Articles | Volume 12, issue 14
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6405-2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-6405-2012
Research article
 | 
24 Jul 2012
Research article |  | 24 Jul 2012

CO2 flux estimation errors associated with moist atmospheric processes

N. C. Parazoo, A. S. Denning, S. R. Kawa, S. Pawson, and R. Lokupitiya

Related subject area

Subject: Biosphere Interactions | Research Activity: Atmospheric Modelling | Altitude Range: Troposphere | Science Focus: Physics (physical properties and processes)
Impact of atmospheric transport on CO2 flux estimates derived from the atmospheric tracer inversions
Saqr Munassar, Guillaume Monteil, Marko Scholze, Ute Karstens, Christian Rödenbeck, Frank-Thomas Koch, Kai Uwe Totsche, and Christoph Gerbig
Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-510,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2022-510, 2022
Revised manuscript accepted for ACP
Short summary
Net ecosystem exchange (NEE) estimates 2006–2019 over Europe from a pre-operational ensemble-inversion system
Saqr Munassar, Christian Rödenbeck, Frank-Thomas Koch, Kai U. Totsche, Michał Gałkowski, Sophia Walther, and Christoph Gerbig
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7875–7892, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7875-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7875-2022, 2022
Short summary
Interpreting machine learning prediction of fire emissions and comparison with FireMIP process-based models
Sally S.-C. Wang, Yun Qian, L. Ruby Leung, and Yang Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 3445–3468, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3445-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-3445-2022, 2022
Short summary
Distinguishing the impacts of natural and anthropogenic aerosols on global gross primary productivity through diffuse fertilization effect
Hao Zhou, Xu Yue, Yadong Lei, Chenguang Tian, Jun Zhu, Yimian Ma, Yang Cao, Xixi Yin, and Zhiding Zhang
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 693–709, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-693-2022,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-693-2022, 2022
Short summary
Was Australia a sink or source of CO2 in 2015? Data assimilation using OCO-2 satellite measurements
Yohanna Villalobos, Peter J. Rayner, Jeremy D. Silver, Steven Thomas, Vanessa Haverd, Jürgen Knauer, Zoë M. Loh, Nicholas M. Deutscher, David W. T. Griffith, and David F. Pollard
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17453–17494, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17453-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17453-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Baker, D. F., Bösch, H., Doney, S. C., O'Brien, D., and Schimel, D. S.: Carbon source/sink information provided by column CO2 measurements from the Orbiting Carbon Observatory, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4145–4165, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4145-2010, 2010.
Bloom, S. C., Takacs, L. L., Da Silva, A. M., and Ledvina, D.: Data assimilation using incremental analysis updates, Mon. Weather Rev., 124, 1256–1271, 1996.
Bloom, S., da Silva, A., and Dee, D.: Documentation and Validation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) Data Assimilation System – Version 4. Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, in: Global Modeling Data Assimilation 104606, Tech. Rep. Ser. 26, NASA Goddard Space Flight Cent., Md., 2005.
Bruhwiler, L. M. P., Michalak, A. M., Peters, W., Baker, D. F., and Tans, P.: An improved Kalman Smoother for atmospheric inversions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2691–2702, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2691-2005, 2005.
Chevallier, F., Breon, F.-M., and Rayner, P. J.: Contribution of the Orbiting Carbon Observatory to the estimation of CO2 sources and sinks: Theoretical study in a variational data assimilation framework, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09307, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007375, 2007.
Download
Altmetrics
Final-revised paper
Preprint