References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-8-2365-2008

Evaluation of near-tropopause ozone distributions in the Global Modeling Initiative combined stratosphere/troposphere model with ozonesonde data

Considine

D. B.

¹ Logan

J. A.

² Olsen

M. A.

NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA

Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA

Goddard Earth Sciences and Technology Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

06 05 2008

8 9 2365 2385

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/2365/2008/acp-8-2365-2008.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/2365/2008/acp-8-2365-2008.pdf

The NASA Global Modeling Initiative has developed a combined stratosphere/troposphere chemistry and transport model which fully represents the processes governing atmospheric composition near the tropopause. We evaluate model ozone distributions near the tropopause, using two high vertical resolution monthly mean ozone profile climatologies constructed with ozonesonde data, one by averaging on pressure levels and the other relative to the thermal tropopause. At the tropopause, model ozone is high-biased in the SH tropics and NH midlatitudes by ~45% in a 4° latitude ×5° longitude model simulation. Doubling the resolution to 2°×2.5° increases the NH high bias to ~60%, and reduces the tropical bias to ~30%, apparently due to decreased horizontal transport between the tropics and extratropics in the higher-resolution simulation. These ozone biases do not appear to be due to an overly vigorous residual circulation, insufficient convection, or excessive stratosphere/troposphere exchange, and so may be due to insufficient vertical resolution or excessive vertical diffusion near the tropopause. In the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, model/measurement intercomparisons are strongly affected by the averaging technique. <br><br> Compared to the pressure-averaged climatology, NH and tropical mean model lower stratospheric biases are >20%. In the upper troposphere, the 2°×2.5° simulation shows mean high biases of ~20% and ~35% during April in the tropics and NH midlatitudes, respectively. This apparently good model/measurement agreement degrades when relative-to-tropopause averages are considered, with upper troposphere high biases of ~30% and 70% in the tropics and NH midlatitudes. This occurs because relative-to-tropopause averaging better preserves the larger cross-tropopause O<sub>3</sub> gradients which are seen in the daily sonde data, but not in daily model profiles. Relative-to-tropopause averages therefore more accurately reveal model/measurement discrepancies. The relative annual cycle of ozone near the tropopause is reproduced very well in the model Northern Hemisphere midlatitudes. In the tropics, the model amplitude of the near-tropopause annual cycle is weak. This is likely due to the annual amplitude of mean vertical upwelling near the tropopause, which analysis suggests is ~30% weaker than in the real atmosphere.

References 1

Bey, I., Jacob, D. J., Yantosca, R. M., Logan, J. A., Field, B. D., Fiore, A. M., Li, Q., Liu, H., Mickley, L. J., and Schultz, M. G.: Global modeling of tropospheric chemistry with assimilated meteorology: Model description and evaluation, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 23 073–23 095, 2001.

Bloom, S., da Silva, A., Dee, D., Bosilovich, M., Chern, J. D., Pawson, S., Schubert, S., Sienkiewicz, M., Stajner, I., Tan, W. W., and Wu, M. L.: Technical Report Series on Global Modeling and Data Assimilation, Vol. 26: Documentation and validation of the Goddard Earth Observing System (GEOS) data assimilation system – Version 4, NASA/TM – 2005 – 104606, Vol. 26, 2005.

Chin, M., Ginoux, P., Kinne, S., Torres, O., Holben, B. N., Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Logan, J.A., Higurashi, A., and Nakajima, T.: Tropospheric aerosol optical thickness from the GOCART model and comparisons with satellite and sunphotometer measurements, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 461–483, 2002.

Chipperfield, M. P.: New version of the TOMCAT/SLIMCAT off-line chemical transport model: Intercomparison of stratospheric tracer experiments, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 132, 1179–2003, 2006.

Considine, D. B., Douglass, A. R., Connell, P. S., Kinnison, D. E., and Rotman, D. A.: A polar stratospheric cloud parameterization for the global modeling initiative three-dimensional model and its response to stratospheric aircraft, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 3955–3973, 2000.

Considine, D. B., Bergmann, D. J., and Liu, H.: Sensitivity of Global Modeling Initiative chemistry and transport model simulations of radon-222 and lead-210 to input meteorological data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3389–3406, 2005.

Douglass, A. R. and Kawa, S. R.: Contrast between 1992 and 1997 high-latitude spring Halogen Occultation Experiment observations of lower stratospheric HCl, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18 739–18 754, 1999.

Douglass, A. R., Schoeberl, M. R., Rood, R. B., and Pawson, S.: Evaluation of transport in the lower tropical stratosphere in a global chemistry and transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 108, D94259, doi:10.1029/2002JD002696, 2003.

Douglass, A. R., Stolarski, R. S., Strahan, S. E., and Connell, P. S.: Radicals and reservoirs in the GMI chemistry and transport model: Comparison to measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D16302, doi:10.1029/2004JD004632, 2004.

Duncan, B. N., Martin, R. V., Staudt, A. C., Yevich, R., and Logan, J. A.: Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D2), 3100, doi:10.1029/2002JD002378, 2003.

Duncan, B. N., Strahan, S. E., Yoshida, Y., Steenrod, S. D., and Livesey, N.: Model study of the cross-tropopause transport of biomass burning pollution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3713–3736, 2007.

Galanter, M., Levy, H., and Carmichael, G. R.: Impacts of biomass burning on tropospheric CO, NOx, and O3, J. Geophys. Res., 105(D5), 6633–6653, 2000.

Gettelman, A., Kinnison, D. E., Dunkerton, T. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: Impact of monsoon circulations on the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D22101, doi:10.1029/2004JD004878, 2004.

Hack, J. J.: Parameterization of moist convection in the National Center for Atmospheric Research community climate model (CCM2), J. Geophys. Res., 99, 5551–5568, 1994.

Holton, J. R., Haynes, P. H., McIntyre, M. E., Douglass, A. R., Rood, R. B., and Pfister, L.: Stratosphere-Troposphere Exchange, Rev. Geophys., 33, 403–439, 1995.

Horowitz, L. W., Liang, J., Gardner, G. M., and Jacob, D. J.: Export of reactive nitrogen from North America during summertime: Sensitivity to hydrocarbon chemistry, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 13 451–13 476, 1998.

Horowitz, L. W., Walters S., Mauzerall, D. L., et al.: A global simulation of tropospheric ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4784, doi:10.1029/2002JD002853, 2003.

Kinnison, D. E., Brasseur, G. P., Walters, S., et al.: Sensitivity of chemical tracers to meteorological parameters in the MOZART-3 chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D20302, doi:10.1029/2006JD007879, 2007.

Lacis, A. A., Wuebbles, D. J., and Logan, J. A.: Radiative forcing of climate by changes in the vertical distribution of ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 9971–9981, 1990.

Lin, S. J. and Rood, R. B.: Multidimensional flux-form semi-Lagrangian transport schemes, Mon. Weather Rev., 124(9), 2046–2070, 1996.

Logan, J. A.: An analysis of ozonesonde data for the troposphere: Recommendations for testing 3-D models and development of a gridded climatology for tropospheric ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16 115–16 149, 1999a.

Logan, J. A.: An analysis of ozonesonde data for the lower stratosphere: Recommendations for testing models, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 16 151–16 170, 1999.

Martin, R. V., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Ziemke, J. M., and Washington, R.: Detection of a lightning influence on tropical tropospheric ozone, Geophy. Res. Lett., 27, 1639–1642, 2000.

Müller, J.-F. and Brasseur, G.: Sources of upper tropospheric HOx: A three-dimensional study, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 1705–1715, 1999.

Olsen, M. A., Schoeberl, M. R., and Douglass, A. R.: Stratosphere-troposphere exchange of mass and ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D24114, doi:10.1029/2004JD005186, 2004.

Olsen, M. A., Schoeberl, M. R., and Nielsen, J. E.: Response of stratospheric circulation and stratosphere-troposphere exchange to changing sea surface temperatures, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D16104, doi:10.1029/2006JD008012, 2007.

Pan, L. L., Randel, W. J., Gary, B. L., Mahoney, B. L., and Hintsa, E. J.: Definitions and sharpness of the extratropical tropopause: A trace gas perspective, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D23103, doi:10.1029/2004JD004982, 2004.

Pan, L. L., Wei, J. C., Kinnison, D. E., Garcia, R. R., Wuebbles, D. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A set of diagnostics for evaluating chemistry-climate models in the extratropical tropopause region, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D09316, doi:10:1029/2006JD007792, 2007.

Pickering, K. E., Wang, Y. S., Tao, W. K., Price, C., and Muller, J. F.: Vertical distributions of lightning NOx for use in regional and global chemical transport models, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D23), 31 203–31 216, 1998.

Price, C. and Rind, D.: A simple lightning parameterization for calculating global lightning distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 97(D9), 9919–9933, 1992.

Price, C., Penner, J., and Prather, M.: NOx from lightning 1. Global distribution based on lightning physics, J. Geophys. Res., 102(D5), 5929–5941, 1997.

Randel, W. J., Park, M., and Wu, F.: A large annual cycle in ozone above the tropical tropopause linked to the Brewer-Dobson Circulation, J. Atmos. Sci, 64, 4479–4488, 2007.

Rasch, P. J., Coleman, D. B., Mahowald, N., Williamson, D. L., Lin, S. J., Boville, B. A., and Hess, P.: Characteristics of atmospheric transport using three numerical formulations for atmosperic dynamics in a single GCM framework, J. Climate, 19, 2243–2266, 2006.

Rood, R. B., Douglass, A. R., Cerniglia, M. C., Sparling, L. C., and Nielsen, J. E.: Seasonal variability of middle-latitude ozone in the lowermost stratosphere derived from probability distribution functions, J. Geophys. Res., 105(D14), 17 793–17 805, 2000.

Rotman, D. A., Tannahill, J. R., Kinnison, D. E., et al.: Global Modeling Initiative assessment model: Model description, integration, and testing of the transport shell, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 1669–1691, 2001.

Rotman, D. A., Atherton, C. S., Bergmann, D. A., et al.: IMPACT, the LLNL 3-D global atmospheric chemical transport model for the combined troposphere and stratosphere: Model description and analysis of ozone and other trace gases, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D04303, doi:10.1029/2002JD003155, 2004.

Russell, J. M., Gordley, L. L., Park, J. H., Drayson, S. R., Hesketh, W. D., Cicerone, R. J., Tuck, A. F., Frederick, J. E., Harries, J. E., and Crutzen, P. J.: The Halogen Occultation Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 10 777–10 797, 1993.

Schoeberl, M. R., Duncan, B. N., Douglass, A. R., Waters, J., Livesey, N., Read, W., and Filipiak, M.: The carbon monoxide tape recorder, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L12811, doi:10.1029/2006GL026178, 2006.

Stolarski, R. S. and Frith, S. M.: Search for evidence of trend slow-down in the long-term TOMS/SBUV total ozone data record: the importance of instrument drift uncertainty, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4057–4065, 2006.

Strahan, S. E. and Polansky, B. C.: Meteorological implementation issues in chemistry and transport models, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2895–2910, 2006.

Strahan, S. E., Duncan, B. N, and Hoor, P.: Observationally derived transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to the GMI chemistry and transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445, 2007.

Thompson, A. M., Pickering, K. E., McNamara, D. P., Schoeberl, M. R., Hudson, R. D., Kim, J. H., Browell, E. V., Kirchhoff, V. W. J. H., and Nganga, D.: Where did tropospheric ozone over southern Africa and the tropical Atlantic come from in October 1992? Insights from TOMS, GTE TRACE A, and SAFARI 1992, J. Geophys. Res., 101(D19), 24 251–24 278, 1996.

Thompson, A. M., Witte, J. C., McPeters, R. D., et al.: Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ) 1998–2000 tropical ozone climatology – 1. Comparison with Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) and ground-based measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D2), 8238, doi:10.1029/2001JD000967, 2003a.

Thompson, A. M., Witte, J. C., Oltmans, S., et al.: Southern Hemisphere Additional Ozonesondes (SHADOZ) 1998–2000 tropical ozone climatology 2. Tropospheric variability and the zonal wave-one, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D2), 8241, doi:10.1029/2002JD002241, 2003b.

Wang, Y. H., Jacob, D. J., and Logan, J. A.: Global simulation of tropospheric O3-Nox-hydrocarbon chemistry 1. Model formulation, J. Geophys. Res., 103(D9), 10 713-10 725, 1998.

Wauben, W. M. F., Fortuin J. P., van Velthoven, F. J., and Kelder, H. M.: Comparison of modeled ozone distributions with sonde and satellite observations, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 3511–3530, 1998.

Wennberg, P. O., Hanisco, T. F., Jaegle, L., et al.: Hydrogen radicals, nitrogen radicals, and the production of O3 in the upper troposphere, Science, 279, 5347, 49–53, 1998.

WMO: Meteorology – A three-dimensional science, WMO Bull., 6, 134–138, 1957.

Zhang, G. J. and McFarlane, N. A.: Sensitivity of climate simulations to the parameterization of cumulus convection in the Canadian Climate Center general circulation model, Atmos. Ocean, 33, 407–446, 1995.

Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., Duncan, B. N., Froidevaux, L., Bhartia, P. K., Levelt, P. F., and Waters, J. W.: Tropospheric ozone determined from aura OMI and MLS: Evaluation of measurements and comparison with the Global Modeling Initiative's chemical transport model, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D19303, doi:10.1029/2006JD007089, 2006.