Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.509 IF 5.509
  • IF 5-year value: 5.689 IF 5-year 5.689
  • CiteScore value: 5.44 CiteScore 5.44
  • SNIP value: 1.519 SNIP 1.519
  • SJR value: 3.032 SJR 3.032
  • IPP value: 5.37 IPP 5.37
  • h5-index value: 86 h5-index 86
  • Scimago H index value: 161 Scimago H index 161
Volume 14, issue 8
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4263-4278, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4263-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 4263-4278, 2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-4263-2014
© Author(s) 2014. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 30 Apr 2014

Research article | 30 Apr 2014

Atmospheric boundary layer top height in South Africa: measurements with lidar and radiosonde compared to three atmospheric models

K. Korhonen1,2, E. Giannakaki1, T. Mielonen1, A. Pfüller1, L. Laakso3,4, V. Vakkari3,5, H. Baars6, R. Engelmann6, J. P. Beukes4, P. G. Van Zyl4, A. Ramandh7, L. Ntsangwane8, M. Josipovic4, P. Tiitta2,4,9, G. Fourie7, I. Ngwana8, K. Chiloane10, and M. Komppula1 K. Korhonen et al.
  • 1Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 1627, 70211, Kuopio, Finland
  • 2Department of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • 3Finnish Meteorological Institute, P.O. Box 503, 00101, Helsinki, Finland
  • 4Unit for Environmental Sciences and Management, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa
  • 5Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
  • 6Leibniz Institute for Tropospheric Research, Permoserstrasse 15, 04318, Leipzig, Germany
  • 7Sasol Technology R{&}D (Pty) Ltd., P.O. Box 1, Sasolburg, South Africa
  • 8South African Weather Service, Pretoria, South Africa
  • 9Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • 10Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd; Sustainability Division; Research, Testing and Development, South Africa

Abstract. Atmospheric lidar measurements were carried out at Elandsfontein measurement station, on the eastern Highveld approximately 150 km east of Johannesburg in South Africa throughout 2010. The height of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) top was continuously measured using a Raman lidar, PollyXT (POrtabLe Lidar sYstem eXTended). High atmospheric variability together with a large surface temperature range and significant seasonal changes in precipitation were observed, which had an impact on the vertical mixing of particulate matter, and hence, on the PBL evolution. The results were compared to radiosondes, CALIOP (Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization) space-borne lidar measurements and three atmospheric models that followed different approaches to determine the PBL top height. These models included two weather forecast models operated by ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts) and SAWS (South African Weather Service), and one mesoscale prognostic meteorological and air pollution regulatory model TAPM (The Air Pollution Model). The ground-based lidar used in this study was operational for 4935 h during 2010 (49% of the time). The PBL top height was detected 86% of the total measurement time (42% of the total time). Large seasonal and diurnal variations were observed between the different methods utilised. High variation was found when lidar measurements were compared to radiosonde measurements. This could be partially due to the distance between the lidar measurements and the radiosondes, which were 120 km apart. Comparison of lidar measurements to the models indicated that the ECMWF model agreed the best with mean relative difference of 15.4%, while the second best correlation was with the SAWS model with corresponding difference of 20.1%. TAPM was found to have a tendency to underestimate the PBL top height. The wind speeds in the SAWS and TAPM models were strongly underestimated which probably led to underestimation of the vertical wind and turbulence and thus underestimation of the PBL top height. Comparison between ground-based and satellite lidar shows good agreement with a correlation coefficient of 0.88. On average, the daily maximum PBL top height in October (spring) and June (winter) was 2260 m and 1480 m, respectively. To our knowledge, this study is the first long-term study of PBL top heights and PBL growth rates in South Africa.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share