<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>7</volume_number>
		<issue_number>21</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2007</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-7-5659-2007</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/5659/2007/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/5659/2007/acp-7-5659-2007.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/5659/2007/acp-7-5659-2007.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>5659</start_page>
	<end_page>5674</end_page>
	<publication_date>2007-11-15</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Two adaptive radiative transfer schemes for numerical weather prediction models</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>V. Venema</name>
			<email>victor.venema@uni-bonn.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="1">
			<name>A. Schomburg</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="1,2">
			<name>F. Ament</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="1">
			<name>C. Simmer</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Meteorologisches Institut, Universität Bonn, Auf dem Hügel 20, 53121 Bonn, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">Meteo Schweiz, Numerical Models, Kraehbuehlstrasse 58, 8044 Zurich, Switzerland</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Radiative transfer calculations in atmospheric models are computationally
expensive, even if based on simplifications such as the &amp;delta;-two-stream
approximation. In most weather prediction models these parameterisation
schemes are therefore called infrequently, accepting additional model error
due to the persistence assumption between calls. This paper presents two
so-called adaptive parameterisation schemes for radiative transfer in a
limited area model: A perturbation scheme that exploits temporal
correlations and a local-search scheme that mainly takes advantage of
spatial correlations. Utilising these correlations and with similar
computational resources, the schemes are able to predict the surface net
radiative fluxes more accurately than a scheme based on the persistence
assumption. An important property of these adaptive schemes is that their
accuracy does not decrease much in case of strong reductions in the number
of calls to the &amp;delta;-two-stream scheme. It is hypothesised that the
core idea can also be employed in parameterisation schemes for other
processes and in other dynamical models.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Baldauf, M., Förstner, J., Klink, S., Reinhardt, T., Schraff, C., Seifert, A., and Stephan, K.: Kurze Beschreibung des Lokal-Modells Kürzestfrist LMK und seiner Datenbanken auf dem Datenserver des DWD, Stand 27.10.2006, DWD, Offenbach, Germany, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Barker, H. W., Pincus, R., and Morcrette, J.-J.: The Monte Carlo independent column approximation: application within large-scale models, Proc. GCSS-ARM Workshop on the Representation of Cloud Systems in Large-Scale Models, Kananaskis, Alberta, Canada, 20&amp;ndash;24 May, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Buizza, R., Miller, M., and Palmer, T. N.: Stochastic representation of model uncertainties in the ECMWF ensemble prediction system, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 125, 2887&amp;ndash;2908, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Chevallier, F., Chéruy, F., Scott, N. A., and Chédin, A.: A neural network approach for a fast and accurate computation of a longwave radiative budget, J. Appl. Meteorol., 37, 1385&amp;ndash;1397, 1998. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Chevallier, F., Morcrette, J.-J., Chéruy, F., and Scott, N. A.: Use of a neural-networkbased long-wave radiative-transfer scheme in the ECMWF atmospheric model, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 761&amp;ndash;776, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Collins, W. D., Rasch, P. J., Boville, B. A., et al.: Description of the NCAR Community Atmosphere Model (CAM 3.0). NCAR Technical note, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, http://www.ccsm.ucar.edu/models/atm-cam/, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Davis, A. B., Marshak, A., Gerber, H., and Wiscombe, W. J.: Horizontal structure of marine boundary-layer clouds from cm- to km-scales, J. Geophys. Res., D104, 6123&amp;ndash;6144, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Gagnon, J. S., Lovejoy, S., and Schertzer, D.: Multifractal earth topography, Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 13, 541&amp;ndash;570, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Grabowski, W. W.: Coupling cloud processes with the large-scale dynamics using the Cloud-Resolving Convection Parameterization (CRCP), J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 978&amp;ndash;997, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Geleyn, J.-F., Fournier, R., Hello, G., and Pristov, N.: A new &quot;bracketing&quot; technique for a flexible and economical computation of thermal radiative fluxes, on the basis of the Net Exchange Rate (NER) formalism, WGNE Blue Book, 4-07, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Green, J. S. A.: Division of radiative streams into internal transfer and cooling to space, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 93, 371&amp;ndash;372, 1967. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Hofstadter, D. R.: Fluid concepts and creative analogies, Basic books, New York, 1995. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Kessler, E.: On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations, Meteorological Monographs, 10(32), p 84, 1969. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> King, M. D., Tsay, S. C., Platnick, S. E., Wang, M., Liou, K.-N.: Cloud retrieval algorithms for MODIS: Optical thickness, effective particle radius, and thermodynamic phase. Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document ATBD-MOD-05, NASA, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Krasnopolski, V. M., Fox-Rabinovitz, M. S., and Chalikov, D. V.: New approach to calculation of atmospheric model physics: Accurate and fast neural network emulation of longwave radiation in a climate model, Mon. Weather Rev., 133, 1370&amp;ndash;1383, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Matsui, T., Leoncini, G., Pielke Sr., R. A., and Nair, U. S.: A new paradigm for parameterization in atmospheric models: application to the new Fu-Liou radiation code, Colorado State University, Dept. of Atmospheric Sci., paper no 747, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Majewski, D., Lierman, D., Prohl, P., Ritter, B., Buchhold, M., Hanisch, T., Paul, G., Wergen, W., and Baumgardner, J.: The operational global icosahedral-hexagonal gridpoint model GME: Description and high-resolution tests, Mon. Weather Rev., 130, 319&amp;ndash;338, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Meteo France: Book 1, Chapter 21: The radiation parameterization, In The Meso-NH scientific documentation, http://mesonh.aero.obs-mip.fr/mesonh, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Morcrette, J.-J.: On the effects of the temporal and spatial sampling of radiation fields on the ECMWF forecasts and analyses, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 876&amp;ndash;887, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R.: A simplex method for function minimization, Comput. J., 7, 308&amp;ndash;313, 1965. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Niemela, S., Raisanen, P., and Savijarvi, H.: Comparison of surface radiative flux parameterizations &amp;ndash; Part I: Longwave radiation, Atmos. Res., 58(1), 1&amp;ndash;18, 2001a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Niemela, S., Raisanen, P., and Savijarvi, H.: Comparison of surface radiative flux parameterizations &amp;ndash; Part II, Shortwave radiation, Atmos. Res., 58(2), 141&amp;ndash;154, 2001b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Pincus, R., Barker, H. W., and Morcrette, J.-J.: A fast flexible approximate technique of computing radiative transfer for inhomogeneous clouds, J. Geophys. Res., 108(D13), 4376, doi:10.1209/2002JD003322, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Pielke Sr., R. A., Matsui, T., Leoncini, G., Nobis, T., Nair, U. S., Lu, E., and Walko, R. L.: A new paradigm for parameterizations in numerical weather prediction and other atmospheric models, National Wea. Digest, 30, 93&amp;ndash;99, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Randall, D., Khairoutdinov, A. M., Arakawa, A., and Grabowski, W. W.: Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84, 1547&amp;ndash;1564, 2003a. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Randall, D., Krueger, St., Bretherton, Ch., Curry, J., Duynkerke, P., Moncrieff, M., Ryan, B., Starr, D., Miller, M., Rossow, W., Tselioudis, G., and Wielicki B.: Confronting models with data: the GEWEX Cloud Systems Study, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 84(4), 455&amp;ndash;469, 2003b. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Reinhardt, T. and Seifert, A.: A three-category ice scheme for LMK, COSMO Newsletter, no. 6, July, 115&amp;ndash;120, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Ritter, B. and Geleyn, J.-F.: A Comprehensive radiation scheme for numerical weather prediction models with potential applications in climate simulations, Mon. Weather Rev., 120, 303&amp;ndash;325, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Sass, B. H., Rontu, L., and Räisänen, P.: HIRLAM-2 radiation scheme: Documentation and tests, Rep. no. 16, SMHI, Norrköping, Sweden, 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Schättler, U., Doms, G., and Schraff, C.: Description of the nonhydrostatic regional model (LM). Part VII: user&apos;s guide, COSMO-Consortium for Small Scale Modelling, http://www.cosmo-model.org, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Steppler, J., Doms, G., Schättler, U., Bitzer, H. W., Gassmann, A., Damrath, U., and Gregoric, G.: Meso-gamma scale forecasts using the nonhydrostatic model LM, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 82, 75&amp;ndash;96, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="32" content_type="text"> Theis, S.: Deriving probabilistic short-range forecasts from a deterministic high-resolution model, PhD thesis, University of Bonn, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="33" content_type="text"> Tiedtke, M.: A comprehensive mass flux scheme for cumulus parameterisation in large-scale models, Mon. Weather Rev., 117, 1779&amp;ndash;1799, 1989. </reference>
		<reference numeration="34" content_type="text"> Undén, P., Rontu, L., Järvinen, H., et al.: HIRLAM-5 scientific documentation, SMHI, Norrköping, Sweden, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="35" content_type="text"> WCRP: Annual review of the World Climate Research Programme and report of the twenty-fifth session of the Joint Scientific Committee, http://www.wmo.ch/pages/prog/wcrp/pdf/jsc25report.pdf, Moscow, Russian Federation, 1&amp;ndash;6 March, 2004. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

