Articles | Volume 16, issue 15
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9785-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-9785-2016
Research article
 | 
04 Aug 2016
Research article |  | 04 Aug 2016

Regional and global temperature response to anthropogenic SO2 emissions from China in three climate models

Matthew Kasoar, Apostolos Voulgarakis, Jean-François Lamarque, Drew T. Shindell, Nicolas Bellouin, William J. Collins, Greg Faluvegi, and Kostas Tsigaridis

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Matthew Kasoar on behalf of the Authors (12 Jun 2016)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (21 Jun 2016) by Christopher Hoyle
Download
Short summary
Computer models are our primary tool to investigate how fossil-fuel emissions are affecting the climate. Here, we used three different climate models to see how they simulate the response to removing sulfur dioxide emissions from China. We found that the models disagreed substantially on how large the climate effect is from the emissions in this region. This range of outcomes is concerning if scientists or policy makers have to rely on any one model when performing their own studies.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint