Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Volume 13, issue 1
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 269–283, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-269-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 269–283, 2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-269-2013
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 11 Jan 2013

Research article | 11 Jan 2013

Assimilation of ground versus lidar observations for PM10 forecasting

Y. Wang2,1, K. N. Sartelet1, M. Bocquet3,1, and P. Chazette2 Y. Wang et al.
  • 1CEREA, joint laboratory Ecole des Ponts ParisTech - EDF R&D, Université Paris-Est, 77455 Champs sur Marne, France
  • 2LSCE, joint laboratory CEA-CNRS, UMR8212, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  • 3INRIA, Paris-Rocquencourt Research Center, Le Chesnay, France

Abstract. This article investigates the potential impact of future ground-based lidar networks on analysis and short-term forecasts of particulate matter with a diameter smaller than 10 μm (PM10). To do so, an Observing System Simulation Experiment (OSSE) is built for PM10 data assimilation (DA) using optimal interpolation (OI) over Europe for one month from 15 July to 15 August 2001. First, using a lidar network with 12 stations and representing the "true" atmosphere by a simulation called "nature run", we estimate the efficiency of assimilating the lidar network measurements in improving PM10 concentration for analysis and forecast. It is compared to the efficiency of assimilating concentration measurements from the AirBase ground network, which includes about 500 stations in western Europe. It is found that assimilating the lidar observations decreases by about 54% the root mean square error (RMSE) of PM10 concentrations after 12 h of assimilation and during the first forecast day, against 59% for the assimilation of AirBase measurements. However, the assimilation of lidar observations leads to similar scores as AirBase's during the second forecast day. The RMSE of the second forecast day is improved on average over the summer month by 57% by the lidar DA, against 56% by the AirBase DA. Moreover, the spatial and temporal influence of the assimilation of lidar observations is larger and longer. The results show a potentially powerful impact of the future lidar networks. Secondly, since a lidar is a costly instrument, a sensitivity study on the number and location of required lidars is performed to help define an optimal lidar network for PM10 forecasts. With 12 lidar stations, an efficient network in improving PM10 forecast over Europe is obtained by regularly spacing the lidars. Data assimilation with a lidar network of 26 or 76 stations is compared to DA with the previously-used lidar network. During the first forecast day, the assimilation of 76 lidar stations' measurements leads to a better score (the RMSE decreased by about 65%) than AirBase's (the RMSE decreased by about 59%).

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation