Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6603-6615, 2008
www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/6603/2008/
doi:10.5194/acp-8-6603-2008
© Author(s) 2008. This work is distributed
under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Statistical analysis of water vapour and ozone in the UT/LS observed during SPURT and MOZAIC
A. Kunz1,2, C. Schiller1, F. Rohrer2, H. G. J. Smit2, P. Nedelec3, and N. Spelten1
1Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre: Stratosphäre (ICG-1), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
2Institut für Chemie und Dynamik der Geosphäre: Troposphäre (ICG-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany
3Laboratoire d'Aerologie, CNRS, Observatoire Midi-Pyrenees, Toulouse, France

Abstract. A statistical analysis for the comparability of water (H2O) and ozone (O3) data sets sampled during the SPURT aircraft campaigns and the MOZAIC passenger aircraft flights is presented. The Kolmogoroff-Smirnoff test reveals that the distribution functions from SPURT and MOZAIC trace gases differ from each other with a confidence of 95%. A variance analysis shows a different variability character in both trace gas data sets. While the SPURT H2O data only contain atmospheric processes variable on a diurnal or synoptical timescale, MOZAIC H2O data also reveal processes, which vary on inter-seasonal and seasonal timescales. The SPURT H2O data set does not represent the full MOZAIC H2O variance in the UT/LS for climatological investigations, whereas the variance of O3 is much better represented. SPURT H2O data are better suited in the stratosphere, where the MOZAIC RH sensor looses its sensitivity.

Citation: Kunz, A., Schiller, C., Rohrer, F., Smit, H. G. J., Nedelec, P., and Spelten, N.: Statistical analysis of water vapour and ozone in the UT/LS observed during SPURT and MOZAIC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6603-6615, doi:10.5194/acp-8-6603-2008, 2008.
 
Search ACP
Final Revised Paper
PDF XML
Citation
Discussion Paper
Share