Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.414 IF 5.414
  • IF 5-year value: 5.958 IF 5-year
    5.958
  • CiteScore value: 9.7 CiteScore
    9.7
  • SNIP value: 1.517 SNIP 1.517
  • IPP value: 5.61 IPP 5.61
  • SJR value: 2.601 SJR 2.601
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 191 Scimago H
    index 191
  • h5-index value: 89 h5-index 89
Volume 16, issue 22
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14169–14202, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14169-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14169–14202, 2016
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14169-2016
© Author(s) 2016. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 16 Nov 2016

Research article | 16 Nov 2016

Global biogenic volatile organic compound emissions in the ORCHIDEE and MEGAN models and sensitivity to key parameters

Palmira Messina et al.

Related authors

Isoprene chemistry in pristine and polluted Amazon environments: Eulerian and Lagrangian model frameworks and the strong bearing they have on our understanding of surface ozone and predictions of rainforest exposure to this priority pollutant
J. G. Levine, A. R. MacKenzie, O. J. Squire, A. T. Archibald, P. T. Griffiths, N. L. Abraham, J. A. Pyle, D. E. Oram, G. Forster, J. F. Brito, J. D. Lee, J. R. Hopkins, A. C. Lewis, S. J. B. Bauguitte, C. F. Demarco, P. Artaxo, P. Messina, J. Lathière, D. A. Hauglustaine, E. House, C. N. Hewitt, and E. Nemitz
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-24251-2015,https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-24251-2015, 2015
Revised manuscript has not been submitted
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Biosphere Interactions | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Chemistry (chemical composition and reactions)
Effects of fertilization and stand age on N2O and NO emissions from tea plantations: a site-scale study in a subtropical region using a modified biogeochemical model
Wei Zhang, Zhisheng Yao, Xunhua Zheng, Chunyan Liu, Rui Wang, Kai Wang, Siqi Li, Shenghui Han, Qiang Zuo, and Jianchu Shi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6903–6919, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6903-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6903-2020, 2020
Short summary
Temperature response measurements from eucalypts give insight into the impact of Australian isoprene emissions on air quality in 2050
Kathryn M. Emmerson, Malcolm Possell, Michael J. Aspinwall, Sebastian Pfautsch, and Mark G. Tjoelker
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 6193–6206, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6193-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-6193-2020, 2020
Short summary
Data assimilation using an ensemble of models: a hierarchical approach
Peter Rayner
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 3725–3737, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3725-2020,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-3725-2020, 2020
Short summary
Fundamentals of data assimilation applied to biogeochemistry
Peter J. Rayner, Anna M. Michalak, and Frédéric Chevallier
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13911–13932, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13911-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13911-2019, 2019
Short summary
On what scales can GOSAT flux inversions constrain anomalies in terrestrial ecosystems?
Brendan Byrne, Dylan B. A. Jones, Kimberly Strong, Saroja M. Polavarapu, Anna B. Harper, David F. Baker, and Shamil Maksyutov
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 13017–13035, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-13017-2019, 2019
Short summary

Cited articles

Acosta Navarro, J. C., Smolander, S., Struthers, H., Zorita, E., Ekman, A. M. L., Kaplan, J. O., Guenther, A., Arneth, A., and Riipinen, I.: Global emissions of terpenoid VOCs from terrestrial vegetation in the last millennium, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 6867–6885, https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD021238, 2014.
Arneth, A., Monson, R. K., Schurgers, G., Niinemets, Ü., and Palmer, P. I.: Why are estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions so similar (and why is this not so for monoterpenes)?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 4605–4620, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4605-2008, 2008.
Arneth, A., Schurgers, G., Lathiere, J., Duhl, T., Beerling, D. J., Hewitt, C. N., Martin, M., and Guenther, A.: Global terrestrial isoprene emission models: sensitivity to variability in climate and vegetation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8037–8052, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8037-2011, 2011.
Ashworth, K., Wild, O., and Hewitt, C. N.: Sensitivity of isoprene emissions estimated using MEGAN to the time resolution of input climate data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1193–1201, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1193-2010, 2010.
Bai, J., Baker, B., Liang, B., Greenberg, J., and Guenther, A.: Isoprene and monoterpene emissions from an Inner Mongolia grassland, Atmos. Environ., 40, 5753–5758, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.05.019, 2006.
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
We provide BVOC emissions for the present scenario, employing the updated ORCHIDEE emission module and the MEGAN model. The modelling community still faces the problem of emission model evaluation because of the absence of adequate observations. The accurate analysis performed, employing the two models, allowed the various processes modelled to be investigated, in order to fully understand the origin of the mismatch between the model estimates and to quantify the emission uncertainties.
We provide BVOC emissions for the present scenario, employing the updated ORCHIDEE emission...
Citation