Articles | Volume 16, issue 8
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4945-2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4945-2016
Research article
 | 
21 Apr 2016
Research article |  | 21 Apr 2016

Comparing model and measured ice crystal concentrations in orographic clouds during the INUPIAQ campaign

Robert J. Farrington, Paul J. Connolly, Gary Lloyd, Keith N. Bower, Michael J. Flynn, Martin W. Gallagher, Paul R. Field, Chris Dearden, and Thomas W. Choularton

Viewed

Total article views: 2,904 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
1,684 849 371 2,904 234 92 81
  • HTML: 1,684
  • PDF: 849
  • XML: 371
  • Total: 2,904
  • Supplement: 234
  • BibTeX: 92
  • EndNote: 81
Views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 21 Sep 2015)

Cited

Saved (preprint)

Latest update: 23 Apr 2024
Download
Short summary
This paper assesses the reasons for high ice number concentrations observed in orographic clouds by comparing observations with model simulations over Jungfraujoch, Switzerland. The results suggest that ice nuclei do not significantly contribute to the high concentrations and that a surface source of ice crystals is responsible for the witnessed ice number concentrations.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint