Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

Journal metrics

  • IF value: 5.668 IF 5.668
  • IF 5-year value: 6.201 IF 5-year
    6.201
  • CiteScore value: 6.13 CiteScore
    6.13
  • SNIP value: 1.633 SNIP 1.633
  • IPP value: 5.91 IPP 5.91
  • SJR value: 2.938 SJR 2.938
  • Scimago H <br class='hide-on-tablet hide-on-mobile'>index value: 174 Scimago H
    index 174
  • h5-index value: 87 h5-index 87
Volume 11, issue 22
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11447-11453, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11447-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 11447-11453, 2011
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-11447-2011
© Author(s) 2011. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

Research article 17 Nov 2011

Research article | 17 Nov 2011

The Arctic vortex in March 2011: a dynamical perspective

M. M. Hurwitz2,1, P. A. Newman2, and C. I. Garfinkel3 M. M. Hurwitz et al.
  • 1Goddard Earth Sciences Technology and Research (GESTAR), Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, USA
  • 2NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
  • 3Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

Abstract. Despite the record ozone loss observed in March 2011, dynamical conditions in the Arctic stratosphere were unusual but not unprecedented. Weak planetary wave driving in February preceded cold anomalies in the polar lower stratosphere in March and a relatively late breakup of the Arctic vortex in April. La Niña conditions and the westerly phase of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) were observed in March 2011. Though these conditions are generally associated with a stronger vortex in mid-winter, the respective cold anomalies do not persist through March. Therefore, the La Niña and QBO-westerly conditions cannot explain the observed cold anomalies in March 2011. In contrast, positive sea surface temperature anomalies in the North Pacific may have contributed to the unusually weak tropospheric wave driving and strong Arctic vortex in late winter 2011.

Publications Copernicus
Download
Citation
Share