<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>9</volume_number>
		<issue_number>1</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2009</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-9-71-2009</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/71/2009/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/71/2009/acp-9-71-2009.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/71/2009/acp-9-71-2009.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>71</start_page>
	<end_page>80</end_page>
	<publication_date>2009-01-07</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Cloud processing, cloud evaporation and Angström exponent</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>G.-J. Roelofs</name>
			<email>g.j.h.roelofs@uu.nl</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>V. Kamphuis</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht (IMAU), Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">With a cloud parcel model we investigate how cloud processing and cloud
evaporation modify the size distribution and the Angström exponent of an
aerosol population. Our study provides a new explanation for the observed
variability of the aerosol optical thickness and Angström exponent in
the vicinity of clouds. Cloud processing causes a decrease of aerosol
particle concentrations, relatively most efficiently in the coarse mode, and
reduces the relative dispersion of the aerosol distribution. As a result the
Angström exponent of the aerosol increases. The Angström exponent is
very sensitive for changes in relative humidity during cloud evaporation,
especially between 90% and 100%. In addition, kinetic limitations
delay evaporation of relatively large cloud drops, especially in clean and
mildly polluted environments where the coarse mode fraction is relatively
large. This hampers a direct relation between the aerosol optical thickness,
the Angström exponent and the ambient relative humidity, which may
severely complicate interpretation of these parameters in terms of aerosol
properties, such as the fine mode fraction.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> % vor jede Referenz Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, cloud microphysics and fractional cloudiness, Science, 245, 1227–1230, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Anderson, T. L., Wu, Y., Chu, D. A., Schmid, B., Redemann, J., and Dubovik, O.: Testing the MODIS satellite retrieval of aerosol fine-mode fraction, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18204, doi:10.1029/2005JD005978, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Bréon, F. M., Tanr\&apos;e, D., and Generoso, S.: Aerosol effects on cloud droplet size monitored from satellite, Science, 295, 834–838, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Charlson, R. J., Schwarz, S. E., Hales, J. M., Cess, R. D., Coakley, J. A., Hansen Jr., J. E., and Hofmann, D. J.: Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, Science, 255, 423–430, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Charlson, R. J., Ackerman, A. S., Bender, F. A. M., Anderson, T. L., and Liu, Z.: On the climate forcing consequences of the albedo continuum between cloudy and clear air, Tellus, 59, 715–727, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Chuang, P. Y., Charlson, R. J., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Kinetic limitations on droplet formation in clouds, Nature, 390, 594–596, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D. W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D. C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., M., Schulz, and van Dorland, R.: Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of WG I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Fukuta, N. and Walter, N. A.: Kinetics of hydrometeor growth from a vapor spherical model, J. Atmos. Sci., 27, 1160–1172, 1970. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Hänel, G.: The role of aerosol properties during the condensational stage of cloud: a reinvestigation of numerics and microphysics, Beitr. Phys. Atmosph., 60, 321–339, 1987. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Jacobson, M. Z.: Fundamentals of atmospheric modeling, Cambridge University Press, New York, 426–452, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., and Boucher, O.: A satellite view of aerosols in the climate system, Nature, 419, 215–223, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Kaufman, Y. J., Boucher, O., Tanré, D., Chin, M., Remer, L. A., and Takemura, T.: Aerosol anthropogenic component estimated from satellite data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L17804, doi:10.1029/2005GL023125, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Koren, I., Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Rudich, Y., and Vanderlei Martins, J.: On the twilight zone between clouds and aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08805, doi:10.1029/2007GL029253, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Korhonen, P., Ahonen, T., and Baret, J.: The effect of atmospheric nitric acid vapor on cloud condensation nucleus activation, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 22949–22958, 1993. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Lesins, G. and Lohmann, U.: Using MODIS and AERONET to determine GCM aerosol size, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1338–1347, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Loeb, N. G. and Schuster, G. L.: An observational study of the relationship between cloud, aerosol and meteorology in broken low- level cloud conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14214, doi:10.1029/2007JD009763, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Lohmann, U. and Lesins, G.: Stronger constraints on the anthropogenic indirect aerosol effect, Science, 298, 1012–1015, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Lohmann, U., Quaas, J., Kinne, S., and Feichter, J.: Different approaches for constraining global climate models of the anthropogenic indirect aerosol effect, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 243–249, doi:10.1175/BAMS-88-2-243, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Lu, M. L., Wang, J., Freedman, A., Jonsson, H. H., Flagan, R. C., McClatchey, R. A., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Analysis of humidity halos around trade wind cumulus clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 60, 1041–1059, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Menon, S., Del Genio, A. D., Kaufman, Y., Bennartz, R., Koch, D., Loeb, N., and Orlikowski, D.: Analyzing signatures of aerosol-cloud interactions from satellite retrievals and the GISS GCM to constrain the aerosol indirect effect, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14S22, doi:10.1029/2007JD009442, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> G., Stordal, F., Johnsrud, M., Kaufman, Y. J., Rosenfeld, D., Storelvmo, T., Kristjansson, J. E., Berntsen, T. K., Myhre, A., and Isaksen, I. S. A.: Aerosol-cloud interaction inferred from MODIS satellite data and global aerosol models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3081–3101, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Nakajima, T., Higurashi, A., Kawamoto, K., and Penner, J. E.: A possible correlation between satellite-derived cloud and aerosol microphysical parameters, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 1171–1174, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Pace, G., di Sarra, A., Meloni, D., Piacentino, S., and Chamard, P.: Aerosol optical properties at Lampedusa (Central Mediterranean). 1. Influence of transport and identification of different aerosol types, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 697–713, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Penner, J. E., Quaas, J., Storelvmo, T., Takemura, T., Boucher, O., Guo, H., Kirkevåg, A., Kristjánsson, J. E., and Seland, Ø.: Model intercomparison of indirect aerosol effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3391–3405, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Quaas, J., Boucher, O., Bellouin, N., and Kinne, S.: Satellite-based estimate of the direct and indirect aerosol climate forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D05204, doi:10.1029/2007JD008962, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Roelofs, G. J.: On the drop and aerosol size dependence of aqueous sulfate formation in a continental cumulus cloud, Atmos. Environ., 26A, 2309–2321, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Roelofs, G. J. and Jongen, S.: A model study of the influence of aerosol size and chemical properties on precipitation formation in warm clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22201, doi:10.1029/2004JD004779, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Roelofs, G. J.: A GCM study of organic matter in marine aerosol and its potential contribution to cloud drop activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 709–719, 2008. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angström exponent and bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07207, doi:10.1029/2005JD006328, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., et al.: Technical Summary, in: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L.: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Tang, I.: Thermodynamic and optical properties of mixed-salt aerosols of atmospheric importance, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 1883–1893, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Twomey, S.: Pollution and the planetary albedo, Atmos. Environ., 8, 1251–1256, 1974. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Van de Hulst, H. C.: Light scattering by small particles, Wiley, New York, 176–178, 1957. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Wen, G., Marshak, A., Cahalan, R. F., Remer, L. A., and Kleidman, R. G.: 3D aerosol-cloud radiative interaction observed in collocated MODIS and ASTER images of cumulus cloud fields, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D13204, doi:10.1029/2006JD008267, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> Whitby, K. T.: The physical characteristics of sulfur aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 12, 135–159, 1978. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

