Dear Colleagues,
I have reviewed your revised manuscript and answers to the Reviewers' comments and am pleased to recommend acceptance of your manuscript for publication in ACP after a number of minor changes (see below).
Regards,
Graham

0) Reviewer 2, Comment 2: I would recommend adding text in the conclusions to the effect that “an enhancement of the warm rain process by taking into account turbulence effects on collisions has a very similar effect on cloud patterns, cloud fields, vertical profiles etc. as a change in the cloud droplet number.”
1) Reviewer 3, comment # 7. I found your response to the reviewer appropriate but think that a simple statement acknowledging that p is not actually constant would be appropriate.
2) Revised manuscript, Pg. 6, line 11: “would call for”
3) Pg. 6, line 15: “As a metric for evaluation we use..”
4) Pg.6, line 25: “we would recommend using..”
5) Pg. 6, line 2: “in which the Reynolds number dependency is also shown in more…”
6) Pg 9, line 16: “as can be seen”
7) Pg. 9, line 17: “much shallower”