References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-8-389-2008

N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels

Crutzen

P. J.

¹ ² ³ Mosier

A. R.

⁴ Smith

K. A.

⁵ Winiwarter

³ ⁶

Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Mainz, Germany

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, La Jolla, USA

International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria

Mount Pleasant, SC, USA

School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK

Austrian Research Centers - ARC, Vienna, Austria

29 01 2008

8 2 389 395

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/389/2008/acp-8-389-2008.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/389/2008/acp-8-389-2008.pdf

The relationship, on a global basis, between the amount of N fixed by chemical, biological or atmospheric processes entering the terrestrial biosphere, and the total emission of nitrous oxide (N2O), has been re-examined, using known global atmospheric removal rates and concentration growth of N2O as a proxy for overall emissions. For both the pre-industrial period and in recent times, after taking into account the large-scale changes in synthetic N fertiliser production, we find an overall conversion factor of 3–5% from newly fixed N to N2O-N. We assume the same factor to be valid for biofuel production systems. It is covered only in part by the default conversion factor for "direct" emissions from agricultural crop lands (1%) estimated by IPCC (2006), and the default factors for the "indirect" emissions (following volatilization/deposition and leaching/runoff of N: 0.35–0.45%) cited therein. However, as we show in the paper, when additional emissions included in the IPCC methodology, e.g. those from livestock production, are included, the total may not be inconsistent with that given by our "top-down" method. When the extra N2O emission from biofuel production is calculated in "CO2-equivalent" global warming terms, and compared with the quasi-cooling effect of "saving" emissions of fossil fuel derived CO2, the outcome is that the production of commonly used biofuels, such as biodiesel from rapeseed and bioethanol from corn (maize), depending on N fertilizer uptake efficiency by the plants, can contribute as much or more to global warming by N2O emissions than cooling by fossil fuel savings. Crops with less N demand, such as grasses and woody coppice species, have more favourable climate impacts. This analysis only considers the conversion of biomass to biofuel. It does not take into account the use of fossil fuel on the farms and for fertilizer and pesticide production, but it also neglects the production of useful co-products. Both factors partially compensate each other. This needs to be analyzed in a full life cycle assessment.

References 1

Adler, P. R., Del Grosso, S. J., and Parton, W. J.: Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems, Ecol. Appl., 17, 675–691, 2007.

Balasubramanian, V., Alves, B., Aulakh, M., Bekunda, M., Cai, Z., Drinkwater, L., Mugendi, D., van Kessel, C., and Oenema O.: Crop, environmental, and management factors affecting nitrogen use efficiency, in: Agriculture and the Nitrogen Cycle, edited by: Mosier, A. R., Syers, J. K., and Freney, J., SCOPE 65, 19–33, Island Press, Washington, Covelo, London, 2004.

Biewinga, E. E. and van der Bijl, G.: Sustainability of energy crops in Europe, Centre for Agriculture and Environment (CLM), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 1–209, 1996.

Cassman, K. G., Dobermann, A., and Walters, D. T.: Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management, Ambio, 31, 132–140, 2002.

Christian, D. G., Poulton, P. R., Riche, A. B., and Yates, N. E.: The recovery over several seasons of $^15$N-labelled fertilizer applied to Miscanthus x giganteus ranging from 1 to 3 years old, Biomass Bioenerg., 30, 125–133, 2006.

Crutzen, P. J.: The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone content, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 96, 320–325, 1970.

de Vries, W., Reinds, G.J., Gundersen, P., Sterba, H.: The impact of nitrogen deposition on carbon sequestration in European forests and forest soils, Global Change Biol., 12, 1151–1173, 2006.

Farrell, A. E., Plevin, R. J., Turner, B. T., Jones, A. D., O'Hare, M., and Kammen, D. M.: Ethanol Can Contribute to Energy and Environmental Goals, Science, 311, 506–508, 2006.

Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., Holland, E. A., Karl, D. M., Michaels, A. F., Porter, J. H., Townsend, A. R. and Vörösmarty, C. J.: Nitrogen cycles: Past, present, and future, Biogeochemistry, 70, 153–226, 2004.

Galloway, J. N., Aber, J. D., Erisman, J. W., Seitzinger, S. P., Howarth, R. H., Cowling, E. B., and Cosby B. J.: The nitrogen cascade, Bioscience, 53, 341–356, 2003.

Hill, J., Nelson, E., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., and Tiffany, D.: Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 103, 11 206–11 210, 2006.

Hyvönen, R., Persson, T., Andersson, S., Olsson, B., Ågren, G. I., and Linder, S.: Impact of long-term nitrogen addition on carbon stocks in trees and soils in northern Europe, Biogeochemistry, online edition, doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9121-3, 2007.

IPCC: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, edited by: Eggleston, H.S, Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T. and Tanabe, K., Volume 4, Chapter 11, N2O emissions from managed soils, and CO2 emissions from lime and urea application, IGES, Hayama, Japan, 2006.

Isa, D. W., Hofman, G., and van Cleemput, O,: Uptake and balance of fertilizer nitrogen applied to sugarcane, Field Crop. Res., 95, 348–354, 2005.

JRC: Well-to-Wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the European context. Well-to-Tank report, version 2c, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy, March 2007.

Kaltschmitt, M., Krewitt, W., Heinz, A., Bachmann, T., Gruber, S., Kappelmann, K.-H., Beerbaum, S., Isermeyer, F., and Seifert, K.: Gesamtwirtschaftliche Bewertung der Energiegewinnung aus Biomasse unter Berücksichtigung externer und makroökonomischer Effekte (Externe Effekte der Biomasse), Final Report (in German), IER, University of Stuttgart, Germany, 2000.

Klein Goldewijk, C. G. M.: Estimating global land use change over the past 300 years: The HYDE data base, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15, 415–434, 2001.

Magnani, F., Mencuccini, M., Borghetti, M., et al.: The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests, Nature, 447, 848–850, 2007.

Mosier, A., Kroeze, C., Nevison, C., Oenema, O., Seitzinger, S., and van Cleemput, O.: Closing the global N2O budget: nitrous oxide emissions through the agricultural nitrogen cycle, Nutr. Cycl. Agroecosyst., 52, 225–248, 1998.

Prather, M., Ehhalt, D., et al.: Atmospheric chemistry and greenhouse gases, in: Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, edited by: Houghton, J. T., Ding, Y., Griggs, D. J., et al., 239–287, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2001.

Rauh, S. and Berenz, S.: Interactive comment on "N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels" by: P.J. Crutzen et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, S4616–4619, 2007.

Smeets, E., Bouwman, A. F., and Stehfest, E.: Interactive comment on "N2O release from agro-biofuel production negates global warming reduction by replacing fossil fuels" by P.J. Crutzen et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., 7, S4937–4941, 2007.

Tillman, D., Hill, J., and Lehman, C.: Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass, Science, 314, 1598–1600, 2006.

UK Department for Transport, International resource costs of bio-diesel and bio-ethanol, published 26 January 2006, http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/environment/research/cqvcf/internationalresourcecostsof3833, 2006.

Velthof, G. L. and Kuikman, P. J.: Beperking van lachgasemissie uit gewasresten, Alterra rapport 114.3 (in Dutch), Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2004.

von Blottnitz, H., Rabl, A., Boiadjiev, D., Taylor, T., and Arnold, S.: Damage Costs of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Europe and their Internalization, J. Environ. Plan. Manage., 49, 413–433, 2006.

Wahid, M. B., Abdullah, S. N. A., and Henson, I. E.: Oil palm – achievements and potential, Plant Prod. Sci., 8, 288–297, 2005.