Journal cover
Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic
- About
- Editorial & advisory board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer review
- For authors
- For reviewers
- EGU publications
- Imprint
- Data protection
- About
- Editorial & advisory board
- Articles
- Special issues
- Highlight articles
- Manuscript tracking
- Subscribe to alerts
- Peer review
- For authors
- For reviewers
- EGU publications
- Imprint
- Data protection
Journal metrics
Journal metrics
IF 5.668
6.201CiteScore
6.13SNIP 1.633
SJR 2.938
index 174h5-index 87
Abstracted/indexed
Abstracted/indexed
Volume 12, issue 19
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9041-9055, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9041-9055, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9041-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Research article 04 Oct 2012
Research article | 04 Oct 2012
Adjoint sensitivity of global cloud droplet number to aerosol and dynamical parameters
V. A. Karydis et al.Related subject area
Subject: Clouds and Precipitation | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Direct Lagrangian tracking simulation of droplet growth in vertically developing cloud
The effect of secondary ice production parameterization on the simulation of a cold frontal rainband
Global streamflow and flood response to stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
Large simulated radiative effects of smoke in the south-east Atlantic
The role of droplet sedimentation in the evolution of low-level clouds over southern West Africa
A numerical modelling investigation of the role of diabatic heating and cooling in the development of a mid-level vortex prior to tropical cyclogenesis – Part 1: The response to stratiform components of diabatic forcing
Aerosol as a potential factor to control the increasing torrential rain events in urban areas over the last decades
Investigating the impacts of Saharan dust on tropical deep convection using spectral bin microphysics
The relative impact of cloud condensation nuclei and ice nucleating particle concentrations on phase-partitioning in Arctic Mixed-Phase Stratocumulus Clouds
A model intercomparison of CCN-limited tenuous clouds in the high Arctic
Impact of gravity waves on the motion and distribution of atmospheric ice particles
The efficacy of aerosol-cloud-radiative perturbations from near-surface emissions in deep open-cell stratocumulus
Aerosol–cloud interactions in mixed-phase convective clouds – Part 2: Meteorological ensemble
Impact of upstream moisture structure on a back-building convective precipitation system in south-eastern France during HyMeX IOP13
Extreme temperature and precipitation response to solar dimming and stratospheric aerosol geoengineering
The importance of mixed-phase and ice clouds for climate sensitivity in the global aerosol–climate model ECHAM6-HAM2
Evaluate autoconversion and accretion enhancement factors in GCM warm-rain parameterizations using ground-based measurements at the Azores
Convective environment in pre-monsoon and monsoon conditions over the Indian subcontinent: the impact of surface forcing
Competition for water vapour results in suppression of ice formation in mixed-phase clouds
Cloud droplet size distribution broadening during diffusional growth: ripening amplified by deactivation and reactivation
Bridging the condensation–collision size gap: a direct numerical simulation of continuous droplet growth in turbulent clouds
Quantifying the effect of aerosol on vertical velocity and effective terminal velocity in warm convective clouds
Assessing the uncertainty of soil moisture impacts on convective precipitation using a new ensemble approach
The sensitivity of Alpine summer convection to surrogate climate change: an intercomparison between convection-parameterizing and convection-resolving models
Theoretical analysis of mixing in liquid clouds – Part IV: DSD evolution and mixing diagrams
Aerosol–cloud interactions in mixed-phase convective clouds – Part 1: Aerosol perturbations
Towards a bulk approach to local interactions of hydrometeors
Initiation of secondary ice production in clouds
Relating large-scale subsidence to convection development in Arctic mixed-phase marine stratocumulus
Regional simulation of Indian summer monsoon intraseasonal oscillations at gray-zone resolution
Response to marine cloud brightening in a multi-model ensemble
Effects of model resolution and parameterizations on the simulations of clouds, precipitation, and their interactions with aerosols
Multifractal evaluation of simulated precipitation intensities from the COSMO NWP model
Partitioning the primary ice formation modes in large eddy simulations of mixed-phase clouds
Data assimilation of GNSS zenith total delays from a Nordic processing centre
Sensitivity of surface temperature to radiative forcing by contrail cirrus in a radiative-mixing model
Stochastic coalescence in Lagrangian cloud microphysics
The influence of sea- and land-breeze circulations on the diurnal variability in precipitation over a tropical island
Large eddy simulation of radiation fog: impact of dynamics on the fog life cycle
Uncertainty from the choice of microphysics scheme in convection-permitting models significantly exceeds aerosol effects
The microphysics of clouds over the Antarctic Peninsula – Part 2: modelling aspects within Polar WRF
How do changes in warm-phase microphysics affect deep convective clouds?
Cloud albedo changes in response to anthropogenic sulfate and non-sulfate aerosol forcings in CMIP5 models
On the limits of Köhler activation theory: how do collision and coalescence affect the activation of aerosols?
Time-dependent, non-monotonic response of warm convective cloud fields to changes in aerosol loading
Technical note: Fu–Liou–Gu and Corti–Peter model performance evaluation for radiative retrievals from cirrus clouds
The impact of fluctuations and correlations in droplet growth by collision–coalescence revisited – Part 1: Numerical calculation of post-gel droplet size distribution
Modelling micro- and macrophysical contributors to the dissipation of an Arctic mixed-phase cloud during the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS)
Thermodynamic and dynamic responses of the hydrological cycle to solar dimming
Effect of anthropogenic aerosol emissions on precipitation in warm conveyor belts in the western North Pacific in winter – a model study with ECHAM6-HAM
Yuichi Kunishima and Ryo Onishi
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16619-16630, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16619-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16619-2018, 2018
Short summary
Sylvia C. Sullivan, Christian Barthlott, Jonathan Crosier, Ilya Zhukov, Athanasios Nenes, and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16461-16480, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16461-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16461-2018, 2018
Short summary
Liren Wei, Duoying Ji, Chiyuan Miao, Helene Muri, and John C. Moore
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 16033-16050, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16033-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-16033-2018, 2018
Short summary
Hamish Gordon, Paul R. Field, Steven J. Abel, Mohit Dalvi, Daniel P. Grosvenor, Adrian A. Hill, Ben T. Johnson, Annette K. Miltenberger, Masaru Yoshioka, and Ken S. Carslaw
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 15261-15289, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15261-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-15261-2018, 2018
Short summary
Christopher Dearden, Adrian Hill, Hugh Coe, and Tom Choularton
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14253-14269, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14253-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14253-2018, 2018
Short summary
Melville E. Nicholls, Roger A. Pielke Sr., Donavan Wheeler, Gustavo Carrio, and Warren P. Smith
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14393-14416, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14393-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14393-2018, 2018
Short summary
Seoung Soo Lee, Byung-Gon Kim, Zhanqing Li, Yong-Sang Choi, Chang-Hoon Jung, Junshik Um, Jungbin Mok, and Kyong-Hwan Seo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12531-12550, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12531-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12531-2018, 2018
Matthew Gibbons, Qilong Min, and Jiwen Fan
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12161-12184, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12161-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12161-2018, 2018
Short summary
Amy Solomon, Gijs de Boer, Jessie M. Creamean, Allison McComiskey, Matthew D. Shupe, Maximilian Maahn, and Christopher Cox
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-714, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-714, 2018
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Robin G. Stevens, Katharina Loewe, Christopher Dearden, Antonios Dimitrelos, Anna Possner, Gesa K. Eirund, Tomi Raatikainen, Adrian A. Hill, Benjamin J. Shipway, Jonathan Wilkinson, Sami Romakkaniemi, Juha Tonttila, Ari Laaksonen, Hannele Korhonen, Paul Connolly, Ulrike Lohmann, Corinna Hoose, Annica M. L. Ekman, Ken S. Carslaw, and Paul R. Field
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11041-11071, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11041-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11041-2018, 2018
Short summary
Aurélien Podglajen, Riwal Plougonven, Albert Hertzog, and Eric Jensen
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10799-10823, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10799-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10799-2018, 2018
Short summary
Anna Possner, Hailong Wang, Robert Wood, Ken Caldeira, and Thomas Ackerman
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-708, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-708, 2018
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Annette K. Miltenberger, Paul R. Field, Adrian A. Hill, Ben J. Shipway, and Jonathan M. Wilkinson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10593-10613, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10593-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10593-2018, 2018
Keun-Ok Lee, Cyrille Flamant, Fanny Duffourg, Véronique Ducrocq, and Jean-Pierre Chaboureau
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-707, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-707, 2018
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Duoying Ji, Songsong Fang, Charles L. Curry, Hiroki Kashimura, Shingo Watanabe, Jason N. S. Cole, Andrew Lenton, Helene Muri, Ben Kravitz, and John C. Moore
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 10133-10156, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-10133-2018, 2018
Short summary
Ulrike Lohmann and David Neubauer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 8807-8828, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8807-2018, 2018
Short summary
Peng Wu, Baike Xi, Xiquan Dong, and Zhibo Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-499, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-499, 2018
Manuscript under review for ACP
Short summary
Lois Thomas, Neelam Malap, Wojciech W. Grabowski, Kundan Dani, and Thara V. Prabha
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7473-7488, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7473-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7473-2018, 2018
Short summary
Emma L. Simpson, Paul J. Connolly, and Gordon McFiggans
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7237-7250, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7237-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7237-2018, 2018
Short summary
Fan Yang, Pavlos Kollias, Raymond A. Shaw, and Andrew M. Vogelmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7313-7328, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7313-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7313-2018, 2018
Short summary
Sisi Chen, Man-Kong Yau, Peter Bartello, and Lulin Xue
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7251-7262, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7251-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7251-2018, 2018
Short summary
Guy Dagan, Ilan Koren, and Orit Altaratz
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6761-6769, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6761-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6761-2018, 2018
Short summary
Olga Henneberg, Felix Ament, and Verena Grützun
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 6413-6425, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6413-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-6413-2018, 2018
Short summary
Michael Keller, Nico Kröner, Oliver Fuhrer, Daniel Lüthi, Juerg Schmidli, Martin Stengel, Reto Stöckli, and Christoph Schär
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5253-5264, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5253-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5253-2018, 2018
Short summary
Mark Pinsky and Alexander Khain
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3659-3676, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3659-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3659-2018, 2018
Short summary
Annette K. Miltenberger, Paul R. Field, Adrian A. Hill, Phil Rosenberg, Ben J. Shipway, Jonathan M. Wilkinson, Robert Scovell, and Alan M. Blyth
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 3119-3145, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3119-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3119-2018, 2018
Manuel Baumgartner and Peter Spichtinger
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 2525-2546, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2525-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-2525-2018, 2018
Short summary
Sylvia C. Sullivan, Corinna Hoose, Alexei Kiselev, Thomas Leisner, and Athanasios Nenes
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1593-1610, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1593-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1593-2018, 2018
Short summary
Gillian Young, Paul J. Connolly, Christopher Dearden, and Thomas W. Choularton
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1475-1494, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1475-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1475-2018, 2018
Short summary
Xingchao Chen, Olivier M. Pauluis, and Fuqing Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 1003-1022, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1003-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1003-2018, 2018
Short summary
Camilla W. Stjern, Helene Muri, Lars Ahlm, Olivier Boucher, Jason N. S. Cole, Duoying Ji, Andy Jones, Jim Haywood, Ben Kravitz, Andrew Lenton, John C. Moore, Ulrike Niemeier, Steven J. Phipps, Hauke Schmidt, Shingo Watanabe, and Jón Egill Kristjánsson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 621-634, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-621-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-621-2018, 2018
Short summary
Seoung Soo Lee, Zhanqing Li, Yuwei Zhang, Hyelim Yoo, Seungbum Kim, Byung-Gon Kim, Yong-Sang Choi, Jungbin Mok, Junshik Um, Kyoung Ock Choi, and Danhong Dong
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 13-29, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-13-2018, 2018
Short summary
Daniel Wolfensberger, Auguste Gires, Ioulia Tchiguirinskaia, Daniel Schertzer, and Alexis Berne
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14253-14273, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14253-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14253-2017, 2017
Short summary
Luke B. Hande and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14105-14118, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14105-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14105-2017, 2017
Short summary
Magnus Lindskog, Martin Ridal, Sigurdur Thorsteinsson, and Tong Ning
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13983-13998, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13983-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13983-2017, 2017
Short summary
Ulrich Schumann and Bernhard Mayer
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13833-13848, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13833-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13833-2017, 2017
Short summary
Piotr Dziekan and Hanna Pawlowska
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13509-13520, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13509-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13509-2017, 2017
Short summary
Lei Zhu, Zhiyong Meng, Fuqing Zhang, and Paul M. Markowski
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13213-13232, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13213-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13213-2017, 2017
Short summary
Marie Mazoyer, Christine Lac, Odile Thouron, Thierry Bergot, Valery Masson, and Luc Musson-Genon
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 13017-13035, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13017-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13017-2017, 2017
Short summary
Bethan White, Edward Gryspeerdt, Philip Stier, Hugh Morrison, Gregory Thompson, and Zak Kipling
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12145-12175, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12145-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12145-2017, 2017
Short summary
Constantino Listowski and Tom Lachlan-Cope
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10195-10221, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10195-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10195-2017, 2017
Short summary
Qian Chen, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, Reuven H. Heiblum, Guy Dagan, and Lital Pinto
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9585-9598, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9585-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9585-2017, 2017
Lena Frey, Frida A.-M. Bender, and Gunilla Svensson
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 9145-9162, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9145-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9145-2017, 2017
Short summary
Fabian Hoffmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 8343-8356, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8343-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-8343-2017, 2017
Short summary
Guy Dagan, Ilan Koren, Orit Altaratz, and Reuven H. Heiblum
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7435-7444, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7435-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7435-2017, 2017
Short summary
Simone Lolli, James R. Campbell, Jasper R. Lewis, Yu Gu, and Ellsworth J. Welton
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 7025-7034, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7025-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-7025-2017, 2017
Short summary
Lester Alfonso and Graciela B. Raga
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6895-6905, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6895-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6895-2017, 2017
Short summary
Katharina Loewe, Annica M. L. Ekman, Marco Paukert, Joseph Sedlar, Michael Tjernström, and Corinna Hoose
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6693-6704, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6693-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6693-2017, 2017
Short summary
Jane E. Smyth, Rick D. Russotto, and Trude Storelvmo
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6439-6453, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6439-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6439-2017, 2017
Short summary
Hanna Joos, Erica Madonna, Kasja Witlox, Sylvaine Ferrachat, Heini Wernli, and Ulrike Lohmann
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 6243-6255, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6243-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-6243-2017, 2017
Short summary
Cited articles
Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation 2. Multiple aerosol types, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6837–6844, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901161, 2000.
Alexander, B., Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Li, Q. B., Yantosca, R. M., Savarino, J., Lee, C. C. W., and Thiemens, M. H.: Sulfate formation in sea-salt aerosols: constraints from oxygen isotopes, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005659, 2005.
D'Almeida, G. A.: On the variability of desert aerosol radiative characteristics, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 3017–3026, 1987.
Alterskjær, K., Kristjénsson, J. E., and Seland, Ø.: Sensitivity to deliberate sea salt seeding of marine clouds – observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2795–2807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2795-2012, 2012.
Amos, H. M., Jacob, D. J., Holmes, C. D., Fisher, J. A., Wang, Q., Yantosca, R. M., Corbitt, E. S., Galarneau, E., Rutter, A. P., Gustin, M. S., Steffen, A., Schauer, J. J., Graydon, J. A., Louis, V. L. St., Talbot, R. W., Edgerton, E. S., Zhang, Y., and Sunderland, E. M.: Gas-particle partitioning of atmospheric Hg(II) and its effect on global mercury deposition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 591–603, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-591-2012, 2012.
Anderson, B. E., Grant, W. B., Gregory, G. L., Browell, E. V., Collins, J. E., Sachse, G. W., Bagwell, D. R., Hudgins, C. H., Blake, B. R., and Blake, N. J.: Aerosols from biomass burning over the tropical South Atlantic region: distributions and impacts, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 24117–24137, https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD00717, 1996.
Anttila, T. and Kerminen, V.-M.: On the contribution of Aitken mode particles to cloud droplet populations at continental background areas – a parametric sensitivity study, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4625–4637, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4625-2007, 2007.
Barahona, D. and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in large-scale models: including effects of entrainment, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008473, 2007.
Barahona, D., West, R. E. L., Stier, P., Romakkaniemi, S., Kokkola, H., and Nenes, A.: Comprehensively accounting for the effect of giant CCN in cloud activation parameterizations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 2467–2473, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-2467-2010, 2010.
Barahona, D., Sotiropoulou, R. E. P., and Nenes, A.: Global distribution of cloud droplet number concentration, autoconversion rate and aerosol indirect effect under diabatic droplet activation, J. Geophy. Res., 116, D09203, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD015274, 2011.
Bartholomew-Biggs, M.: Using Forward Accumulation for Automatic Differentiation of Implicitly-Defined Functions, Computational Optimization and Applications, 9, 65–84, 1998.
Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q. B., Liu, H. G. Y., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23073–23095, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd000807, 2001.
Bond, T. C., Bhardwaj, E., Dong, R., Jogani, R., Jung, S. K., Roden, C., Streets, D. G., and Trautmann, N. M.: Historical emissions of black and organic carbon aerosol from energy-related combustion, 1850–2000, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21, GB2018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gb002840, 2007.
Boucher, O. and Lohmann, U.: The sulfate-CCN-cloud albedo effect – a sensitivity study with 2 general-circulation models, Tellus B, 47, 281–300, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.47.issue3.1.x, 1995.
Capps, S. L., Henze, D. K., Hakami, A., Russell, A. G., and Nenes, A.: ANISORROPIA: the adjoint of the aerosol thermodynamic model ISORROPIA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 527–543, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-527-2012, 2012.
Chuang, C. C., Penner, J. E., Taylor, K. E., Grossman, A. S., and Walton, J. J.: An assessment of the radiative effects of anthropogenic sulfate, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 3761–3778, 1997.
Chuang, P. Y., Collins, D. R., Pawlowska, H., Snider, J. R., Jonsson, H. H., Brenguier, J. L., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: CCN measurements during ACE-2 and their relationship to cloud microphysical properties, Tellus B, 52, 843–867, 2000.
Considine, D. B., Bergmann, D. J., and Liu, H.: Sensitivity of Global Modeling Initiative chemistry and transport model simulations of radon-222 and lead-210 to input meteorological data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3389–3406, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3389-2005, 2005.
Ervens, B., Cubison, M., Andrews, E., Feingold, G., Ogren, J. A., Jimenez, J. L., DeCarlo, P., and Nenes, A.: Prediction of cloud condensation nucleus number concentration using measurements of aerosol size distributions and composition and light scattering enhancement due to humidity, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S32, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007426, 2007.
Ervens, B., Cubison, M. J., Andrews, E., Feingold, G., Ogren, J. A., Jimenez, J. L., Quinn, P. K., Bates, T. S., Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Coe, H., Flynn, M., and Allan, J. D.: CCN predictions using simplified assumptions of organic aerosol composition and mixing state: a synthesis from six different locations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4795–4807, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4795-2010, 2010.
Fairlie, T. D., Jacob, D. J., and Park, R. J.: The impact of transpacific transport of mineral dust in the United States, Atmos. Environ., 41, 1251–1266, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2006.09.048, 2007.
Fisher, J. A., Jacob, D. J., Wang, Q. Q., Bahreini, R., Carouge, C. C., Cubison, M. J., Dibb, J. E., Diehl, T., Jimenez, J. L., Leibensperger, E. M., Lu, Z. F., Meinders, M. B. J., Pye, H. O. T., Quinn, P. K., Sharma, S., Streets, D. G., van Donkelaar, A., and Yantosca, R. M.: Sources, distribution, and acidity of sulfate-ammonium aerosol in the Arctic in winter-spring, Atmos. Environ., 45, 7301–7318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.030, 2011.
Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D11212, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005591, 2005.
Fountoukis, C., Nenes, A., Meskhidze, N., Bahreini, R., Conant, W. C., Jonsson, H., Murphy, S., Sorooshian, A., Varutbangkul, V., Brechtel, F., Flagan, R. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Aerosol-cloud drop concentration closure for clouds sampled during the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation 2004 campaign, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D10S30, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007272, 2007.
Ghan, S. J., Guzman, G., and Abdul-Razzak, H.: Competition between sea salt and sulfate particles as cloud condensation nuclei, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 3340–3347, 1998.
Ghil, M. and Malanotterizzoli, P.: Data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography, Adv. Geophys., 33, 141–266, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2687(08)60442-2, 1991.
Giering, R.: Tangent linear and adjoint biogeochemical models, in: Inverse Methods in Global Biogeochemical Cycles, edited by: Kasibhatla, P., Heimann, M., Rayner, P., Mahowald, N., Prinn, R. G., and Hartley, D. E., Geophysical Monograph Series, American Geophysical Union, Washington, 33–48, 2000.
Guibert, S., Snider, J. R., and Brenguier, J. L.: Aerosol activation in marine stratocumulus clouds: 1. measurement validation for a closure study, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8628, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002678, 2003.
Haerter, J. O., Roeckner, E., Tomassini, L., and von Storch, J. S.: Parametric uncertainty effects on aerosol radiative forcing, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L15707, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl039050, 2009.
Hakami, A., Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., Chai, T., Tang, Y., Carmichael, G. R., and Sandu, A.: Adjoint inverse modeling of black carbon during the Asian Pacific Regional Aerosol Characterization Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D14301, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005671, 2005.
Hall, M. C. G.: Application of adjoint sensitivity theory to an atmospheric general-circulation model, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 2644–2651, 1986.
Hascoët, L. and Pascual, V.: TAPENADE 2.1 user's guide (No. 0300), Sophia Antipolis Cedex: INRIA Sophia Antipolis, 2004.
Henze, D. K., Seinfeld, J. H., and Shindell, D. T.: Inverse modeling and mapping US air quality influences of inorganic PM2.5 precursor emissions using the adjoint of GEOS-Chem, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5877–5903, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5877-2009, 2009.
Karydis, V. A., Kumar, P., Barahona, D., Sokolik, I. N., and Nenes, A.: On the effect of dust particles on global cloud condensation nuclei and cloud droplet number, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D23204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016283, 2011.
Kopacz, M., Mauzerall, D. L., Wang, J., Leibensperger, E. M., Henze, D. K., and Singh, K.: Origin and radiative forcing of black carbon transported to the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 2837–2852, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-2837-2011, 2011.
Korhonen, H., Carslaw, K. S., and Romakkaniemi, S.: Enhancement of marine cloud albedo via controlled sea spray injections: a global model study of the influence of emission rates, microphysics and transport, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4133–4143, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4133-2010, 2010.
Kumar, P., Sokolik, I. N., and Nenes, A.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation for global and regional models: including adsorption activation from insoluble CCN, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2517–2532, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2517-2009, 2009.
Kumar, P., Sokolik, I. N., and Nenes, A.: Measurements of cloud condensation nuclei activity and droplet activation kinetics of fresh unprocessed regional dust samples and minerals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3527–3541, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3527-2011, 2011a.
Kumar, P., Sokolik, I. N., and Nenes, A.: Cloud condensation nuclei activity and droplet activation kinetics of wet processed regional dust samples and minerals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8661–8676, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8661-2011, 2011b.
Lance, S., Nenes, A., and Rissman, T. A.: Chemical and dynamical effects on cloud droplet number: Implications for estimates of the aerosol indirect effect, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22208, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd004596, 2004.
Le Dimet, F. X. and Talagrand, O.: Variational algorithms for analysis and assimilation of meteorological observations: theoretical aspects, Tellus B, 38, 97–110, 1986.
Lee, C., Martin, R. V., van Donkelaar, A., Lee, H., Dickerson, R. R., Hains, J. C., Krotkov, N., Richter, A., Vinnikov, K., and Schwab, J. J.: SO2 emissions and lifetimes: estimates from inverse modeling using in situ and global, space-based (SCIAMACHY and OMI) observations, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D06304, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014758, 2011a.
Lee, L. A., Carslaw, K. S., Pringle, K. J., Mann, G. W., and Spracklen, D. V.: Emulation of a complex global aerosol model to quantify sensitivity to uncertain parameters, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12253–12273, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12253-2011, 2011b.
Leibensperger, E. M., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Chen, W.-T., Seinfeld, J. H., Nenes, A., Adams, P. J., Streets, D. G., Kumar, N., and Rind, D.: Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols – Part 1: Aerosol trends and radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 3333–3348, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-3333-2012, 2012.
Lions, J. L.: Optimal control of systems governed by partial differential equations, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1971.
Liu, H. Y., Jacob, D. J., Bey, I., and Yantosca, R. M.: Constraints from Pb-210 and Be-7 on wet deposition and transport in a global three-dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological fields, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12109–12128, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900839, 2001.
Liu, X. H., Penner, J. E., and Herzog, M.: Global modeling of aerosol dynamics: model description, evaluation, and interactions between sulfate and nonsulfate aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18206, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005674, 2005.
Liu, X. H. and Wang, J. A.: How important is organic aerosol hygroscopicity to aerosol indirect forcing?, Environ. Res. Lett., 5, 044010, https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/4/044010, 2010.
Mari, C., Jacob, D. J., and Bechtold, P.: Transport and scavenging of soluble gases in a deep convective cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 22255–22267, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900211, 2000.
Martien, P. T. and Harley, R. A.: Adjoint sensitivity analysis for a three-dimensional photochemical model: implementation and method comparison, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 2663–2670, https://doi.org/10.1021/es0510257, 2006.
Menut, L., Vautard, R., Beekmann, M., and Honore, C.: Sensitivity of photochemical pollution using the adjoint of a simplified chemistry-transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 15379–15402, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd900953, 2000.
Meskhidze, N., Nenes, A., Conant, W. C., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Evaluation of a new cloud droplet activation parameterization with in situ data from CRYSTAL-FACE and CSTRIPE, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D16202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005703, 2005.
Minnis, P., Heck, P. W., Young, D. F., Fairall, C. W., and Snider, J. B.: Stratocumulus cloud properties derived from simultaneous satellite and island-based instrumentation during fire, J. Appl. Meteorol., 31, 317–339, 1992.
Moore, R. H., Bahreini, R., Brock, C. A., Froyd, K. D., Cozic, J., Holloway, J. S., Middlebrook, A. M., Murphy, D. M., and Nenes, A.: Hygroscopicity and composition of Alaskan Arctic CCN during April 2008, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11807–11825, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11807-2011, 2011.
Moore, R. H., Cerully, K., Bahreini, R., Brock, C. A., Middlebrook, A. M., and Nenes, A.: Hygroscopicity and composition of California CCN during summer 2010, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D00V12, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD017352, 2012.
Morales, R. and Nenes, A.: Characteristic updrafts for computing distribution-averaged cloud droplet number and stratocumulus cloud properties, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D18220, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013233, 2010.
Morrison, H. and Gettelman, A.: A new two-moment bulk stratiform cloud microphysics scheme in the community atmosphere model, version 3 (CAM3). Part I: description and numerical tests, J. Climate, 21, 3642–3659, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008jcli2105.1, 2008.
Nenes, A. and Seinfeld, J. H.: Parameterization of cloud droplet formation in global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4415, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd002911, 2003.
Nenes, A., Ghan, S., Abdul-Razzak, H., Chuang, P. Y., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Kinetic limitations on cloud droplet formation and impact on cloud albedo, Tellus B, 53, 133–149, https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0889.2001.d01-12.x, 2001.
Olivier, J. G. J. and Berdowski, J. J. M.: Global emissions sources and sinks, in: The Climate System, A. A. Balkema Publishers/Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse, The Netherlands, 33–78, 2001.
Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Chin, M., and Martin, R. V.: Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4355, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002jd003190, 2003.
Park, R. J., Jacob, D. J., Field, B. D., Yantosca, R. M., and Chin, M.: Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosols in the United States: implications for policy, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D15204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004473, 2004.
Partridge, D. G., Vrugt, J. A., Tunved, P., Ekman, A. M. L., Gorea, D., and Sorooshian, A.: Inverse modeling of cloud-aerosol interactions – Part 1: Detailed response surface analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 7269–7287, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7269-2011, 2011.
Pöschl, U., Martin, S. T., Sinha, B., Chen, Q., Gunthe, S. S., Huffman, J. A., Borrmann, S., Farmer, D. K., Garland, R. M., Helas, G., Jimenez, J. L., King, S. M., Manzi, A., Mikhailov, E., Pauliquevis, T., Petters, M. D., Prenni, A. J., Roldin, P., Rose, D., Schneider, J., Su, H., Zorn, S. R., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Rainforest Aerosols as Biogenic Nuclei of Clouds and Precipitation in the Amazon, Science, 329, 1513–1516, 2010.
Price, C. and Rind, D.: A simple lightning parameterization for calculating global lightning distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 9919–9933, 1992.
Prospero, J. M., Charlson, R. J., Mohnen, V., Jaenicke, R., Delany, A. C., Moyers, J., Zoller, W., and Rahn, K.: The atmospheric aerosol system – an overview, Rev. Geophys., 21, 1607–1629, 1983.
Pye, H. O. T., Liao, H., Wu, S., Mickley, L. J., Jacob, D. J., Henze, D. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Effect of changes in climate and emissions on future sulfate-nitrate-ammonium aerosol levels in the United States, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D01205, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010701, 2009.
Rissman, T. A., Nenes, A., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Chemical amplification (or dampening) of the Twomey effect: conditions derived from droplet activation theory, J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 919–930, 2004.
Rotman, D. A., Tannahill, J. R., Kinnison, D. E., Connell, P. S., Bergmann, D., Proctor, D., Rodriguez, J. M., Lin, S. J., Rood, R. B., Prather, M. J., Rasch, P. J., Considine, D. B., Ramaroson, R., and Kawa, S. R.: Global Modeling Initiative assessment model: model description, integration, and testing of the transport shell, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1669–1691, https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900463, 2001.
Saide, P. E., Carmichael, G., Spak, S. N., Minnis, P., and Ayers, J. K.: Improving aerosol distributions below clouds by assimilating satellite-retrieved cloud droplet number, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 11939–11943, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205877109, 2012.
Sandu, A., Liao, W., Carmichael, G. R., Henze, D. K., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Inverse modeling of aerosol dynamics using adjoints: theoretical and numerical considerations, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 677–694, https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182289, 2005.
Sasaki, Y.: Some basic formalisms in numerical variational analysis, Mon. Weather Rev., 98, 875–883, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1970)098<0875:SBFINV>2.3.CO;2, 1970.
Segal, Y. and Khain, A.: Dependence of droplet concentration on aerosol conditions in different cloud types: application to droplet concentration parameterization of aerosol conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D15204, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005jd006561, 2006.
Seifert, A. and Beheng, K. D.: A two-moment cloud microphysics parameterization for mixed-phase clouds. Part 1: model description, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 92, 45–66, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-005-0112-4, 2006.
Sotiropoulou, R. E. P., Medina, J., and Nenes, A.: CCN predictions: is theory sufficient for assessments of the indirect effect?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L05816, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gl025148, 2006.
Sotiropoulou, R. E. P., Nenes, A., Adams, P. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Cloud condensation nuclei prediction error from application of Köhler theory: importance for the aerosol indirect effect, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D12202, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007834, 2007.
Spracklen, D. V., Pringle, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Chipperfield, M. P., and Mann, G. W.: A global off-line model of size-resolved aerosol microphysics: II. Identification of key uncertainties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3233–3250, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-3233-2005, 2005.
Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., Wang, L. T., He, K. B., Hao, J. M., Wu, Y., Tang, Y. H., and Carmichael, G. R.: Revisiting China's CO emissions after the Transport and Chemical Evolution over the Pacific (TRACE-P) mission: synthesis of inventories, atmospheric modeling, and observations, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D14306, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007118, 2006.
van Donkelaar, A., Martin, R. V., Leaitch, W. R., Macdonald, A. M., Walker, T. W., Streets, D. G., Zhang, Q., Dunlea, E. J., Jimenez, J. L., Dibb, J. E., Huey, L. G., Weber, R., and Andreae, M. O.: Analysis of aircraft and satellite measurements from the Intercontinental Chemical Transport Experiment (INTEX-B) to quantify long-range transport of East Asian sulfur to Canada, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 2999–3014, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-2999-2008, 2008.
Vuki{ć}evi{ć}, T. and Hess, P.: Analysis of tropospheric transport in the Pacific basin using the adjoint technique, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 7213–7230, https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901110, 2000.
Wang, Y. H., Jacob, D. J., and Logan, J. A.: Global simulation of tropospheric O3-NOx-hydrocarbon chemistry 1. model formulation, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 10713–10725, https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd00158, 1998.
Wang, Y. X. X., McElroy, M. B., Jacob, D. J., and Yantosca, R. M.: A nested grid formulation for chemical transport over Asia: applications to CO, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jd005237, 2004.
van der Werf, G. R., Morton, D. C., DeFries, R. S., Giglio, L., Randerson, J. T., Collatz, G. J., and Kasibhatla, P. S.: Estimates of fire emissions from an active deforestation region in the southern Amazon based on satellite data and biogeochemical modelling, Biogeosciences, 6, 235–249, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-235-2009, 2009.
Wesely, M. L.: Parametirization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical-models, Atmos. Environ., 23, 1293–1304, https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90153-4, 1989.
Woodhouse, M. T., Carslaw, K. S., Mann, G. W., Vallina, S. M., Vogt, M., Halloran, P. R., and Boucher, O.: Low sensitivity of cloud condensation nuclei to changes in the sea-air flux of dimethyl-sulphide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 7545–7559, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-7545-2010, 2010.
Yienger, J. J. and Levy, H.: Empirical-model of global soil-biogenic NOx emissions J. Geophys. Res., 100, 11447–11464, https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd00370, 1995.
Zhang, W., Capps, S. L., Hu, Y., Nenes, A., Napelenok, S. L., and Russell, A. G.: Development of the high-order decoupled direct method in three dimensions for particulate matter: enabling advanced sensitivity analysis in air quality models, Geosci. Model Dev., 5, 355–368, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-5-355-2012, 2012.
Search articles