2University of Latvia, Latvia
3Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Italy
4CNRM UMR 3589, Météo-France/CNRS, Toulouse, France
5Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
6Depatment of Animal Biology, Plant Biology and Ecology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
7Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan Zabludowicz Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Israel
8Agenzia Tutela della Salute della Città Metropolitana di Milano/LHA ATS Città Metropolitana Milano, Italy
9Biology department, Uludag University, Turkey
10Chair and Institute of Environmental Medicine, UNIKA-T, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health, Augsburg, Germany
11Department of Ecology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece
12Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute, De Bilt, the Netherlands
13Rhenish Institute for Environmental Research at the University of Cologne, Germany
14Dpto. Botánica, Ecología y Fisiol. Vegetal, University of Cordoba, Spain
15RNSA, Brussieu, France
16Andrija Stampar Teaching Institute of Public Health, Croatia
17Institute of Energy and Climate Research (IEK-8), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Germany
18National Centre of Public Health, Hungary
19Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute SMHI, Sweden
20MET Norway
21TNO, the Netherlands
22IAPh, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Abstract. The paper presents the first modelling experiment of the European-scale olive pollen dispersion, analyses the quality of the predictions, and outlines the research needs. A 6-model strong ensemble of Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) was run throughout the olive season of 2014, computing the olive pollen distribution. The simulations have been compared with observations in eight countries, which are members of the European Aeroallergen Network (EAN). Analysis was performed for individual models, the ensemble mean and median, and for a dynamically optimised combination of the ensemble members obtained via fusion of the model predictions with observations. The models, generally reproducing the olive season of 2014, showed noticeable deviations from both observations and each other. In particular, the season was reported to start too early by 8 days, but for some models the error mounted to almost 2 weeks. For the end of the season, the disagreement between the models and the observations varied from a nearly perfect match up to 2 weeks too late. A series of sensitivity studies carried out to understand the origin of the disagreements revealed the crucial role of ambient temperature and consistency of its representation by the meteorological models and heat-sum-based phenological model. In particular, a simple correction to the heat-sum threshold eliminated the shift of the start of the season but its validity in other years remains to be checked. The short-term features of the concentration time series were reproduced better, suggesting that the precipitation events and cold/warm spells, as well as the large-scale transport, were represented rather well. Ensemble averaging led to more robust results. The best skill scores were obtained with data fusion, which used the previous days' observations to identify the optimal weighting coefficients of the individual model forecasts. Such combinations were tested for the forecasting period up to 4 days and shown to remain nearly optimal throughout the whole period.

Citation: Sofiev, M., Ritenberga, O., Albertini, R., Arteta, J., Belmonte, J., Bernstein, C. G., Bonini, M., Celenk, S., Damialis, A., Douros, J., Elbern, H., Friese, E., Galan, C., Oliver, G., Hrga, I., Kouznetsov, R., Krajsek, K., Magyar, D., Parmentier, J., Plu, M., Prank, M., Robertson, L., Steensen, B. M., Thibaudon, M., Segers, A., Stepanovich, B., Valdebenito, A. M., Vira, J., and Vokou, D.: Multi-model ensemble simulations of olive pollen distribution in Europe in 2014: current status and outlook, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12341-12360, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12341-2017, 2017.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This work presents the features and evaluates the quality of the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service forecasts of olive pollen distribution in Europe. It is shown that the models can predict the main features of the observed pollen distribution but have more difficulties in capturing the season start and end, which appeared shifted by a few days. We also demonstrated that the combined use of model predictions with up-to-date measurements (data fusion) can strongly improve the results.
This work presents the features and evaluates the quality of the Copernicus Atmospheric...
Share