ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-9-995-2009 The ASSET intercomparison of stratosphere and lower mesosphere humidity analyses Thornton H. E. 1 Jackson D. R. 1 Bekki S. 2 Bormann N. 3 Errera Q. 4 Geer A. J. 3 Lahoz W. A. 5 Rharmili S. 2 Met Office, UK UPMC Univ Paris 06; CNRS; SA-IPSL, France European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts, UK Insitut d'Aéronomie Spatiale de Begique, BIRA-IASB, Belgium Norsk Institutt for Luftforskning, Norway 09 02 2009 9 3 995 1016 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/995/2009/acp-9-995-2009.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/995/2009/acp-9-995-2009.pdf

This paper presents results from the first detailed intercomparison of stratosphere-lower mesosphere water vapour analyses; it builds on earlier results from the EU funded framework V "Assimilation of ENVISAT Data" (ASSET) project. Stratospheric water vapour plays an important role in many key atmospheric processes and therefore an improved understanding of its daily variability is desirable. With the availability of high resolution, good quality Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) water vapour profiles, the ability of four different atmospheric models to assimilate these data is tested. MIPAS data have been assimilated over September 2003 into the models of the European Centre for Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), the Belgian Institute for Space and Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), the French Service d'Aéronomie (SA-IPSL) and the UK Met Office. The resultant middle atmosphere humidity analyses are compared against independent satellite data from the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE), the Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM III) and the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE II). The MIPAS water vapour profiles are generally well assimilated in the ECMWF, BIRA-IASB and SA systems, producing stratosphere-mesosphere water vapour fields where the main features compare favourably with the independent observations. However, the models are less capable of assimilating the MIPAS data where water vapour values are locally extreme or in regions of strong humidity gradients, such as the southern hemisphere lower stratosphere polar vortex. Differences in the analyses can be attributed to the choice of humidity control variable, how the background error covariance matrix is generated, the model resolution and its complexity, the degree of quality control of the observations and the use of observations near the model boundaries. Due to the poor performance of the Met Office analyses the results are not included in the intercomparison, but are discussed separately. The Met Office results highlight the pitfalls in humidity assimilation, and provide lessons that should be learnt by developers of stratospheric humidity assimilation systems. In particular, they underline the importance of the background error covariances in generating a realistic troposphere to mesosphere water vapour analysis.

 References Andersson, E. and Järvinen, H.: Variational quality control, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 697–722, 1999. Bormann, N., Healy, S. B., and Hamrud, M.: Assimilation of MIPAS limb radiances in the ECMWF system. II: Experiments with a 2-dimensional observation operator and comparison to retrieval assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 133, 329–346, doi:10.1002/qj.47, 2007. Brewer, A. W.: Evidence for a world circulation provided by the measurements of helium and water vapour distribution in the stratosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 75, 351–363, doi:10.1002/qj.49707532603, 1949. Cohn, S. E.: Assessing the effects of data selection with the DAO physical-space statistical analysis system, Mon. Weather Rev., 126(2913), 2013–2926, 1998. Daerden, F., Larsen, N., Chabrillat, S., Errera, Q., Bonjean, S., Fonteyn, D., Hoppel, K., and Fromm, M.: A 3D-CTM with detailed online PSC-microphysics: analysis of the Antarctic winter 2003 by comparison with satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1755–1772, 2007. Davies, T., M. J. P. Cullen, Malcolm, A. J., Mawson, M H., Staniforth, A., White, A. A., and Wood, N.: A new dynamical core for the Met Office's global and regional modelling of the atmosphere, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 1759–1782, 2005. Errera, Q., Daerden, F., Chabrillat, S., Lambert, J C., Lahoz, W A., Viscardy, S., Bonjean, S., and Fonteyn, D.: 4D-Var assimilation of MIPAS chemical observations: ozone and nitrogen dioxide analyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6169–6187, 2008. Dee, D. and da Silva, A.: The Choice of Variable for Atmospheric Moisture Analysis, Mon. Weather Rev., 131, 155–171, 2003. El Amraoui, L., Ricaud, P., Urban, J., Théodore, B., Hauchecorne, A., Lautié, N., De La Noë, J., Guirlet, M., Flochmoën, E L., Murtagh, D., Dupuy, E., Frisk, U., and Fanton d'Andon, O.: Assimilation of Odin/SMR $O_3$ and \chemN_2O measurements in a three-dimensional chemistry transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22304, doi:10.1029/2004JD004796, 2004. Fierli, F., Hauchecorne, A., Bekki, S., Théodore, B., and Fanton d'Andon, O.: Data assimilation of stratospheric ozone using a high-resolution transport model, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1381, doi:10.1029/2001GL014272, 2002. Fischer, H. and Oelhaf, H.: Remote sensing of vertical profiles of atmospheric trace constituents with MIPAS limb-emission spectrometers, Appl. Optics, 35, 2787–2796, 1996. Fisher, M.: Background error covariance modelling, in: Seminar on Recent developments in data assimilation for atmosphere and ocean, 8–12 September 2003, edited by ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, 45–64, 2003. Geer, A. J., Lahoz, W. A., Bekki, S., Bormann, N., Errera, Q., Eskes, H. J., Fonteyn, D., Jackson, D. R., Juckes, M. N., Massart, S., Peuch, V.-H., Rharmili, S., and Segers, A.: The ASSET intercomparison of ozone analyses: method and first results, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5445–5474, 2006. Harries, J. E., Russell III, J. M., Tuck, A. F., Gordley, L. L., Purcell, P., Stone, K., Bevilacqua, R. M., Gunson, M., Nedoluha, G., and Traub, W. A.: Validation of measurements of water vapor from the Halogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE), J. Geophys. Res, 101, 10 205–10 216, 1996. Healy, S. B. and Thépaut, J. N.: Assimilation experiments with CHAMP GPS radio occultation measurements, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 605–623, 2006. Hólm, E., Andersson, E., Beljaars, A., and et al.: Assimilation and Modelling of the Hydrological Cycle: ECMWF\u2019s Status and Plans, Tech. Memo., 383, ECMWF, 2002. Jackson, D. R., Burrage, M. D., Harries, J. E., Gray, L. J., Russell, J. M.: The semi-annual oscillation in upper stratospheric and mesospheric water vapour as observed by HALOE, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 2493–2515, 1998. Jackson, D. R., Keil, M., and Devenish, B. J.: Use of Canadian Quick Covariances in the Met Office data assimilation system, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 134, 1567–1582, 2008. Juckes, M. N.: An annual cycle of long lived stratospheric gases from MIPAS, Atm. Chem. Phys., 7, 1879–1897, 2007. Kalnay, E.: Atmospheric modeling, data assimilation and predictability, Cambridge University Press, UK, 2003. Kley, D., Henderson, E. J. S. W. R., Drummond, J. R., Harrop, W. J., Schmeltekopf, A. L., Thompson, R. L., and Winkler, R. H.: In situ measurements of the mixing ratio of water vapor in the stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 36, 2513–2524, 1979. Kley, D., Russell III, J. M., and Phillips, C.: SPARC assessment of upper tropospheric and stratospheric water vapour, Tech. Rep 2, SPARC, WMO, Geneva, 2000. Lahoz, W. A., Geer, A. J., and O'Neill, A.: Dynamical evolution of the 2003 southern hemisphere stratospheric winter using Envisat trace-gas observations, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 132, 1985–2008, doi:10.1256/qj.05.221, 2006. Lahoz, W. A., Errera, Q., Swinbank, R., and Fonteyn, D.: Data assimilation of stratospheric constituents: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5745–5773, 2007. Lorenc, A. C., Ballard, S. P., Bell, R. S., and et al.: The Met Office global three dimensional data assimilation scheme, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 2991–3012, 2002. Lumpe, J., Bevilacqua, R., Randall, C., Nedoluha, G., Hoppel, K., Russell, J., Harvey, V. L., Schiller, C., Sen, B., Taha, G., Toon, G., and Vömel, H.: Validation of Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) III version 4 stratospheric water vapor, J. Geophys. Res., 111, doi:10.1029/2005JD006763, 2006. Mastenbrook, H. J. and Daniels, R. E.: Atmospheric Water Vapor, chap. Measurements of stratospheric water vapor using a frost point hygrometer, Academic Press, 1980. Mauldin III, L. E., Zaun, N. H., McCormick, M. P., Guy, J. H., and Vaughn, W. R.: Stratospheric aerosol and gas experiment II instrument: a functional description, Opt. Eng., 24, 307–312, 1985. Ménard, R. and Chang, L.-P.: Assimilation of stratospheric chemical tracer observation using Kalman filter. Part II: $\chi ^2$ – Validated results and analysis of variance and correlation dynamics, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 2672–2686, 2000. Mote, P. W., Rosenlof, K. H., McIntyre, M. E., Carr, E. S., Gille, J. C., Holton, J. R., Kinnersley, J. S., Pumphrey, H. C., Russell, III, J. M., and Waters, J. W.: An atmospheric tape recorder: The imprint of tropical tropopause temperatures on stratospheric water vapor, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 3989–4006, doi:10.1029/95JD03422, 1996. Oelhaf, H., Fix, A., Schiller, C., and et al.: Validation of MIPAS ENVISAT v4.61 operational data with balloon and aircraft measurements: $H_2O$, in: ESA Special Publication SP-572: Second Workshop on the Atmospheric Chemistry Validation of ENVISAT (ACVE–2), 2004. Pappalardo, G., Colavitto, T., Congeduti, F., et al.: Validation of MIPAS water vapor products by ground based measurements, in: ESA Special Publication SP-572: Second Workshop on the Atmospheric Chemistry Validation of ENVISAT (ACVE–2), 2004. Parrish, D. F. and Derber, J. C.: The National Meteorological Center's spectral statistical-interpolation analysis system, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 1747-1763, 1992. Polavarapu, S., Shepherd, T. G., Rochon, Y., and Ren, S.: Some challenges of middle atmosphere data assimilation, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 3513–3527, 2005a. Polavarapu, S., Ren, S., Rochon, Y., Sankey, D., Ek, N., Koshyk, J., and Tarasick, D.: Data assimilation with the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model, Atmos. Ocean, 43, 77–100, 2005b. Pumphrey, H. C., Rind, D., M., J., Russell III, and Harries, J. E.: A preliminary zonal mean climatology of water vapour in the stratosphere and mesosphere, Adv. Space Res., 21, 1417–1420, 1998. Rabier, F., Jarvinen, H., Klinker, E., Mahfouf, J. F., and Simmons, A.: The ECMWF operational implementation of four-dimensional variational assimilation. I: Experimental results with simplified physics, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1148–1170, 2000. Raspollini, P., Belotti, C., Burgess, A., Carli, B., Carlotti, M., Ceccherini, S., Dinelli, B. M., Dudhia, A., Flaud, J.-M., Funke, B., Höpfner, M., Lopez-Puertas, M., Payne, V., Piccolo, C., Remedios, J. J., Ridolfi, M., and Spang, R.: MIPAS level 2 operational analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5605–5630, 2006. Russell III, J. M., Gordley, L. L., Park, J. H., Drayson, S. R., Hesketh, D. H., Cicerone, R. J., Tuck, A. F., Frederick, J. E., Harries, J. E., and Crutzen, P. J.: The Halogen Occultation Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 10 777–10 797, 1993. Schmidlin, F. and Ivanov, A.: Radiosonde relative humidity sensor performance: The WMO intercomparison\u2014Sept 1995, Preprints, 10th Symp. on Meteorological Observations and Instrumentation, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 68–71, 1998. Simmons, A. J., Untch, A., Jakob, C., Kållberg, P., and Undén, P.: Stratospheric water vapour and tropical tropopause temperatures in ECMWF analyses and multi-year simulations, Q. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc., 125, 353–386, doi:10.1256/smsqj.55316, 1999. Solomon, S. and Brasseur, G.: Polar Ozone, in: The stratosphere and its role in the climate system, edited by: Brasseur, G. P., Springer-Verlag, 253–259, 1997. Taha, G., Thomason, L. W., and Burton, S. P.: Comparison of Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II version 6.2 water vapour with balloon-borne and space-based instruments, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D18313, doi:10.1029/2004JD004859, 2004. Thomason, L. W., Burton, S. P., Iyer, N., Zawodny, J. M., and Anderson, J.: A revised water vapor product for the Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) II version 6.2 data set, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06312, doi:10.1029/2003JD004465, 2004. Weber, M., Bracher, A., Bramstedt, K., and et al.: Overview on validation of MIPAS H2O vapour by comparison with independent satellite measurements, in: ESA Special Publication SP-572: Second Workshop on the Atmospheric Chemistry Validation of ENVISAT (ACVE–2), 2004.