Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.509 IF 5.509
  • IF 5-year value: 5.689 IF 5-year 5.689
  • CiteScore value: 5.44 CiteScore 5.44
  • SNIP value: 1.519 SNIP 1.519
  • SJR value: 3.032 SJR 3.032
  • IPP value: 5.37 IPP 5.37
  • h5-index value: 86 h5-index 86
  • Scimago H index value: 161 Scimago H index 161
Volume 14, issue 10 | Copyright

Special issue: BACCHUS – Impact of Biogenic versus Anthropogenic emissions...

Special issue: Interactions between climate change and the Cryosphere: SVALI,...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 5127-5152, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5127-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 26 May 2014

Research article | 26 May 2014

Evaluation of aerosol number concentrations in NorESM with improved nucleation parameterization

R. Makkonen1,*, Ø. Seland2, A. Kirkevåg2, T. Iversen1,2, and J. E. Kristjánsson1 R. Makkonen et al.
  • 1Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1047 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway
  • 2Norwegian Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 43 Blindern, 0313 Oslo, Norway
  • *now at: Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract. The Norwegian Earth System Model (NorESM) is evaluated against atmospheric observations of aerosol number concentrations. The model is extended to include an explicit mechanism for new particle formation and secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation from biogenic precursors. Three nucleation mechanisms are included in NorESM: binary sulfuric acid, activation type, and organic nucleation. Ten model experiments are conducted to study the sensitivity of the simulated aerosol number concentrations to nucleation, SOA formation, black carbon size distribution and model meteorology. Simulated vertical profiles are evaluated against 12 flight campaigns. Comparison of monthly averaged aerosol number concentrations against 60 measurement sites reveals that the model with explicit nucleation and SOA scheme performs well in terms of correlation coefficient, R2 = 0.41 and a bias of −6%. NorESM generally overestimates the amplitude of the seasonal cycle, possibly due to underestimated sinks or exaggerated sensitivity to biogenic precursors.

Download & links
Publications Copernicus
Special issue
Download
Citation
Share