ACP Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics ACP 1680-7324 Copernicus GmbH Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/acp-8-7115-2008 Simulation of aerosol optical properties over Europe with a 3-D size-resolved aerosol model: comparisons with AERONET data Tombette M. 1 Chazette P. 2 Sportisse B. 1 Roustan Y. 1 CEREA Joint Laboratory ENPC – EDF R&D, Université Paris-Est, 77455 Champs sur Marne, France LSCE, Joint Laboratory CEA-CNRS, 91191 Gif-Sur-Yvette, France 08 12 2008 8 23 7115 7132 This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/7115/2008/acp-8-7115-2008.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/7115/2008/acp-8-7115-2008.pdf

This paper aims at presenting a model-to-data comparison of the Aerosol Optical Thickness (AOT) and of a few sparse data for Single Scattering Albedo (SSA) over Europe for one year. The main contribution of this paper is the sensitivity study to a large number of parameters, including physical and numerical parameters of the aerosol model itself. The optical parameters are computed from a size-resolved aerosol model embedded in the Polyphemus system. The methodology is first described, showing that several hypothesis can be made for micro-physical aerosol properties. The simulation is made over one year (2001); statistics and monthly time series for the simulation and AERONET data are used to evaluate the ability of the model to reproduce AOT and vertically averaged SSA fields and their variability. The relation with the uncertainties of measurements is discussed. Then a sensitivity study with respect to the mixing state of the particle, the way to take into account water uptake, numerical parameters and physical parameterizations of the model is carried out. The results indicate that the mixing state of particles has an influence on optical parameters, as well as the computation of the wet diameter. But some physical and numerical parameters associated with the aerosol model itself have even more influence under certain conditions, through the uncertainties on the aerosol chemical composition, and their size distribution.

 References Baumgardner, D., Raga, G B., Kok, G., Ogren, J., Rosas, I., Baez, A., and Novakov, T.: On the evolution of aerosol properties at a mountain site above Mexico City, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 22 243–22 253, 2000. Bergin, M H., Cass, G R., Xu, J., Fang, C., Zeng, L M., Yu, T., Salmon, L G., Kiang, C S., Tang, X Y., Zhang, Y H., and Chameides, W L.: Aerosol radiative, physical, and chemical properties in Beijing during June 1999, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 17 969–17 980, 2001. Bösenberg, J., Ansmann, A., Aldasano, J. M B., Balis, D., Bockmann, C., Calpini, B., Chaikovski, A., Flamant, P., Hagard, A., Mitev, V., Papayannis, A., Pelon, J., Resendes, D., Schneider, J., Spinelli, N., Trickl, T., Vaughan, G., Visconti, G., and Wiegner, M.: EARLINET: A European Aerosol Research Lidar Network, Laser Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere, Selected Papers of the 20th International Laser Radar Conference, Vichy, France, edited by: Dabas, A., Loth, C., and Pelon, J., 155–158, 2001. Boucher, O. and Anderson, T H.: General circulation model assessment of the sensitivity of direct climate forcing by anthropogenic sulfate aerosols to aerosol size and chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26 117–26 134, 1995. Boutahar, J., Lacour, S., Mallet, V., Quelo, D., Roustan, Y., and Sportisse, B.: Development and validation of a fully modular platform for numerical modelling of air pollution: POLAIR, Int. J. Environ. Pollut., 22(1/2), 17–28, 2004. Brindley, H E. and Ignatov, A.: Retrieval of mineral aerosol optical depth and size information from Meteosat Second Generation SEVIRI solar reflectance bands, Remote Sens. Environ., 102, 344–363, 2006. Chazette, P. and Liousse, C.: A case study of optical and chemical ground apportionment for urban aerosols in Thessaloniki, Atmos. Environ., 35, 2497–2506, 2000. Chazette, P., Randriamiarisoa, H., Sanak, J., Couvert, P., and Flamant, C.: Optical properties of urban aerosol from airborne and ground-based in situ measurements performed during the ESQUIF program, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D02206, doi:10.1029/2004JD004 810, 2005. Chin, M., Rood, R., Lin, S.-J., Muller, J F., and Thompson, A M.: Atmospheric sulfur cycle in the global model GOCART: Model description and global properties, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 24 671–24 688, 2000. Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B N., Duncan, B N., Martin, R V., Logan, J A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sun photometer measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, 2002. Chung, C E., Ramanathan, V., Kim, D., and Podgorny, I A.: Global anthropogenic aerosol direct forcing derived from satellite and ground-based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D24207, doi:10.1029/2005JD006 356, 2005. Chung, S. and Seinfeld, J.: Global distribution and forcing of carbonaceous aerosols, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D19), 4407, doi:10.1029/2001JD001 397, 2002. CMAQ: Science Algorithms of the EPA Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Tech. rep., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, ePA/600/R-99/030, 1999. Debry, E. and Sportisse, B.: Reduction of the condensation/evaporation dynamics for atmospheric aerosols: theoretical and numerical investigation of hybrid methods, J. Aerosol Sci., 37, 950–966, 2006. Debry, E., Fahey, K., Sartelet, K., Sportisse, B., and Tombette, M.: Technical note: A new SIze REsolved Aerosol Model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1537–1547, 2007. Deuzé, J L., Bréon, F M., Devaux, C., Goloub, P., Herman, M., Lafrance, B., Maignan, F., Marchand, A Nadal, F., Perry, G., and Tanré, D.: Remote sensing of aerosols over land surfaces from POLDER-ADEOS-1 polarized measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 4913–4926, 2001. Dickerson, R R., Kondragunta, S., Stenchikov, G., Civerolo, K. L., Doddridge, B G., and Holben, N.: The Impact of Aerosols on Solar Ultraviolet Radiation and Photochemical Smog, Science, 278, 827–830, 1997. Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Holben, B N., King, M D., Kaufman, Y J., Eck, T F., and Slutsker, I.: Accuracy assessments of aerosol optical properties retrieved from AERONET Sun and sky-radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 9791–9806, 2000. Fahey, K M. and Pandis, S N.: Optimizing model performance: variable size resolution in cloud chemistry modeling, Atmos. Environ., 35, 4471–4478, 2001. Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D W., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D C., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., and van Dorland, R.: Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing, in : Climate Change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, edited by: Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K. B., Tignor, M., and Miller, H. L., 2007. Gerber, H.: Relative-humidity parameterization of the Navy Aerosol Model, Technical report 8956, Natl. Res. Lab. Washington D.C., 1985. Ginoux, P., Horrowitz, L W., Ramaswamy, V., Geogdzhayev, I V., Holben, B N., Stenchikov, G., and Tie, X.: Evaluation of aerosol distribution and optical depth in the Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory coupled model CM2.1 for present climate, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D22210, doi:10.1029/2005JD006 707, 2006. Hamonou, E., Chazette, P., Balis, D., Dulac, F., Schneider, X., Galani, E., Ancellet, G., and Papayannis, A.: Characterization of the vertical structure of Saharan dust export to the Mediterranean basin, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22 257–22 270, 1999. Hänel, G.: The properties of atmospheric aerosols as function of the relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding moist air, Adv. Geophys., 19, 73–188, 1976. Hess, M., Koepke, P., and Schult, I.: Optical properties of aerosols and clouds: the software package OPAC, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 831–844, 1998. Hodzic, A., Chepfer, H., Vautard, R., Chazette, P., Beekmann, M., Bessagnet, B., Chatenet, B., Cuesta, J., Drobinski, P., Haefflin, M., and Morille, Y a.: Comparison of aerosol chemistry transport model simulations with lidar and Sun photometer observations at a site near Paris, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23201, doi:10.1029/2004JD004 735, 2004. Hodzic, A., Vautard, R., Chepfer, H., Goloub, P., Menut, L., Chazette, P., Deuzé, J.-L., Apituley, A., and Couvert, P.: Evolution of aerosol optical thickness over Europe during the August 2003 heat wave as seen from CHIMERE model simulations and POLDER data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1853–1864, 2006. Hodzic, A., Madronich, S., Bohn, B., Massie, S., Menut, L., and Wiedinmyer, C.: Wildfire particulate matter in Europe during summer 2003: Meso-scale modeling of smoke emissions, transport and radiative effects, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 4781–4855, 2007. Holben, B N., Tanré, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T K., Slutsker, I., Abuhassan, N., Newcomb, W W., Schafer, J S., Chatenet, B., Lavenu, F., Kaufman, Y J., Castle, J V., Setzer, A., Markham, B., Clark, D., Frouin, R., Halthore, R., Karneli, A., O'Neil, N T., Pietras, C., Pinker, R T., Vass, K., and Zibordi, G.: An emerging ground-based aerosol climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 12 067–12 097, 2001. Houghton, J., Ding, Y., Griggs, D., Noguer, M., van~der Linden, P., Dai, X., Maskell, K., Johnson, C., Meira~Filho, L., Bruce, J., Lee, H., Callander, B., Haites, E., Harris, N., and Maskell, K.: Climate change 2001, The scientific basis, an evaluation of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, New York, 2001. Jacob, D.: Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone, Atmos. Environ., 34, 2131–2159, 2000. Jacobson, M Z.: A physically-based treatment of elemental carbon optics: Implications for global direct forcing of aerosols, Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 217–220, 2000. Jeuken, A., Veefkind, J P., Dentener, F., Metzger, S., and Robles~Gonzáles, C.: Simulation of the optical depth over Europe for August 1997 and a comparison with observation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28 295–28 311, 2001. Kaskaoutis, D G., Kambezidis, H D., Hatzianastassiou, N., Kosmopoulos, P G., and Badarinath, K. V S.: Aerosol climatology: on the discrimination of aerosol types over four AERONET sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 6357–6411, 2007. Katrinak, K A., Rez, P., Perkes, P R., and Buseck, P. R.: Fractal geometry of carbonaceous agregates from an urban aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 539–547, 1993. Kaufman, Y J., Tanré, D., Remer, L A., Vermote, E F., Chu, A., and Holben, B N.: Operational remote sensing of tropospheric aerosol over land from EOS moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 17 051–17 068, 1997. Kinne, S., Schultz, M., Textor, C., Guibert, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S E., Berntsen, T., Berglen, T F., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Collins, W., Dentener, F., Diehl, T., Easter, R., Feichetr, J., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S., Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Herzog, M., Horowitz, L., Isaken, I., Iversen, T., Kirkevag, A., Kloster, S., Koch, D. an~Kristjansson, J E., Krol, M., Lauer, A., Lamarque, J F., Lesins, G., Liu, X., Lohmann, U., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J E., Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, O., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X a.: An AeroCom initial assessment – Optical properties in aerosol component modules of global models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1815–1834, 2006. Koh, G.: Effective dieclectric constant of a medium with sperical inclusions, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 30, 184–186, 1992. Léon, J., Chazette, P., Pelon, J., Dulac, F., and Randriamarisoa, H.: Aerosol direct radiative impact over the INDOEX area based on passive and active remote sensing, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D19), 8006, doi:10.1029/2000JD000 116, 2002. Lesins, G., Chylek, P., and Lohmann, U.: A study of internal and external mixing scenarios and its effect on aerosol optical properties and direct radiative forcing, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D10), 4094, doi:10.1029/2001JD000973, 2002. Lohmann, U. and Feichter, J.: Global indirect aerosol effects: a review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 715–737, 2005. Louis, J.-F.: A parametric model of vertical eddy fluxes in the atmosphere, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 17, 187–202, 1979. Mallet, M., Roger, J., Despiau, S., Dubovik, O., and Putaud, J.: Microphysical and optical properties of aerosol particles in urban zone during ESCOMPTE, Atmos. Res., 69, 73–97, 2003. Mallet, V. and Sportisse, B.: Uncertainty in a chemistry-transport model due to physical parametrizations and numerical approximations: An ensemble approach applied to ozone modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D01302, doi:10.1029/2005JD006 149, 2006. Mallet, V., Quélo, D., Sportisse, B., Ahmed~de Biasi, M., Debry, \'E., Korsakissok, I., Wu, L., Roustan, Y., Sartelet, K., Tombette, M., and Foudhil, H.: Technical Note: The air quality modeling system Polyphemus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5479–5487, 2007. Maxwell-Garnett, J C.: Colours in Metal Glasses and in Metallic Films, Philos. T. Roy. Soc. A, 203, 385–420, 1904. Mie, G.: Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen, Ann. Phys.-Leipzig, 330, 377–445, 1908. Monahan, E. C., Spiel, D. E., and Davidson, K. L.:: A model of marine aerosol generation via whitecaps and wave disruption, in: Oceanic whitecaps and their role in air-sea exchange, edited by: Monahan, E. C., Spiel, D. E., Davidson, K. L., and Reidel, D., 167–174, 1986. Moulin, C., Lambert, C., Dulac, F., and Dayan, U.: Control of Atmospheric Export of dust from North Africa by the North Atlantic Oscillation, Nature, 387, 691–694, 1997. Nenes, A., Pandis, S., and Pilinis, C.: ISORROPIA: A new thermodynamic equilibrium model for multiphase multicomponent inorganic aerosols, Aquat. Geochem., 4, 123–152, 1998. Penner, J E., Chang, S Y., Chin, M., Chuang, C C., Feichter, J., Feng, Y., Geogdzhayev, I V., Ginoux, P., Herzog, M., Higurashi, A., Koch, D., Land, C., Lohmann, U., Mishchenko, M., Nakajima, T., Pitari, G., Soden, B., Tegen, I., and Stowe, L.: A comparison of model- and satellite-derived Aerosol Optical Depth and Reflectivity, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 441–460, 2002. Pilinis, C., Capaldo, K., Nenes, A., and Pandis, S.: MADM – a new Multi-component Aerosol Dynamic Model, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 32, 482–502, 2000. Pun, B K. and Seigneur, C.: Investigative modeling of new pathways for secondary organic aerosol formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2199–2216, 2007. Putaud, J.-P., Raes, F., Dingenen, R V., Brüggemann, E., Facchini, M C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., Gehrig, R., Hüglin, C., Laj, P., Lorbeer, G., Maenhaut, W., Mihalopoulos, N., Müller, K., Querol, X., S Rodriguez~andi, J S., Spindler, G., ten Brink, H., rseth, K T., and Wiedensohler, A.: A European aerosol phenomenology – 2: Chemical characteristics of particulate matter at kerbside, urban, rural and background sites in Europe, Atmos. Environ., 38, 2579–2595, 2004. Ramanathan, V., Crutzen, P J., Lelieved, J., Mitra, A P., Althausen, D., Anderson, J., Andreae, M O., Cantrell, W., Cass, G R., Chung, C E., Clarke, A D., Coakley, J A., Collins, W D., Conant, W C., Dulac, F., Heintzenberg, J., Heymsfield, A J., Holben, S., Howell, S., Hudson, J., Jayaraman, A., Kiehl, J T., Krishnamurti, T N., Lubin, D., McFarquhar, G., Novakov, T., Ogren, J A., Podgorny, I A., Prather, K., Priestley, K., Prospero, J M., Quinn, P K., Rajeev, K., Rash, P., Rupert, S., Sadourny, R., Satheesh, S K., Sham, G E., Sheridan, P., and Valero, P J.: Indian Ocean Experiment: An integrated analysis of the climate forcing and effects of the great Indo-Asian haze, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28 371–28 398, 2001. Randriamiarisoa, H., Chazette, P., and Mégie, G.: The columnar retrieved single scattering albedo from NO2 photolysis rate, Tellus B, 56, 118–127, 2004. Randriamiarisoa, H., Chazette, P., Couvert, P., Sanak, J., and Mégie, G.: Relative humidity impact on aerosol parameters in a Paris suburban area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1389–1407, 2006. Raut, J.-C. and Chazette, P.: Retrieval of aerosol complex refractive index from a synergy between lidar, sunphotometer and in situ measurements during LISAIR campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 1017–1065, 2007a. Raut, J.-C. and Chazette, P.: Vertical profiles of urban aerosol complex refractive index in the frame of ESQUIF airborne measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, 10 799–10 835, 2007b. Robles~González, C., Schaap, M., de~Leeuw, G., Builtjes, P. J H., and Van~Loon, M.: Spatial variation of aerosol properties over Europe derived from satellite observations and comparison with model calculations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 521–533, 2003. Sartelet, K N., Debry, E., Fahey, K M., Roustan, Y., Tombette, M., and Sportisse, B.: Simulation of aerosols and gas-phase species over Europe with the Polyphemus system. Part I: model-to-data comparison for 2001, Atmos. Environ., 29, 6116–6131, 2007. Schaap, M., Van~Loon, M., ten Brink, H M., Dentener, F J., and Builtjes, P. J H.: Secondary inorganic aerosol simulations for Europe with special attention to nitrate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 857–874, 2004. Schell, B., Ackermann, I J., and Haas, H.: Modeling the formation of secondary organic aerosol within a comprehensive air quality model system, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 28 275–28 293, 2001. Seinfeld, J H. and Pandis, S N.: Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Wiley-Interscience, 1998. Smith, M H. and Harrison, N M.: The sea spray generation function, J. Atmos. Sci., 29, S189–S190, 1998. Sportisse, B., Debry, E., Fahey, K., Roustan, Y., Sartelet, K., and Tombette, M.: PAM project (Multiphase Air Pollution): description of the aerosol models SIREAM and MAM, Tech. Rep. 2006-08, CEREA, http://www.enpc.fr/cerea/polyphemus, 2006. Stockwell, W., Kirchner, F., and Kuhn, M.: A new Mechanism for regional chemistry modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 25 847–25 879, 1997. Strader, R., Gurciullo, C., Pandis, S., Kumar, N., and Lurmann, F.: Development of a gas-phase chemistry, secondary organic aerosol and aquesous-phase chemistry modules for PM modelling, Technical report, STI, 1998. Tombette, M. and Sportisse, B.: Aerosol modeling at a regional scale: Model-to-data comparison and sensitivity analysis over Greater Paris, Atmos. Environ., 41, 6941–6950, 2007. Troen, I B. and Mahrt, L.: A simple model of the atmospheric boundary layer; sensitivity to surface evaporation, Bound.-Lay. Meteorol., 37, 129–148, 1986. Warneck, P.: Chemistry of the natural atmosphere, Academic Press, New York, 1988. Wiscombe, W J.: Improved Mie scattering algorithms, Appl. Optics, 19, 1505–1509, 1980. Yu, H., Kaufman, Y J., Chin, M., Feingold, G., Remer, L A., Anderson, T L., Balkanski, Y., Belloin, N., Boucher, O., Christopher, S., DeCola, P., Kahn, R., Koch, D., Loeb, N., Reddy, M S., Schultz, M., Takemura, T., and Zhou, M.: A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 613–666, 2006.