Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Volume 13, issue 7
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3777-3791, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3777-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3777-3791, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3777-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 10 Apr 2013

Research article | 10 Apr 2013

Validation of an hourly resolved global aerosol model in answer to solar electricity generation information needs

M. Schroedter-Homscheidt1 and A. Oumbe2,* M. Schroedter-Homscheidt and A. Oumbe
  • 1German Aerospace Center (DLR), Earth Observation Center (EOC), 82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
  • 2Total New Energies, R&D – Concentrated Solar Technologies, 2 place de Vosges – La Défense 5, 92400 Courbevoie, France
  • *formerly at: German Aerospace Center (DLR), Earth Observation Center (EOC), 82234 Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany

Abstract. Solar energy applications need global aerosol optical depth (AOD) information to derive historic surface solar irradiance databases from geostationary meteorological satellites reaching back to the 1980's. This paper validates the MATCH/DLR model originating in the climate community against AERONET ground measurements. Hourly or daily mean AOD model output is evaluated individually for all stations in Europe, Africa and the Middle East – an area highly interesting for solar energy applications being partly dominated by high aerosol loads. Overall, a bias of 0.02 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.23 are found for daily mean AOD values, while the RMSE increases to 0.28 for hourly mean AOD values. Large differences between various regions and stations are found providing a feedback loop for the aerosol modelling community. The difference in using daily means versus hourly resolved modelling with respect to hourly resolved observations is evaluated. Nowadays state-of-the-art in solar resource assessment relies on monthly turbidity or AOD climatologies while at least hourly resolved irradiance time series are needed by the solar sector. Therefore, the contribution of higher temporally modelled AOD is evaluated.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share