<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>22</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-9-8857-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/8857/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/8857/2009/acp-9-8857-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/8857/2009/acp-9-8857-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>8857</start_page>
	<end_page>8867</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-11-23</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Estimating trajectory uncertainties due to flow dependent errors in the atmospheric analysis</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Engström</name>
			<email>anderse@misu.su.se</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>L. Magnusson</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Department of Meteorology, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">The uncertainty of a calculated trajectory is dependent on the uncertainty in
the atmospheric analysis. Using the Ensemble Transform method (originally adapted
for ensemble forecasting) we sample the analysis uncertainty in order to create
an ensemble of analyses where a trajectory is started from each perturbed
analysis. This method, called the Ensemble analysis method (EA), is compared
to the Initial spread method (IS), where the trajectory receptor point is
perturbed in the horizontal and vertical direction to create a set of trajectories
used to estimate the trajectory uncertainty. The deviation growth is examined
for one summer and one winter month and for 15 different geographical locations.
We find up to a 40% increase in trajectory deviation in the mid-latitudes using
the EA method. A simple model for trajectory deviation growth speed is set up
and validated. It is shown that the EA method result in a faster error growth
compared to the IS method. In addition, two case studies are examined to
qualitatively illustrate how the flow dependent analysis uncertainty can impact
the trajectory calculations. We find a more irregular behavior for the EA
trajectories compared to the IS trajectories and a significantly increased
uncertainty in the trajectory origin. We conclude that by perturbing
the analysis in agreement with the analysis uncertainties the error
in backward trajectory calculations can be more consistently estimated.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Bannister, R N.: A review of forecast error covariance statistics in atmospheric variational data assimilation. I: Characteristics and measurements of forecast error covariances, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 1951–1970, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Bishop, C H. and Toth, Z.: Ensemble Transformation and Adaptive Observations, J. Atmos. Sci, 56, 1748–1765, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Bofetta, G., Celani, A., Cencini, M., Lacorata, G., and Vulpiani, A.: Nonasymptotic properties of transport and mixing, Chaos, 10, 50–60, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Buizza, R., Leutbecher, M., and Isaksen, L.: Potential use of an ensemble of analyses in the ECMWF Ensemble Prediction System, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134, 2051–2066, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Corazza, M., ad~D J Patil, E K., Szunyogh, I., Hunt, B R., Ott, E., and Yorke, J A.: Use of the breeding technique to estimate the structure of the analysis &quot;errors of the day&quot;, Nonlinear Proc. Geophys., 10, 233–243, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Draxler, R R.: Evaluation of an Ensemble Dispersion Calculation, J. App. Meteorol., 42, 308–317, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Harris, J M., Drexler, R R., and Oltmans, S J.: Trajectory model sensitivity to differences in input data and vertical transport method, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D14109, doi:10.1029/2004JD005750, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Houtekamer, P L. and Mitchell, H L.: Data Assimilation Using an Ensemble Kalman Filter Technique, Mon. Weather Rev., 126, 796–811, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Kalnay, E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., Collins, W., Deaven, D., Gandin, L., Iredell, M., Saha, S., White, G., Woollen, J., Zhu, Y., Leetmaa, A., Reynolds, R., Chelliah, M., Ebisuzaki, W., Higgins, W., Janowiak, J., Mo, K., Ropelewski, C., Wang, J., Jenne, R., , and Joseph, D.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project, Am. Meteor. Soc., 77, 437–471, 1996. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Magnusson, L., Nycander, J., and Källen, E.: Flow-dependent versus flow-independent initial perturbations for ensemble forecasting, Tellus, 61A, 194–209, 2009. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> McLay, J G., Bishop, C H., and Reynolds, C A.: Evaluation of the Ensemble Transform Analysis Perturbation Scheme at NRL, Mon. Weather Rev., 136, 1093–1108, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Merrill, J T., Bleck, R., and Avila, L.: Modeling Atmospheric Transport to the Marshall Island, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 12927–12936, 1985. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Palmer, T N.: Extended-Range Atmospheric Prediction and the Lorenz Model, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 74, 49–66, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Palmer, T N., Buizza, R., Hagedorn, R., Lawrence, A., Leutbecher, M., and Smith, L.: Ensemble prediction: a pedagogical perspective, Newsletter 106, ECMWF, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Scheele, M P. and Siegmund, P C.: Estimating errors in trajectory forecasts using ensemble predictions, Am. Meteor. Soc., 1223–1232, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Stohl, A.: Computation, accuracy and applications of trajectories – A review and bibliography, Atmos. Environ., 32, 947–966, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Straume, A G.: A More Extensive Investigation of the Use of Ensemble Forecasts for Dispersion Model Evaluation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 40, 425–445, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Toth, Z. and Kalnay, E.: Ensemble Forecasting at NCEP and the Breeding Method, Mon. Weather Rev., 125, 3297–3319, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Uppala, S M., K&amp;aring;llberg, P W., Simmons, A J., Andrae, U., Bechtold, V. D C., Fiorino, M., Gibson, J K., Haseler, J., Hernandez, A., Kelly, G A., Li, X., Onogi, K., Saarinen, S., Sokka, N., Allan, R P., Andersson, E., Arpe, K., Balmaseda, M A., Beljaars, A. C M., Berg, L. V D., Bidlot, J., Bormann, N., Caires, S., Chevallier, F., Dethof, A., Dragosavac, M., Fisher, M., Fuentes, M., Hagemann, S., Hólm, E., Hoskins, B J., Isaksen, L., Janssen, P. A. E M., Jenne, R., McNally, A P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Morcrette, J.-J., Rayner, N A., Saunders, R W., Simon, P., Sterl, A., Trenberth, K E., Untch, A., Vasiljevic, D., Viterbo, P., and Woollen, J.: The ERA-40 Re-Analysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Verver, G H L., Sikka, D R., Lobert, J M., Stossmeister, G., and Zachariasse, M.: Overview of the meteorological conditions and atmospheric transport porcesses during INDOEX 1999, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28399–28413, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Wang, X. and Bishop, C.: A Comparison of Breeding and Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter Ensemble Forecast Schemes, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1140–1158, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Wei, M., Toth, Z., Wobus, R., and Zhu, Y.: Initial Perturbations Based on the Ensemble Transform (ET) Technique in the NCEP Global Ensemble Forecast Systems, Tellus, 60A, 62–79, 2008. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

