Articles | Volume 16, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-305-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-305-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article
| 
18 Jan 2016
Research article |
| 18 Jan 2016
Radiative and climate impacts of a large volcanic eruption during stratospheric sulfur geoengineering
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
H. Kokkola
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
A.-I. Partanen
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Climate Research, Helsinki, Finland
Department of Geography, Planning and Environment, Concordia University, Montréal, Québec, Canada
U. Niemeier
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
C. Timmreck
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
K. E. J. Lehtinen
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Atmospheric Research Centre of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio campus, Kuopio, Finland
H. Hakkarainen
A. I. Virtanen Institute for Molecular Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
H. Korhonen
Finnish Meteorological Institute, Climate Research, Helsinki, Finland
Viewed
Total article views: 4,748 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Aug 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,894 | 1,697 | 157 | 4,748 | 110 | 107 |
- HTML: 2,894
- PDF: 1,697
- XML: 157
- Total: 4,748
- BibTeX: 110
- EndNote: 107
Total article views: 3,856 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 18 Jan 2016)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,435 | 1,309 | 112 | 3,856 | 91 | 83 |
- HTML: 2,435
- PDF: 1,309
- XML: 112
- Total: 3,856
- BibTeX: 91
- EndNote: 83
Total article views: 892 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 12 Aug 2015)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 459 | 388 | 45 | 892 | 19 | 24 |
- HTML: 459
- PDF: 388
- XML: 45
- Total: 892
- BibTeX: 19
- EndNote: 24
Cited
30 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Mie scattering from optically levitated mixed sulfuric acid–silica core–shell aerosols: observation of core–shell morphology for atmospheric science M. McGrory et al. 10.1039/D1CP04068E
- Impact of climate change on volcanic processes: current understanding and future challenges T. Aubry et al. 10.1007/s00445-022-01562-8
- Biomass burning aerosols in most climate models are too absorbing H. Brown et al. 10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9
- Revisiting the Agung 1963 volcanic forcing – impact of one or two eruptions U. Niemeier et al. 10.5194/acp-19-10379-2019
- Potential impacts of major nineteenth century volcanic eruptions on temperature over Cape Town, South Africa: 1834–1899 J. Picas & S. Grab 10.1007/s10584-020-02678-6
- Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble M. Clyne et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Differing precipitation response between solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal due to fast and slow components A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-11-415-2020
- A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk A. Tang & L. Kemp 10.3389/fclim.2021.720312
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification D. MacMartin et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202230119
- Regional Climate Response of Middle Eastern, African, and South Asian Monsoon Regions to Explosive Volcanism and ENSO Forcing M. Dogar & T. Sato 10.1029/2019JD030358
- Energetic constraints on the time-dependent response of the ITCZ to volcanic eruptions M. Erez & O. Adam 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0146.1
- UCLALES–SALSA v1.0: a large-eddy model with interactive sectional microphysics for aerosol, clouds and precipitation J. Tonttila et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-169-2017
- 30-year lidar observations of the stratospheric aerosol layer state over Tomsk (Western Siberia, Russia) V. Zuev et al. 10.5194/acp-17-3067-2017
- Summertime Aerosol Radiative Effects and Their Dependence on Temperature over the Southeastern USA T. Mielonen et al. 10.3390/atmos9050180
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
- Retrieval of refractive indices of ten volcanic ash samples in the infrared, visible and ultraviolet spectral region A. Deguine et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106100
- Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario L. Wheeler et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205515
- How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations A. Talberg et al. 10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8
- Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00047
- Retrieval of Refractive Indices of Ten Volcanic Ash Samples in the Infrared, Visible and Ultraviolet Spectral Region A. Deguine et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4178248
- Site of asteroid impact changed the history of life on Earth: the low probability of mass extinction K. Kaiho & N. Oshima 10.1038/s41598-017-14199-x
- Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance D. MacMartin et al. 10.1080/14693062.2019.1668347
- Atmospheric Lamb wave pulse and volcanic explosivity index following the 2022 Hunga Tonga (South Pacific) eruption P. Dalal et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.931545
- Exploring accumulation-mode H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> versus SO<sub>2</sub> stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Evaluation of observed and modelled aerosol lifetimes using radioactive tracers of opportunity and an ensemble of 19 global models N. Kristiansen et al. 10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016
- SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
- Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-17-6957-2017
- Climate Action Gaming Experiment: Methods and Example Results C. Singer & L. Matchett 10.3390/challe6020202
29 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Mie scattering from optically levitated mixed sulfuric acid–silica core–shell aerosols: observation of core–shell morphology for atmospheric science M. McGrory et al. 10.1039/D1CP04068E
- Impact of climate change on volcanic processes: current understanding and future challenges T. Aubry et al. 10.1007/s00445-022-01562-8
- Biomass burning aerosols in most climate models are too absorbing H. Brown et al. 10.1038/s41467-020-20482-9
- Revisiting the Agung 1963 volcanic forcing – impact of one or two eruptions U. Niemeier et al. 10.5194/acp-19-10379-2019
- Potential impacts of major nineteenth century volcanic eruptions on temperature over Cape Town, South Africa: 1834–1899 J. Picas & S. Grab 10.1007/s10584-020-02678-6
- Model physics and chemistry causing intermodel disagreement within the VolMIP-Tambora Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol ensemble M. Clyne et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3317-2021
- Climate change modulates the stratospheric volcanic sulfate aerosol lifecycle and radiative forcing from tropical eruptions T. Aubry et al. 10.1038/s41467-021-24943-7
- Differing precipitation response between solar radiation management and carbon dioxide removal due to fast and slow components A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/esd-11-415-2020
- A Fate Worse Than Warming? Stratospheric Aerosol Injection and Global Catastrophic Risk A. Tang & L. Kemp 10.3389/fclim.2021.720312
- An approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide I. Quaglia et al. 10.5194/acp-22-5757-2022
- Scenarios for modeling solar radiation modification D. MacMartin et al. 10.1073/pnas.2202230119
- Regional Climate Response of Middle Eastern, African, and South Asian Monsoon Regions to Explosive Volcanism and ENSO Forcing M. Dogar & T. Sato 10.1029/2019JD030358
- Energetic constraints on the time-dependent response of the ITCZ to volcanic eruptions M. Erez & O. Adam 10.1175/JCLI-D-21-0146.1
- UCLALES–SALSA v1.0: a large-eddy model with interactive sectional microphysics for aerosol, clouds and precipitation J. Tonttila et al. 10.5194/gmd-10-169-2017
- 30-year lidar observations of the stratospheric aerosol layer state over Tomsk (Western Siberia, Russia) V. Zuev et al. 10.5194/acp-17-3067-2017
- Summertime Aerosol Radiative Effects and Their Dependence on Temperature over the Southeastern USA T. Mielonen et al. 10.3390/atmos9050180
- Dependency of the impacts of geoengineering on the stratospheric sulfur injection strategy – Part 1: Intercomparison of modal and sectional aerosol modules A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-22-93-2022
- Retrieval of refractive indices of ten volcanic ash samples in the infrared, visible and ultraviolet spectral region A. Deguine et al. 10.1016/j.jaerosci.2022.106100
- Performance assessment for climate intervention (PACI): preliminary application to a stratospheric aerosol injection scenario L. Wheeler et al. 10.3389/fenvs.2023.1205515
- How geoengineering scenarios frame assumptions and create expectations A. Talberg et al. 10.1007/s11625-018-0527-8
- Stratospheric aerosol injection may impact global systems and human health outcomes S. Tracy et al. 10.1525/elementa.2022.00047
- Retrieval of Refractive Indices of Ten Volcanic Ash Samples in the Infrared, Visible and Ultraviolet Spectral Region A. Deguine et al. 10.2139/ssrn.4178248
- Site of asteroid impact changed the history of life on Earth: the low probability of mass extinction K. Kaiho & N. Oshima 10.1038/s41598-017-14199-x
- Technical characteristics of a solar geoengineering deployment and implications for governance D. MacMartin et al. 10.1080/14693062.2019.1668347
- Atmospheric Lamb wave pulse and volcanic explosivity index following the 2022 Hunga Tonga (South Pacific) eruption P. Dalal et al. 10.3389/feart.2022.931545
- Exploring accumulation-mode H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> versus SO<sub>2</sub> stratospheric sulfate geoengineering in a sectional aerosol–chemistry–climate model S. Vattioni et al. 10.5194/acp-19-4877-2019
- Evaluation of observed and modelled aerosol lifetimes using radioactive tracers of opportunity and an ensemble of 19 global models N. Kristiansen et al. 10.5194/acp-16-3525-2016
- SALSA2.0: The sectional aerosol module of the aerosol–chemistry–climate model ECHAM6.3.0-HAM2.3-MOZ1.0 H. Kokkola et al. 10.5194/gmd-11-3833-2018
- Radiative and climate effects of stratospheric sulfur geoengineering using seasonally varying injection areas A. Laakso et al. 10.5194/acp-17-6957-2017
1 citations as recorded by crossref.
Saved (final revised paper)
Saved (preprint)
Discussed (final revised paper)
Latest update: 26 Apr 2024
Short summary
We have studied the impacts of a volcanic eruption during solar radiation management (SRM) using an aerosol-climate model ECHAM5-HAM-SALSA and an Earth system model MPI-ESM. A volcanic eruption during stratospheric sulfur geoengineering would lead to larger particles and smaller amount of new particles than if an volcano erupts in normal atmospheric conditions. Thus, volcanic eruption during SRM would lead to only a small additional cooling which would last for a significantly shorter period.
We have studied the impacts of a volcanic eruption during solar radiation management (SRM) using...
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint