<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="no"?>
<!DOCTYPE article SYSTEM "http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/inc/acp/copernicus.dtd">
<article language="en">
	<journal>
		<journal_title>Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics</journal_title>
		<journal_url>www.atmos-chem-phys.net</journal_url>
		<issn>1680-7316</issn>
		<eissn>1680-7324</eissn>
		<volume_number>7</volume_number>
		<issue_number>19</issue_number>
		<publication_year>2007</publication_year>
	</journal>
	<doi>10.5194/acp-7-5033-2007</doi>
	<article_url>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/5033/2007/</article_url>
	<abstract_html>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/5033/2007/acp-7-5033-2007.html</abstract_html>
	<fulltext_pdf>http://www.atmos-chem-phys.net/7/5033/2007/acp-7-5033-2007.pdf</fulltext_pdf>
	<start_page>5033</start_page>
	<end_page>5042</end_page>
	<publication_date>2007-10-01</publication_date>
	<article_title content_type="html">Evaluation of ECMWF water vapour fields by airborne differential absorption lidar measurements: a case study between Brazil and Europe</article_title>
	<authors>
		<author numeration="1" affiliations="1">
			<name>H. Flentje</name>
			<email>harald.flentje@dwd.de</email>
		</author>
		<author numeration="2" affiliations="2">
			<name>A. Dörnbrack</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="3" affiliations="2">
			<name>A. Fix</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="4" affiliations="2">
			<name>G. Ehret</name>
		</author>
		<author numeration="5" affiliations="3">
			<name>E. Hólm</name>
		</author>
	</authors>
	<affiliations>
		<affiliation numeration="1" content_type="html">Deutscher Wetterdienst, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="2" content_type="html">DLR Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</affiliation>
		<affiliation numeration="3" content_type="html">European Centre For Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, UK</affiliation>
	</affiliations>
	<abstract content_type="html">Three extended airborne Differential Absorption Lidar (DIAL) sections of
tropospheric water vapour across the tropical and sub-tropical Atlantic in
March 2004 are compared to short-term forecasts of the European Centre for
Medium Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The humidity fields between 28&amp;deg; S
and 36&amp;deg; N exhibit large inter air-mass gradients and reflect typical
transport patterns of low- and mid-latitudes like convection (e.g. Hadley
circulation), subsidence and baroclinic development with stratospheric
intrusion. These processes re-distribute water vapour vertically such that
locations with extraordinary dry/moist air-masses are observed in the
lower/upper troposphere, respectively. The mixing ratios range over 3 orders
of magnitude. Back-trajectories are used to trace and characterize the
observed air-masses.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Overall, the observed water vapour distributions are largely reproduced by
the short-term forecasts at 0.25&amp;deg; resolution (T799/L91), the correlation
ranges from 0.69 to 0.92. Locally, large differences occur due to comparably
small spatial shifts in presence of strong gradients. Systematic deviations
are found associated with specific atmospheric domains. The planetary
boundary layer in the forecast is too moist and to shallow. Convective
transport of humidity to the middle and upper troposphere tends to be
overestimated. Potential impacts arising from data assimilation and model
physics are considered. The matching of air-mass boundaries (transport) is
discussed with repect to scales and the representativity of the 2-D sections
for the 3-D humidity field. The normalized bias of the model with respect to
the observations is 6%, 11% and 0% (moist model biases) for the
three along-flight sections, whereby however the lowest levels are excluded.</abstract>
	<references>
		<reference numeration="1" content_type="text"> Andersson, E., Hólm, E., and Thépaut, J. N.: Impact studies of main types of conventional and satellite humidity data, in: Proc. 3rd WMO Workshop on &quot;The Impact of Various Observing Systems on Numerical Weather Prediction&quot;, Alpbach, Austria, 9&amp;ndash;12 March 2004, edited by: Böttger, H., Menzel, P., and Pailleux, J., WMO/TD No. 1228, 32&amp;ndash;44, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="2" content_type="text"> Andersson, E., Hólm, E., Bauer, P., Beljaars, A., Kelly, G. A., McNally, A. P., Simsons, A. J., Thépaut, J.-N., and Tompkins, A. M.: Analysis and forecast impact of the main humidity observing systems, ECMWF Technical Memorandum No. 493, ECMWF, Reading, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="3" content_type="text"> Bauer, P., Kelly, G., and Andersson, E.: SSM/I radiance assimilation at ECMWF, Proceedings at ECMWF/GEWEX workshop on &quot;Humidity Analysis&quot;, Reading, U.K., 8&amp;ndash;11 July 2002, 167&amp;ndash;175, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="4" content_type="text"> Bengtsson, L., Hodges, K. I., and Hagemann, S.: Sensitivity of large scale atmospheric analyses to humidity observations and its impact on the global water cycle and tropical and extratropical weather systems in ERA40, Tellus, 56A, 202&amp;ndash;217, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="5" content_type="text"> Chahine, M. T.: The hydrological cycle and its influence on climate, Nature, 359, 373&amp;ndash;380, 1992. </reference>
		<reference numeration="6" content_type="text"> Charlson, R. J. and Heintzenberg, J.: Aerosol forcing of climate, Report of the Dahlem Wokshop on Aerosol Forcing on Climate, Berlin 1994, John Wiley &amp; Sons, New York, 416~p., 1994. </reference>
		<reference numeration="7" content_type="text"> Ehret, G., Hoinka, K. P., Stein, J., Fix, A., Kiemle, C., and Poberaj, G.: Low-Stratospheric Water Vapour Measured by an Airborne DIAL, J. Geophys. Res., 104(D24), S31 351&amp;ndash;31 359, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="8" content_type="text"> Flentje, H., Dörnbrack, A., Ehret, G., Fix, A., Kiemle, C., Poberaj, G., and Wirth, M.: Water vapour heterogeneity related to stratospheric intrusions over the northern Atlantic revealed by airborne water vapour, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D03115, doi:10.1029/2004JD004957, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="9" content_type="text"> Forster, P. M. de F. and Shine, K. P.: Radiative forcing and temperature trends from stratospheric ozone depletion, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 10 841&amp;ndash;10 855, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="10" content_type="text"> Gettelman, A., Forster, P. M. de F., Fujiwara, M., Fu, Q., Vömel, H., Gohar, L. K., Johanson, C., and Ammerman, M.: Radiation balance of the tropical tropopause layer, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D07103, doi:10.1029/2003JD004190, 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="11" content_type="text"> Giver, L. P., Chackerian Jr., C., and Varanasi, P.: Visible and near-infrared H$_2 ^16$O line intensity corrections for HITRAN-96, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer, 66(1), 101&amp;ndash;105, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="12" content_type="text"> Hólm, E., Andersson, E., Beljaars, A., Lopez, P., Mahfouf, J.-F., Simmons, A., and Thépaut, J.-N.: Assimilation and modeling of the hydrological cycle: ECMWF&apos;s status and plans, ECMWF Technical Memorandum No. 383, ECMWF, Reading 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="13" content_type="text"> Kärcher, B. and Solomon, S.: On the composition and optical extinction of particles in the tropopause region, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 27 441&amp;ndash;27 459, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="14" content_type="text"> Kiehl, J. T. and Trenberth, K. E.: Earth&apos;s annual global mean energy budget, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 197&amp;ndash;208, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="15" content_type="text"> Kirk-Davidoff, D. B., Anderson, J., Hintsa, G. E. J., and Keith, D. W.: The effect of climate change on ozone depletion through changes in stratospheric water vapour, Nature, 402, 399&amp;ndash;401, 1999. </reference>
		<reference numeration="16" content_type="text"> Koop, T., Luo, B. P., Tsias, A. and Peter, T.: Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions, Nature, 406, 611&amp;ndash;614, 2000. </reference>
		<reference numeration="17" content_type="text"> Lawrence, M. G., Hov,Ö., Beekmann, M., Brandt, J., Elbern, H., Eskes, H., Feichter, H., and Takigawa, M.: The Chemical Weather, Environ. Chem., 2, 6&amp;ndash;8, doi:10:1071/EN05014, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="18" content_type="text"> Leiterer, U., Dier, H., Nagel, D., Naebert, T., Althausen, D., Franke, K., Kats, A., and Wagner, F.: A correction method for RS-80A Humicap profiles and their validation by Lidar backscattering profiles in tropical cirrus clouds, J. Atmos. Oceanic. Tech. (JTECH), 22, 18&amp;ndash;29, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="19" content_type="text"> Manabe, S. and Weatherald, R.: Thermal equilibrium of the atmosphere with a given distribution of atmospheric humidity, J. Atmos. Sci., 24, 241&amp;ndash;259, 1967. </reference>
		<reference numeration="20" content_type="text"> Moreau, E., Lopez, P., Bauer, P., Tompkins, A. M., Janiskova, M., and Chevallier, F.: Variational retrieval of temperature and humidity profiles using rain rates versus microwave brightness temperatures, ECMWF Technical Memorandum No. 412, www.ecmwf.int, 2003. </reference>
		<reference numeration="21" content_type="text"> Nash, J.: Review of test results on the accuracy of radiosonde relative humidity sensors, Proc. ECMWF/GEWEX workshop on &quot;Humidity Analysis&quot;, Reading, U.K., 8&amp;ndash;11 July 2002, 117&amp;ndash;123, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="22" content_type="text"> Ovarlez, J. and van Velthoven, P.: Comparison of water vapour measurements with data retrieved from ECMWF analyses during the POLINAT experiment, J. Appl. Meteorol., 36, 1329&amp;ndash;1335, 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="23" content_type="text"> Palm, S. P., Benedetti, A., and Spinhirne, J.: Validation of ECMWF global forecast model parameters using GLAS atmospheric channel measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett, 32, L22S09, doi:10.1029/2005GL023535, 2005. </reference>
		<reference numeration="24" content_type="text"> Poberaj, G., Fix, A., Assion, A., Wirth, M., Kiemle, C., and Ehret, G.: All-Solid-State Airborne DIAL for Water Vapour Measurements in the Tropopause Region: System Description and Assessment of Accuracy, Appl. Phys. B, 75, 165&amp;ndash;172, 2002. </reference>
		<reference numeration="25" content_type="text"> Pruppacher, H. R. and Klett, J. D.: Microphysics of clouds and precipitation, Dordrecht, Holland, D. Reidel Publ. Co., 976 p., 1997. </reference>
		<reference numeration="26" content_type="text"> Rohrer, F. and Berresheim, H.: Strong correlation between levels of tropospheric hydroxyl radicals and solar ultraviolet radiation, Nature, 442, 184&amp;ndash;187, doi:10.1038, 2006. </reference>
		<reference numeration="27" content_type="text"> Shine, K. P. and Sinha, A.: Sensitivity of the earth&apos;s climate to height dependent changes in the water vapour mixing ratio, Nature, 354, 382&amp;ndash;384, 1991. </reference>
		<reference numeration="28" content_type="text"> Stohl, A., Haimberger, L., Scheele, M. P., and Wernli, H.: An intercomparison of results from three trajectory models, Meteorol. Appl., 8, 127&amp;ndash;135, 2001. </reference>
		<reference numeration="29" content_type="text"> Tompkins, A. M., Bechtold, P., Beljaars, A. C. M., Benedetti, A, Cheinet, S., Janisková, M., Köhler, M., Lopez, P., and Morcrette, J.-J.: Moist physical processes in the IFS: progress and plans, ECMWF Tech Memo., 452, 91 pp., 2004. </reference>
		<reference numeration="30" content_type="text"> Tompkins, A. M., Gierens, K., and Rädel, G.: Ice supersaturation in the ECMWF integrated forecasting system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 133, 53&amp;ndash;56, 2007. </reference>
		<reference numeration="31" content_type="text"> Wernli, H. and Davies, H. C.: A Lagrangian-based analysis of extratropical cyclones. I: The method and some applications, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 123, 467&amp;ndash;489, 1997. </reference>
	</references>
</article>

