ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-9-5007-2009 Reinterpreting aircraft measurements in anisotropic scaling turbulence Lovejoy S. 1 Tuck A. F. 2 Schertzer D. 3 4 Hovde S. J. 2 Physics, McGill University, 3600 University st., Montreal, Que. H3A 2T8, Canada NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences Division, 325 Broadway, Boulder CO 80305-3337, USA CEREVE, Université Paris Est, France Météo France, 1 Quai Branly, Paris 75005, France 27 07 2009 9 14 5007 5025 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/5007/2009/acp-9-5007-2009.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/5007/2009/acp-9-5007-2009.pdf

Due to both systematic and turbulent induced vertical fluctuations, the interpretation of atmospheric aircraft measurements requires a theory of turbulence. Until now virtually all the relevant theories have been isotropic or "quasi isotropic" in the sense that their exponents are the same in all directions. However almost all the available data on the vertical structure shows that it is scaling but with exponents different from the horizontal: the turbulence is scaling but anisotropic. In this paper, we show how such turbulence can lead to spurious breaks in the scaling and to the spurious appearance of the vertical scaling exponent at large horizontal lags. <br></br> We demonstrate this using 16 legs of Gulfstream 4 aircraft near the top of the troposphere following isobars each between 500 and 3200 km in length. First we show that over wide ranges of scale, the horizontal spectra of the aircraft altitude are nearly <i>k</i><sup>-5/3</sup>. In addition, we show that the altitude and pressure fluctuations along these fractal trajectories have a high degree of coherence with the measured wind (especially with its longitudinal component). There is also a strong phase relation between the altitude, pressure and wind fluctuations; for scales less than &asymp;40 km (on average) the wind fluctuations lead the pressure and altitude, whereas for larger scales, the pressure fluctuations leads the wind. At the same transition scale, there is a break in the wind spectrum which we argue is caused by the aircraft starting to accurately follow isobars at the larger scales. In comparison, the temperature and humidity have low coherencies and phases and there are no apparent scale breaks, reinforcing the hypothesis that it is the aircraft trajectory that is causally linked to the scale breaks in the wind measurements. <br></br> Using spectra and structure functions for the wind, we then estimate their exponents (&beta;, <i>H</i>) at small (5/3, 1/3) and large scales (2.4, 0.73). The latter being very close to those estimated by drop sondes (2.4, 0.75) in the vertical direction. In addition, for each leg we estimate the energy flux, the sphero-scale and the critical transition scale. The latter varies quite widely from scales of kilometers to greater than several hundred kilometers. The overall conclusion is that up to the critical scale, the aircraft follows a fractal trajectory which may increase the intermittency of the measurements, but doesn't strongly affect the scaling exponents whereas for scales larger than the critical scale, the aircraft follows isobars whose exponents are different from those along isoheights (and equal to the vertical exponent perpendicular to the isoheights). We bolster this interpretation by considering the absolute slopes (|&Delta;<i>z</i>/&Delta;<i>x</i>|) of the aircraft as a function of lag &Delta;<i>x</i> and of scale invariant lag &Delta;<i>x</i>/&Delta;<i>z<sup>1/H<sub>z</sub></sup></i>. <br></br> We then revisit four earlier aircraft campaigns including GASP and MOZAIC showing that they all have nearly identical transitions and can thus be easily explained by the proposed combination of altitude/wind in an anisotropic but scaling turbulence. Finally, we argue that this reinterpretation in terms of wide range anisotropic scaling is compatible with atmospheric phenomenology including convection.

 References Adelfang, S. I.: On the relation between wind shears over various intervals, J. Appl. Meteorol., 10(10), 156–159, 1971. Bacmeister, J. T., Eckermann, S. D., Newman, P. A., Lait, L., Chan, K. R., Loewenstein, M., Proffitt, M. H., and Gary, B. L.: Stratospheric horizontal wavenumber spectra of winds, potnetial temperature, and atmospheric tracers observed by high-altitude aircraft, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 9441–9470, 1996. Cho, J. and Lindborg, E.: Horizontal velocity structure functions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere 1. Observations, J. Geophys. Res., 106(D10), 10 223–10 232, 2001. Dewan, E. and Good, R.: Saturation and the "universal" spectrum vertical profiles of horizontal scalar winds in the stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 91, p 2742, 1986. Dewan, E.: Saturated-cascade similtude theory of gravity wave spectra, J. Geophys. Res. , 102, 29 799–29 817, 1997. Endlich, R. M., Singleton, R. C., and Kaufman, J. W.: Spectral Analyes of detailed vertical wind profiles, J. Atmos. Sci., 26, 1030–1041, 1969. Fritts, D. and Chou, H.: An investigation of the vertical wavenumber and frequency spectra of gravity wave motions in the lower stratosphere, J. Atmos. Sci., 44, p 3611, 1987. Gage, K. S. and Nastrom, G. D.: Theoretical Interpretation of atmospheric wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature observed by commercial aircraft during GASP, J. Atmos. Sci., 43, 729–740, 1986. Gao, X. and Meriwether, J. W.: Mesoscale spectral analysis of in situ horizontal and vertical wind measurements at 6 km, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 6397–6404, 1998. Gardner, C.: Diffusive filtering theory of gravity wave spectra in the atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 99(D10), 20 601, 1994. Gardner, C., Tao, X., and Papen, G.: Simultaneous lidar observations of vertical wind, tmepreature and density profiles in the upper atmsophere: evidence of nonseperability of atmospheric perturbation spectra, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22(20), p 2877, 1995. Gardner, C. S., Hostetler, C. A., and Franke, S. J.: Gravity Wave models for the horizontal wave number spectra of atmospheric velocity and density flucutations, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 1035–1049, 1993. Hovde, S. J., Tuck, A. F., Lovejoy, S., and Schertzer, D.: Vertical Scaling of the Atmosphere: Dropsondes from 13 km to the Surface, Q. J. Royal Meteor. Soc., in review, 2009. Koch, S. E., Jamison, B. D., Lu, C. G., Smith, T. L., Tollerud, E. I., Girz, C., Wang, N., Lane, T. P., Shapiro, M. A., Parrish, D. D., and Cooper, O. R.: Turbulence and gravity waves within an upper-level front, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 3885–3908, 2005. Landahl, M. T. and Mollo-Christensen, E.: Turbulence and random processes in fluid mechanics, Cambridge University press, Cambridge, 154~pp., 1986. Lazarev, A., Schertzer, D., Lovejoy, S., and Chigirinskaya, Y.: Unified multifractal atmospheric dynamics tested in the tropics: part II, vertical scaling and generalized scale invariance, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 1, 115–123, 1994. Lilly, D. K.: Two-dimensional turbulence generated by energy sources at two scales, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2026-2030, 1989. Lilley, M., Lovejoy, S., Strawbridge, K., and Schertzer, D.: 23/9 dimensional anisotropic scaling of passive admixtures using lidar aerosol data, Phys. Rev E, 70(3), 7~pp., 2004. Lilley, M., Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., Strawbridge, K. B., and Radkevitch, A.: Scaling turbulent atmospheric stratification, Part II: empirical study of the the stratification of the intermittency, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134(631), 301–315, 2008. Lindborg, E.: Can the atmospheric kinetic energy spectrum be explained by two-dimensional turbulence?, J. Fluid Mech., 388, 259–288, 1999. Lindborg, E. and Cho, J.: Horizontal velocity structure functions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere 2. Theoretical considerations, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 10 233–10 241, 2001. Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., and Tuck, A. F.: Fractal aircraft trajectories and nonclassical turbulent exponents, Phys. Rev E, 70(3), 5~pp., 2004. Lovejoy, S. and Schertzer, D.: Scale, scaling and multifractals in geophysics: twenty years on, in: Nonlinear dynamics in geophysics, edited by: Tsonis, A. A. and Elsner, J., Elsevier, 2007. Lovejoy, S., Tuck, A. F., Hovde, S. J., and Schertzer, D.: Is isotropic turbulence relevant in the atmosphere?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L14802, doi:10.1029/2007GL029359., 2007. Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., Lilley, M., Strawbridge, K. B., and Radkevitch, A.: Scaling turbulent atmospheric stratification, Part I: Turbulence and waves, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134(631), 277–300, 2008. Lovejoy, S., Schertzer, D., Allaire, V., Bourgeois, T., King, S., Pinel, J., and Stolle, J.: Atmospheric complexity or scale by scale simplicity? , Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L01801, doi:01810.01029/02008GL035863, 2009a. Lovejoy, S., Tuck, A., and Schertzer, D.: The Horizontal cascade structure of atmospheric fields determined from aircraft data, J. Geophys. Res., in review, 2009b. Lovejoy, S., Tuck, A. F., Hovde, S. J., and Schertzer, D.: The vertical cascade structure of the atmosphere and multifractal drop sonde outages, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D07111, doi:07110.01029/02008JD010651., 2009c. Nastrom, G. D. and Gage, K. S.: A first look at wave number spectra from GASP data, Tellus~A, 35, p 383, 1983. Nastrom, G. D., Gage, K. S., and Jasperson, W. H.: Kinetic energy spectrum of large and meso-scale atmospheric processes, Nature, 310, 36–38, 1984. Nastrom, G. D. and Gage, K. S.: A climatology of atmospheric wavenumber spectra of wind and temperature by commercial aircraft, J. Atmos. Sci., 42, 950–960, 1985. Radkevitch, A., Lovejoy, S., Strawbridge, K. B., Schertzer, D., and Lilley, M.: Scaling turbulent atmospheric stratification, Part III: Space-time stratification of passive scalars using lidar data, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 134(631), 317–335, 2008. Ray, E. A., Rosenlof, K. H., Richard, E., Parrish, D., and Jakoubek, R.: Distributions of ozone in the region of the subtropical jet: An analysis of in situ aircraft measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, D08106, doi:10.1029/2003JD004143, 2004. Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S.: Generalised scale invariance in turbulent phenomena, Physico-Chemical Hydrodynamics Journal, 6, 623–635, 1985a. Schertzer, D. and Lovejoy, S.: The dimension and intermittency of atmospheric dynamics, in: Turbulent Shear Flow~4, edited by: Launder, B., Springer-Verlag, 7–33, 1985b. Stolle, : Space-time Cascade structure of numerical models of the atmosphere, McGill, Montreal, 2009. Tsuda, T., Inoue, T., Fritts, D., VanZandt, T., Kato, S., Sato, T., and Fukao, S.: MST radar observations of a saturated gravity wave spectrum, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2440, 1989. Tuck, A.: ATMOSPHERIC TURBULENCE: A Molecular Dynamics Perspective, Oxford University Press, 2008. Van der Hoven, I.: Power spectrum of horizontal wind speed in the frequency range from .0007 to 900 cycles per hour, J. Meteorol., 14, 160–164, 1957. Van Zandt, T. E.: A universal spectrum of buoyancy waves in the atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 575–578, 1982.