Articles | Volume 15, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-815-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-815-2015
Research article
 | 
23 Jan 2015
Research article |  | 23 Jan 2015

A comparison of four receptor models used to quantify the boreal wildfire smoke contribution to surface PM2.5 in Halifax, Nova Scotia during the BORTAS-B experiment

M. D. Gibson, J. Haelssig, J. R. Pierce, M. Parrington, J. E. Franklin, J. T. Hopper, Z. Li, and T. J. Ward

Download

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Peer-review completion

AR: Author's response | RR: Referee report | ED: Editor decision
AR by Mark Gibson on behalf of the Authors (26 Nov 2014)  Author's response    Manuscript
ED: Publish as is (09 Dec 2014) by Stephan Matthiesen
Download
Short summary
This paper presents a quantitative comparison of the four most commonly used receptor models, namely absolute principal component scores, pragmatic mass closure, chemical mass balance, and positive matrix factorization. The receptor models were used to predict the contributions of boreal wild-fire smoke and other sources to PM2.5 mass in Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada during the BORTAS-B experiment. This paper also presents a new woodsmoke PM2.5 enrichment factor (levoglucosan x 52).
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint