References

ACP

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

ACP

1680-7324

Copernicus GmbH

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/acp-8-1029-2008

Influence of particle size and chemistry on the cloud nucleating properties of aerosols

Quinn

P. K.

¹ Bates

T. S.

¹ Coffman

D. J.

¹ Covert

D. S.

NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, Seattle, WA 98115, USA

Joint Institute for the Study of the Atmosphere and Oceans, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, USA

26 02 2008

8 4 1029 1042

This is an open-access article ditributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

This article is available from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/1029/2008/acp-8-1029-2008.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/8/1029/2008/acp-8-1029-2008.pdf

The ability of an aerosol particle to act as a cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) is a function of the size of the particle, its composition and mixing state, and the supersaturation of the cloud. In-situ data from field studies provide a means to assess the relative importance of these parameters. During the 2006 Texas Air Quality – Gulf of Mexico Atmospheric Composition and Climate Study (TexAQS-GoMACCS), the NOAA RV Ronald H. Brown encountered a wide variety of aerosol types ranging from marine near the Florida panhandle to urban and industrial in the Houston-Galveston area. These varied sources provided an opportunity to investigate the role of aerosol sources and chemistry in the potential activation of particles to form cloud droplets. Measurements were made of CCN concentrations, aerosol chemical composition in the size range relevant for particle activation in warm clouds, and aerosol size distributions. Variability in aerosol composition was parameterized by the mass fraction of Hydrocarbon-like Organic Aerosol (HOA) for particle diameters less than 200 nm (vacuum aerodynamic). The HOA mass fraction in this size range was lowest for marine aerosol and highest for aerosol sampled close to anthropogenic sources. Combining all data from the experiment reveals that composition (defined by HOA mass fraction) explains 40% of the variance in the critical diameter for particle activation at the instrumental supersaturation (S) of 0.44%. Correlations between HOA mass fraction and aerosol mean diameter show that these two parameters are essentially independent of one another for this data set. We conclude that, based on the variability of the HOA mass fraction observed during TexAQS-GoMACCS, variability in particle composition played a significant role in determining the fraction of particles that could activate to form cloud droplets. Using a simple model based on Köhler theory and the assumption that HOA is insoluble, we estimate the degree to which calculated CCN concentrations are under- or overestimated if the variability in the HOA mass fraction that was observed during TexAQS-GoMACCS is neglected. The percent under- or overestimation in the CCN concentration is related to the source of the aerosol. Relative to the mean HOA mass fraction of 0.4±0.2 (average ±1σ standard deviation) for the entire experiment, CCN concentrations are underestimated by up to 50% (at 0.22% S) for aerosol sampled far from anthropogenic source regions as it had a lower HOA mass fraction and overestimated by up to 50% for organic-rich aerosol sampled near the source as it had a higher HOA mass fraction.

References 1

Abdul-Razzak, H. and Ghan, S. J.: A parameterization of aerosol activation 3. Sectional representation, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D3), 4026, doi:10.1029/2001JD000483, 2002.

Alfarra, M. R., Coe, H., Allan, J. D., et al.: Characterization of urban and rural organic particulate matter in the lower Fraser valley using two Aerodyne mass spectrometers, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5745–5758, 2004.

Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M. R., Bower, K. N., et al.: Quantitative sampling using an Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer. Part 2: Measurements of fine particulate chemical composition in two UK cities, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4091, doi:410.1029/2002JD002359, 2003.

Bates, T. S., Coffman, D. J., Covert, D. S., and Quinn, P. K.: Regional marine boundary layer aerosol size distributions in the Indian, Atlantic and Pacific Oceans: A comparison of INDOEX measurements with ACE-1, ACE-2, and Aerosols99, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D19), 8026, doi:10.1029/2001JD001174, 2002.

Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., et al.: Marine boundary layer dust and pollutant transport associated with the passage of a frontal system over eastern Asia, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19S19, doi:10.1029/2003JD004094, 2004.

Berner, A., Lurzer, C., Pohl, F., Preining, O., and Wagner, P.: The size distribution of the urban aerosol in Vienna, Sci. Total Environ., 13, 245–261, 1979.

Boudries, H., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., et al.: Chemical and physical processes controlling the distribution of aerosols in the Lower Fraser Valley, Canada during the PACIFIC 2001 field campaign, Atmos. Environ., 38, 5759–5774, 2004.

Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Ghertner, D. A., et al.: Chase studies of particulate emissions from in-use New York city vehicles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 555–573, 2004.

Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., et al.: Chemical and microphysical characterization of ambient aerosols with the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, 2007.

Corrigan, C. E. and Novakov, T.: Cloud condensation nucleus activity of organic compounds: a laboratory study, Atmos. Environ., 33, 2661–2668, 1999.

Cubison, M. J., Alfarra, M. R., Allan, J., Bower, K. N., Coe, H., McFiggans, G. B., Whitehead, J. D., Williams, P. I., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Hopkins, J., and Lee, J.: The characterisation of pollution aerosol in a changing photochemical environment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5573–5588, 2006.

Drewnick, F., Schwab, J. J., Jayne, J. T., Canagaratna, M., Worsnop, D. R., and Demergian, K. L.: Measurement of ambient aerosol composition during the PMTACS-NY 2001 using an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Part II: Chemically speciated mass distributions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 104–117, 2004.

Dusek, U., Frank, G. P., Hildebrandt, L., et al.: Size matters more than chemistry for cloud-nucleating ability of aerosol particles, Science, 312, 1375–1376, 2006.

Ervens, B., Feingold, G., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: The influence of water-soluble organic carbon on cloud drop number concentration, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 18211, doi:10.1029/2004JD005634, 2005.

Feingold, G.: Modeling of the first indirect effect: Analysis of measurement requirements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1997, doi:10.1029/2003GL017967, 2003.

Fitzgerald, J. W. and Hoppel, W. A.: Equilibrium size of atmospheric aerosol particles as a function of relative humidity: Calculations based on measured aerosol properties, in: Hygroscopic Aerosols, edited by: Ruhnke, L. H. and Deepak, A., A. Deepak, Hampton, VA, 21–34, 1984.

Fountoukis, C. and Nenes, A.: Continued development of a cloud droplet formation parameterization for global climate models, J. Geophys. Res., 110, 11212, doi:10.1029/2003JD004324, 2005.

Hudson, J.: Variability of the relationship between particle size and cloud-nucleating ability, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L08801, doi:10.1029/2006GL028850, 2007.

Huffman, J. A., Jayne, J. T., Drewnick, F., Aiken, A. C., Onasch, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Experimental Tests of a Particle Beam Width Probe for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 1143–1163, 2005.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Radiative forcing of climate change, in Climate Change 2001, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, Cambridge University Press, 2001.

IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, in: The IPCC 4th Assessment Report, 2007.

Lance, S., Medina, J., Smith, J. N., and Nenes, A.: Mapping the operation of the DMT continuous flow CCN counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 242–254, 2006.

Maßling, A., Wiedensohler, A., Busch, B., Neusuß, C., Quinn, P., Bates, T., and Covert, D.: Hygroscopic properties of different aerosol types over the Atlantic and Indian Oceans, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1377–1397, 2003.

McFiggans, G., Artaxo, P., Baltensperger, U., Coe, H., Facchini, M. C., Feingold, G., Fuzzi, S., Gysel, M., Laaksonen, A., Lohmann, U., Mentel, T. F., Murphy, D. M., O'Dowd, C. D., Snider, J. R., and Weingartner, E.: The effect of physical and chemical aerosol properties on warm cloud droplet activation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 2593–2649, 2006.

Mircea, M., Facchini, M. C., Decesari, S., Fuzzi, S., and Charlson, R. J.: The influence of the organic aerosol component on CCN supersaturation spectra for different aerosol types, Tellus B, 54, 74–81, 2002.

Nenes, A., Charlson, R. J., Facchini, M. C., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Can chemical effects on cloud droplet number rival the first indirect effect?, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 1848, doi:10.1029/2002GL015295, 2002.

Petzold, A., Gysel, M., Vancassel, X., Hitzenberger, R., Puxbaum, H., Vrochticky, S., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., and Mirabel, P.: On the effects of organic matter and sulphur-containing compounds on the CCN activation of combustion particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3187–3203, 2005.

Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Bates, T. S., Miller, T. L., Johnson, J. E., Welton, E. J., Neusüss, C., Miller, M., and Sheridan, P.: Aerosol optical properties during INDOEX 1999: Means, variabilities, and controlling factors, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D19), 8020, doi:10.1029/2000JD000037, 2002.

Quinn, P. K., Coffman, D. J., Bates, T. S., Welton, E. J., Covert, D. S., Miller, T. L., Johnson, J. E., Maria, S., Russell, L., Arimoto, R., Carrico, C. M., Rood, M. J., and Anderson, J.: Aerosol Optical Properties Measured Onboard the \textitRonald H. Brown During ACE Asia as a Function of Aerosol Chemical Composition and Source Region, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19S01, doi:10.1029/2003JD004010, 2004.

Roberts, G. C. and Nenes, A.: A continuous-flow streamwise thermal gradient CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 206–221, 2005.

Rogers, R. R. and Yau, M. K.: A Short Course in Cloud Physics, Elsevier, New Yori, 1989.

Saxena, P., Hildemann, L. M., McMurry, P. H., and Seinfeld, J. H.: Organics alter hygroscopic behavior of atmospheric particles, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 18 755–18 770, 1995.

Schneider, J., Hock, N., Weimer, S., Borrmann, S., Kirchner, R., Vogt, R., and Scheer, V.: Nucleation particles in diesel exhaust: Composition inferred from in situ mass spectrometric analysis, Environ. Sci. Tech., 39, 6153–6161, 2005.

Shantz, N. C., Leaitch, W. R., and Caffrey, P. F.: Effect of organics of low solubility on the growth rate of cloud droplets, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4168, doi:10.1029/2002JD002540, 2003.

Stratmann, F. and Wiedensohler, A.: A new data inversion algorithm for DMPS measurements, J. Aerosol Sci., 27, 339–340, 1997.

Twomey, S.: The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1149–1152, 1977.

Whittlestone, S. and Zahorowski, W.: Baseline radon detectors for shipboard use: Development and deployment in the First Aerosol Characterization Experiment (ACE 1), J. Geophys. Res., 103, 16 743–16 751, 1998.

Winklmeyer, W., Reischl, G. P., Lindner, A. O., and Berner, A.: New electromobility spectrometer for the measurement of aerosol size distributions in the size range 1 to 1000 nm, J. Aerosol Sci., 22, 289–296, 1991.

Zhang, Q., Alfarra, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Canagaratna, M. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Deconvolution and quantification of hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols based on aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Tech., 39, 4938–4952, doi:10.1021/es0485681, 2005a.

Zhang, Q., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., and Jimenez, J. L.: Hydrocarbon-like and oxygenated organic aerosols in Pittsburgh: Insights into sources and processes of organic aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 3289–3311, 2005b.