Articles | Volume 17, issue 18
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11209-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11209-2017
© Author(s) 2017. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
21 Sep 2017
Research article |
| 21 Sep 2017
| 21 Sep 2017
Sulfate geoengineering impact on methane transport and lifetime: results from the Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP)
Daniele Visioni
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Università dell'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
CETEMPS, Università dell'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
Giovanni Pitari
Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Università dell'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
Valentina Aquila
GESTAR/Johns Hopkins University, Department of Earth and Planetary Science, 3400 N Charles Street, Baltimore, MD 21218, USA
Simone Tilmes
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO 80305, USA
Irene Cionni
ENEA, Ente per le Nuove Tecnologie, l'Energia e l'Ambiente, 00123 Rome, Italy
Glauco Di Genova
CETEMPS, Università dell'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
Eva Mancini
Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Università dell'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
CETEMPS, Università dell'Aquila, 67100 L'Aquila, Italy
Viewed
Total article views: 3,931 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Jul 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,876 | 970 | 85 | 3,931 | 253 | 79 | 68 |
- HTML: 2,876
- PDF: 970
- XML: 85
- Total: 3,931
- Supplement: 253
- BibTeX: 79
- EndNote: 68
Total article views: 3,325 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 21 Sep 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,448 | 797 | 80 | 3,325 | 253 | 74 | 63 |
- HTML: 2,448
- PDF: 797
- XML: 80
- Total: 3,325
- Supplement: 253
- BibTeX: 74
- EndNote: 63
Total article views: 606 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 11 Jul 2017)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 428 | 173 | 5 | 606 | 5 | 5 |
- HTML: 428
- PDF: 173
- XML: 5
- Total: 606
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 5
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 3,931 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,949 with geography defined
and -18 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 3,325 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 3,353 with geography defined
and -28 with unknown origin.
Total article views: 606 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 596 with geography defined
and 10 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
23 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sulfur deposition changes under sulfate geoengineering conditions: quasi-biennial oscillation effects on the transport and lifetime of stratospheric aerosols D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-18-2787-2018
- Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00047
- Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research B. Kravitz & D. MacMartin 10.1038/s43017-019-0004-7
- Potential of future stratospheric ozone loss in the midlatitudes under global warming and sulfate geoengineering S. Robrecht et al. 10.5194/acp-21-2427-2021
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering Could Alter the High‐Latitude Seasonal Cycle J. Jiang et al. 10.1029/2019GL085758
- Practice of EVA-Based Balanced Scorecard in the Construction of Performance Evaluation System D. Xie et al. 10.1155/2021/5198364
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Exploring accumulation-mode H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> versus SO<sub>2</sub> stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Mechanism of ozone loss under enhanced water vapour conditions in the mid-latitude lower stratosphere in summer S. Robrecht et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5805-2019
- Seasonally Modulated Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Alters the Climate Outcomes D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2020GL088337
- Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
- Potential ecological impacts of climate intervention by reflecting sunlight to cool Earth P. Zarnetske et al. 10.1073/pnas.1921854118
- Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species H. Franke et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8615-2021
- What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario D. Visioni et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab94eb
- Emergent methane mitigation and removal approaches: A review I. Mundra & A. Lockley 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100223
- Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering? D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2020JD033952
- Upper tropospheric ice sensitivity to sulfate geoengineering D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-18-14867-2018
- Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity J. Moch et al. 10.1029/2023AV000911
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- Effects of Different Stratospheric SO2 Injection Altitudes on Stratospheric Chemistry and Dynamics S. Tilmes et al. 10.1002/2017JD028146
- Conditions for Stabilization of Average Global Surface Temperature at the Levels of +2°C and +1.5°C by the Geoengineering Method Based on Stratospheric Aerosols V. Ginzburg et al. 10.3103/S1068373920050052
22 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Sulfur deposition changes under sulfate geoengineering conditions: quasi-biennial oscillation effects on the transport and lifetime of stratospheric aerosols D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-18-2787-2018
- Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00047
- Uncertainty and the basis for confidence in solar geoengineering research B. Kravitz & D. MacMartin 10.1038/s43017-019-0004-7
- Potential of future stratospheric ozone loss in the midlatitudes under global warming and sulfate geoengineering S. Robrecht et al. 10.5194/acp-21-2427-2021
- Identifying the sources of uncertainty in climate model simulations of solar radiation modification with the G6sulfur and G6solar Geoengineering Model Intercomparison Project (GeoMIP) simulations D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-21-10039-2021
- Stratospheric Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering Could Alter the High‐Latitude Seasonal Cycle J. Jiang et al. 10.1029/2019GL085758
- Practice of EVA-Based Balanced Scorecard in the Construction of Performance Evaluation System D. Xie et al. 10.1155/2021/5198364
- Climate response to off-equatorial stratospheric sulfur injections in three Earth system models – Part 1: Experimental protocols and surface changes D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-23-663-2023
- Exploring accumulation-mode H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> versus SO<sub>2</sub> stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Mechanism of ozone loss under enhanced water vapour conditions in the mid-latitude lower stratosphere in summer S. Robrecht et al. 10.5194/acp-19-5805-2019
- Seasonally Modulated Stratospheric Aerosol Geoengineering Alters the Climate Outcomes D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2020GL088337
- Hemispherically symmetric strategies for stratospheric aerosol injection Y. Zhang et al. 10.5194/esd-15-191-2024
- Potential ecological impacts of climate intervention by reflecting sunlight to cool Earth P. Zarnetske et al. 10.1073/pnas.1921854118
- Differences in the quasi-biennial oscillation response to stratospheric aerosol modification depending on injection strategy and species H. Franke et al. 10.5194/acp-21-8615-2021
- What goes up must come down: impacts of deposition in a sulfate geoengineering scenario D. Visioni et al. 10.1088/1748-9326/ab94eb
- Emergent methane mitigation and removal approaches: A review I. Mundra & A. Lockley 10.1016/j.aeaoa.2023.100223
- Is Turning Down the Sun a Good Proxy for Stratospheric Sulfate Geoengineering? D. Visioni et al. 10.1029/2020JD033952
- Upper tropospheric ice sensitivity to sulfate geoengineering D. Visioni et al. 10.5194/acp-18-14867-2018
- Overlooked Long‐Term Atmospheric Chemical Feedbacks Alter the Impact of Solar Geoengineering: Implications for Tropospheric Oxidative Capacity J. Moch et al. 10.1029/2023AV000911
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Interactive stratospheric aerosol models' response to different amounts and altitudes of SO2 injection during the 1991 Pinatubo eruption I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-23-921-2023
- Effects of Different Stratospheric SO2 Injection Altitudes on Stratospheric Chemistry and Dynamics S. Tilmes et al. 10.1002/2017JD028146
Discussed (final revised paper)
Latest update: 18 Apr 2024
Short summary
Sulfate geoengineering (SG), the sustained injection of SO2 in the lower stratosphere, is being discussed as a way to counterbalance surface warming, mimicking volcanic eruptions. In this paper, we analyse results from two models part of the GeoMIP project in order to understand the effect SG might have on the concentration and lifetime of methane, which acts in the atmosphere as a greenhouse gas. Understanding possible side effects of SG is a crucial step if its viability is to be assessed.
Sulfate geoengineering (SG), the sustained injection of SO2 in the lower stratosphere, is being...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint