Articles | Volume 15, issue 7
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3873-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-3873-2015
Research article
 | 
13 Apr 2015
Research article |  | 13 Apr 2015

Comparisons of polar processing diagnostics from 34 years of the ERA-Interim and MERRA reanalyses

Z. D. Lawrence, G. L. Manney, K. Minschwaner, M. L. Santee, and A. Lambert

Related authors

Quantifying stratospheric biases and identifying their potential sources in subseasonal forecast systems
Zachary D. Lawrence, Marta Abalos, Blanca Ayarzagüena, David Barriopedro, Amy H. Butler, Natalia Calvo, Alvaro de la Cámara, Andrew Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Etienne Dunn-Sigouin, Javier García-Serrano, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Neil P. Hindley, Liwei Jia, Martin Jucker, Alexey Y. Karpechko, Hera Kim, Andrea L. Lang, Simon H. Lee, Pu Lin, Marisol Osman, Froila M. Palmeiro, Judith Perlwitz, Inna Polichtchouk, Jadwiga H. Richter, Chen Schwartz, Seok-Woo Son, Irina Statnaia, Masakazu Taguchi, Nicholas L. Tyrrell, Corwin J. Wright, and Rachel W.-Y. Wu
Weather Clim. Dynam., 3, 977–1001, https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/wcd-3-977-2022, 2022
Short summary
Reanalysis intercomparison of potential vorticity and potential-vorticity-based diagnostics
Luis F. Millán, Gloria L. Manney, and Zachary D. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5355–5376, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5355-2021, 2021
Short summary
Reanalysis intercomparisons of stratospheric polar processing diagnostics
Zachary D. Lawrence, Gloria L. Manney, and Krzysztof Wargan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13547–13579, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13547-2018,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13547-2018, 2018
Short summary
Reanalysis comparisons of upper tropospheric–lower stratospheric jets and multiple tropopauses
Gloria L. Manney, Michaela I. Hegglin, Zachary D. Lawrence, Krzysztof Wargan, Luis F. Millán, Michael J. Schwartz, Michelle L. Santee, Alyn Lambert, Steven Pawson, Brian W. Knosp, Ryan A. Fuller, and William H. Daffer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 11541–11566, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11541-2017,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-11541-2017, 2017
Short summary
The major stratospheric final warming in 2016: dispersal of vortex air and termination of Arctic chemical ozone loss
Gloria L. Manney and Zachary D. Lawrence
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 15371–15396, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15371-2016, 2016
Short summary

Related subject area

Subject: Dynamics | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling and Data Analysis | Altitude Range: Stratosphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Crucial role of obliquely propagating gravity waves in the quasi-biennial oscillation dynamics
Young-Ha Kim, Georg Sebastian Voelker, Gergely Bölöni, Günther Zängl, and Ulrich Achatz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 3297–3308, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3297-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-3297-2024, 2024
Short summary
Technical note: Multi-year changes in the Brewer–Dobson circulation from Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE) methane
Ellis Remsberg
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 1691–1697, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1691-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-1691-2024, 2024
Short summary
Exploring the ENSO modulation of the QBO periods with GISS E2.2 models
Tiehan Zhou, Kevin J. DallaSanta, Clara Orbe, David H. Rind, Jeffrey A. Jonas, Larissa Nazarenko, Gavin A. Schmidt, and Gary Russell
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 509–532, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-509-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-509-2024, 2024
Short summary
The impact of ENSO and NAO initial conditions and anomalies on the modeled response to Pinatubo-sized volcanic forcing
Helen Weierbach, Allegra N. LeGrande, and Kostas Tsigaridis
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 15491–15505, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15491-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-15491-2023, 2023
Short summary
Stratospherically induced circulation changes under the extreme conditions of the no-Montreal-Protocol scenario
Franziska Zilker, Timofei Sukhodolov, Gabriel Chiodo, Marina Friedel, Tatiana Egorova, Eugene Rozanov, Jan Sedlacek, Svenja Seeber, and Thomas Peter
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 13387–13411, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13387-2023,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-13387-2023, 2023
Short summary

Cited articles

Bloom, S. C., Takacs, L. L., da Silva, A. M., and Ledvina, D.: Data Assimilation Using Incremental Analysis Updates, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1256–1271, 1996.
Brakebusch, M., Randall, C. E., Kinnison, D. E., Tilmes, S., Santee, M. L., and Manney, G. L.: Evaluation of whole atmosphere community climate model simulations of ozone during Arctic winter 2004–2005, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 2673–2688, 2013.
Coy, L. and Pawson, S.: The Major Stratospheric Sudden Warming of January 2013: Analyses and Forecasts in the GEOS-5 Data Assimilation System, Mon. Weather Rev., 143, 491–510, https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00023.1, 2015.
Download
Short summary
We use a comprehensive set of diagnostics to investigate how two widely used modern reanalysis data sets might affect studies of lower stratospheric polar processing and ozone loss. Our results show that the agreement in temperature diagnostics between the two reanalyses improves over time in both hemispheres with increasing assimilation model inputs. This suggests that both data sets are appropriate choices for studies of polar processing in recent winters.
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint