Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Volume 14, issue 18
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9807–9830, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9807-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 9807–9830, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-9807-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 17 Sep 2014

Research article | 17 Sep 2014

To what extent could water isotopic measurements help us understand model biases in the water cycle over Western Siberia

V. Gryazin1,2, C. Risi3, J. Jouzel1, N. Kurita4, J. Worden5, C. Frankenberg5, V. Bastrikov1,2,6, K. Gribanov2, and O. Stukova2 V. Gryazin et al.
  • 1Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement (LSCE/IPSL CEA-CNRS-UVSQ), CEA Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 2Institute of Natural Science, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia
  • 3Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
  • 4Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Nagoya University Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Japan
  • 5Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA
  • 6Institute of Industrial Ecology UB RAS, Ekaterinburg, Russia

Abstract. We evaluate the isotopic composition of water vapor and precipitation simulated by the LMDZ (Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique-Zoom) GCM (General Circulation Model) over Siberia using several data sets: TES (Tropospheric Emission Spectrometer) and GOSAT (Greenhouse gases Observing SATellite) satellite observations of tropospheric water vapor, GNIP (Global Network for Isotopes in Precipitation) and SNIP (Siberian Network for Isotopes in Precipitation) precipitation networks, and daily, in situ measurements of water vapor and precipitation at the Kourovka site in Western Siberia. LMDZ captures the spatial, seasonal and daily variations reasonably well, but it underestimates humidity (q) in summer and overestimates δD in the vapor and precipitation in all seasons. The performance of LMDZ is put in the context of other isotopic models from the SWING2 (Stable Water Intercomparison Group phase 2) models. There is significant spread among models in the simulation of δD, and of the δD-q relationship. This confirms that δD brings additional information compared to q only. We specifically investigate the added value of water isotopic measurements to interpret the warm and dry bias featured by most GCMs over mid and high latitude continents in summer. The analysis of the slopes in δD-q diagrams and of processes controlling δD and q variations suggests that the cause of the dry bias could be either a problem in the large-scale advection transporting too much dry and warm air from the south, or too strong boundary-layer mixing. However, δD-q diagrams using the available data do not tell the full story. Additional measurements would be needed, or a more sophisticated theoretical framework would need to be developed.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation