Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Volume 12, issue 5
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2289–2295, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2289-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Special issue: European Integrated Project on Aerosol-Cloud-Climate and Air...

Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 2289–2295, 2012
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-2289-2012
© Author(s) 2012. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 01 Mar 2012

Research article | 01 Mar 2012

A numerical comparison of different methods for determining the particle formation rate

H. Vuollekoski1, S.-L. Sihto1, V.-M. Kerminen1,2, M. Kulmala1,3, and K. E. J. Lehtinen4,5 H. Vuollekoski et al.
  • 1Department of Physics, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 48, 00014 Helsinki, Finland
  • 2Finnish Meteorological Institute, 00560 Helsinki, Finland
  • 3Department of Applied Environmental Science, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden
  • 4Department of Physics and Mathematics, University of Eastern Finland, 70211 Kuopio, Finland
  • 5Finnish Meteorological Institute, 70211 Kuopio, Finland

Abstract. Different methods of determining formation rates of 3 nm particles are compared, basing on analysis of simulated data, but the results are valid for analyses of experimental particle size distribution data as well, at least within the accuracy of the applied model. The study shows that the method of determining formation rates indirectly from measured number concentration data of 3–6 nm particles is generally in good agreement with the theoretical calculation with a systematic error of 0–20%. While this accuracy is often enough, a simple modification to the approximative equation for the formation rate is recommended. A brief study on real atmospheric data implied that in some cases the accuracy gain may be significant.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation