ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-9-5261-2009 Interannual variability in hindcasts of atmospheric chemistry: the role of meteorology Hess P. 1 3 Mahowald N. 2 3 Department of Biological and Environmental Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA 29 07 2009 9 14 5261 5280 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/5261/2009/acp-9-5261-2009.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/5261/2009/acp-9-5261-2009.pdf

Two 40-year meteorological datasets are used to drive the Model of Ozone and Related Tracers chemical transport model, version 2 (MOZART2) in hindcast simulations. One dataset is from the National Center for Environmental Prediction/National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) reanalysis, the second dataset uses meteorology from the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM3) forced with observed interannually varying sea surface temperatures. All emissions, except those from lightning are annually constant. Analysis of these simulations focuses on the period between 1979–1999, due to meteorological discontinuities in the NCEP reanalysis during the 1970s. The meteorology using CAM3 captures observed trends in temperature and water vapor; the simulation using NCEP meteorology does not. This paper examines the regional and global interannual variability of various chemical and meteorological fields: CO, OH, O<sub>3</sub> and HNO<sub>3</sub>, the surface photolysis rate of NO<sub>2</sub> (as a proxy for overhead cloudiness), lightning NO emissions, water vapor, planetary boundary layer height, and temperature. The variability due to changes in emissions is not considered in this analysis. In both the NCEP and CAM3 simulations the relative variability of CO, OH, O<sub>3</sub> and HNO<sub>3</sub> are qualitatively similar, with variability maxima both in the tropics and the high latitudes. Locally, relative variability generally ranges between 3 and 10%; globally the tropospheric variability generally ranges from half to one percent, but can be higher. For most fields the leading global Empirical Orthogonal Function explains approximately 10% of the variability and correlates significantly with El Niño. In both simulations the first principal component of a multiple tracer, globally averaged analysis shows a strong coupling between surface temperature, measures of the hydrological cycle, CO and OH, but is not correlated with El Niño. In both simulations we examine the global response of the selected variables to changes in global surface temperature, and compare with a climate simulation over the 21st century.

 References Abbot,~D S., Palmer,~P I., Martin,~R V., Chance,~K V., Jacob,~D J., and Guenther,~A.: Seasonal and interannual variability of North American isoprene emissions as determined by formaldehyde column measurements from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(17), 1886, doi:10.1029/2003GL017336, 2003. Allen,~D J., Kasibhatla,~P., Thompson,~A M., Rood,~R B., Doddridge,~B G., Pickering,~K E., Hudson,~R D., and Lin,~S.: Transport-induced interannual variability of carbon monoxide determined using a chemistry and transport model,~J. Geophys. Res., 101, 28655–28669, 1996. Andersson,~C., Langner,~J., and Bergstrom,~R.: Tellus, 59B, 77–98, 2007. Arellano, Jr.,~A F., Raeder,~K., Anderson,~J L., Hess,~P G., Emmons,~L K., Edwards,~D P., Pfister,~G G., Campos,~T L., and Sachse,~G W.: Evaluating model performance of an ensemble-based chemical data assimilation system during INTEX-B field mission, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5695–5710, 2007. Bengtsson,~L., Hodges,~K I., and Hagemann,~S.: Sensitivity of large-scale atmospheric analyses to humidity observations and its impact on the global water cycle and tropical and extratropical weather systems in ERA40, Tellus A, 56(3), 202–217, doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2004.00053.x, 2004. Bousquet,~P., Ciais, P., Miller, J. B., et al.: Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability, Nature, 443(7110), 439–443, doi:10.1038/nature05132, 2006. Bousquet,~P., Hauglustaine,~D A., Peylin,~P., Carouge,~C., and Ciais,~P.: Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2635–2656, 2005. Bowman,~K P. and Erukhimova,~T.: Comparison of Global-Scale Lagrangian Transport Properties of the NCEP Reanalysis and CCM3,~J. Climate, 17, 1135–1146, 2004. Cess,~R D., Potter, G. L., Blanchet, J. P., et al.: Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general circulation models,~J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16601–16615, 1990. Chang,~J S.: Three-dimensional Eulerian acid deposition model: physical concepts and formulation,~J. Geophys. Res., 92, 14681–14700, 1987. Chen,~Y H. and Prinn,~R G.: Atmospheric modeling of high- and low-frequency methane observations: importance of interannually varying transport,~J. Geophys. Res., 110(27), D10303, doi:doi:10.1029/2004JD005542, 2005. Collins,~W D., Blackmon, M L., Bonan, G B., et al.: The Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3),~J. Climate, 19, 2122–2143, 2006. Creilson, J. K., Fishman, J., and Wozniak, A. E.: Intercontinental transport of tropospheric ozone: a study of its seasonal variability across the North Atlantic utilizing tropospheric ozone residuals and its relationship to the North Atlantic Oscillation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 2053–2066, 2003. Creilson,~J K., Fishman,~J., and Wozniak,~A E.: Arctic Oscillation-induced variability in satellite-derived tropospheric ozone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(14), L14822, doi:10.1029/2005GL023016, 2005. Dai,~A., Karl,~T R., Sun,~B., and Trenberth,~K E.: Recent trends in cloudiness over the United States: a tale of monitoring inadequacies, B. Am. Meteor. Soc., 87(5), 597–606, doi:10.1175/BAMS-87-5-597, 2006. Dentener,~F., Peters,~W., Krol,~M., Van Weele,~M., Bergamaschi,~P., and Lelieveld,~J.: Interannual variability and trend of \chemCH_4 lifetime as a measure for OH changes in the 1979–1993 time period,~J. Geophys. Res., 108(D15), 4442, doi:10.1029/2002JD002916, 2003. Doherty,~R M., Stevenson,~D S., Johnson,~C E., Collins,~W J., and Sanderson,~M G.: Tropospheric ozone and el Niño-Southern Oscillation: Influence of atmospheric dynamics, biomass burning emissions, and future climate change,~J. Geophys. Res. (D. Atmos.), 111(D19), D19304, doi:10.1029/2005JD006849, 2006. Eckhardt,~S., Stohl,~A., Beirle,~S., Spichtinger,~N., James,~P., Forster,~C., Junker,~C., Wagner,~T., Platt,~U., and Jennings,~S G.: The North Atlantic oscillation controls air pollution transport to the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1769–1778, 2003. Edwards,~D P. et al.: Observations of carbon monoxide and aerosols from the Terra satellite: Northern Hemisphere variability,~J. Geophys. Res., 109(D24), doi:10.1029/2004JD004727, 2004. Emmons,~L K., Hess, P., Klonecki, A., et al.: Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models,~J. Geophys. Res., 108(D8), 8372, doi:10.1029/2002JD002665, 2003. Fischer,~P H., Brunekreef,~B., and Lebret,~E.: Air pollution related deaths during the 2003 heat wave in the Netherlands, Atmos. Environ., 38, 1083–1085, 2004. Giorgi,~F. and Chameides,~W L.: Rainout parameterization in a photochemical model,~J. Geophys. Res., 90(D5), 7872–7880, 1985. Guenther,~A., Hewitt, C. N., Erickson, D., et al.: A~global model of natural volatile organic compound emissions,~J. Geophys. Res., 100, 8873–8892, 1995. Hack,~J J., Caron,~J M., Yeager,~S G., Oleson,~K W., Holland,~M M., Truesdale,~J E., and Rasch,~P J.: Simulation of the global hydrological cycle in the CCSM community atmosphere model version 3 (CAM3): mean features,~J. Climate, 19, 2199–2221, 2006. Hack,~J J.: Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2),~J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5551–5568, 1994. Hartley,~D E. and Black,~R X.: Mechanistic analysis of interhemispheric transport, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22(21), 2945–2948, 1995. Held,~I M. and Soden,~B J.: Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming,~J. Climate, 19, 5686–5699, 2006. Hess,~P G. and Lamarque,~J.: Ozone source attribution and its modulation by the Arctic oscillation during the spring months,~J. Geophys. Res., 112(D11), D11303, doi:10.1029/2006JD007557, 2007. Holtslag,~A A M. and Boville,~B A.: Local versus nonlocal boundary-layer diffusion in a global climate model,~J. Climate, 6, 1825–1842, 1993. Horowitz,~L W., Walters, S., Mauzerallet, D. L., et al.: A~global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,~J. Geophys. Res., 108(D24), 4784, doi:10.1029/2002JD002853, 2003. Hurrell,~J W.: Decadal Trends in the North Atlantic Oscillation: Regional Temperatures and Precipitation, Science, 269(5224), 676–679, 1995. Jaffe,~D. and Ray,~J.: Increase in surface ozone at rural sites in the western US, Atmos. Environ., 41(26), 5452–5463, 2007. Kallberg,~P., Berrisford,~P., Hoskins,~B., Simmons,~A., Uppala,~S., Lamy-Thepaut,~S., and Hine,~R.: ERA-40 Atlas, 1–191, 2005. Kalnay,~E., Kanamitsu, M., Kistler, R., et al.: The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 77(3), 437–471, 1996. Karlsdóttir,~S. and Isaksen,~I S A.: Changing methane lifetime: Possible cause for reduced growth, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27(1), 93–96, 2000. Kistler,~R., Kalnay,~E., Collins,~W., Saha,~S., White,~G., Woollen,~J., Chelliah,~M., Ebisuzaki,~W., Kanamitsu,~M., and Kousky,~V.: The NCEP-NCAR 50-year reanalysis: monthly means cd-rom and documentation, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82(2), 247–267, 2001. Krol,~M. and Lelieveld,~J.: Can the variability in tropospheric OH be deduced from measurements of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (methyl chloroform)?~J. Geophys. Res., 108(D3), 4125, doi:10.1029/2002JD002423, 2003. Labrador,~L J., Von Kuhlmann,~R., and Lawrence,~M G.: Strong sensitivity of the global mean OH concentration and the tropospheric oxidizing efficiency to the source of NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(6), L06102, doi:10.1029/2003GL019229, 2004. Lamarque,~J. and Hess,~P G.: Arctic Oscillation modulation of the Northern Hemisphere spring tropospheric ozone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31(6), L06127, doi:10.1029/2003GL019116, 2004. Mahowald,~N M., Zender,~C S., Luo,~C., Savoie,~D., Torres,~O., and del Corral,~J.: Understanding the 30-year Barbados desert dust record,~J. Geophys. Res., 107(D21), 4561, doi:10.1029/2002JD002097, 2002. Mahowald,~N M., Rasch,~P J., Eaton,~B E., Whittlestone,~S., and Prinn,~R G.: Transport of super(2) super(2) super(2)radon to the remote troposphere using the Model of Atmospheric Transport and Chemistry and assimilated winds from ECMWF and the National Center for Environmental Prediction/NCAR,~J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28139–28151, 1997. Murazaki,~K. and Hess,~P.: How does climate change contribute to surface ozone change over the United States?,~J. Geophys. Res., 111(D5), D05301, doi:10.1029/2005JD005873, 2006. Nevison,~C D., Mahowald,~N M., Weiss,~R F., and Prinn,~R G.: Interannual and seasonal variability in atmospheric \chemN_2O, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 21(3), GB3017, doi:10.1029/2006GB002755, 2007. Norris,~J R.: On trends and possible artifacts in global ocean cloud cover between 1952 and 1995,~J. Climate, 12(6), 1864–1870, 1999. Olivier,~J., Peters,~J., Granier,~C., Petron,~G., Muller,~J F., and Wallens,~S.: Present and future surface emissions of atmospheric compounds, POET Rep. 2, EU Proj. EVK2-1999-00011, 1999. Oltmans,~S J., Lefohn, A. S., Harris, J. M., et al.: Long-term changes in tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ., 40, 3156–3173, 2006. Ordonez,~C., Brunner,~D., Staehelin,~J., Hadjinicolaou,~P., Pyle,~J A., Jonas,~M., Wernli,~H., and Prevot,~A S H.: Strong influence of lowermost stratospheric ozone on lower tropospheric background ozone changes over Europe, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34(7), L07805, doi:10.1029/2006GL029113, 2007. Peters,~W., Krol,~M., Dentener,~F., and Lelieveld,~J.: Identification of an El Niño-Southern Oscillation signal in a multiyear global simulation of tropospheric ozone,~J. Geophys. Res., 106(D10), 10389–10402, 2001. Pickering,~K E., Wang,~Y., Tao,~W., Price,~C., and Mueller,~J.: Vertical distributions of lightning NO<sub>x</sub> for use in regional and global chemical transport models,~J. Geophys. Res., 103, 31203–31216, 1998. Prather, M., Ehhalt, D., Dentener, F., Derwent, R. G., Dlugokencky, E., Holland, E., Isaksen, I. S. A., Katima, J., Kirchhoff, V., Matson, P., Midgley, P. M., and Wang, M.: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Greenhouse Gases, Chap. 4, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, USA, 239–287, 2001. Price,~C., Penner,~J., and Prather,~M.: NO<sub>x</sub> from lightning. Part 1: Global distribution based on lightning physics,~J. Geophys. Res., 102, 5929–5941, 1997. Prinn, R. G., Huang, J., and R. F. Weiss: Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32(7), L07809, doi:10.1029/2004GL022228, 2005. Prinn,~R G., Huang, J., Weiss, R. F., et al.: Evidence for Substantial Variations of Atmospheric Hydroxyl Radicals in the Past Two Decades, Science, 292, 1882–1888, 2001. Rasch,~P J., Mahowald,~N M., and Eaton,~B E.: Representations of transport, convection, and the hydrologic cycle in chemical transport models: implications for the modeling of short-lived and soluble species,~J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28127–28138, 1997. Ross,~R J. and Elliott,~W P.: Radiosonde-based Northern Hemisphere tropospheric water vapor trends, J. Climate, 14(13), 1602–1611, 2001. Simmonds,~P G., Derwent,~R G., Manning,~A L., and Spain,~G.: Significant growth in surface ozone at Mace Head, Ireland, 1987–2003, Atmos. Environ., 38, 4769–4778, 2004. Slingo,~A., Pamment,~J A., Allan,~R P., and Wilson,~P S.: Water vapor feedbacks in the ECMWF reanalyses and Hadley Centre climate model,~J. Climate, 13(17), 3080–3098, 2000. Soden,~B J.: The sensitivity of the tropical hydrological cycle to ENSO,~J. Climate, 13(3), 538–549, 2000. Stevenson,~D S., Dentener, F. J., Schultz, M. G., et al.: Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone,~J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 111(D8), D08301, doi:10.1029/2005JD006338, 2006. Sudo,~K. and Takahashi,~M.: Simulation of tropospheric ozone changes during 1997–1998 El Niño: Meteorological impact on tropospheric photochemistry, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28(21), 4091–4094, 2001. Tie, X., Emmons, L., and Horowitz, L.: Effect of sulfate aerosol on tropospheric NO<sub>x</sub> and ozone budgets: Model simulations and TOPSE evidence,~J. Geophys. Res., 108(D4), 8364, doi:10.1029/2001JD001508, 2003. Trenberth,~K E. and Stepaniak,~D P.: Indices of El Niño Evolution,~J. Clim., 14(8), 1697–1701, 2001. Trenberth,~K E., Fasullo,~J., and Smith,~L.: Trends and variability in column-integrated atmospheric water vapor, Clim. Dynam., 24, 741–758, 2005. Uppala,~S M. et al.: The ERA-40 re-analysis,~Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 131, 2961–3012, 2005. Vukovich,~F M.: Time scales of surface ozone variations in the regional, non-urban environment, Atmos. Environ., 31, 1513–1530, 1997. Wang,~J S., Logan,~J A., McElroy,~M B., Duncan,~B N., Megretskaia,~I A., and Yantosca,~R M.: A~3-D model analysis of the slowdown and interannual variability in the methane growth rate from 1988 to 1997, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 18(3), GB3011, doi:10.1029/2003GB002180, 2004. Warwick,~N J., Bekki,~S., Law,~K S., Nisbet,~E G., and Pyle,~J A.: The impact of meteorology on the interannual growth rate of atmospheric methane, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(20), 1947, doi:10.1029/2002GL015282, 2002. Wentz,~F J., Ricciardulli,~L., Hilburn,~K., and Mears,~C.: How Much More Rain Will Global Warming Bring? Science, 317(5835), 233–235, doi:10.1126/sience.1140746, 2007. Wilks,~D.: Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, vol. 91, Academic Press, Inc., 525 B St. Ste. 1900 San Diego CA 92101–4495 USA, [http://www.academicpress.com], 648 pp., 2006. Zbinden,~R M., Cammas,~J.-P., Thouret,~V., Nédélec,~P., Karcher,~F., and Simon,~P.: Mid-latitude tropospheric ozone columns from the MOZAIC program: climatology and interannual variability Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1053–1073, 2006. Zhang,~G J. and McFarlane,~N A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Centre General Circulation Model, Atmosphere-Ocean, Ontario, Canada, 33, 407–446, 1995. Zhou,~W. and Sanso,~B.: Statistical inference for atmospheric transport models using process convolutions, Environmetrics, 19(1), 87–101, 2008. Ziemke,~J R. and Chandra,~S.: Seasonal and interannual variabilities in tropical tropospheric ozone,~J. Geophys. Res., 104(D17), 21425–21442, 1999. Ziemke,~J R. and Chandra,~S.: La Nina and El Niño-induced variabilities of ozone in the tropical lower atmosphere during 1970–2001, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(3), 1142, doi:10.1029/2002GL016387, 2003.